RE: [FairfieldLife] Facebook | Yes on May 4: Committee for Fairfield Civic Center ballot issue

2010-02-18 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Sal Sunshine
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:32 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Facebook | Yes on May 4: Committe for Fairfeld
Civic Center ballot issue
 
  
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

 http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=344130496487
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=344130496487v=info v=info

Rick, that place has been so poorly managed
and run into the ground in such a short time that
for anyone to vote yes to use public funds would
require a leap of faith that nobody should be
asked to make. I hope city residents vote no
and let it be funded by private donations--such as
the concerts they've been having. That way
public funds won't be taken from public projects,
and the people who use the Center will be able
to continue to support it. Win/win. Anything else 
makes little sense IMO.

Have you or anyone else in favor of using
city $$ ever asked yourselves how things got so 
desperate in such a short period of time? How 
so much goodwill and high expectations were 
blown so quickly?
Don't know, and I've only been there a few times. Only once for an event I
had to pay for. I just don't want to see it go under. It's a valuable
community asset. 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Facebook | Yes on May 4: Committee for Fairfield Civic Center ballot issue

2010-02-18 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

 On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
 
  http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=344130496487v=info
 
 Rick, that place has been so poorly managed
 and run into the ground in such a short time that
 for anyone to vote yes to use public funds would
 require a leap of faith that nobody should be
 asked to make. I hope city residents vote no
 and let it be funded by private donations--such as
 the concerts they've been having. That way
 public funds won't be taken from public projects,
 and the people who use the Center will be able
 to continue to support it. Win/win. Anything else 
 makes little sense IMO.
 
 Have you or anyone else in favor of using
 city $$ ever asked yourselves how things got so 
 desperate in such a short period of time? How 
 so much goodwill and high expectations were 
 blown so quickly?
 
 Don't know, and I've only been there a few times. Only once for an event I 
 had to pay for. I just don't want to see it go under. It's a valuable 
 community asset.

I doubt very many want to see it go under.
But that doesn't mean using public funds
is the way to go.  I hope they can come up
with some other creative ways of raising cash, like
the concerts.  I thought the county was 
right-on in not even wanting a vote.

Sal