[expert] eth0 error

2000-02-05 Thread Stout, Wayne

Greetings, all.

First, I want to thank all those that helped me get my laptop up and
running, especially John and Axalon.

But now I'm having problems with my desktop. I'm sure it's something simple
I forgot to do, but I can't figure it out.

I upgraded the kernel using the 2.2.14 rpms. (I think it was the -22mdk). I
did the kernel, kernel headers and initscripts. But since then, I'm not able
to get any network connectivity. Here's the stuff from the logs:

eth0: Digital DC2104 Tulip rev 17 at 0x6400, MAC address snipped, IRQ 10.
eth0: 21041 Media Table, default media 0800 (Autosense).
eth0: 21041 media #0, 10baseT
eth0: 21041 media #4, 10baseT-FD
eth0: 21143 10baseT link beat good.

Before I have a chance to log in, the following appears:

eth0: 21041 transmit timed out, status fc26, CSR 12 50c8, CSR 13
ef01, CSR 14 , resetting...

And I noticed in the logs just under this line there is:

eth0: 21143 10 Mbps sensed media.

What did I forget to do? Everything worked great before I upgraded the
kernel, so I know that *I* screwed something up. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks,

Wayne



Re: [expert] problems sending mail to list??

2000-02-05 Thread Daniel Woods


 On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
  could someone please advise if there is a certain way to post to the list?
  
 Nopejust send it to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" :-)
   John

TEST !!!

I receive messages from the expert list (digest and individual), yet I've
been unable to *post* to the list... this is a test.

Thanks... Dan.



Re: [expert] 128 mb mem

2000-02-05 Thread Dana Laude

Actually thats not true at all.  For example, I used to run SuSE 5.1 and had
to add the append statement into my lilo.conf to see 64M of ram.  Btw, you
DON'T enable the OS/2 option, since that's specific to the OS/2 operating
system. ;)  After upgrading to SuSE 5.3  I didn't need the append option in
lilo.conf, nor RH 6.x or Mandrake 6.1. I upgraded the hardware recently to a
Asus MB, (last summer/fall) and still no problems.  Sometimes, an older SCSI
card can do odd things also..., I can't recall exactly what it was, but it
had something to do the a 16MB memory limit with direct DMA. (?)  This was
back in my OS/2 days.  (good os btw)

Regards,

Dana

On Thu, 03 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 Well, Jean-Louis,
 It happend that the box has a brand new ASUS board (BIOS 11/99)
 If I will set the BIOS for OS/2 I am getting only 14M. Go figure!!
 Again I think that thre is something wrong with the code itself - there
 are too many people complainig about the same thing - LINUX IS NOT ABLLE
 TO RECOGNIZE MORE THAN 64M
 It looks like the intruction code is made to recognize only a 16Bit
 integer.



[expert] MDK 7.0 Install - Easy as a pie!

2000-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bornath

After reading such a lot of complaints, cries for help and even last
whispers of broken down users, all about problems with installing Air;
After I was told by Alix and some other Mandrake guys to be very
sensible with the install if I don't want my Windows98 wiped (as if I
cared about a thing which asks for quarterly install-fests!);

After all that I took a daring stand and did an install after the book.
Put the MDK 7.0 CD1 of the PowerPack in my CD drive, hit the reset and
told BIOS to boot from CD.
Great graphical install procedure. Jumped into DrakX, erased my Linux
partitions (did I back up my data?) and left the Win partition alone.
Created new partitions (all on a 8.4 IDE disk), formatted and went on
with the installation.

What else:

I installed the complete system within 3.5 hours. Involved was:

1. Flawless hardware recognition of SCSI controller and CD writer, also
grafics card and soundcard (Soundblaster AWE64).

2. Could choose all packages to install or not to install, dependencies
were automagically resolved.

3. First reboot took me right to the kdm where I found myself as a
mini-Tux.

4. Second stage was installation of my ISDN card. I had my Netscape up
and was looking at my favourite site within 20 minutes.

I tried some applications and all the stuff I did with Helios.
Everything just worked out of the box so far.

Oh, BTW, I must not forget to read the installation guide sometime when
I'm not busy. ;-)

Great stuff!

wobo
-- 
GPG Fingerprint 519E 2627 FE60 91F5 32AA  6862 CE9D 800A 3876 EF13 
--
Linux Mandrake's Home: http://www.linux-mandrake.com
## LLaP (Linux Lovers are Perfect!) #



RE: [expert] LM 7.0 loses the clock setting

2000-02-05 Thread Lyle

You told Linux that your CMOS clock was set to GMT and that you were in the
Eastern timezone.  So set the CMOS clock to GMT(for EST add 5 hours) and all
will be right until you rebuild and tell the install that your clock is NOT
set to GMT...

Lyle

-Original Message-
From: Mohammad R. Salehpour, Ph.D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 3:51 PM
To: Mandrake List
Subject: [expert] LM 7.0 loses the clock setting


Hello,

I have LM 7.0 installed on my notebook computer. All of a sudden I 
noticed that when I boot the clock which is displayed on the KDE 
panel is 5 hours behind EST. I set it then on reboot the same thing. 
I thought maybe the internal clock battery is going bad. But when I 
enter the BIOS setup at startup, the cock is correct, but it changes 
when it boot into linux. And it is off exactly 5 hours. I did set it 
back in the DrakeConf. But on the next reboot it is back by 5 hours.

Any ideas?

Thank you.

M.S.




M. R. Salehpour, Ph.D., DABR
Associate Professor / Chief Physicist
Rad. Onc. / ECU School of Medicine
Dir. Medical Physics Grad. Program
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
East Carolina University
Greenville, NC 27858
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (252) 816-2900





Re: [expert] MDK 7.0 Install - Easy as a pie!

2000-02-05 Thread Ron Stodden

On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:

 After reading such a lot of complaints, cries for help and even last
 whispers of broken down users, all about problems with installing Air;
 After I was told by Alix and some other Mandrake guys to be very
 sensible with the install if I don't want my Windows98 wiped (as if I
 cared about a thing which asks for quarterly install-fests!);

You were lucky. Mandrake 7.0 as we know it today is now dead.   See the
following:

Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 02:41:11 +0100
From: Gael Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hello,

Due to a bug in the installer that occured in certain conditions with
some FAT partitions resizing and some other smaller problems (see
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/fupdates.php3), the Mandrake 7.0
PowerPack has been delayed. It will be available at the end of
February. This quality engagement has also lead us to release a new
ISO image of Mandrake 7.0 has soon as the bug as been fixed. 

 Gaël.

--
 Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




-- 

Regards,

Ron. [AU] - sent by Linux.



Re: [expert] MDK 7.0 Install - Easy as a pie!

2000-02-05 Thread Rich Clark

On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Ron Stodden wrote:

 On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
 
  After reading such a lot of complaints, cries for help and even last
  whispers of broken down users, all about problems with installing Air;
  After I was told by Alix and some other Mandrake guys to be very
  sensible with the install if I don't want my Windows98 wiped (as if I
  cared about a thing which asks for quarterly install-fests!);
 
 You were lucky. Mandrake 7.0 as we know it today is now dead.   See the
 following:
 
 Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 02:41:11 +0100
 From: Gael Duval [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Hello,
 
 Due to a bug in the installer that occured in certain conditions with
 some FAT partitions resizing and some other smaller problems (see
 http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/fupdates.php3), the Mandrake 7.0
 PowerPack has been delayed. It will be available at the end of
 February. This quality engagement has also lead us to release a new
 ISO image of Mandrake 7.0 has soon as the bug as been fixed. 
 
  Gaël.
 
 --
  Gael DUVAL - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 
 
 


Dead?  No.  I'd call it a minor setback.  I've done several upgrades and
installs on my machine since Oxygen was announced.  I've encountered
several bugs but no big deal.  Fix it and move on.  What you hear most of
all in these complaint posts is each individual's frustration with being
unable to find the problems and fix the problems by themselves.  I do
feel, however, that 7.0 was rushed through to production a bit too
quickly.  Good product == long beta test period during which all these
bugs could have been identified and ironed out before the masses got hold 
of the product.

-- 
Rich Clark

Sign the petition at http://www.libranet.com/petition.html
Help bring us more Linux Drivers



Re: [expert] Sound Card difficulties

2000-02-05 Thread Warren Doney


-Original Message-
From: S. Newhouse 


http://www.indelible-blue.com/ibapps/hardware.nsf/category/4386 
says there are no Linux drivers.


They are *wrong*
There is support in MDK6.1,  7.0 will configure it automaticly.
The ALSA drivers work too.
Do a search on "esssolo1" in the mailing list archives at
mandrake.com.

Post back if you have problems.


Bryan Donald writes:
  Does anyone know how I might be able to get an ESS
  SOLO-1 PCI AUDIODRIVE soundcard to work in Linux? I
  can't figure it out. 
  -Thanks



-Warren
[from VMware 2.0 in MDK 7.0 /brag]



[expert] Cron Errors after update to 7.0

2000-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How can i fix these?

mv: /var/log/security/suid_root.today: No such file or directory
mv: /var/log/security/unowned_user.today: No such file or directory
mv: /var/log/security/unowned_group.today: No such file or directory
mv: /var/log/security/open_port.today: No such file or directory
mv: /var/log/security/suid_md5.today: No such file or directory


mv: /var/log/security/suid_group.today: No such file or directory
mv: /var/log/security/unowned_group.today: No such file or directory
mv: /var/log/security/open_port.today: No such file or directory


I get about 100+ emails from cron about this stuff daily!



Re: [expert] Sound Card difficulties

2000-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

try www.opensound.com

they had a fixfor my sound card, and yours might be on their list 
they sell their driver (huge support list and free upgrades for $20)
(untill some one figures it out and puts it in the kernel GRIN

dave

On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 http://www.indelible-blue.com/ibapps/hardware.nsf/category/4386 
 says there are no Linux drivers.
 
 I would get another card.
 
 -sen
 
 Bryan Donald writes:
   Does anyone know how I might be able to get an ESS
   SOLO-1 PCI AUDIODRIVE soundcard to work in Linux? I
   can't figure it out. 
   -Thanks
   __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
   http://im.yahoo.com



Re: [expert] /mnt lacks disk space for upgrade?

2000-02-05 Thread Dana Sparling

Hello Steve,

I had some troubles installing 7.0 myself until I made the txt_boot.img 
bootdisk and installed using the text mode (6.0 version) of the installer.  
The rawrite utility for windows didn't work either. I had to use the 
rawrite.exe file from a dos environment or the disk wouldn't boot.
I notice on RedHat's bug page that they hosed up the install images on their 
latest release and I wonder if it has carried over into Mandrake.
I have had no problems at all using the text-mode-boot-disk-install.

Dana Sparling


Hello, I have been using 6.0 since its release and it has made me very
productive.

I picked up a copy of 7.0 at the Mandrake booth at LinuxWorldExpo; I
tried to do an upgrade using a CDROM install.

The upgrade fails, giving me an error message that "/mnt" needs 37M for
the RPM packages. I mv'd /mnt to /usr/mnt (which has two gigs
available), made a symlink /mnt - /usr/mnt, and tried again.

This time I got an error that /mnt needed another 36M for the install.

I'm probably overlooking something obvious... the CDROM is a
"pre-release" of 7.0, but the gentleman at the booth said that it was
the same as the final version except for th DiskDrake tool.

I'm going to try once more to boot off the CDROM (instead of a floppy
boot) to see if I can get it to work..

thx
sw

--
Steve Wainstead, programmer, | "When will the rhetorical
Times Company Digital|  questions all end?"
1120 6th Ave, NY NY 10036|  -- George Carlin
(212) 597-8067   |

__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [expert] MDK 7.0 Install - Easy as a pie!

2000-02-05 Thread Palmer C Byrne

At 07:27 AM 2/5/00 -0500, you wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Ron Stodden wrote:

  On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
 
   After reading such a lot of complaints, cries for help and even last
   whispers of broken down users, all about problems with installing Air;
   After I was told by Alix and some other Mandrake guys to be very

See the Mandrake home page for 5 Feb. All the info regarding the new image 
70-2.iso is available. The image is on most if not all of the mirrors.

palmer





[expert] IRQ conflicts or SBLive hell

2000-02-05 Thread R. David Whitlock

I'm not sure if I'm diagnosing this correctly, but I think I'm having an
IRQ conflict.

I've been having a right headache attempting to get my SBLive card working
under Mandrake 7.0, and I've read alot of web pages and newsgroup messages
that purport to fix the problem, and even after working them all out with
a fair amount of understanding about the underlying stuff in linux, I
really do think that the problem is an IRQ conflict. 

The quick summary is that after I have removed all sound related drivers
from the kernel, andkilled all sound related processes, I insmod
soundcore, no complaints, and then insmod emu10k1.

But I _always_ get the following:
./emu10k1.o: init_module: Device or resource busy 

Now everything that tries to detect my soundcard tells me its an ensoniq
1371 or something like that, and looking at the pci information, I see
that an Ensoniq ES1371 is reported and is using IRQ 10, supposedly.

Thats it in a nutshell.  I'm about to install windows dual boot I think,
just to see if I can get all the IRQ etc information firgured out.  Please
let me know where my thinking is going astray, and if my guess is right,
how I go about resolving it (pass flags to the insmod command when loading
the driver?) ?

Thanks,
 David


"Without the Law, there is no Liberty.  Without Justice, there is no Law."




Re: [expert] eth0 error

2000-02-05 Thread John Aldrich

On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 Greetings, all.
 
 First, I want to thank all those that helped me get my laptop up and
 running, especially John and Axalon.
 
 But now I'm having problems with my desktop. I'm sure it's something simple
 I forgot to do, but I can't figure it out.
 
 I upgraded the kernel using the 2.2.14 rpms. (I think it was the -22mdk). I
 did the kernel, kernel headers and initscripts. But since then, I'm not able
 to get any network connectivity. Here's the stuff from the logs:
 
Hmm...it would APPEAR that maybe it doesn't have the correct driver
for your network card? Just a shot in the dark...
John



[expert] xtraceroute on mdk 7

2000-02-05 Thread tommiy

Is it only my machine or does xtraceroute not work on 7?

If I run it from the command line i get a internal error and if I
install the src rpm and try to package it when its doing the configure
of build it halts on the fact that it can't find the mesa/gl libs but
these are also installed. How did they get a rpm if the src doesn't
actually compile? or is it my machine.



Re: [expert] Sound Card difficulties

2000-02-05 Thread Warren Doney

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
 
 try www.opensound.com
 
 they had a fixfor my sound card, and yours might be on their list
 they sell their driver (huge support list and free upgrades for $20)
 (untill some one figures it out and puts it in the kernel GRIN

It's already in the kernel.
With opensound/solo1 you need to buy another module which 
takes the price up to about $40. A low end Soundblaster
card could be had for less - go figure :o)

-WBD



[expert] Mailing list comments

2000-02-05 Thread David M. Kufta

Iv'e been watching the mailing list and have seen many different
complaint's/problem's concerning (AIR) 7.0 release. I must admit I have
also found a few problems, however was able to easily find and resolve
those simply by verifying rpm install. I will tell everyone it did require
that I correct some bad symlinks which pointed to libs in /lib directory
which were in fact in /usr/lib and also some rpms for mod_ssl and mod_perl
that did not install all files from the rpm packages. I corrected all the
symlinks to libraries that wer not correct, a few I can recall at the
moment were libforms , libpanel , and libmenu and can honestly say I have
had absolutely no problems with Linux-Mandrake-7.0 (AIR) release. Linux
has allways required one to look at the system and configure it for your
own personal requirements which is the very reason I choose Linux as my
computer OS 9 years ago and with just a little effort, " a very good
learning experience" Mandrake 7.0 Distro performs very
well. Congratulation's to all the Mandrake staff! I certainly do
appreciate your efforts and can surely understand the difficulty in making
any Linux Distro "User Friendly" to the point of a zero knowledged
install. I feel that the advancements made to this point are excellent and
encourage the staff and any users with helpfull input to keep up the Great
Work.

Sincerely scripted,
Dave.

-- 
  --
  David M. Kufta   http://www.slip.n3meq.ampr.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  REAL PORTION of Microsoft Windows code:
while (memory_available){
eat_major_portion_of_memory (no_real_reason);
if (feel_like_it)
make_user_THINK (this_is_an_OS);
gates_bank_balance++;
}

My Current Dynamic IP Address Is http://216.155.33.103
You're currently going through a difficult transition period called 
"Life."



Re: [expert] /mnt lacks disk space for upgrade?

2000-02-05 Thread Jim Pilrose

I can't understand why so many people have had problems with mandrake 
7.0. It's by far the easiest install I've seen in my 2 years using 
linux. The only recommendation I have is to back up your users(s) 
directory  then blow out the old install and re-install a fresh 7.0 
install. Personally I didn't have any problems going from mandrake 6.1 
to 7.0 (I used an iso I downloaded from the net). As to the delay in 
official release? I think its a good sign that they posponed the 
release to make some fixes rather than rush it out as some have 
suggested. Everyone is making these comments on a pre-release, but you 
have to remember, it is a PRE-RELEASE.

Just my 2 cents :)
Jim

 Original Message 

On 2/5/00, 12:17:40 AM, "Dana Sparling" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
regarding Re: [expert] /mnt lacks disk space for upgrade?:


 Hello Steve,

 I had some troubles installing 7.0 myself until I made the 
txt_boot.img
 bootdisk and installed using the text mode (6.0 version) of the 
installer.
 The rawrite utility for windows didn't work either. I had to use the
 rawrite.exe file from a dos environment or the disk wouldn't boot.
 I notice on RedHat's bug page that they hosed up the install images on 
their
 latest release and I wonder if it has carried over into Mandrake.
 I have had no problems at all using the text-mode-boot-disk-install.

 Dana Sparling


 Hello, I have been using 6.0 since its release and it has made me 
very
 productive.
 
 I picked up a copy of 7.0 at the Mandrake booth at LinuxWorldExpo; I
 tried to do an upgrade using a CDROM install.
 
 The upgrade fails, giving me an error message that "/mnt" needs 37M 
for
 the RPM packages. I mv'd /mnt to /usr/mnt (which has two gigs
 available), made a symlink /mnt - /usr/mnt, and tried again.
 
 This time I got an error that /mnt needed another 36M for the 
install.
 
 I'm probably overlooking something obvious... the CDROM is a
 "pre-release" of 7.0, but the gentleman at the booth said that it was
 the same as the final version except for th DiskDrake tool.
 
 I'm going to try once more to boot off the CDROM (instead of a floppy
 boot) to see if I can get it to work..
 
 thx
 sw
 
 --
 Steve Wainstead, programmer, | "When will the rhetorical
 Times Company Digital|  questions all end?"
 1120 6th Ave, NY NY 10036|  -- George Carlin
 (212) 597-8067   |

 __
 Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com





[expert] updated/fixed xwindows-ttfonts faq/

2000-02-05 Thread Sheldon Lee Wen

Hi,

   I've fixed and expanded the FAQ that was here:
http://www.mandrakeuser.org/xwin/xfont.html

There were some errors in the steps and I expanded it
for people who have broken ttfonts.

I originally emailed it to the email address on the home page
but no one has posted it or bothered to reply so I'm sending
it to you guys. 

Gael- maybe you can beat him over the head with it "s'il vous plait"

-- 
==
Sheldon Lee Wenhttp://members.xoom.com/Lycadican 
"Superstition is a word the ignorant use to describe their ignorance."
  -- Sifu.
==
Title: 
MUO -X - Fonts
















  



Administration  
Connectivity  
Forum  
Hardware 
Installation  
Kernel  Modules  
LinuxBasics  
OtherResources  
SiteMap  
Troubleshooting  
X



 







Main - X 

Fonts On X

Anyone Seen My Loupe?
 

Covers: 


Why Do Look Fonts So Ugly?
My Fonts Are Too Small!
Adding Fonts
Font Viewers
Font Resources



Related Resources: 



X Window User HOWTO, 7


Font Deuglification mini-HOWTO


man xfs



Translations: 







 
 




Dec. 12, 1999
 Tom Berger




Why Do Look Fonts So Ugly?


By default, X only supports bitmapped fonts, while are not scaleable. If you scale
them anyway, they will look crumbly and rugged. This bipmapping is one reason
why X eats up so much memory: instead of vectorial descriptions it sends bitmaps
(i.e. small pictures of each displayed character).
Later there came support for PostScript Type 1 and Speedo fonts which are 
scaleable, but the Type 1 font rendering machine is mediocre at best. Furthermore
are good Postscript fonts very expensive and therefore can't be included. 
There are a lot of free fonts but their quality doesn't match commercial ones.
(Thanks to Gael and Pablo for correcting me about this.)


Now X supports TrueType fonts via the X Font Server 'xfs', but isn't
able to do nifty stuff like anti-aliasing yet (some window managers however
- like Enlightenment - do. The results
are not very convincing, though). Many X applications don't
know about TrueType at all. 'Hinting' works differently than with
PostScript so that even if the application allows using TT fonts, the
results could differ widely from what you might have expected. Hopefully
this problem will lessen as soon as XFree 4 will be released (expected 
around February 2000), which will feature a major reimplantation of the font rendering 
subsystem. Until then, one has to resort to shifts for the most serious problems.


  

[expert] Mail rests in peace at Mandrake?

2000-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bornath

Hi,

I happended to look at the header of my last mail to the expert-list. It
took the mail 2 days to return to me. How come?

Here is the relevant part:

Received: from [216.71.84.35] (helo=mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com) by
mx00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 12H3Bs-0006Gi-00; Sat,
5 Feb 2000 12:15:48 +0100

Received: from majordomo@localhost) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com
(8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA25843 for expert-list; Fri, 4 Feb 2000 00:24:55
-0600

Received: from mout00.kundenserver.de (mout00.kundenserver.de
[195.20.224.69]) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with
ESMTP id AAA25827 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Feb 2000
00:24:50 -0600

So this shows that it really took a long time from
mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com to mx00.kundenserver.de

wobo 
-- 
GPG Fingerprint 519E 2627 FE60 91F5 32AA  6862 CE9D 800A 3876 EF13 
--
Linux Mandrake's Home: http://www.linux-mandrake.com
## LLaP (Linux Lovers are Perfect!) #




Re: [expert] MDK 7.0 Install - Easy as a pie!

2000-02-05 Thread Wolfgang Bornath

Palmer C Byrne wrote:
 
 On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
  After reading such a lot of complaints, cries for help and even last
  whispers of broken down users, all about problems with installing Air;
  After I was told by Alix and some other Mandrake guys to be very
 
 See the Mandrake home page for 5 Feb. All the info regarding the new image
 70-2.iso is available. The image is on most if not all of the mirrors.
 

I'll read that but don't really need it. 

I just stated that: 
in _my_ case 
on _my_ hardware 
with _my_ situation of the VFAT32 partition of Win
there was no problem during installation.

I also found during normal daily useage there was no problem.

So why do I need a bugfix where there is no bug here?
I don't want to say that there may not be a hardware and/or software
situation where a fix is called for. But again, not here.

And, BTW, MDK 7.0 is not dead, it's very much alive here!

wobo
-- 
GPG Fingerprint 519E 2627 FE60 91F5 32AA  6862 CE9D 800A 3876 EF13 
--
Linux Mandrake's Home: http://www.linux-mandrake.com
## LLaP (Linux Lovers are Perfect!) #




Re: [expert] xtraceroute on mdk 7

2000-02-05 Thread Sam

tommiy wrote:
 
 Is it only my machine or does xtraceroute not work on 7?
 
 If I run it from the command line i get a internal error and if I
 install the src rpm and try to package it when its doing the configure
 of build it halts on the fact that it can't find the mesa/gl libs but
 these are also installed. How did they get a rpm if the src doesn't
 actually compile? or is it my machine.
It it is like 6.1 Traceroute is only allowed by root.
from x-term (after su) the command traceroute works for me
of course you could change permissions ..



Re: [expert] updated/fixed xwindows-ttfonts faq/

2000-02-05 Thread ibi

Thanks, Sheldon! .. Pj 

Sheldon Lee Wen wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
I've fixed and expanded the FAQ that was here:
 http://www.mandrakeuser.org/xwin/xfont.html
 
 There were some errors in the steps and I expanded it
 for people who have broken ttfonts.
 
 I originally emailed it to the email address on the home page
 but no one has posted it or bothered to reply so I'm sending
 it to you guys... snip.."



Re: [expert] updated/fixed xwindows-ttfonts faq/

2000-02-05 Thread Sheldon Lee Wen

Ooops. Wrong one. Don't worry bout this one. Let me
find the right one. Sorry.


 Sheldon Lee Wen wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
I've fixed and expanded the FAQ that was here:
 http://www.mandrakeuser.org/xwin/xfont.html
 
 There were some errors in the steps and I expanded it
 for people who have broken ttfonts.
 
 I originally emailed it to the email address on the home page
 but no one has posted it or bothered to reply so I'm sending
 it to you guys.
 
 Gael- maybe you can beat him over the head with it "s'il vous plait"
 


-- 
==
Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away
on a 
complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a
software
project.
   -- Andy Tanenbaum, oh how wrong you are :)
==



[expert] new/fixed xfont.html tutorial.

2000-02-05 Thread Sheldon Lee Wen

Hi,

  Here is the actual fixed xfont.html file for mandrake-user.org
-- 
==
Anyone who says you can have a lot of widely dispersed people hack away
on a 
complicated piece of code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a
software
project.
   -- Andy Tanenbaum, oh how wrong you are :)
==
Title: 
MUO -X - Fonts
















  



Administration  
Connectivity  
Forum  
Hardware 
Installation  
Kernel  Modules  
LinuxBasics  
OtherResources  
SiteMap  
Troubleshooting  
X



 







Main - X 

Fonts On X

Anyone Seen My Loupe?
 

Covers: 


Why Do Look Fonts So Ugly?
My Fonts Are Too Small!
Adding Fonts
Font Viewers
Font Resources



Related Resources: 



X Window User HOWTO, 7


Font Deuglification mini-HOWTO


man xfs



Translations: 







 
 




Dec. 12, 1999
 Tom Berger




Why Do Look Fonts So Ugly?


By default, X only supports bitmapped fonts, while are not scaleable. If you scale
them anyway, they will look crumbly and rugged. This bipmapping is one reason
why X eats up so much memory: instead of vectorial descriptions it sends bitmaps
(i.e. small pictures of each displayed character).
Later there came support for PostScript Type 1 and Speedo fonts which are 
scaleable, but the Type 1 font rendering machine is mediocre at best. Furthermore
are good Postscript fonts very expensive and therefore can't be included. 
There are a lot of free fonts but their quality doesn't match commercial ones.
(Thanks to Gael and Pablo for correcting me about this.)


Now X supports TrueType fonts via the X Font Server 'xfs', but isn't
able to do nifty stuff like anti-aliasing yet (some window managers however
- like Enlightenment - do. The results
are not very convincing, though). Many X applications don't
know about TrueType at all. 'Hinting' works differently than with
PostScript so that even if the application allows using TT fonts, the
results could differ widely from what you might have expected. Hopefully
this problem will lessen as soon as XFree 4 will be released (expected 
around February 2000), which will feature a major reimplantation of the font rendering 
subsystem. Until then, one has to resort to shifts for the most serious problems.


section index / 
top


My fonts are too small!


The Xconfigurator might still prefer 75dpi (dots 

Re: [expert] Problems starting httpd

2000-02-05 Thread Jean-Michel Dault

Hello. Sorry to answer late, I was buried under e-mail.

Looks like you have conflicting libraries.

Please give me the output of these commands:
rpm -qa|grep apache
rpm -q --whatrequires apache 
cat /etc/mandrake-release
rpm -qa|grep \^gd-1

Jean-Michel Dault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Stephen Boulet wrote:

 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 19:25:23 -0600
 From: Stephen Boulet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [expert] Problems starting httpd
 
 Here's the error I get when trying to start httpd:
 
 [root@tolstoy /root]#  /usr/sbin/httpd 
 Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/httpd/conf/addon-modules/midgardphp3.conf:
 Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/midgardphp3.so into server: /usr/lib/libgd.so.1: 
undefined symbol: png_set_dither
 
 Anyone know what causes it?
 
 -- Stephen
 



Re: [expert] eth0 error

2000-02-05 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Stout, Wayne wrote:
[..]
 I upgraded the kernel using the 2.2.14 rpms. (I think it was the -22mdk). I

Mmm, you mean updated from a -22mdk, to the 2.2.14-15mdk (i think?)

 did the kernel, kernel headers and initscripts. But since then, I'm not able
 to get any network connectivity. Here's the stuff from the logs:
 
 eth0: Digital DC2104 Tulip rev 17 at 0x6400, MAC address snipped, IRQ 10.
 eth0: 21041 Media Table, default media 0800 (Autosense).
 eth0: 21041 media #0, 10baseT
 eth0: 21041 media #4, 10baseT-FD
 eth0: 21143 10baseT link beat good.
 
 Before I have a chance to log in, the following appears:
 
 eth0: 21041 transmit timed out, status fc26, CSR 12 50c8, CSR 13
 ef01, CSR 14 , resetting...
 
 And I noticed in the logs just under this line there is:
 
 eth0: 21143 10 Mbps sensed media.
 
 What did I forget to do? Everything worked great before I upgraded the
 kernel, so I know that *I* screwed something up. Any help would be greatly
 appreciated.

Exactly which module are you useing, tulip.o old_tulip.o or the de4x5.o ?
if it's a 100mbs you can specify that to the module, it does seem they
search in the reverse expected order, from 10mbs-100mbs. Hmm
 
 Thanks,
 
 Wayne
 

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



[expert] Netsacpe problems

2000-02-05 Thread Harshal Pradhan

Hi,

We have just installed Mandrake 7.0 in our computing lab at college.
Users home directories are mounted over NFS and authentication is over
NIS.

Everything is up and running fine except this irritating problem we have
been having with netscape. Even after a user quits Netscape, it
sometimes leaves behind a process called ld-linux.so which keeps eating
up CPU (sometimes upto 98% CPU) This happens more often
when the user has been using some java applet. Even after the user has
logged out the process will keep running, making the system look very
slow till it has been killed by a kill -9. Besides this, while using
java, Netscape often just freezes though the process is still running
and taking a lot of CPU.

I know it is not new for netscape to crash pretty regularly with bus
error or something, but I've seen this for the first time. Anyone know
what is happening?

Thanks in advance,

Harshal Pradhan