RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:31 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , authfriend jstein@... wrote: If you are going to lose any commission on this book by doing so please forgive me and feel free to ignore. Oh, give me a *break*, Ravi! You sound like Nabby at his absolute worst. Why do you even care about any of this anyway? Thanks :-) I do of course not believe a word she says because she has no credibility. And I haven't read the book, reading the accounts here on FFL is more than enough, thank you very much. I'm not planning to buy it either Rick, so no need for trying to be sarcastic again. I'll give you a free copy if you'll promise to read it, cover to cover.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of WillyTex Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:14 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] I'm not planning to buy it either Rick, so no need for trying to be sarcastic again. Rick Archer: I'll give you a free copy if you'll promise to read it, cover to cover. On what page does Judith say that she had sexual intercourse with the Maharishi? Maybe she just fantasized that a hug was an embrace. The point I'm trying to make is, why didn't she just come out and say I screwed the Maharishi on his antelope skin under a photo of the Guru Dev? We don't really know what happened between the two of them do we, based on what she wrote in the book? You don't, because you haven't read the book. You just babble on about it, making the same idiotic comments for months on end.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sparaig Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 7:02 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Yifu yifuxero@... wrote: The degree of evidence imo doesn't rise to the level of a criminal conviction; (unanimous agreement among jurors); but rather a preponderance of evidence as in civil cases. (or the ancient Roman system which had a mere majority for guilty). I'd say guilty, 95% but why bring this up again and again. It's about as water under the bridge as Weiner-gate. and no longer of much interest. imo. I haven't read the book, and don't intend to, but for preponderance of evidence to apply, you would need more than one witness to the events because the consisted of personal interactions of two parties. There's no stained shirt, for example. There were numerous witnesses, in the person of multiple women. Each had their own events. Only one has had the guts to write a book.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sparaig Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 7:00 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@... wrote: If you read what she said you could determine the credibility yourself. Actual video evidence is rare is nay sex case for obvious reasons, so it is up to the jury to determine the credibility of the witness. Since Judith's account was backed up by an even more credible witness,for me the case is closed. YMMV. Someone was in the room with them? Have you read the book Lawson? Those who haven't done so sound pretty foolish when trying to dismiss its credibility.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of sparaig Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:41 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] Have you read the book Lawson? Those who haven't done so sound pretty foolish when trying to dismiss its credibility. Unless someone was in the room or took pictures, there's no way of settling it for sure. You didn't answer the question. Have you read the book?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:36 PM, John wrote: IMO, the human physiology is the living system that reflects the effects of the planets in the solar system. It is through human consciousness that we can understand their influences in our individual lives, physically and psychologically. From the individual level, we can foresee the effects to the national and global levels. Put the bong away John.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Ravi Yogi wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@... wrote: Flannigan, if he indeed is 'awakened', provides a clear example that 'awakened' self-important assholes can still be self-important assholes. Et Tu do? You exceeded your 1 post limit, but I guess it's your pain resulting in the rflex. Are you back to some semblence of sanity, Mr Ravi? Thanks for asking Mr. do.rflex, No I haven't, I'm as insane as before but I learned a new technique since last time, it seems I can turn on/off my insanity and I can also adjust the insanity level according to the sanity levels of the person I'm dealing with But, unfortunately, he can still not transcend his own insanity... sigh
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:42 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] Having lost direction in life, some rejoice in posting on a forum for nitwits brought about by the King of Irony and the Disenchantment; Rick Archer Hey Nabby, I don't have time to read FFL much lately, much less post, but I'm glad I happened to notice this post, as it brings joy to my heart to know you're still thinking of me, and expressing your sentiments so poetically. Where's my crown?
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:02 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer rick@... wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:42 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] Having lost direction in life, some rejoice in posting on a forum for nitwits brought about by the King of Irony and the Disenchantment; Rick Archer Hey Nabby, I don't have time to read FFL much lately, much less post, but I'm glad I happened to notice this post, as it brings joy to my heart to know you're still thinking of me, and expressing your sentiments so poetically. Where's my crown? Hear, hear; the King of Inverted Irony speaks yet again ! Yes, I clambered out of my ironic pit of disenchantment, was dazzled by golden, enchanted rays of certainty, and now must return and resume wallowing.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008 Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 3:31 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq] Fine my friend. You're an idiot. It's clear that those once close to Maharishi, that found themselves shelved somewhere, not invited anywhere, those who felt as if struck by lightening, are the same men who later was found to be rude and unfriendly to His students. Sometimes it was found that they, in their eagerness to serve Maharishi, were rude to complete strangers also. I have thought of this fact lately. I went trhough some of Maharishi's points this morning. One was not to speak ill of anyone. He claimed that by doing so one would acquire the carma of that particular person. The last thing I would want is to have anything to do with the weird carma of Rick Archer. I therefore solemnly swear that I from now on will not denounce anyone, so help me God ! It seems you made that resolution between the time you began this post by calling me an idiot and the time you concluded it.
