[FairfieldLife] Re: The Names of theTranscendent

2010-04-19 Thread curtisdeltablues
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@... wrote:

 Rick started on the batgap homepage this description referencing the 
 cross-cultural experience of the spiritual transcendent.
 
 Craig Pearson enumerates this too in some of his writing:
 
 This same field is described everywhere in the world's great philosophical 
 and religious traditions. Plato refers to it as the Good and the Beautiful. 
 Aristotle calls it Being. For Plotinus it is the Infinite, for St. Bernard of 
 Clairvaux the Word, for Ralph Waldo Emerson the Oversoul. It is referred to 
 in Christiantity as the kingdom of Heaven within, in Judaism as Ein Sof. The 
 direct experience of this transcendental field is referred to in India as 
 Yoga, in Buddhism as Nirvana, in Islam as fana, in Christianity as spiritual 
 marriage. It is a universal teaching based on a universal reality and a 
 universal experience.
 
  
 http://www.tm.org/blog/meditation/laozi-and-the-tao-te-ching-the-ancient-wisdom-of-china/
 
 Evidently is 'repeatable' in experience.  Seems scientific as it appears 
 universal across culture and time.

You mean like belief in witchcraft and the lower status of women from men?  
Both are super popular on this planet.  Or perhaps the now trans cultural 
popularity of Mcdonald's should grant it status as a universally healthy diet?

It is OK to just believe things because you want to.  Just keep the misleading 
term scientific out of it.  There is nothing scientific about collaging 
together a bunch of poorly defined terms as a poetic exercise.

If you really believed in the methods of science as a way to increase the 
reliability of knowledge you wouldn't be slap dashing the term where it doesn't 
belong.  Like in the humanities where all these vague terms in the world salad 
paragraph come from.  Using the terms of science to market ideas in the 
humanities is an obvious con.  No one is being fooled.  

Scientific knowledge isn't the only knowledge worthy of asserting.  But 
misapplying it isn't going to help your argument of the value of these ideas.  
And if you do misapply science and look down under your butt and don't see a 
deerskin on a silk couch, don't be surprised if someone points their finger and 
says bullshit.  You don't have the insulated environment Maharishi had to get 
away with this.



 
 
 Rick writing on batgap:


People everywhere are undergoing a shift to an Awakened state of 
consciousness which is transforming their understanding of themselves 
and the world. For some, this shift has been abrupt and dramatic. For 
others, it has been so gradual that they may not have realized it has 
occurred. Such shifts, or awakenings, are not new: Christ spoke of 
the Kingdom of Heaven within, Buddhists speak of Nirvana, Zen masters 
of Satori, Hindus of Moksha, but these traditions generally regard 
these states as rare and difficult to attain. 

Many people are therefore skeptical of claims of higher states of 
consciousness. They find it hard to believe that apparently ordinary 
friends and neighbors might be experiencing something extraordinary. 
Maybe they expect Enlightenment to look as remarkable on the outside as 
it is reputed to be on the inside.
   
   
   
   About,
   
   This show will attempt to dispel skepticism and misconceptions by week 
   after week, allowing otherwise ordinary people to relate their experience 
   of spiritual awakening. The terminology is tricky, because there are no 
   universally agreed upon definitions to describe this experience. Also, 
   enlightenment is not something that an individual person gets. It's not 
   even something that the mind can grasp. It's an awakening to that which 
   contains the mind and all other things. So it's not surprising that 
   language is inadequate to convey it. 
   
   http://batgap.com/
  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Names of theTranscendent

2010-04-19 Thread emptybill

Once he gets past Aristotle his statement of equivalence between
traditions is just new age amateurism. He plainly doesn't know much of
anything about the traditions he is comparing. In terms of the
philosophy of religion this is just a waste of time.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony2k5@ wrote:
 
  Rick started on the batgap homepage this description referencing the
cross-cultural experience of the spiritual transcendent.
 
  Craig Pearson enumerates this too in some of his writing:
 
  This same field is described everywhere in the world's great
philosophical and religious traditions. Plato refers to it as the Good
and the Beautiful. Aristotle calls it Being. For Plotinus it is the
Infinite, for St. Bernard of Clairvaux the Word, for Ralph Waldo Emerson
the Oversoul. It is referred to in Christiantity as the kingdom of
Heaven within, in Judaism as Ein Sof. The direct experience of this
transcendental field is referred to in India as Yoga, in Buddhism as
Nirvana, in Islam as fana, in Christianity as spiritual marriage. It is
a universal teaching based on a universal reality and a universal
experience.
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Names of theTranscendent

2010-04-19 Thread yifuxero
Ssssettt...wary sswweeet!  I've heard that the Eskimos have numerous 
names for Snow. The Christian references could easily have dualistic 
meanings, not necessarily the sole Gnostic interpretation.
But first one should (imo) lay the groundwork for such a discussion by stating 
the objective. Are there benefits to experiencing or realizing the Spiritual 
Transcendent?
...
If so, what are the benefits?
What are the effective techniques of realizing the goal?
How long does it take?
Why should people experience the Transcendent?...as opposed to (say), spending 
time getting involved with the Tea Party Movement?
Does the Transcendent make people Happy?
Does it make them self-actualized?
How about rich?  Improve one's health?...cure diseases?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@... wrote:

 Rick started on the batgap homepage this description referencing the 
 cross-cultural experience of the spiritual transcendent.
 
 Craig Pearson enumerates this too in some of his writing:
 
 This same field is described everywhere in the world's great philosophical 
 and religious traditions. Plato refers to it as the Good and the Beautiful. 
 Aristotle calls it Being. For Plotinus it is the Infinite, for St. Bernard of 
 Clairvaux the Word, for Ralph Waldo Emerson the Oversoul. It is referred to 
 in Christiantity as the kingdom of Heaven within, in Judaism as Ein Sof. The 
 direct experience of this transcendental field is referred to in India as 
 Yoga, in Buddhism as Nirvana, in Islam as fana, in Christianity as spiritual 
 marriage. It is a universal teaching based on a universal reality and a 
 universal experience.
 
  
 http://www.tm.org/blog/meditation/laozi-and-the-tao-te-ching-the-ancient-wisdom-of-china/
 
 Evidently is 'repeatable' in experience.  Seems scientific as it appears 
 universal across culture and time. 
 
 Rick writing on batgap:


People everywhere are undergoing a shift to an Awakened state of 
consciousness which is transforming their understanding of themselves 
and the world. For some, this shift has been abrupt and dramatic. For 
others, it has been so gradual that they may not have realized it has 
occurred. Such shifts, or awakenings, are not new: Christ spoke of 
the Kingdom of Heaven within, Buddhists speak of Nirvana, Zen masters 
of Satori, Hindus of Moksha, but these traditions generally regard 
these states as rare and difficult to attain. 

Many people are therefore skeptical of claims of higher states of 
consciousness. They find it hard to believe that apparently ordinary 
friends and neighbors might be experiencing something extraordinary. 
Maybe they expect Enlightenment to look as remarkable on the outside as 
it is reputed to be on the inside.
   
   
   
   About,
   
   This show will attempt to dispel skepticism and misconceptions by week 
   after week, allowing otherwise ordinary people to relate their experience 
   of spiritual awakening. The terminology is tricky, because there are no 
   universally agreed upon definitions to describe this experience. Also, 
   enlightenment is not something that an individual person gets. It's not 
   even something that the mind can grasp. It's an awakening to that which 
   contains the mind and all other things. So it's not surprising that 
   language is inadequate to convey it. 
   
   http://batgap.com/