[FairfieldLife] Re: New Yorker cover

[Richard J. Williams]

Judy wrote:
> The cover is obviously intended to be satirical;
> it's mocking the folks (probably none of them
> readers of The New Yorker) who believe all kinds
> of nutty things about Obama.
> 
> I have two problems with it. First, it's not very
> well done artistically.
> 
> Second, and much more important, the controversy 
> it's creating distracts attention from the excellent
> article inside the magazine by Ryan Lizza on Obama's
> Chicago political history, which has nothing 
> whatsoever to do with the "Obama-is-a-Muslim"-type 
> rumors. Two completely different topics.
> 
"This is another illustration of how the liberal 
media's blind hatred of, and desire to slander, 
conservatives can divert it from its quest to assist 
liberal candidates."

Read more:

'The Politics of Dodging the Issue'
Posted by John Hinderaker
Powerline, July 13, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/5motke

[FairfieldLife] Re: New Yorker cover

[authfriend]

The cover is obviously intended to be satirical;
it's mocking the folks (probably none of them
readers of The New Yorker) who believe all kinds
of nutty things about Obama.

I have two problems with it. First, it's not very
well done artistically.

Second, and much more important, the controversy it's
creating distracts attention from the excellent
article inside the magazine by Ryan Lizza on Obama's
Chicago political history, which has nothing whatsoever
to do with the "Obama-is-a-Muslim"-type rumors. Two
completely different topics.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
>  2429.html>
>