[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread authfriend
It's SO much more complex than this biologically, BillyG. What about people, 
for example, who are born with indeterminate genitals, or genitals of both 
sexes? There's a whole range of possibilities that your formula doesn't account 
for.
 

 “Everybody’s Inner Being is Pure Happiness”, MMY. This inner happiness is 
consciousness itself, being formless it takes on bodies of a Male or Female 
nature in alternating incarnations on Earth to learn the lessons of life.
  
 Being incarnated sometimes Male and sometimes Female gives the formless Soul 
the full opportunity to experience the full range of experiences of the heart 
(female) and mind (male).
  
 This brings in to question the ‘erroneous’ idea that one can be born “in the 
WRONG sex”. How can the soul, being sexless, be in the wrong sex? In addition, 
how can one really ‘change’ one’s sex? Surgically one can remove  sexual organs 
and chemically/hormonally grow breasts, but how about the subtle nature of the 
physical body, yes, the etheric body?
  
 It is said in esoteric literature that the WHOLE man/woman is both negative or 
female AND positive or male!
 

 In a Man the outer physical body is positive or masculine and his subtle 
etheric body is negative or feminine/passive; conversely in the Female the 
outer physical body is negative/feminine and the inner subtle body is positive 
or masculine. Can science eradicate or alter ‘these’ characteristics of the 
soul?
  
 Until modern man can understand the inner nature of man and his subltle bodies 
he will be unable to understand the nature of the soul and the mistaken notion 
that the soul can be born ‘in the wrong sex’, IMHO.
 



[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread anartaxius
I suppose the question of the nature of the soul would be valuable, if the soul 
exists. I do not see any reason to suppose why something called a soul exists, 
or whether something like an aetheric body exists either. If these have no 
observable characteristics, then they have the same characteristics as nothing. 
Science could not alter what has no perceptible manifestation.



[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
Everything is accounted for Judy, down to the last jot and tittle, also 
called Karma.
 

 Did it ever occur to you that those born with those genital defects were 
actually gender confused in previous lives and did the very thing transsexuals 
are doing today with their bodies?  Could being born with the genitals of both 
sexes be the just working out of the willful behavior of that individual?, you 
don't know do you Judy?!,  you don't have any answers, you just don't like mine.
 

 BTW, the 'cure' for those with GID (Gender Identity Disorder) is not indulging 
in it but rather beginning the practice of meditation to find one's identity 
with the Self or the Soul (the inner happiness MMY talks about) thereby 
rendering the relative sex of the physical body mute, irrelevant since one is 
not identified with it, but with the soul.
 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


 It's SO much more complex than this biologically, BillyG. What about people, 
for example, who are born with indeterminate genitals, or genitals of both 
sexes? There's a whole range of possibilities that your formula doesn't account 
for.
 

 “Everybody’s Inner Being is Pure Happiness”, MMY. This inner happiness is 
consciousness itself, being formless it takes on bodies of a Male or Female 
nature in alternating incarnations on Earth to learn the lessons of life.
  
 Being incarnated sometimes Male and sometimes Female gives the formless Soul 
the full opportunity to experience the full range of experiences of the heart 
(female) and mind (male).
  
 This brings in to question the ‘erroneous’ idea that one can be born “in the 
WRONG sex”. How can the soul, being sexless, be in the wrong sex? In addition, 
how can one really ‘change’ one’s sex? Surgically one can remove  sexual organs 
and chemically/hormonally grow breasts, but how about the subtle nature of the 
physical body, yes, the etheric body?
  
 It is said in esoteric literature that the WHOLE man/woman is both negative or 
female AND positive or male!
 

 In a Man the outer physical body is positive or masculine and his subtle 
etheric body is negative or feminine/passive; conversely in the Female the 
outer physical body is negative/feminine and the inner subtle body is positive 
or masculine. Can science eradicate or alter ‘these’ characteristics of the 
soul?
  
 Until modern man can understand the inner nature of man and his subltle bodies 
he will be unable to understand the nature of the soul and the mistaken notion 
that the soul can be born ‘in the wrong sex’, IMHO.
 





[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
One thing is certain, a microscope (or any scientific instrument) can never 
prove the existence of the soul or God because it is a subjective experience. I 
can't prove God to you, only you can prove God to yourself, till then it's just 
a theory. As MMY used to say, the proof is in the pudding.
 

 It seems your best position with be agnosticism, since you can't prove the 
soul *doesn't* exist either

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:


 I suppose the question of the nature of the soul would be valuable, if the 
soul exists. I do not see any reason to suppose why something called a soul 
exists, or whether something like an aetheric body exists either. If these have 
no observable characteristics, then they have the same characteristics as 
nothing. Science could not alter what has no perceptible manifestation.




[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
Confused about what the Self IS!  See below: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c9ZnpMppHQ 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-c9ZnpMppHQ



[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
Sorry to have to post this one but, (viewer discretion advised). It's a sad day 
for modern civilization. See below: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinlZhfdN1o 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinlZhfdN1o
 

 To think this is where the LGBT community is leading us; really? wake up 
America!


[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread authfriend
BillyG, you are one sick dude, IMHO, to go hunting around for a video like that 
to post in the hope that we'll all go Oh, ick, ain't it awful! That's 
exploitative, to say the least. The video was made for people who have an 
interest in the surgical procedures, not to promote loathing of people who have 
it done.
 

 Did you read the comments and notice how compassionate and appreciative most 
of them were? A few expressed dispproval, but they did so to the person who 
made the video, not to a bunch of total strangers.
 

 Really despicable. I pity your state of mind.
 

 
 Sorry to have to post this one but, (viewer discretion advised). It's a sad 
day for modern civilization. See below: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinlZhfdN1o 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinlZhfdN1o
 

 To think this is where the LGBT community is leading us; really? wake up 
America!




[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
Right Judy, we really shouldn't be looking at these videos, and definitely 
NOT making public policy based on them either, lets just see how happy these 
folks are...'er, eventually! 'er, well, maybe not. Here's a few where it DIDN'T 
work out!
 

 http://www.sexchangeregret.com/ http://www.sexchangeregret.com/
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 BillyG, you are one sick dude, IMHO, to go hunting around for a video like 
that to post in the hope that we'll all go Oh, ick, ain't it awful! That's 
exploitative, to say the least. The video was made for people who have an 
interest in the surgical procedures, not to promote loathing of people who have 
it done.
 

 Did you read the comments and notice how compassionate and appreciative most 
of them were? A few expressed dispproval, but they did so to the person who 
made the video, not to a bunch of total strangers.
 

 Really despicable. I pity your state of mind.
 

 
 Sorry to have to post this one but, (viewer discretion advised). It's a sad 
day for modern civilization. See below: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinlZhfdN1o 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YinlZhfdN1o
 

 To think this is where the LGBT community is leading us; really? wake up 
America!






[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
BTW Judy, definitely DON'T look at this one, go figure? 
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XpMsUeu8m4 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XpMsUeu8m4


[FairfieldLife] RE: The Sexless Nature of the Soul

2014-01-03 Thread wgm4u
This one's just for you Judy! Enjoy! 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT65GFEMQ2s 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT65GFEMQ2s