Just finished a 2010 Exchange class. One of the designs that was brought up
was to have 3 hardware servers, all of them running CAS/HT/MB, with the MB
roles in a DAG, and hardware load balancers in front, for the CAS roles.
>>> "farooq.ahmed" 8/6/2010 7:42 PM >>>
I think it is in best practices to separate the CAS server from mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Anderson [mailto:jan...@mapiadmin.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 7:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 and 2007 Co-Existance
If I have Exch 10 and 2007, does the Exchange 2010 server have to have the CAS
role separated from the mailbox role?
I want my users to never notice the difference, just to have them go to
mail.company.com/owa I have read the articles about creating a Legacy host
record, and I am fine with that, but I cant find a difinative answer on if the
CAS server needs to be seperate from the mail box server. I know that this was
the case for 2007 to 2003.
Also, does the answer to the question above change if its published behind ISA
2006?
Thanks
Jeremy
This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments
and notify us immediately.