Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Renouncing enlightenment

2013-02-13 Thread Share Long
You're welcome Doc.  And I really liked what you said about not throwing out 
the baby with the bath water.  No matter how dirty that bath water is, keep the 
baby (-:





 From: doctordumb...@rocketmail.com doctordumb...@rocketmail.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 8:18 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Renouncing enlightenment
 

  
Thanks for this - I agree completely with it. On FFL there is very little blind 
obedience to ANYTHING. All of us have been around the block, so what may look 
to you like inordinate defense of a guru, may in fact be an attempt to get the 
critics to open their eyes, and examine their legion of blindspots, as they 
would like others to do. It is not ever a case of kill the messenger, and only 
an egomaniac would think so. Thanks again.:-) 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Hey navashok I really appreciate what you say here especially the part about 
 how mixed our qualities can be.  It reminds me of something I see sometimes 
 in older people.  I think of it as the second innocence.  When they've gone 
 through a lot and been humbled by life.  And come out on the other side.  
 Very at peace with it all, even their own flaws which they often have a 
 friendly but firm attitude towards.
 
 
 What I notice in myself is that I can shift from a pride energy to a humble 
 energy or vice versa in a nanosecond.  It can happen so fast.  I think 
 doing the TMSP has made it easier for me to catch these shifts when they 
 happen.  And life is always there to show me what refinement still needs to 
 happen.
 
 
 
  From: navashok 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 4:34 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Renouncing enlightenment
 
 
   
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
  
   Looks like there's already a flag on the play - Navashok calls
  roughing the passer, but it looks like the officials will overturn it...
 The confession is only recent. To me it seems that the guy has
  strong
enlightenment experiences, and actually uncovers deeper layers of
conditioning. It has nothing to do with forcefully de-enlightening
oneself.
  
  To me this guy seems to be very honest and straightforward, so
his 'confession' is rather a plus than a minus..
  
  There was a five yard penalty for excessive display of ego, but because
  the player has acknowledged this, the penalty shall be cancelled.  Still
  first down. A time out will not be assessed.
 
 LOL, funny Steve. I don't quite see myself in the role of a judge or a 
 referee, I have my opinions, true, but then they are just that, opinions. I 
 do not condemn anybody, certainly not Cesar, whom I hardly know, I would 
 direct everybody to his FB page because I cannot really speak for him. I also 
 don't judge DrD either. 
 
 What I believe in is that, after (initial) awakening, there is still a 
 display of ego in many, and that the ongoing work, is all about the 
 PURIFICATION OF INSTRUMENTS (Aurobindo's term). Instruments here relates to 
 all our mental faculties, like mind, intellect, emotion (the subtle bodies) 
 and of course ego. I think there are layers of ego or the sophistication of 
 ego, which I think will get uncovered with time. But to do so, I believe it 
 needs a certain culture, an awareness of it, or maybe as in the case of 
 Cesar, simply a strong degree of sincerity. 
 
 That's my point, not judging or condemning people. I also believe that in our 
 human field, usually things are mixed up. So, devotion gets mixed with 
 ego/pride, and, as I understand devotion to be a good thing, I think that if 
 it comes at the cost of demeaning other teachers / saints / religions in 
 order to heighten one's own spiritual ideal, then the ego has 
 instrumentalized devotion for it's own purpose.



 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Renouncing enlightenment

2013-02-07 Thread Share Long
Hey navashok I really appreciate what you say here especially the part about 
how mixed our qualities can be.  It reminds me of something I see sometimes in 
older people.  I think of it as the second innocence.  When they've gone 
through a lot and been humbled by life.  And come out on the other side.  Very 
at peace with it all, even their own flaws which they often have a friendly but 
firm attitude towards.


What I notice in myself is that I can shift from a pride energy to a humble 
energy or vice versa in a nanosecond.  It can happen so fast.  I think doing 
the TMSP has made it easier for me to catch these shifts when they happen.  And 
life is always there to show me what refinement still needs to happen.



 From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 4:34 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Renouncing enlightenment
 

  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27  wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
 
  Looks like there's already a flag on the play - Navashok calls
 roughing the passer, but it looks like the officials will overturn it...
The confession is only recent. To me it seems that the guy has
 strong
   enlightenment experiences, and actually uncovers deeper layers of
   conditioning. It has nothing to do with forcefully de-enlightening
   oneself.
 
 To me this guy seems to be very honest and straightforward, so
   his 'confession' is rather a plus than a minus..
 
 There was a five yard penalty for excessive display of ego, but because
 the player has acknowledged this, the penalty shall be cancelled.  Still
 first down. A time out will not be assessed.

LOL, funny Steve. I don't quite see myself in the role of a judge or a referee, 
I have my opinions, true, but then they are just that, opinions. I do not 
condemn anybody, certainly not Cesar, whom I hardly know, I would direct 
everybody to his FB page because I cannot really speak for him. I also don't 
judge DrD either. 

What I believe in is that, after (initial) awakening, there is still a display 
of ego in many, and that the ongoing work, is all about the PURIFICATION OF 
INSTRUMENTS (Aurobindo's term). Instruments here relates to all our mental 
faculties, like mind, intellect, emotion (the subtle bodies) and of course ego. 
I think there are layers of ego or the sophistication of ego, which I think 
will get uncovered with time. But to do so, I believe it needs a certain 
culture, an awareness of it, or maybe as in the case of Cesar, simply a strong 
degree of sincerity. 

That's my point, not judging or condemning people. I also believe that in our 
human field, usually things are mixed up. So, devotion gets mixed with 
ego/pride, and, as I understand devotion to be a good thing, I think that if it 
comes at the cost of demeaning other teachers / saints / religions in order to 
heighten one's own spiritual ideal, then the ego has instrumentalized devotion 
for it's own purpose. 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Renouncing enlightenment

2013-02-06 Thread Bhairitu
Nope, just passing on what a lot of gurus say.

On 02/06/2013 11:46 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
 One should never claim enlightenment but it is perfectly
 okay to say one is experiencing some enlightenment.

 Huh?! Who the fuck made you King? You are proclaiming what a person can, and 
 cannot say, about enlightenment?? You are a reasonable person and movie buff, 
 but, We don't nd no steen-keeng Badges! :-)

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu  wrote:
 On 02/06/2013 06:26 AM, navashok wrote:
 Recently a friend alerted me that an Advaita teacher he knows, Cesar 
 Teruel, 'renounced' his enlightenment, making a 'Confession' at his 
 facebook page https://www.facebook.com/teruelcesar He is on Batgap too 
 http://batgap.com/cesar-teruel/

 The confession is only recent. To me it seems that the guy has strong 
 enlightenment experiences, and actually uncovers deeper layers of 
 conditioning. It has nothing to do with forcefully de-enlightening oneself. 
 To me this guy seems to be very honest and straightforward, so his 
 'confession' is rather a plus than a minus..


 Often people who renounce their enlightenment weren't enlightened to
 begin with.  One should never claim enlightenment but it is perfectly
 okay to say one is experiencing some enlightenment.  It is an ongrowing
 experience.  And of course obsessing over enlightenment is an impediment
 to developing it.