[FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-13 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Akasha108 writes:
Are there / were there any 10 year old adepts doing such transmissions?

Tom T:
I am reminded of the story of Robert Adams who had a funny little guy
who appeared at the end of his bed every night until Adams was 7.
After he had woken up in a math exam (age 15), where he used his sidhi
for getting the correct answers, he began reading spiritual books. One
day in a book store he opened a book and saw a picture of the funny
looking little guy who had appeared every night at the end of his bed.
None other than Ramana Maharishi. After much persuasion he got his
mother to pay his way to India to visit Ramana and the rest is a much
longer story. Tom 





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






Re: [FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread Vaj
Interesting, no mention of the teacher.

Who's David Hawkins BTW?

On Oct 11, 2005, at 11:56 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:

 This subject has had a lot of play here from time to time and I
 thought the following quotation from the book I   Reality and
 Subjectivity by David Hawkins was a very suscinct answer. Page 359

 Questioner: There is confusion about the state of enlightenment and
 about the individual to whom it happens or who is it that has
 become enlightened. There is a common saying that the truly
 enlightened being does not claim to be enlightened, so that anybody
 who states that they are must be in error,

 Answer: There is great difficulity in describing a condition that is
 not within the experiental reality of the ego, and especially in
 answering a question the asking of which stems from the dualistic
 paradigm of reality of the questioner. An enlightened being *is* their
 condition; thus, there is no purpose to make a 'claim'. That is an ego
 view.

 The personal self does not become enlightened or transformed but
 instead is assimilated, silenced, and replaced by a different
 condition altogether.

 Implied in the common saying that we are discussing is the belief that
 to disclaim being enlightened is a form of modesty. This is a
 projection of the spiritual ego of the originator of such a statement
 for in the condition of enlightenment, no egotism remains. The state
 is merely a simple fact; it is not an achievment. It has no merits or
 anything which is laudatory that would require the posture of
 pseudo-humility. In the naive spiritual community, there is much
 adulation, charismatic glamour, and the importance attributed to
 'enlightened masters', and the like.These are projections. To the
 enlightened being, the state is merely the natural condition of how  
 it is.

 Tom T





  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor  
 ~--
 Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your  
 home page
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
  
 ~-

 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Or go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!'
 Yahoo! Groups Links












 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Vaj wrote:
Interesting, no mention of the teacher.
Who's David Hawkins BTW?

Tom T:
Had no teacher. Had near death exp at 7 and another one during WWII.
Went on to become MD and shrink after WWII and had further
understandings. Eventually ended up in 12 step which became his
teacher. Wrote Power vs FOrce in 95 and followed up with The Eye of
the I in 2000+/- and finished with I  Reality and Subjectivity 2003.
In the last book which is mostly Q and A he admits meeting with
Muktanada and Ramesh Balsekar and both of them verfied and validated.
He also allowed that it took almost 10 years of prolonged silence ( he
quit his practice and withdrew to Sedona AZ) before he was ready to
talk about his standing. I found all of his books to have a number of
gems in them. He also set up a scale of Enlightment which appears to
be quite usefull since on his scale it extends from a nominal value
from 700 to 1200, Pretty broad range and a lot of insight in the third
book about that range and the cast of characters that play in it. Tom T





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2005, at 10:22 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote:Vaj wrote: Interesting, no mention of the teacher. Who's David Hawkins BTW?  Tom T: Had no teacher. Had near death exp at 7 and another one during WWII. Went on to become MD and shrink after WWII and had further understandings. Eventually ended up in 12 step which became his teacher. Wrote Power vs FOrce in 95 and followed up with "The Eye of the I" in 2000+/- and finished with I  Reality and Subjectivity 2003. In the last book which is mostly Q and A he admits meeting with Muktanada and Ramesh Balsekar and both of them verfied and validated. He also allowed that it took almost 10 years of prolonged silence ( he quit his practice and withdrew to Sedona AZ) before he was ready to talk about his standing. I found all of his books to have a number of gems in them. He also set up a scale of Enlightment which appears to be quite usefull since on his scale it extends from a nominal value from 700 to 1200, Pretty broad range and a lot of insight in the third book about that range and the cast of characters that play in it. Tom T Very interesting, thank you.Can you share anything further about his scale of enlightenment and how it goes?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread Peter
This is one of the clearest responses articulating the
 condition of I after realization. It's brilliant.
Wondering what happens to the I in enlightenment is
like asking what happens to the knot after it's
untied; what happens to the darkness when the light is
turned on. What happens is that they no longer exist.
They are not accounted for because they cease to
beassimilated, silenced, replaced by no-thing! 

snip

 
 Questioner: There is confusion about the state of
 enlightenment and
 about the individual to whom it happens or who
 is it that has
 become enlightened. There is a common saying that
 the truly
 enlightened being does not claim to be
 enlightened, so that anybody
 who states that they are must be in error,
 
 Answer: There is great difficulity in describing a
 condition that is
 not within the experiental reality of the ego, and
 especially in
 answering a question the asking of which stems from
 the dualistic
 paradigm of reality of the questioner. An
 enlightened being *is* their
 condition; thus, there is no purpose to make a
 'claim'. That is an ego
 view. 
 
 The personal self does not become enlightened or
 transformed but
 instead is assimilated, silenced, and replaced by a
 different
 condition altogether.
 
 Implied in the common saying that we are discussing
 is the belief that
 to disclaim being enlightened is a form of modesty.
 This is a
 projection of the spiritual ego of the originator of
 such a statement
 for in the condition of enlightenment, no egotism
 remains. The state
 is merely a simple fact; it is not an achievment. It
 has no merits or
 anything which is laudatory that would require the
 posture of
 pseudo-humility. In the naive spiritual community,
 there is much
 adulation, charismatic glamour, and the importance
 attributed to
 'enlightened masters', and the like.These are
 projections. To the
 enlightened being, the state is merely the natural
 condition of how it is.
 
 Tom T
 
 
 
 
 
  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 ~-- 
 Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make
 Yahoo! your home page

http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM

~-
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 
 
 





__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread Vaj


On Oct 12, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Peter wrote:This is one of the clearest responses articulating the  condition of "I" after realization. It's brilliant. Wondering what happens to the "I" in enlightenment is like asking what happens to the knot after it's untied; what happens to the darkness when the light is turned on. What happens is that they no longer exist. They are not accounted for because they cease to be"assimilated, silenced, replaced" by no-thing!   Answer: There is great difficulity in describing acondition that isnot within the experiental reality of the ego, andespecially inanswering a question the asking of which stems fromthe dualisticparadigm of reality of the questioner. Anenlightened being *is* theircondition; thus, there is no purpose to make a'claim'. That is an egoview.The personal self does not become enlightened ortransformed butinstead is assimilated, silenced, and replaced by adifferentcondition altogether.Implied in the common saying that we are discussingis the belief thatto disclaim being enlightened is a form of modesty.This is aprojection of the spiritual ego of the originator ofsuch a statementfor in the condition of enlightenment, no egotismremains. The stateis merely a simple fact; it is not an achievment. Ithas no merits oranything which is laudatory that would require theposture ofpseudo-humility. In the naive spiritual community,there is muchadulation, charismatic glamour, and the importanceattributed to'enlightened masters', and the like.These areprojections. To theenlightened being, the state is merely the naturalcondition of how it is.From my POV it represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the eastern experience of "ahamkara" (translated often as "ego") and the Freudian, psychological or New Age idea of "ego". The two are not the same, although many assume they are. When you lose ahamkara, you lose the ability to identify with your body. In laymen's terms, you die. In general, organs and cells don't like it.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








[FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
 Tom T:
 I have two friends who are Enlightened 

Spare egg writes:
And you know this because?

Tom T:
Takes one to know one. and as Rick insinuated I know a lot more than
two. More like 32 or so. I was referring to these specific two who had
the same experience independently of each other. Your milage may vary. Tom





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 






[FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-12 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Vaj writes:
Can you share anything further about his scale of enlightenment and  
how it goes?

The upper limit scale goes like this. The entire thing is way too long
to copy. Tom T

Sainthood 575 Very close to Enlightenment
Bliss 575+ Sat chit ananda
Enlightenment 600 Bliss replaced by peace, stillness, and silence
I Am 650 Awareness of the I as beingness or is-ness
Self 680 As Existence
Sage 700
Sage 740 Self as God Manifest
I (as a total statement)740 As the Ultimate Reality; the Supreme
Self 840 As beyond Existence or Nonexistence
Avatar 985
Buddahood 1000 At-oneness with God Manifest and Unmanifest
Krishna/Christ Consciousness 1000 At-oneness woith GOd Manifest and
Unmanifest
I 1100 as the Ultimate Reality beyond this dimension transcending
dimensions.
I 1200 As essence of Creation
Archangel 50,000+ 
Divinity Infinite 






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Proclaiming ones enlightenment

2005-10-11 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
This subject has had a lot of play here from time to time and I
thought the following quotation from the book I   Reality and
Subjectivity by David Hawkins was a very suscinct answer. Page 359

Questioner: There is confusion about the state of enlightenment and
about the individual to whom it happens or who is it that has
become enlightened. There is a common saying that the truly
enlightened being does not claim to be enlightened, so that anybody
who states that they are must be in error,

Answer: There is great difficulity in describing a condition that is
not within the experiental reality of the ego, and especially in
answering a question the asking of which stems from the dualistic
paradigm of reality of the questioner. An enlightened being *is* their
condition; thus, there is no purpose to make a 'claim'. That is an ego
view. 

The personal self does not become enlightened or transformed but
instead is assimilated, silenced, and replaced by a different
condition altogether.

Implied in the common saying that we are discussing is the belief that
to disclaim being enlightened is a form of modesty. This is a
projection of the spiritual ego of the originator of such a statement
for in the condition of enlightenment, no egotism remains. The state
is merely a simple fact; it is not an achievment. It has no merits or
anything which is laudatory that would require the posture of
pseudo-humility. In the naive spiritual community, there is much
adulation, charismatic glamour, and the importance attributed to
'enlightened masters', and the like.These are projections. To the
enlightened being, the state is merely the natural condition of how it is.

Tom T





 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/