Re: [expert] Rich Jones' Auto-Responder
Douglas wrote: > > This is the reply from their IT guy to the email I sent them last night. What > a jerk! I was just giving him a valid risk assesment. > > -- Forwarded Message -- > Subject: Re: irritating email autoreply on your system. > Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 08:46:12 -0700 > From: "Dave Peat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This was a simple mistake and the problem has been fixed. We thank you for > bringing it to our attention and we appologize for any inconvience this has > caused. In the future, threats are inappropriate, (I wouldn't want to think > what they might do, if this isn't addressed soon.), so please avoid them. > Thank you, > Dave > Webmaster > Thanks for getting that taken care of. However, I don't think he sounded like a jerk. Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
Re: [expert] Rich Jones' Auto-Responder
Your probobly right. After getting the blood level in my cafene system down to an appropriate level, I see that he, David Peat has a valid point about a possible threating comment. I was a bit hasty with the letter last night and my "jerk" comment to this list. I apologise to everybody. On Tuesday 07 November 2000 12:42 pm, you wrote: > > Just to set the record stratght. Now you know "The rest of the story" > > This email exchange took place BEFORE he posted the message of what a > "jerk" I was. It sounds like he is on some kind of a crusade. You be the > judge! > > >>>From me to Douglas>>> > > Douglas, > Chill out- I don't believe I was getting nasty at all. This wasn't a > "F*up" on any server at all, it was "A USER" - "ONE USER" on a personal > desktop configuration who had created a rule for auto-reply. I understand > the issue, I subscribe to the list myself and yes, it is annoying. If you > meant it as a funny comment, then I apologize for mentioning it, but again, > I am thankful for you bringing this to my attention so the problem could be > resolved. Incidently, others had replied to that individual himself and he > was aware of the problem as soon as he got to work this morning and the > issue was resolved. > > >>> Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/07/00 09:01AM >>> > > it was supposed to be a funny comment on a very crummy situation. In any > case the list has thousands of people on it worldwide with no moderator, so > this wouldn't be a threat just a valid assesment of the likelyhood of > somebody getting nasty with you for the F*up on your servers. I was > advising the people on the list in any case to NOT get nasty, so back off > jack! > > On Tuesday 07 November 2000 08:46 am, you wrote: > > > This was a simple mistake and the problem has been fixed. We thank you > > for > > > bringing it to our attention and we appologize for any inconvience this > > has caused. In the future, threats are inappropriate, (I wouldn't want > > to think what they might do, if this isn't addressed soon.), so please > > avoid them. Thank you, > > Dave > > Webmaster > > > > >>> Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/07/00 01:39AM >>> > > > > Dear sirs > > > > Below are some samples of an irritating auto reply that appears to be > > coming from a machine on your URL. Could you investigate this please? > > The natives of this list are beginning to complain, and are getting > > restless. I wouldn't want to think what they might do, if this isn't > > addressed soon. The stupid " fred " we are getting is only coming from > > this email address; Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"; name="Attachment: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: HTML -- Douglas Moreen email [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone 406-375-0566 web http://www.allboot.com mailAllBoot.Com 814 Priscilla Way Hamilton, MT 59840 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
Re: [expert] Rich Jones' Auto-Responder
Just to set the record stratght. Now you know "The rest of the story" This email exchange took place BEFORE he posted the message of what a "jerk" I was. It sounds like he is on some kind of a crusade. You be the judge! >>>From me to Douglas>>> Douglas, Chill out- I don't believe I was getting nasty at all. This wasn't a "F*up" on any server at all, it was "A USER" - "ONE USER" on a personal desktop configuration who had created a rule for auto-reply. I understand the issue, I subscribe to the list myself and yes, it is annoying. If you meant it as a funny comment, then I apologize for mentioning it, but again, I am thankful for you bringing this to my attention so the problem could be resolved. Incidently, others had replied to that individual himself and he was aware of the problem as soon as he got to work this morning and the issue was resolved. >>> Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/07/00 09:01AM >>>it was supposed to be a funny comment on a very crummy situation. In any case the list has thousands of people on it worldwide with no moderator, so this wouldn't be a threat just a valid assesment of the likelyhood of somebody getting nasty with you for the F*up on your servers. I was advising the people on the list in any case to NOT get nasty, so back off jack!On Tuesday 07 November 2000 08:46 am, you wrote:> > This was a simple mistake and the problem has been fixed. We thank you for> bringing it to our attention and we appologize for any inconvience this has> caused. In the future, threats are inappropriate, (I wouldn't want to> think what they might do, if this isn't addressed soon.), so please avoid> them. Thank you,> Dave> Webmaster>> >>> Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/07/00 01:39AM > Dear sirs>> Below are some samples of an irritating auto reply that appears to be> coming from a machine on your URL. Could you investigate this please?> The natives of this list are beginning to complain, and are getting> restless. I wouldn't want to think what they might do, if this isn't> addressed soon. The stupid " fred " we are getting is only coming from this> email address;>
Re: [expert] Rich Jones' Auto-Responder
This is the reply from their IT guy to the email I sent them last night. What a jerk! I was just giving him a valid risk assesment. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: irritating email autoreply on your system. Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 08:46:12 -0700 From: "Dave Peat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This was a simple mistake and the problem has been fixed. We thank you for bringing it to our attention and we appologize for any inconvience this has caused. In the future, threats are inappropriate, (I wouldn't want to think what they might do, if this isn't addressed soon.), so please avoid them. Thank you, Dave Webmaster >>> Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/07/00 01:39AM >>> Dear sirs Below are some samples of an irritating auto reply that appears to be coming from a machine on your URL. Could you investigate this please? The natives of this list are beginning to complain, and are getting restless. I wouldn't want to think what they might do, if this isn't addressed soon. The stupid " fred " we are getting is only coming from this email address; "Rich Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and from no other source. --- On Tuesday 07 November 2000 08:29 am, you wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:38:01PM -0900, Dave Brown wrote: > > It's Novell GroupWise's autoreply going berserk, if you look at the > > headers you can see it. > > --Dave > > Right. > > And thiokol.com belongs to Morton Thiokol a US military and NASA > contractor company. I expect a note to the administrative contact at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] would get a speedy response. However, as it is now > after 09:00 in Utah, I suspect Mr. Jones has figured out that he has > erred. > > For more information, run: "whois thiokol.com". > > Meanwhile, it is rather counterproductive to put out messages to the > effect of "what is this stuff" because all that does is generate new crud. > > > Aravind Sadagopan typethed the following... > > > > >What the f*** is this junk > > > > > >Rich Jones wrote: > > > > fred > > > > > > > > >>> expert 11/06/00 22:27 >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="message.footer" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: -- Douglas Moreen email [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone 406-375-0566 web http://www.allboot.com mailAllBoot.Com 814 Priscilla Way Hamilton, MT 59840 Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
[expert] Rich Jones' Auto-Responder
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:38:01PM -0900, Dave Brown wrote: > It's Novell GroupWise's autoreply going berserk, if you look at the > headers you can see it. > --Dave Right. And thiokol.com belongs to Morton Thiokol a US military and NASA contractor company. I expect a note to the administrative contact at [EMAIL PROTECTED] would get a speedy response. However, as it is now after 09:00 in Utah, I suspect Mr. Jones has figured out that he has erred. For more information, run: "whois thiokol.com". Meanwhile, it is rather counterproductive to put out messages to the effect of "what is this stuff" because all that does is generate new crud. > > Aravind Sadagopan typethed the following... > >What the f*** is this junk > > > >Rich Jones wrote: > > > > > fred > > > > > > >>> expert 11/06/00 22:27 >>> -- -- C^2 No windows were crashed in the making of this email. Looking for fine software and/or web pages? http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
