Re: [FairfieldLife] Mike Scozarri being sued

2006-03-05 Thread Sal Sunshine
That's it in a nutshell.  There was an agreement that a TM teacher was one for life and could teach TM, no conditions attached.  What people should really consider doing is *everyone* who can start teaching again, and letting the TMO know.  They can't go after everybody.

Sal


On Mar 5, 2006, at 7:22 AM, tmforlife108 wrote:

 If someone gets a 
 masters in education, pays for their education themselves, the university has no right to 
 try and take the degree back 30 years later!


[FairfieldLife] Mike Scozarri being sued

2006-03-05 Thread tmforlife108
Regarding the dirt that one supporter of Mike Scozzari requested, I know  that 
item is not 
central to Mike's defense. Mike told me he just wants everybody to be able to 
teach TM 
openly without fear and threats from the so called trademark holder.  If 
someone gets a 
masters in education, pays for their education themselves, the university has 
no right to 
try and take the degree back 30 years later!

But to the post from someone (below) who wrote that there would not be 
precedent, I 
think you are way off.

Don't be naive - winning this will be winning it for everybody and we can end 
this for 
good.

I'm guessing this was written by  an attny,  possibly with the TMO as he must 
realize it will 
set precedent.  He is just trying to sidestep that issue, which for supporters 
that are TM 
teachers would be the most important issue.  If they win, the TMO could serve 
the papers 
on other independent teachers using the TM trademark - and THEY WILL- precedent 
has 
power!   What independent teacher would risk it if the TMO wins the case in 
Florida?

The trademark holder in this case has a long history of misusing that 
trademark.  Do we 
need to go over this again?  A judge knows that threats against the trademark 
not acted 
on by the TMO do not amount to defending the trademark.  If you know someone is 
misusing the trademark and has done so for years, threatening them with phone 
calls is 
not defending the trademark, it's harassment.  The courts will have this 
information as it 
unravels.  If TM is going to continue to be available I agree - it will be 
thanks to the 
independents. They just need to see the importance of this case in Florida and 
help with 
the defense. 

Who can honestly say that the TMO is headed in the right direction? 

Daniel Jeffers

One friend who has a spiritual take wrote this
The Bastards are abusing us, the legitimate teachers of M's knowledge, As they 
have for 
the Past 25 Years.  This is nothing new.  Their deliberate intention is to 
crush us and take 
away our livelihood & our sacred mission to help people in need.  They use 
intimidation, 
they use divide & conquer.  They brainwash our friends & turn them against us.  
They 
attempt to isolate us from our friends.  They are demons playing the 
destructive role that 
demons always play.  Everyone on the planet has to battle against demons of 
various 
kinds, whether in the form of family members or bosses or government 
authorities, 
criminals, terrorists, etc. etc.  Can you imagine the karma associated with 
actively 
attempting to stop people from becoming enlightened, and to stop people from 
having 
their suffering alleviated?

   
From: a_non_moose_ff
Subject: Re: Mike Scozarri being sued

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Someone sent me the following:
> 
>   
> This is serious.
>   
> He needs a legal defense fund.  

Does he have a case to argue? He is using a trademarked name against
the wishes of the trademark holder. And depending what agreements he
signed at his TTC or beyond, he may be violating a contract.


> And he needs all the 'dirt' on the movement
> that we can discover.  And people willing to be witnesses, etc.

Why would "dirt" on the TMO be relevant in trial to determine if Mike
is breaking trademark law? If the TMO broke other laws, they would
need to be tried for that. Is the "poster" suggesting sexie-sadie
files or ru dissatisfaction with fund raising will make a jury go "oh
dear, then their trademark is no good."?

> If he loses this, then there will be legal precedent 
 
Where is there precedent? Is an appeals court hearing the case already
-- interpreting new unsettled issues in trademerk and contract law?

> and they will go after
> EVERYONE that is teaching 

And why does the TMO winning the scozarri case make them more likely
to do that? And why does losing it make them less likely?

>and that will be the end of it.  No more TM
> technique.  Because the independents are the only one really 
teaching.

How many are teaching in the US -- using TMO trademarks? Just a
handful I would imagine. Its all ready pretty much over. 

Though teaching "Beatles meditation" or "TransX Meditation" by word of
mouth should not be a problem.













 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Mike Scozarri being sued

2006-03-04 Thread Sal Sunshine
All he needs to do is read the archives.

Sal


On Mar 4, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

 He needs ALL THE DIRT there is on the movement.

[FairfieldLife] Mike Scozarri being sued

2006-03-04 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Mike Scozarri being sued





Someone sent me the following:

Mike is being sued.

  Any chance of publicizing this on FFL?
  
  He really needs someone to organize a legal defense fund.  If  there are any independents out there, this will only help them to help  him.  A precedent would be set, and then there would be NO  teaching in the US at all.  Cuz let's face it, the only ones  teaching or caring about teaching are the independents.
  
  He needs ALL THE DIRT there is on the movement.  It is time for them to be exposed.
  
  He really shouldn't have to stand alone on this.
  
And a 2nd email:  
 
My husband just got off the phone with Mike.
  
This is serious.
  
He needs a legal defense fund.  And he needs all the 'dirt' on the movement that we can discover.  And people willing to be witnesses, etc.  
  
If he loses this, then there will be legal precedent and they will go after EVERYONE that is teaching and that will be the end of it.  No more TM technique.  Because the independents are the only one really teaching.  
  
Can you post this legal document to Fairfield life and perhaps see if there's interest in setting up a fund for his defense?
  
It's time for the dirty laundry to be aired.
  
I STILL WANT TO BE ANON at this point...

-

The PDF of the summons will be posted soon. Too large for the files section.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.