[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: The Science of Compassion, for Wednesday

2012-10-31 Thread Robin Carlsen


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote:
 
  
  

 ---  raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
 
  Well, Buck, you're entitled to your opinion and in my 
  opinion the contract I made with Maharishi out of love 
  and respect for his great gift to humanity is still valid. 
 
---  turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:

 Ahem. You're entitled to your opinion (however erroneous
 it may be) as to what constitutes a gift. As someone
 reported here not long ago, the TM movement *in India
 alone* is worth about $1,114,380,000.00 US Dollars. 
 
 There has not been a *moment* that I know of since the
 beginning of the TM movement in which this gift has
 ever been one; it's been a profit-making enterprise
 since Day One. 
 
 If you feel the need to honor a contract that was never
 worth the paper it was printed on (meaning that it was
 never a legal agreement to start with) with a businessman 
 intent on making money by charging as much as he possibly 
 could for mantras he ripped off from traditional Indian 
 teachings, that's your right. 
 
 If you're further willing to give up your right to read
 what you want, study what you want, see the spiritual
 teachers you want to see, etc., and instead just do what 
 you were told to do and believe what you were told to 
 believe by this same businessman, that also is your
 right.
 
 Just don't expect too many of us to have any respect
 for you still being this gullible this many years later.


   ---  raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
   
I opened my heart to loving Maharishi because his gift of TM uplifts 
the consciousness of the world. Even Buck who thinks Maharishi is a 
skunk believes this. I respect Maharishi's tireless dedication to 
bringing TM to thousands of people who now enjoy a more fulfilling 
life. It's a gift that keeps on giving. My love for Maharishi is born 
of hope for a better world. Respect from hateful cynics like you, 
Barry, is at the bottom of my list of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
   
  
  ---  awoelflebater no_reply@ wrote:
  
   I do not have a strong opinion of this matter either way. I meditated as 
   a young person until I was an older person. Attended MIU from where I 
   graduated in 1980. I had an entire family who meditated, two of my 
   sisters were initiators but I never once felt the inkling to join them. I 
   respected the technique and took it seriously. But in time, due to a 
   number of factors, it fell away for me and although occasionally I choose 
   to say my mantra I do not feel strongly either negatively or positively 
   about the practice or Maharishi. I did not invest myself in him 
   personally like you Raunchy or Barry or Robin or Buck or many others. So, 
   while I read about how the people who are the enforcers in the Movement 
   are what I would call dogmatic, power hungry, delusional and downright 
   bullies my life is not intertwined with this and so although I react with 
   indignation because this bothers me, it is not my world.
   
   On the subject of loyalty to and love for Maharishi, that appears to be a 
   very personal and precious thing for Raunchy and, I am sure, for many 
   others. Even if the Movement and the practice is not all it was cracked 
   up to be the reality remains, for Raunchy, that she loves MMY and she 
   feels like it is the right thing (in fact could probably not feel any 
   other way, but she will correct me if I am wrong here) to remain 
   steadfast in her promise and her devotion to him. Even if Maharishi is 
   what Buck claims he was, a money-grabbing lecherous greedy man that does 
   not change, for those who were touched in a very deep place by him, the 
   reality of their personal, heart-felt relationship with him and it will 
   never change. I believe that one's devotion to something less than 
   perfect can purify things, can make them clean and can effect what may be 
   suspect and make it, somehow, beautiful, keep it true. In some way the 
   devotee can purge the imperfect with the perfection of their love and 
   loyalty. So the devotee is unscathed even while the subject of their 
   devotion may be corrupt. I am speaking not necessarily of Maharishi or TM 
   here but in what I believe could apply to any number of situations. I 
   respect utterly Raunchy's loyalty and trueness of heart here. Only she 
   can understand and feel what motivates her and I am pretty sure it makes 
   her the beautiful person she is just as the incredible human she is 
   allows her to feel what she does.
   
   
  
  So, you are asking her to be a toadie.  This is the strategy 
  TM-org always used to fill it's ranks.
  
  Yeah, with friends like you, who needs enemies.
  
  

<    1   2