Gram & friends are writing another book I am in coloboration with. In a message dated 7/25/2008 9:12:05 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" <compost1uk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Largest stone blocks in the world, perfectly fitted in wall -- not > > > Roman as claimed? > > > > > > This ia interesting: > > > http://www.vejprty.com/baalbek.htm > > > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > Heavens! That seems to be about 20X larger than the Stonehenge blocks? > >> > > I don't know how much bigger, but much bigger yes - incredible eh. > The temple is claimed to have been built by the Romans (although the > Romans did not record this great feat of engineering, and the > foundation blocks are way more eroded than the Roman building, and it > looks like the Romans built on top of it. The Romans could not move > blocks like that around when they tried in Egypt. They are also as > tightly fitted as the ancient Inca and Peruvian walls - but much bigger > blocks. I am a sucker for that sort of thing! I guess you saw that stuff on the Sphinx a while back? There was a highly respected geologist who was asserting that it must be way older than the archaeologists thought (he considered the latter to be geologically illiterate). His thinking was that the erosion signature implied a wetter climate, which means an age of 10000 years or more. I haven't seen any more on that. In fact, come to think of it, where's that Graham Hancock fellah these days? ------------------------------------ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)