Re: [expert] linux 2.4.1
William Schwartz wrote: > > What all other rpm's did you have to update? I thought there was a few > things other than the kernel you had to upgrade. > > Bill > > Sujeet Bhatt wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 14 February 2001 15:24, William Schwartz declaimed unto the > > faithful: > > > I'm currently running a stock 7.2 mandrake and was wondering if there's > > > a list of recommended rpm's to upgrade to start using the 2.4.1 kernel. > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > Bill > > > > I am running 2.4.1 on 7.2 without any problems. I used the kerenel-2.4.1 rpms > > from Cooker for the update. > > > > Sujeet > > > Get your free domain name and domain-based e-mail from > Namezero.com. New! Namezero Plus domains now available. > Find out more at: http://www.namezero.com Yes, I had problems using the mandrake source for any 2.4.1 src packages above 3mdk. I decided to look into the exit status and find where it chokes. The lm_sensors-2.5.5 is what was my problem. I looked into the commands and it would say that "bison" (command) was not found. I did a rpm query for bison and discovered that I didnt' have it, so I downloaded it and reran the compile. Same place different command. This time "flex" was not there. Of course, I didn't have that so I downloaded it and installed it and ran the compile again. Hopefully, it will run all the way through but I am certain that no matter the dependency, I will get the Mandrake kernel source to once again compile on my machine. Same area of the kernel, I find that I also need Yacc. Got it next?... -- .--. ` |__| .---. Altoine Barker |=.| |.-.| Maximum Time, Inc |--| ||$SEND|| Chicago Based Enterprise | | |'-'| http://www.maximumtime.com |__|~')_('
Re: [expert] linux 2.4.1
What all other rpm's did you have to update? I thought there was a few things other than the kernel you had to upgrade. Bill Sujeet Bhatt wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 February 2001 15:24, William Schwartz declaimed unto the > faithful: > > I'm currently running a stock 7.2 mandrake and was wondering if there's > > a list of recommended rpm's to upgrade to start using the 2.4.1 kernel. > > > > > > thanks, > > Bill > > I am running 2.4.1 on 7.2 without any problems. I used the kerenel-2.4.1 rpms > from Cooker for the update. > > Sujeet
Re: [expert] linux 2.4.1 and another question
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 16:24, William Schwartz wrote: > I'm currently running a stock 7.2 mandrake and was wondering if there's > a list of recommended rpm's to upgrade to start using the 2.4.1 kernel. > > > thanks, > Bill I was able to get to 2.4.1 by d/l'ing the source from www.kernel.org and compiling it myself. Detailed instructions on this can be found in the kernel HowTo. The only thing missing from the howto that you need to do is that in addition to copying the kernel from .../arch/i386/boot/bzImage to /boot (and naming it something that makes sense like "vmlinuz-2.4.1", you also need to copy System.map to something like /boot/System.map-2.4.1 as well. Here's another related question for those in the group that I am confused about. For various purposes, including compiling various software packages, you need to have the correct kernel headers in /usr/src/linux/include. I currently, for instance, have the 2.2.17 ones that came with the MDK 7.2 iso's. Of course, now that I am running on 2.4.1 the headers should differ a bit, but so far everything seems to work ok without updating /usr/src/include. I am concerned because I want to upgrade to X 4.0.2 and install the nvidia drivers from their website. The very detailed instructions on the nvidia website make a point of stating that you need to have the correct kernel header files available for the compile, though. I wonder if I need to copy the 2.4.1 include files into /usr/src and relink to them? OTOH, I was recently pointed to a posting somewhere that said that you don't need to keep upgrading the header files. It make the point that even Linus is running the latest (obviously) kernel with older header files, but of course HIS were 2.3.x, which are likely to be closer to 2.4 than the 2.2.x headers. So, do I need to upgrade them, or not? Neal
Re: [expert] linux 2.4.1
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 17:01, you wrote: > On Wednesday 14 February 2001 15:24, William Schwartz declaimed unto the > > faithful: > > I'm currently running a stock 7.2 mandrake and was wondering if there's > > a list of recommended rpm's to upgrade to start using the 2.4.1 kernel. > > > > > > thanks, > > Bill > > I am running 2.4.1 on 7.2 without any problems. I used the kerenel-2.4.1 > rpms from Cooker for the update. > > Sujeet I am curious... did you just use the "Mandrake Update" utility to update the kernnel or did you download the files seperately and do the "normal" kernel building process, ( all that "make-stuff", etc etc... )? daniel... curious in NJ... :)
Re: [expert] linux 2.4.1
On Wednesday 14 February 2001 15:24, William Schwartz declaimed unto the faithful: > I'm currently running a stock 7.2 mandrake and was wondering if there's > a list of recommended rpm's to upgrade to start using the 2.4.1 kernel. > > > thanks, > Bill I am running 2.4.1 on 7.2 without any problems. I used the kerenel-2.4.1 rpms from Cooker for the update. Sujeet
[expert] linux 2.4.1
I'm currently running a stock 7.2 mandrake and was wondering if there's a list of recommended rpm's to upgrade to start using the 2.4.1 kernel. thanks, Bill