Re: [FairfieldLife] Movie review: Saving Mr. Banks

2014-01-24 Thread Share Long
yeah, noozguru, I think that post of yours went in deep. I actually did not 
enjoy Saving Mr. Banks though I love Emma Thompson and I thoroughly enjoyed the 
character of her chauffeur. 

Spoiler alert:
I think Ginty's Dad was embodied in two of Travers' fictional characters: Mr. 
Banks, of course. But I also think the character of Bert was inspired by her 
Dad.





On Thursday, January 23, 2014 4:43 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 
  
What about that Harlan Ellison review on YouTube I pointed to a month ago?  And 
we get to thank Disney for the lame DMCA, oh eyepatch. ;-) 

On 01/23/2014 01:08 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:

  
This is a strange movie for *me* to be reviewing, and even stranger to be 
reviewing positively, but react to it positively I did. After all, it's a 
Disney movie, and worse, it's *about* Walt Disney, someone whose sensibilities 
with regard to fairy tales and the dilution of them I do not admire. 

And yet. I was charmed by many things in this film.
I felt that the script was wonderfully written, and
directed just as well. And there have been exactly
*zero* other films this year that knocked my socks
off by the strength of their ensemble performances
the way this one did. The combination of Emma
Thompson as the irascible P.L. Travers, arguing
tooth and nail with Walt Disney (Tom Hanks, better
than I would have imagined) over whether she was
going to give him the film rights to her book Mary
Poppins are pretty much unbeatable from start to
finish. Add to them Paul Giamatti as her limo driver
in L.A., Colin Farrell as her father in flashbacks,
and Annie Rose Buckley as Travers herself as a
child, and this is pretty much a dream cast,
crafting a dream. 

Yes, it's schmaltzy, yes, it's a bit of a tearjerker
in parts, and yes, it's manipulative. But it
*works*, and it's a damned pity that the Academy
Awards chose to ignore it, except for its musical
score. The Golden Globes, to their credit, at least
nominated Emma Thompson as Best Actress, and in my
opinion she acted circles around any of the other
nominees, or at least the ones whose films I've seen
so far. 

The real P.L. Travers was supposedly a total bitch
who, according to her own adoptive grandchildren,
died loving no one and with no one loving her.
This film showed a better side of her, one that I
wish the old tyrant had gotten to see in life. If
she had, she might have lightened up a bit and
learned to laugh at herself a bit more, and thus had
a happier life. 





[FairfieldLife] Movie review: Saving Mr. Banks

2014-01-23 Thread TurquoiseB
This is a strange movie for *me* to be reviewing, and even stranger to
be reviewing positively, but react to it positively I did. After all,
it's a Disney movie, and worse, it's *about* Walt Disney, someone whose
sensibilities with regard to fairy tales and the dilution of them I do
not admire.

And yet. I was charmed by many things in this film. I felt that the
script was wonderfully written, and directed just as well. And there
have been exactly *zero* other films this year that knocked my socks off
by the strength of their ensemble performances the way this one did.
The combination of Emma Thompson as the irascible P.L. Travers, arguing
tooth and nail with Walt Disney (Tom Hanks, better than I would have
imagined) over whether she was going to give him the film rights to her
book Mary Poppins are pretty much unbeatable from start to finish. Add
to them Paul Giamatti as her limo driver in L.A., Colin Farrell as her
father in flashbacks, and Annie Rose Buckley as Travers herself as a
child, and this is pretty much a dream cast, crafting a dream.

Yes, it's schmaltzy, yes, it's a bit of a tearjerker in parts, and yes,
it's manipulative. But it *works*, and it's a damned pity that the
Academy Awards chose to ignore it, except for its musical score. The
Golden Globes, to their credit, at least nominated Emma Thompson as Best
Actress, and in my opinion she acted circles around any of the other
nominees, or at least the ones whose films I've seen so far.

The real P.L. Travers was supposedly a total bitch who, according to her
own adoptive grandchildren, died loving no one and with no one loving
her. This film showed a better side of her, one that I wish the old
tyrant had gotten to see in life. If she had, she might have lightened
up a bit and learned to laugh at herself a bit more, and thus had a
happier life.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Movie review: Saving Mr. Banks

2014-01-23 Thread Bhairitu
What about that Harlan Ellison review on YouTube I pointed to a month 
ago?  And we get to thank Disney for the lame DMCA, oh eyepatch. ;-)


On 01/23/2014 01:08 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:


*/This is a strange movie for *me* to be reviewing, and even stranger 
to be reviewing positively, but react to it positively I did. After 
all, it's a Disney movie, and worse, it's *about* Walt Disney, someone 
whose sensibilities with regard to fairy tales and the dilution of 
them I do not admire.


And yet. I was charmed by many things in this film. I felt that the 
script was wonderfully written, and directed just as well. And there 
have been exactly *zero* other films this year that knocked my socks 
off by the strength of their ensemble performances the way this one 
did. The combination of Emma Thompson as the irascible P.L. Travers, 
arguing tooth and nail with Walt Disney (Tom Hanks, better than I 
would have imagined) over whether she was going to give him the film 
rights to her book Mary Poppins are pretty much unbeatable from 
start to finish. Add to them Paul Giamatti as her limo driver in L.A., 
Colin Farrell as her father in flashbacks, and Annie Rose Buckley as 
Travers herself as a child, and this is pretty much a dream cast, 
crafting a dream.


Yes, it's schmaltzy, yes, it's a bit of a tearjerker in parts, and 
yes, it's manipulative. But it *works*, and it's a damned pity that 
the Academy Awards chose to ignore it, except for its musical score. 
The Golden Globes, to their credit, at least nominated Emma Thompson 
as Best Actress, and in my opinion she acted circles around any of the 
other nominees, or at least the ones whose films I've seen so far.


The real P.L. Travers was supposedly a total bitch who, according to 
her own adoptive grandchildren, died loving no one and with no one 
loving her. This film showed a better side of her, one that I wish 
the old tyrant had gotten to see in life. If she had, she might have 
lightened up a bit and learned to laugh at herself a bit more, and 
thus had a happier life.

/*