[FairfieldLife] Re: Buddhist Geeks: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Buddhist Geeks 2: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha. In our first  
 podcast featuring scholar-practitioner B. Alan Wallace we asked Dr.  
 Wallace to give us the low-down on his spiritual journey, as well as  
 describe the stages of deepening relaxation and vividness of  
 attention leading to the culmination of an attainment he calls  
 shamatha.
 
 Link: http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2007/01/15/buddhist-geeks-2-alan- 
 wallace-on-achieving-shamatha/


What a tweeb. And this is the stuff you consider superior to TM???



[FairfieldLife] Re: Buddhist Geeks: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Buddhist Geeks 2: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha. In our first  
 podcast featuring scholar-practitioner B. Alan Wallace we asked Dr.  
 Wallace to give us the low-down on his spiritual journey, as well as  
 describe the stages of deepening relaxation and vividness of  
 attention leading to the culmination of an attainment he calls  
 shamatha.
 
 Link: http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2007/01/15/buddhist-geeks-2-alan- 
 wallace-on-achieving-shamatha/


My response:

Lawson English on Feb 12th, 2007 said:
My response: if these traits are genuine traits, then they will show up in 
other forms of 
meditative practice.

And yetÂ…

Contrast samadhi during TM with compassion meditation:

Where's the underlying universal harmony in all points simultaneously, not just 
in some 
localized expression of expertise in a single function of the brain?

http://web.mac.com/lawsonenglish/iWeb/Site/Meditation EEG.html



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Buddhist Geeks: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha

2007-02-12 Thread Vaj


On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:33 PM, sparaig wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Buddhist Geeks 2: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha. In our first
podcast featuring scholar-practitioner B. Alan Wallace we asked Dr.
Wallace to give us the low-down on his spiritual journey, as well as
describe the stages of deepening relaxation and vividness of
attention leading to the culmination of an attainment he calls
shamatha.

Link: http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2007/01/15/buddhist-geeks-2-alan-
wallace-on-achieving-shamatha/



What a tweeb. And this is the stuff you consider superior to TM???



Well, if you consider the first stage or two involve TM style levels  
of stability and then you go towards hours of continuous absorption  
in the later stages, I guess you can reach your own conclusions!  :-)  
A couple of minutes compared to an hour to several hours is quite a  
difference. Did you even listen to it? I didn't think you did!


And shamatha is just the start...(as he explains)...

[FairfieldLife] Re: Buddhist Geeks: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha

2007-02-12 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:33 PM, sparaig wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  Buddhist Geeks 2: Alan Wallace on achieving Shamatha. In our first
  podcast featuring scholar-practitioner B. Alan Wallace we asked Dr.
  Wallace to give us the low-down on his spiritual journey, as well as
  describe the stages of deepening relaxation and vividness of
  attention leading to the culmination of an attainment he calls
  shamatha.
 
  Link: http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2007/01/15/buddhist-geeks-2-alan-
  wallace-on-achieving-shamatha/
 
 
  What a tweeb. And this is the stuff you consider superior to TM???
 
 
 Well, if you consider the first stage or two involve TM style levels  
 of stability and then you go towards hours of continuous absorption  
 in the later stages, I guess you can reach your own conclusions!  :-)  
 A couple of minutes compared to an hour to several hours is quite a  
 difference. Did you even listen to it? I didn't think you did!
 
 And shamatha is just the start...(as he explains)...


And he is wrong. And you are as well.