[FairfieldLife] Re: 911 Commission on 911 Puts apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous

2006-04-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious
 consistently proved innocuous.

Note that *even if* these innocuous explanations are
correct, the investigations were conducted *because*
there was statistically significant anomalous trading.

So all your huffing and puffing about statistical
significance was, as I pointed out repeatedly, a non
sequitur.

And Mark Meredith finds the supposed explanations
unconvincing, so we're back where we started when I
first brought up the anomalies.

If you trust the 9/11 commission, fine, then you can
rest comfortably in the assumption that all the
anomalies have been explained.

But it's quite amusing that you're not demanding to
see the documentation for *its* conclusions.






 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 911 Commission on 911 Puts apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous

2006-04-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anony_sleuth_ff no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious
  consistently proved innocuous.
 
 Note that *even if* these innocuous explanations are
 correct, the investigations were conducted *because*
 there was statistically significant anomalous trading.
 
 So all your huffing and puffing about statistical
 significance was, as I pointed out repeatedly, a non
 sequitur.
 
 And Mark Meredith finds the supposed explanations
 unconvincing, so we're back where we started when I
 first brought up the anomalies.



I'd love to hear what Mark says about the hedging...



 
 If you trust the 9/11 commission, fine, then you can
 rest comfortably in the assumption that all the
 anomalies have been explained.
 
 But it's quite amusing that you're not demanding to
 see the documentation for *its* conclusions.







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
~- 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/