[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemps does not understand Climate Change.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: This is an Apollo 11 photo I don't recall ever having seen before. It was taken from the command module looking directly down as the landing module was descending toward the surface of the moon. The LM can be seen just to the upper right of the big crater. From Boston.com's photo blog, The Big Picture http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html , July 15, 2009. BTW, this was an exercise in reducing the size of a large photo. First I copied and pasted the full-size photo into the message; then I put a checkmark in View HTML Source so I could see the HTML the Rich Text Editor creates automatically, found the image tag, and changed the dimensions, reducing both height and width by half. What is also astounding about the photograph is the number of craters that virtually cover the landscape. Large or small. And this is not unusual. If the Earth was barren like the moon, we'd have as much of a pock-marked landscape as the moon. But we have soil and water and ice that covers our planet so therefore, in time, most craters get covered up or their rims erode and they blend in with the surroundings Er, is this the reason you don't accept climate change theory?ie. that you simply don't understand it? The Earth has very few craters due to the atmosphere burning up the majority of meteorites in the high atmosphere. The Moon has no atmosphere at all. That is why there are very few craters on Earth, because of the atmosphere, not because of soil and water and ice covering them up. This misundertanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it noramlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is history. OffWorld Wrongo, Beaver Breath. Good argumentative method you got there Shemp. You only degrade yourself with this. It comes back to you and lodges in the cells of your heart, poisoning it. This misunderstanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it normlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is
[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemps does not understand Climate Change.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: This is an Apollo 11 photo I don't recall ever having seen before. It was taken from the command module looking directly down as the landing module was descending toward the surface of the moon. The LM can be seen just to the upper right of the big crater. From Boston.com's photo blog, The Big Picture http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html , July 15, 2009. BTW, this was an exercise in reducing the size of a large photo. First I copied and pasted the full-size photo into the message; then I put a checkmark in View HTML Source so I could see the HTML the Rich Text Editor creates automatically, found the image tag, and changed the dimensions, reducing both height and width by half. What is also astounding about the photograph is the number of craters that virtually cover the landscape. Large or small. And this is not unusual. If the Earth was barren like the moon, we'd have as much of a pock-marked landscape as the moon. But we have soil and water and ice that covers our planet so therefore, in time, most craters get covered up or their rims erode and they blend in with the surroundings Er, is this the reason you don't accept climate change theory?ie. that you simply don't understand it? The Earth has very few craters due to the atmosphere burning up the majority of meteorites in the high atmosphere. The Moon has no atmosphere at all. That is why there are very few craters on Earth, because of the atmosphere, not because of soil and water and ice covering them up. This misundertanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it noramlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is history. OffWorld Wrongo, Beaver Breath. Good argumentative method you got there Shemp. You only degrade yourself with this. It comes back to you and lodges in the cells of your heart, poisoning it. That was actually a take off on Karnac, the Johnny Carson character, and how he used to respond to Ed McMahon but you wouldn't be familiar with the cultural reference, so I forgive you. This misunderstanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, We weren't talking about climate change; we were talking about craters on the moon and the Earth. And I quoted an expert demonstrating that you are wrong. Is that why you're trying to change the topic to global warming? and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it normlly does.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemps does not understand Climate Change.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: This is an Apollo 11 photo I don't recall ever having seen before. It was taken from the command module looking directly down as the landing module was descending toward the surface of the moon. The LM can be seen just to the upper right of the big crater. From Boston.com's photo blog, The Big Picture http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html , July 15, 2009. BTW, this was an exercise in reducing the size of a large photo. First I copied and pasted the full-size photo into the message; then I put a checkmark in View HTML Source so I could see the HTML the Rich Text Editor creates automatically, found the image tag, and changed the dimensions, reducing both height and width by half. What is also astounding about the photograph is the number of craters that virtually cover the landscape. Large or small. And this is not unusual. If the Earth was barren like the moon, we'd have as much of a pock-marked landscape as the moon. But we have soil and water and ice that covers our planet so therefore, in time, most craters get covered up or their rims erode and they blend in with the surroundings Er, is this the reason you don't accept climate change theory?ie. that you simply don't understand it? The Earth has very few craters due to the atmosphere burning up the majority of meteorites in the high atmosphere. The Moon has no atmosphere at all. That is why there are very few craters on Earth, because of the atmosphere, not because of soil and water and ice covering them up. This misundertanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it noramlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is history. OffWorld Wrongo, Beaver Breath. Good argumentative method you got there Shemp. You only degrade yourself with this. It comes back to you and lodges in the cells of your heart, poisoning it. That was actually a take off on Karnac, the Johnny Carson character, and how he used to respond to Ed McMahon but you wouldn't be familiar with the cultural reference, so I forgive you. This misunderstanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, We weren't talking about climate change; we were talking about craters on the moon and the Earth. And I quoted an expert demonstrating that you are wrong. Is that why you're trying to change the topic to global warming? There are not more impacts on Earth, than on the moon. Its just because the Earth's surface is MUCH bigger. It would be like like saying that there are more impacts on Jupiter than on Earth ! Of course there are more - Jupiter is much bigger ! But per
[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemps does not understand Climate Change.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: This is an Apollo 11 photo I don't recall ever having seen before. It was taken from the command module looking directly down as the landing module was descending toward the surface of the moon. The LM can be seen just to the upper right of the big crater. From Boston.com's photo blog, The Big Picture http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html , July 15, 2009. BTW, this was an exercise in reducing the size of a large photo. First I copied and pasted the full-size photo into the message; then I put a checkmark in View HTML Source so I could see the HTML the Rich Text Editor creates automatically, found the image tag, and changed the dimensions, reducing both height and width by half. What is also astounding about the photograph is the number of craters that virtually cover the landscape. Large or small. And this is not unusual. If the Earth was barren like the moon, we'd have as much of a pock-marked landscape as the moon. But we have soil and water and ice that covers our planet so therefore, in time, most craters get covered up or their rims erode and they blend in with the surroundings Er, is this the reason you don't accept climate change theory?ie. that you simply don't understand it? The Earth has very few craters due to the atmosphere burning up the majority of meteorites in the high atmosphere. The Moon has no atmosphere at all. That is why there are very few craters on Earth, because of the atmosphere, not because of soil and water and ice covering them up. This misundertanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it noramlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is history. OffWorld Wrongo, Beaver Breath. Good argumentative method you got there Shemp. You only degrade yourself with this. It comes back to you and lodges in the cells of your heart, poisoning it. That was actually a take off on Karnac, the Johnny Carson character, and how he used to respond to Ed McMahon but you wouldn't be familiar with the cultural reference, so I forgive you. This misunderstanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, We weren't talking about climate change; we were talking about craters on the moon and the Earth. And I quoted an expert demonstrating that you are wrong. Is that why you're trying to change the topic to global warming? There
[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemps does not understand Climate Change.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: This is an Apollo 11 photo I don't recall ever having seen before. It was taken from the command module looking directly down as the landing module was descending toward the surface of the moon. The LM can be seen just to the upper right of the big crater. From Boston.com's photo blog, The Big Picture http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html , July 15, 2009. BTW, this was an exercise in reducing the size of a large photo. First I copied and pasted the full-size photo into the message; then I put a checkmark in View HTML Source so I could see the HTML the Rich Text Editor creates automatically, found the image tag, and changed the dimensions, reducing both height and width by half. What is also astounding about the photograph is the number of craters that virtually cover the landscape. Large or small. And this is not unusual. If the Earth was barren like the moon, we'd have as much of a pock-marked landscape as the moon. But we have soil and water and ice that covers our planet so therefore, in time, most craters get covered up or their rims erode and they blend in with the surroundings Er, is this the reason you don't accept climate change theory?ie. that you simply don't understand it? The Earth has very few craters due to the atmosphere burning up the majority of meteorites in the high atmosphere. The Moon has no atmosphere at all. That is why there are very few craters on Earth, because of the atmosphere, not because of soil and water and ice covering them up. This misundertanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it noramlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is history. OffWorld Wrongo, Beaver Breath. Good argumentative method you got there Shemp. You only degrade yourself with this. It comes back to you and lodges in the cells of your heart, poisoning it. That was actually a take off on Karnac, the Johnny Carson character, and how he used to respond to Ed McMahon but you wouldn't be familiar with the cultural reference, so I forgive you. This misunderstanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory,
[FairfieldLife] Re: Shemps does not understand Climate Change.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@ wrote: This is an Apollo 11 photo I don't recall ever having seen before. It was taken from the command module looking directly down as the landing module was descending toward the surface of the moon. The LM can be seen just to the upper right of the big crater. From Boston.com's photo blog, The Big Picture http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/07/remembering_apollo_11.html , July 15, 2009. BTW, this was an exercise in reducing the size of a large photo. First I copied and pasted the full-size photo into the message; then I put a checkmark in View HTML Source so I could see the HTML the Rich Text Editor creates automatically, found the image tag, and changed the dimensions, reducing both height and width by half. What is also astounding about the photograph is the number of craters that virtually cover the landscape. Large or small. And this is not unusual. If the Earth was barren like the moon, we'd have as much of a pock-marked landscape as the moon. But we have soil and water and ice that covers our planet so therefore, in time, most craters get covered up or their rims erode and they blend in with the surroundings Er, is this the reason you don't accept climate change theory?ie. that you simply don't understand it? The Earth has very few craters due to the atmosphere burning up the majority of meteorites in the high atmosphere. The Moon has no atmosphere at all. That is why there are very few craters on Earth, because of the atmosphere, not because of soil and water and ice covering them up. This misundertanding of yours also pertains to your understanding of climate-change theory, and how you have failed to understand the 'greenhouse effect '- such as on Venus - which is what our planet will look like if we do not stop 'greenhouse gases' entering our atmosphere at a huge rate. It is like a phase transition (like when water changes from water to steam), after a certain point, there is no return and the transition occurs - in the case of a planet - HEAT, unable to escape the atmosphere as it noramlly does. Theoretically, according to physics, the air temperature could become so hot quite quickly that you will die. All water could evaporate quickly, and all living organisms (except maybe some amoebas) will die. On Venus the surface temperature, due to these 'greenhouse gases', is about 860 degrees farhenheight which is much hotter than any part of Mercury which is much closer to the sun than Venus. Venus is an example of a planet (about the same size as ours) in which greenhouse gases became dominant - heat could not escape from the the atmosphere, and the temperature just kept getting hotter, quite quickly. The rest is history. OffWorld Wrongo, Beaver Breath. Good argumentative method you got there Shemp. You only degrade yourself with this. It comes back to you and lodges in the cells of your heart, poisoning it. That was actually a take off on Karnac, the Johnny Carson character, and how
