RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes

2008-06-03 Thread Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
Found this, may help.
 
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb684892.aspx
 



From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes


I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook
totals do not...however I could be wrong.


On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Yes we do.

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 June 2008 15:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes

 

Do you use deleted item retention? 

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,

 

We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is
reporting mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some
cases 400MB more than outlook reports the mailbox size.

 

It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are
running exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes.

 

Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or
should I call Microsoft ?

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may
be privileged.  
It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are
not the addressee, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please erase all 
copies of the message and its attachments and notify us
immediately at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.

 

 

 

 

 


 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes

2008-06-03 Thread Steve Ens
I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook totals
do not...however I could be wrong.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>  Yes we do.
>
>
>
> *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 03 June 2008 15:53
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes
>
>
>
> Do you use deleted item retention?
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,
>
>
>
> We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
> mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more
> than outlook reports the mailbox size.
>
>
>
> It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running
> exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes.
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call
> Microsoft ?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be
> privileged.
> It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are not the
> addressee,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
> strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase
> all
> copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes

2008-06-03 Thread Steve Ens
Do you use deleted item retention?

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>  Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,
>
>
>
> We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
> mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more
> than outlook reports the mailbox size.
>
>
>
> It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running
> exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes.
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call
> Microsoft ?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be
> privileged.
> It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are not the
> addressee,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
> strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase
> all
> copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes

2008-06-03 Thread Davies,Matt
Yes we do.

 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 03 June 2008 15:53
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes

 

Do you use deleted item retention? 

On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,

 

We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB
more than outlook reports the mailbox size.

 

It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running
exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes.

 

Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call
Microsoft ?

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged.  
It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are not the
addressee, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
erase all 
copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes

2008-06-03 Thread Andy Shook
Love you too, dill-weed.

 

Shook



From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Mailbox sizes

 

Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,

 

We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB
more than outlook reports the mailbox size.

 

It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running
exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes.

 

Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call
Microsoft ?

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged.  
It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are not the
addressee, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
erase all 
copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes

2008-06-03 Thread Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator
Don't be hatein' ShookiePoo.



From: Andy Shook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange Mailbox sizes



Love you too, dill-weed.

 

Shook



From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Mailbox sizes

 

Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook,

 

We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting
mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB
more than outlook reports the mailbox size.

 

It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running
exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes.

 

Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call
Microsoft ?

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged.  
It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are not the
addressee, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
erase all 
copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.

 

 

 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~