Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one your bodily fluids?! On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:57 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: An effective Truth Serum for you and a few others here should handle it nicely, thank you. Share cracked: Richard, maybe Rita could find a nice supplement for what ails Ms. Stein (-:
Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
Not Rita, Silly Judy, Whole Foods! On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one your bodily fluids?! On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:57 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: An effective Truth Serum for you and a few others here should handle it nicely, thank you. Share cracked: Richard, maybe Rita could find a nice supplement for what ails Ms. Stein (-:
Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
Judy, it's called joking. Remember, IT'S ONLY A CHAT ROOM! On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 3:49 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: You believe Whole Foods has a supply of my bodily fluids!? Share struggles to get her foot out of her mouth, fails: Not Rita, Silly Judy, Whole Foods! On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 9:22 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You believe Rita has a supply of my bodily fluids!? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: This proposed Truth Serum, Judy, surely you would insist that it contain one your bodily fluids?! On Monday, December 2, 2013 2:57 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: An effective Truth Serum for you and a few others here should handle it nicely, thank you. Share cracked: Richard, maybe Rita could find a nice supplement for what ails Ms. Stein (-:
Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
Judy, we remember it differently. That's all there is to it imo. On Sunday, December 1, 2013 9:47 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Barry, of course, is actually encouraging a pissing contest by advising Share to refrain from acknowledging reality. (Although goodness knows, she doesn't need any help doing that.) And good grief, I've let lie far more than I've ever taken up on this forum, as Barry well knows. I'm not going to let this one lie, though. Share can either acknowledge her (Barry-inspired, gratuitous, thoroughly mean) untruthfulness now, or continue to be confronted with it over and over until she does. Note to Barry: This is about the misrepresentation of facts. Nothing to do with opinions per se, sorry. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote: Ah. Demonstrating once again that she can't let *anything* lie, and feels compelled to start it back up again and try to turn it into one of her endless tarbaby arguments, Judy challenges Share to a pissing contest. Might I remind Share before she falls for it how pissing contests tend to end? http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Hb2h_XAIKp8/TTEOb-lcvLI/B4A/FMEPJJcCFbI/s400/oneup.jpg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: OK, Share, let's see if you can both listen and reply to this post, which is about some unfinished business from yesterday that we need to deal with. In a post to Barry, you wrote: Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012. As I've already noted, this is not true. We had clashed well before September 9. But this is what I want to discuss with you today, since you didn't respond to what I told you yesterday. You wrote: She said that I did such and such in my post to RWC. She did not qualify with in my opinion or it sounds like or even I think. In fact, I said: After all the lovely conversations you'd had with him, covering a wide range of themes, that you had decided you were going to suspend communications altogether because of a single remark sure sounded like you had felt seriously insulted. AND: Because this post sure doesn't sound to me as though you want to do anything but beat up on Robin, even after he's taken the blame on himself for *your* misunderstanding and apologized at length. Then you wrote: Of course she didn't ask me if I was doing such and such. She just declared that I did such and such as if she could see inside my head and know, without error, what I had been thinking and feeling. In fact, I said: And now you seem to feel even more seriously insulted that he's left you a public apology. AND: I couldn't figure out either what your problem was with what he had said. AND: For the life of me, I can't see why you're being so snarky. Now, let's see if you can bring yourself to acknowledge that what you claimed yesterday about my September 9 post was not true. (Let's just look at what you said about it yesterday, and not try to avoid that issue by shifting attention to the merits of the arguments back then, OK?) For your convenience, here's the link to my September 9 post so you can check to make sure I haven't misquoted either you or myself: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/319521 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/319521 It was crammed with qualifiers and expressions of uncertainty, entirely contrary to your characterization of it yesterday. And it wasn't even a nasty post! I'm betting you can't do it, Share. I don't think you have the intestinal fortitude to confess to your untruthfulness, even with the evidence right in front of your eyes, even knowing it's in front of everyone else's eyes here as well. Goodness knows this wasn't the first or the only time you've misrepresented what someone else has said in an attempt to make them look bad and yourself appear to be a blameless victim. It's just such a clear-cut case, and you brought it on yourself. Your post yesterday was an entirely gratuitous slam, piling on to a long list of dishonest statements of Barry's about me. I ran my number on you? No, babe, you ran your number on me. As Ann pointed out to you: Share, take a moment and have a care. You are moving into some dangerous territory for yourself as an individual and as a human being. Be careful that you do not use the mistaken and erroneous notions of your faux friend Barry and your well-intentioned but not-really-helping-you associate Feste to launch into this head space of yours. I don't think it is a healthy one or somewhere that is characterized by what is real or what is true. Share wrote, oblivious to the irony: Nice, turq, and I'd add: we often listen with
RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 wrote: Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what you think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation: you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right you are and how wrong your dishonest opponents are. They are disreputable human beings and must be denounced by the entire community. You're kind of nuts, really. Has anyone ever pointed that out to you? Kind of nuts? The only people who have appeared on this forum who are even in the same ballpark of crazy as Judy Stein were Ravi and Robin Carlsen. I think she glommed onto them and co-opted them as minions so they'd stick around and divert attention from how insane she really is.
Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
What's unfortunate is that Emily used to wrote some interesting posts but once she got on Judy's bandwagon she's become imo sort of repetitive. On Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:22 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com anartax...@yahoo.com wrote: Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius Cicero)
Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too! On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Conversation between Share and Emily: Share: It's raining in Iowa. Emily: Share, is it raining in Fairfield? Share: Emily, I heard it on the news today that it's raining. Emily: Share, is it raining outside your door? Share: Emily, the Farmer's Almanac says that it will be raining this winter. Emily: Share, I'm asking you if it is raining in Fairfield and specifically outside your door. Barry: Share, Emily is one of Ravi's minions so disregard her, and btw, STFU, you are causing all this. Emily: Share, does it upset you that Barry just told you to STFU? Share: Emily, Barry is like a half-brother to me. Also, Jon Grayweather, who is an expert on what women want out of sex, says that having sex in the rain is good for pitta types. Emily: Share, are you a pitta type? Bhairitu: Share, have you tried juicing grass? It's very good for pitta types. Richard: Share, I went to Whole Foods today and bought spinach. Share: Richard, there is a Whole Foods in Iowa and I will be going next week. Emily: Share, is it raining in Iowa today? Share: Emily, you are honing in on my conversation with Richard in a mean and spiteful way. Emily: Share, *you* said it was raining in Iowa today, I just wanted to know if it was raining in Fairfield and specifically outside your door. Share: Emily, you are being repetitive and vicious and critical and negative and I am only responding in-kind. You are one of Judy's minions and I hate her so I hate you too. I will stand up for myself. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: What's unfortunate is that Emily used to wrote some interesting posts but once she got on Judy's bandwagon she's become imo sort of repetitive. On Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:22 AM, anartaxius@... anartaxius@... wrote: Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius Cicero)
Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I think about music. On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: What's unfortunate is that Emily used to wrote some interesting posts... Share: What posts of mine did you used to find interesting? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too! On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Conversation between Share and Emily: Share: It's raining in Iowa. Emily: Share, is it raining in Fairfield? Share: Emily, I heard it on the news today that it's raining. Emily: Share, is it raining outside your door? Share: Emily, the Farmer's Almanac says that it will be raining this winter. Emily: Share, I'm asking you if it is raining in Fairfield and specifically outside your door. Barry: Share, Emily is one of Ravi's minions so disregard her, and btw, STFU, you are causing all this. Emily: Share, does it upset you that Barry just told you to STFU? Share: Emily, Barry is like a half-brother to me. Also, Jon Grayweather, who is an expert on what women want out of sex, says that having sex in the rain is good for pitta types. Emily: Share, are you a pitta type? Bhairitu: Share, have you tried juicing grass? It's very good for pitta types. Richard: Share, I went to Whole Foods today and bought spinach. Share: Richard, there is a Whole Foods in Iowa and I will be going next week. Emily: Share, is it raining in Iowa today? Share: Emily, you are honing in on my conversation with Richard in a mean and spiteful way. Emily: Share, *you* said it was raining in Iowa today, I just wanted to know if it was raining in Fairfield and specifically outside your door. Share: Emily, you are being repetitive and vicious and critical and negative and I am only responding in-kind. You are one of Judy's minions and I hate her so I hate you too. I will stand up for myself. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: What's unfortunate is that Emily used to wrote some interesting posts but once she got on Judy's bandwagon she's become imo sort of repetitive. On Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:22 AM, anartaxius@... anartaxius@... wrote: Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius Cicero)
Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Why FFL isn't more interesting, in one graphic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time now though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie Robertson. Here is a second question for you: How to you remember the posts that Judy wrote differently than she wrote them? No, this is not a setup. I am genuinely curious and will take what you say at face value. Share, don't be a dunce and fall for this shit. Feste already warned you what Emily's game is, and she's trying to run it on you. It's to ask seemingly non-hostile questions of you to suck you into interacting with her, at which point she'll switch over to dumping on you again. You've been starting to fall for Judy doing the same thing, by replying to her posts, too. STOP be a codependent in all of this. YOU can stop it all by just cutting them out of your life.
