RE: License Question

[Neil Hobson]

And let us not forget:

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q131109

Neil
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 22 January 2002 02:19
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: License Question
Subject: RE: License Question


Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


1,512,435,659,022 characters is da bomb!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


Only today.

Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of
1,512,435,659,022 characters.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


That's your favorite.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


Not as good as this one, though, eh?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen that.
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


See Q168633.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When they
authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it doesn't
matter if the seat is at the office or at home.

Jacqueline
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't so,
Bill.
-Original Message-
From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question


It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to
per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume
licensing.

So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server
or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation
(including home machines if they use OWA to authenticate).

There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they licensed
Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet is to check
out the license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft doesn't do a
one size fits all for licensing.

Jacqueline

-Original Message-
From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: License Question


I know nobody here can give legal advice but I will ask the question
anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?
>From the MS web it appears per user.  

Exchange 5.5 

Any links to MS web sites also appreciated.

Pete Hotchkiss
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended
only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which
is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



Lets 
not fight...

  
  -Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:20 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  I 
  deserved that.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 8:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Then could I call on you at CA?

  
  -Original Message-From: Jennifer 
  Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 
  2002 8:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  You call that help?  You should be working for 
  NAI.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:01 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/ 
  Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
  Thats about the best I can do...Well, not the 
  best
  

-Original Message-From: 
Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Speaking of important 
articles, does anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: 
Q259895 XADM: List of Performance 
Counters Added by Squeaky Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of 
the kb database for some unknown 
reason.

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  Here is another important one
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
   
  

-Original 
Message-From: Martin Blackstone Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
1,512,435,659,022 characters is da 
bomb!

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Only today.
   
  Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired 
  icon and the password of 1,512,435,659,022 
  characters.
   
  -Original Message-From: 
  Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  That's your favorite.
  

-Original 
Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Not as good as this one, though, 
eh?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original 
Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Friday, January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I 
have never seen that.

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
  January 18, 2002 5:5

RE: License Question

[Jennifer Baker]

Title: Message



I 
deserved that.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 8:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Then 
  could I call on you at CA?
  

-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:12 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
You call that help?  You should be working for 
NAI.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Monday, January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:01 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/ 
Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
Thats about the best I can do...Well, not the 
best

  
  -Original Message-From: Jennifer 
  Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 
  21, 2002 7:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Speaking of important articles, 
  does anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by 
  Squeaky Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of the kb database for 
  some unknown reason.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
 

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Martin Blackstone Sent: 
  Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  1,512,435,659,022 characters 
  is da bomb!
  

-Original 
Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Only today.
 
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon 
and the password of 1,512,435,659,022 
characters.
 
-Original Message-From: 
Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
That's your favorite.

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Not as good as this one, though, 
  eh?
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
  William
  -Original Message-From: 
  Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Friday, January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I 
  have never seen that.
  

-Original 
Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 
January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
See Q168633.
Steve

  -Original 
  Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



Then 
could I call on you at CA?

  
  -Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:12 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  You 
  call that help?  You should be working for NAI.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:01 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/ 
  Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
  Thats about the best I can do...Well, not the 
  best
  

-Original Message-From: Jennifer 
Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 
2002 7:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: License Question
Speaking of important articles, 
does anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by 
Squeaky Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of the kb database for some 
unknown reason.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Monday, January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Here is another important one
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
   
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
1,512,435,659,022 characters 
is da bomb!

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  Only today.
   
  Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the 
  password of 1,512,435,659,022 characters.
   
  -Original Message-From: 
  Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  That's your favorite.
  

-Original 
Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Not as good as this one, though, 
eh?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-From: 
Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 
January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have 
never seen that.

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 
  18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  See Q168633.
  Steve
  
-Original 
Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for 
those home users too.  When they authenticate, they 
require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it doesn't 
matter if the seat is at the office or at 
home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original 
  Mess

RE: License Question

[Jennifer Baker]

Title: Message



You 
call that help?  You should be working for NAI.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:01 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/ 
Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
Thats about the best I can do...Well, not the 
best

  
  -Original Message-From: Jennifer 
  Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 
  2002 7:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Speaking of important articles, does 
  anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky 
  Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of the kb database for some unknown 
  reason.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  1,512,435,659,022 characters is 
  da bomb!
  

-Original Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Only today.
 
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password 
of 1,512,435,659,022 characters.
 
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
That's your favorite.

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Lefkovics, William 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  Not as good as this one, though, eh?
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
  William
  -Original Message-From: 
  Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 
  January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
  that.
  

-Original 
Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office 
Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
See Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: 
  Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for 
  those home users too.  When they authenticate, they 
  require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it doesn't 
  matter if the seat is at the office or at 
  home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original 
Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in 
from home?  Say it ain't so, Bill.

  -Original 
  Messa

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:01 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/ 
  Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
  Thats about the best I can do...Well, not the 
  best
  

-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Speaking of important articles, does 
anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky 
Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of the kb database for some unknown 
reason.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Monday, January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Here is another important one
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
   
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
1,512,435,659,022 
characters is da 
bomb!

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Only today.
   
  Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of 
  1,512,435,659,022 characters.
   
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  That's your favorite.
  

-Original Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Not as good as this one, though, eh?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 
January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
that.

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office 
  Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  See Q168633.
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: 
Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those 
home users too.  When they authenticate, they require a 
CAL.  When you license per seat, it doesn't matter if the 
seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
      IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in 
  from home?  Say it ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original 
Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
It is per workstation for version 
5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per user for 
Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
licensing.
  

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/ 
Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
Thats 
about the best I can do...Well, not the best

  
  -Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:39 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Speaking of important articles, does 
  anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky 
  Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of the kb database for some unknown 
  reason.
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  1,512,435,659,022 
  characters is da 
  bomb!
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Only today.
 
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of 
1,512,435,659,022 characters.
 
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 
21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
That's your favorite.

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Not as good as this one, though, eh?
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
  William
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 
  January 18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
  that.
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak 
Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 
2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
See Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: 
  Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users 
  too.  When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When 
  you license per seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the 
  office or at home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original 
Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office 
Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from 
home?  Say it ain't so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: 
  Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
      Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  It is per workstation for version 
  5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per user for 
  Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
  licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user 
  or per workstation (per server or per seat mode), then you 
  need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including home 
  machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume 
  licensing in 5.5 where they licensed Exchange per user instead 
  of per workstation.  Your best bet is to check out the 
  license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft

RE: License Question

[Jennifer Baker]

Title: Message



Speaking of important articles, does 
anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky 
Lobster?  Microsoft took it out of the kb database for some unknown 
reason.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:19 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Here 
  is another important one
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
   
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
1,512,435,659,022 
characters is da 
bomb!

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Only today.
   
  Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of 
  1,512,435,659,022 characters.
   
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 
  21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
      RE: License Question
  That's your favorite.
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Not as good as this one, though, eh?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 
18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
that.

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak 
  Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
  5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      License Question
  See Q168633.
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users 
too.  When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When 
you license per seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office 
or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office 
  Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say 
  it ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: 
Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
It is per workstation for version 
5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per user for 
Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or 
per workstation (per server or per seat mode), then you need an 
Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including home machines if 
they use OWA to authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume 
licensing in 5.5 where they licensed Exchange per user instead 
of per workstation.  Your best bet is to check out the 
license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft doesn't 
do a one size fits all for licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
  Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can 
  give legal advice but I will ask the question 
  anyway.  Are Exchan

RE: License Question

[Clark, Steve]

Hey, that sounds like a dream I had..
 
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
"Who's watching your network?"
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
 
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:19 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
 
Here is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
<http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810> 
 
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
1,512,435,659,022 characters is da bomb!
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
Only today.
 
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of
1,512,435,659,022 characters.
 
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
That's your favorite.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 5:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
Not as good as this one, though, eh?
 <http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450>
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen that.
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
See Q168633.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:30 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When they
authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it doesn't
matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't so, Bill.
-Original Message-
From: Moody, Jacqueline [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: License Question
It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per
user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or
per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including
home machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they licensed Exchange
per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet is to check out the
license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft doesn't do a one size
fits all for licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 
-Original Message-
From: Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal advice but I will ask the question anyway.
Are Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web
it appears per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also appreciated.
 
Pete Hotchkiss
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is intended only
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected
by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the
taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



Here 
is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  1,512,435,659,022 
  characters is da 
  bomb!
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 
21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: License Question
Only today.
 
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of 
1,512,435,659,022 characters.
 
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 
2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
That's your favorite.

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
  January 21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Not as good as this one, though, eh?
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
  William
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 
  18, 2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
  that.
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak 
Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    License Question
See Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users 
  too.  When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you 
  license per seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at 
  home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak 
Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say 
it ain't so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: 
  Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
          IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like 
  they changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may 
  not apply to volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation 
  (per server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL 
  per workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where 
  they licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  
  Your best bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased 
  under.  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
  licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original 
Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: License 
Question
I know nobody here can give 
legal advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are 
Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  
From the MS web it appears per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites 
also appreciated.
 
Pete 
HotchkissList Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential information belonging to the se

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



1,512,435,659,022 
characters is da 
bomb!

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 
  21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Only 
  today.
   
  Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of 
  1,512,435,659,022 characters.
   
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 
  2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  That's your favorite.
  

-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 
21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: License Question
Not as good as this one, though, eh?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 
2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
    License Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
that.

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve 
  - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
  5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      License Question
  See Q168633.
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  
When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per 
seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at 
home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak 
  Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
  ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like 
they changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may 
not apply to volume licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation 
(per server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where 
they licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  
Your best bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased 
under.  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: License Question
  I know nobody here can give 
  legal advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are 
  Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From 
  the MS web it appears per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete 
  HotchkissList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
  electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
  individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
  confidential information belonging to the sender which is 
  protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the 
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
  copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on 
  the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
  have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
  immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
  message.L

RE: License Question

[Lefkovics, William]

Title: Message



Only 
today.
 
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of 
1,512,435,659,022 characters.
 
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 
6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
That's 
your favorite.

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 
  21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Not 
  as good as this one, though, eh?
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
  William
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 
  2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
  that.
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
See Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  
  When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per 
  seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at 
  home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak 
Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
ain't so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
      IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not 
  apply to volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation 
  (per server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
  bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
  licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: 
Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
Question
I know nobody here can give 
legal advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are 
Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From 
the MS web it appears per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected 
by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_chart

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



That's 
your favorite.

  
  -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, 
  William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 
  21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Not 
  as good as this one, though, eh?
  
  http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
  William
  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 
  2002 5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
  that.
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
See Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  
  When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per 
  seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at 
  home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak 
Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
    RE: License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
ain't so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
      IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not 
  apply to volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation 
  (per server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
  bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
  licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: 
Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
Question
I know nobody here can give 
legal advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are 
Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From 
the MS web it appears per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected 
by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Lefkovics, William]

Title: Message



Not as 
good as this one, though, eh?

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
that.

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  See 
  Q168633.
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve 
  - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 
  8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      License Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
  ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply 
to volume licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange 
  CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it 
  appears per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
  mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
  entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  information belonging to the sender which is protected by the 
  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
  are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the 
  taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information 
  is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the 
  original message.List Charter and 
FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Micciche, Robert]

Title: RE: License Question



Your 
missing what I said.  "The ONLY server in the 
Domain."  That means it is a PDC, and Exchange.  If it's a PDC, and is 
the only Server that they authenticate to the clients need an NT Server CAL in 
addition to the Exchange CAL.
 
That 
is of course assuming a native NT Domain environment.  I could be misguided 
here I guess, but I would almost bet my left arm that you need a CAL to 
authenticate to log on to an NT Domain Controller.

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
  2:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  >They need an NT CAL if they are in Per Server mode.  
  Or if it is the only NT Server in the domain.  Hard to think of this 
  
  >actually happening in any kind of an environment... 
  
  Happens in my environment. :-) 
  My NT server is used ONLY as an Exchange server (altho I do 
  have a separate Win2K Server running SQL2K as a member server in that domain). 
  File & Print sharing is done on a Netware server. No one accesses any 
  other services or resources on the Exchange Server. So, according to the web 
  page, I do NOT need any NT CALs, only Exchange CALs.
  Which is why I have a 5 user NT license, and a 50 user 
  Exchange license. List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Leone, Michael]

Title: RE: License Question







>They need an NT CAL if they are in Per Server mode.  Or if it is the only NT Server in the domain.  Hard to think of this 

>actually happening in any kind of an environment...


Happens in my environment. :-)


My NT server is used ONLY as an Exchange server (altho I do have a separate Win2K Server running SQL2K as a member server in that domain). File & Print sharing is done on a Netware server. No one accesses any other services or resources on the Exchange Server. So, according to the web page, I do NOT need any NT CALs, only Exchange CALs.

Which is why I have a 5 user NT license, and a 50 user Exchange license.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Micciche, Robert]

Title: Message



They 
need an NT CAL if they are in Per Server mode.  Or if it is the only NT 
Server in the domain.  Hard to think of this actually happening in any kind 
of an environment...

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 
  8:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  Correct. An Exchange CAL is always needed, regardless of where or how 
  (OWA or mail client) you access your mailbox; an NT CAL is 
  not.
   
  
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:52 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
I 
beg to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use 
file or print services (plain old mail users use 
neither).
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  
  When they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per 
  seat, it doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at 
  home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak 
Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
    RE: License Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
ain't so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
      IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not 
  apply to volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation 
  (per server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
  bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
  licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: 
Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
Question
I know nobody here can give 
legal advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are 
Exchange CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From 
the MS web it appears per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This 
electronic mail transmission is intended only for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected 
by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



Perzactly! BTW, good Q article dude. I have never seen 
that.

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  See 
  Q168633.
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve 
  - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 
  8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      License Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
  ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply 
to volume licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange 
  CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it 
  appears per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
  mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
  entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  information belonging to the sender which is protected by the 
  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
  are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the 
  taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information 
  is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the 
  original message.List Charter and 
FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Martin Blackstone]

Title: Message



I 
would TEND to agree with you, but I'm no MS Licensing guru (why should I 
understand what MS cant?)
But 
since most people buy per seat, they have the CAL already. That would be my 
case.
 
However, as for Exch, it is not per WS, it is per user. You have a CAL 
for each person who will be accessing the server (20 users and 1,10 or 
100 mailboxes per user = 20 CALs). Not per mailbox. So yes, even for those 
OWA'ing from home must have a CAL. This is why you dont see ISP's using Exch. If 
that is what you are looking at, check out SendMail or IMail or 
something.
 
Please 
be sure to verify this with your MS rep and get it in 
writing.

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:52 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  I 
  beg to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use 
  file or print services (plain old mail users use neither).
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve 
  - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 
  8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
  ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply 
to volume licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange 
  CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it 
  appears per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
  mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
  entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  information belonging to the sender which is protected by the 
  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
  are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the 
  taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information 
  is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the 
  original message.List Charter and 
FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Leone, Michael]

Title: Message



Correct. An Exchange CAL is always needed, regardless of where or how 
(OWA or mail client) you access your mailbox; an NT CAL is 
not.
 

  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:52 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  I 
  beg to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use 
  file or print services (plain old mail users use neither).
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve 
  - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 
  8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
      License Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it 
  ain't so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
        IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply 
to volume licensing.
 
So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best 
bet is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: 
  MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange 
  CAL's based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it 
  appears per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
  mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
  entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
  information belonging to the sender which is protected by the 
  attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
  are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the 
  taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information 
  is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the 
  original message.List Charter and 
FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



See 
Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
  they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
  doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't 
so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to 
  volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
  server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet 
  is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears 
per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



I beg 
to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use file or 
print services (plain old mail users use neither).
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When 
  they authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it 
  doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
   
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
    Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't 
so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to 
  volume licensing.
   
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
  server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet 
  is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears 
per user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Moody, Jacqueline]

Title: Message



This 
is taken from the EULA out of an Exchange 5.5 box.  I excerpted the 
pertinent info.
 
1.b. 
Use of the Server Software- ... You must acquire a separate Client Access 
LIcense to access or otherwise utilize the services of the Server Software 
installed on a Server, whether you use the Client Software or any other software 
to do so...  Each Client Access License must be dedicated to one unique 
computer or workstation.  It permits that computer or workstation to access 
or utilize the services of the Server Software.  
 
Jacqueline
 

-Original Message-From: 
Hotchkiss, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question

  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's based 
  on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears per 
  user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
  transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
  it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the 
  sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the 
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
  distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this 
  information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
  message.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Moody, Jacqueline]

Title: Message



SBS is 
licensed differently than the single packaged product.  


  
  -Original Message-From: Dawn R. Ashford 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 
  10:49 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
  Question
  We have SBS so it's all rolled into one CAL
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 7:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
It 
is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to 
per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
licensing.
 
So 
- you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or per 
seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including 
home machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet 
is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft 
doesn't do a one size fits all for licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
  Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: License Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
  based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears 
  per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
  transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
  which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging 
  to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you 
  are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
  disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance 
  on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
  received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately 
  by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Moody, Jacqueline]

Title: Message



Don't 
forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too.  When they 
authenticate, they require a CAL.  When you license per seat, it doesn't 
matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
 
Jacqueline

  
  -Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
  NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange 
  Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
  Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't 
  so, Bill.
  
-Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
License Question
It 
is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to 
per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
licensing.
 
So 
- you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or per 
seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including 
home machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
 
There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet 
is to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft 
doesn't do a one size fits all for licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
  Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
  January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: License Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
  based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears 
  per user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
  transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
  which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging 
  to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you 
  are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
  disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance 
  on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
  received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately 
  by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Dawn R. Ashford]

Title: Message



We 
have SBS so it's all rolled into one CAL

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 7:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  It 
  is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per 
  user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
  licensing.
   
  So - 
  you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or per seat 
  mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including home 
  machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet is 
  to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft 
  doesn't do a one size fits all for licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears per 
user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to 
the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail 
and delete the original message.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Dawn R. Ashford]

Title: RE: Outlook question



Practical experience tells me it's based on users that are 
currently logged on.  (I have SBS 4.5 with Exchange 5.5)  I can create 
all the accounts I want; but before we upgraded to the maximum amount of 
client licenses (50 for SBS) I would get the "out of license" message if too 
many folks tried to open Outook2000 at the same time.  We have a 
lot of transient people a few times a year.. I had extra license to cover that 
ebb and flow but on occasion we'd get an extra person trying to log on and we'd 
start seeing the error.  All we had to do to correct the situation was 
close Outook somewhere else.  The system didn't prevent the person 
who closed Outlook from accessing files on the server, or the 
internet.

  -Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 7:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's based 
  on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears per 
  user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
  transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
  it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the 
  sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the 
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
  distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this 
  information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
  message.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home?  Say it ain't so, 
Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  It 
  is per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per 
  user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
  licensing.
   
  So - 
  you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or per seat 
  mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including home 
  machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
   
  There was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet is 
  to check out the license agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft 
  doesn't do a one size fits all for licensing.
   
  Jacqueline
   
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears per 
user.  
 
Exchange 5.5 
 
Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.
 
Pete HotchkissList Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to 
the sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail 
and delete the original message.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Moody, Jacqueline]

Title: Message



It is 
per workstation for version 5.5.  It looks like they changed it to per user 
for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to volume 
licensing.
 
So - 
you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per server or per seat 
mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per workstation (including home 
machines if they use OWA to authenticate).
 
There 
was some academic volume licensing in 5.5 where they licensed Exchange per 
user instead of per workstation.  Your best bet is to check out the license 
agreement your purchased under.  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all 
for licensing.
 
Jacqueline
 

  
  -Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, Peter 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: License 
  Question
  I know nobody here can give legal 
  advice but I will ask the question anyway.  Are Exchange CAL's based 
  on user, workstation, or mailbox?  From the MS web it appears per 
  user.  
   
  Exchange 5.5 
   
  Any links to MS web sites also 
  appreciated.
   
  Pete HotchkissList Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail 
  transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 
  it is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the 
  sender which is protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the 
  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
  distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this 
  information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
  error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
  message.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm