[FairfieldLife] Re: Global Warming Hoax

2009-04-25 Thread Richard J. Williams
  How about ARCHAEOPTERYXES who are painfully 
  aware that dramatic sudden change can happen 
  but, being extinct, are unable to form useful 
  lobby groups...
 
Judy wrote:
 LOL! Slam-dunk.

...Emanuel has completely recanted his position 
and now admits that hurricanes and storms will 
actually decline over the next 200 years and have 
little or no correlation with global temperature 
change whatsoever.

'Central Plank Of Global Warming Alarmism Discredited'
By Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet, Monday, April 14, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/cc9rad

'Democrats Refuse to Allow Skeptic to Testify 
Alongside Gore At Congressional Hearing'
Climate Depot, Thursday, April 23, 2009
http://tinyurl.com/c2jyhw



[FairfieldLife] Re: Global warming hoax

2007-12-21 Thread do.rflex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 _.:  U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works ::
Minority Page 
 :._ 

(http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.BlogsContentRecord_id=f80a6386-802a-23ad-40c8-3c63dc2d02cb)
 


Excellent summary of Republican Senator James Inhofe's work on the
committee cherry picking of mostly discredited global warming denial
reports. 

Wonder why he does it? 

Well...

Since 1999, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Inhofe
has received almost $300,000 in campaign donations from oil and gas
interests and nearly $180,000 from electric utilities. In the 2002
election cycle, he received more oil and gas contributions than any
senator except Texas' John Cornyn.

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=7603


And on the experts Inhofe cherry-picked:

Some key skeptics show up again and again in the echo chamber funded
by ExxonMobil.

ExxonMobil has pumped more than $8 million into more than 40 think
tanks; media outlets; and consumer, religious, and even civil rights
groups that preach skepticism about the oncoming climate catastrophe.
Herewith, a representative overview.

The following article debunks the crap Dixon thinks he can fool people
with.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2005/05/exxon_chart.html

--After reading the chart it's even more fun to read further about the
desperate bullshit tactics the Big Energy paid clowns on the fringe
right attempt to foster on the public.

Go to: As The World Burns: A Mother Jones Special Report on Global Warming
http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2005/05/world_burns.html







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Global warming hoax

2007-12-21 Thread Angela Mailander
One of the reasons I posted the article about how sat yuga will come because 
most of us will die off due to climate change is that I wanted everyone's 
opinion on that subject.  So thanks for responding.  What emerges from the 
discussion is that none of us have (nor can have) definitive answers, even if 
we are ourselves climatologists. Reading and understanding a peer-reviewed 
article in any science is a skill that requires an education in that science. 
Even then, there can be disagreements among experts in how to collect and 
interpret the raw data.  I've been involved in designing scientific studies 
myself (on language acquisition) and even with the best intentions, it is 
uncommonly difficult to avoid spinning the data. Statistics can be 
manipulated to say one thing, and then manipulated again to say the exact 
opposite.  Add to that special interests, and you can see that peer reviewed 
articles in scientific journals cannot always be taken at face
 value even among experts in the field. That is one of the major reasons why 
you can hardly ever take a single study or a single piece of evidence and base 
any conclusion on it.  You go with the body of research, and even that is not 
100% fool proof ever.  If it were, there could be no progress in science. 

Like Off, I'm all for science, but the scientific literature on any subject is 
no different from any other use of language.  It lends itself to truth-telling 
equally well as it lends itself to telling lies--unwittingly or otherwise.  
Most of the time when lay people in a given field quote an article from a 
peer-reviewed journal, it is merely a rhetorical power-play.

And yet, that's the best we can do in discovering truth.
- Original Message 
From: do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 9:03:52 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Global warming hoax









  



--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. wrote:



 _.:  U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works ::

Minority Page 

 :._ 



(http://epw.senate. gov/public/ index.cfm? FuseAction= Minority. 
BlogsContentRec ord_id=f80a6386- 802a-23ad- 40c8-3c63dc2d02c b)

 



Excellent summary of Republican Senator James Inhofe's work on the

committee cherry picking of mostly discredited global warming denial

reports. 



Wonder why he does it? 



Well...



Since 1999, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, Inhofe

has received almost $300,000 in campaign donations from oil and gas

interests and nearly $180,000 from electric utilities. In the 2002

election cycle, he received more oil and gas contributions than any

senator except Texas' John Cornyn.



http://www.prospect .org/cs/articles ?articleId= 7603



And on the experts Inhofe cherry-picked:



Some key skeptics show up again and again in the echo chamber funded

by ExxonMobil.



ExxonMobil has pumped more than $8 million into more than 40 think

tanks; media outlets; and consumer, religious, and even civil rights

groups that preach skepticism about the oncoming climate catastrophe.

Herewith, a representative overview.



The following article debunks the crap Dixon thinks he can fool people

with.



http://www.motherjo nes.com/news/ featurex/ 2005/05/exxon_ chart.html



--After reading the chart it's even more fun to read further about the

desperate bullshit tactics the Big Energy paid clowns on the fringe

right attempt to foster on the public.



Go to: As The World Burns: A Mother Jones Special Report on Global Warming

http://www.motherjo nes.com/news/ featurex/ 2005/05/world_ burns.html






  







!--

#ygrp-mkp{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:14px 0px;padding:0px 14px;}
#ygrp-mkp hr{
border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}
#ygrp-mkp #hd{
color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:bold;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0px;}
#ygrp-mkp #ads{
margin-bottom:10px;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad{
padding:0 0;}
#ygrp-mkp .ad a{
color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}
--



!--

#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc{
font-family:Arial;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc #hd{
margin:10px 0px;font-weight:bold;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}
#ygrp-sponsor #ygrp-lc .ad{
margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}
--



!--

#ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}
#ygrp-mlmsg select, input, textarea {font:99% arial, helvetica, clean, 
sans-serif;}
#ygrp-mlmsg pre, code {font:115% monospace;}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}
#ygrp-text{
font-family:Georgia;
}
#ygrp-text p{
margin:0 0 1em 0;}
#ygrp-tpmsgs{
font-family:Arial;
clear:both;}
#ygrp-vitnav{
padding-top:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;margin:0;}
#ygrp-vitnav a{
padding:0 1px;}
#ygrp-actbar{
clear:both;margin:25px 0;white-space:nowrap;color:#666;text-align:right;}
#ygrp-actbar .left{
float:left;white-space:nowrap;}
.bld{font-weight:bold;}
#ygrp-grft{
font-family:Verdana;font-size:77%;padding:15px 0