Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The real test of the Anti-Science freaks on FFL

2007-12-13 Thread Angela Mailander
Yeah, I know you're right before starting.  While I do react, I'm also 
independent of the reaction.  Even so, I am pretty amazed at the lack of decent 
manners among people who claim an interest in the development of consciousness. 
 And by manners I don't mean the prissy bullshit you'd find in a ladies' 
afternoon tea party in the fifties either.  

curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   --- 
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Off, you amaze me!  What makes you think I'm anti-science? 
 
 Angela, If I were you I wouldn't take Off's comments as having
 anything to do with you.  I think he is a smart. somtimes entertaining
 guy, but he is posting pretty much feedback-free.  So don't think that
 you are having a dialog with a person who gives a shit or is really
 reading what you are writing.  This is not to diminish  how insightful
 or entertaining he can be, but to preserve your more sensitive nature.
  I think you are one of the posters who is really reacting to what is
 being written.  I'm pretty sure at this point that this is not a
 universal standard here. I'm also pretty sure I am preaching to the
 choir on this point, right? 
  
  
  off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@
 wrote:
   

On Dec 12, 2007, at 1:13 AM, off_world_beings wrote:

 A million studies would not convince then about TM, yet it only 
   takes
 about 40-50 to change my mind on TM. This is the absolute truth 
   for
 me and totally proves their anti-science religious agenda to 
   ignore
 science for their own pathetic opinions.


What would it take for legitimate scientists to take TM/TMSP 
   seriously?
   
   They are already. 
   Five major universities conducting studies on TM as we speak, and $20 
   million (and rising) from NIH given to MUM for research based on 
   robust studies. This fact alone makes you cringe so crooked Vaj it is 
   hard to watch. You have nothing remotely of comparable strength to 
   back up your weak anti-science stance.
   
   The poor anti-science folks like Turq, Steven, boo-lives, newmorning, 
   Angela, Sal, Peter etc. ... are grasping at straws as they sink below 
   the waves of the progress of science.
   
   OffWorld
   
   
   
 
  
   Send instant messages to your online friends
 http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
   

 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The real test of the Anti-Science freaks on FFL

2007-12-12 Thread Angela Mailander
Off, you amaze me!  What makes you think I'm anti-science?  

off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   --- 
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  On Dec 12, 2007, at 1:13 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
  
   A million studies would not convince then about TM, yet it only 
 takes
   about 40-50 to change my mind on TM. This is the absolute truth 
 for
   me and totally proves their anti-science religious agenda to 
 ignore
   science for their own pathetic opinions.
  
  
  What would it take for legitimate scientists to take TM/TMSP 
 seriously?
 
 They are already. 
 Five major universities conducting studies on TM as we speak, and $20 
 million (and rising) from NIH given to MUM for research based on 
 robust studies. This fact alone makes you cringe so crooked Vaj it is 
 hard to watch. You have nothing remotely of comparable strength to 
 back up your weak anti-science stance.
 
 The poor anti-science folks like Turq, Steven, boo-lives, newmorning, 
 Angela, Sal, Peter etc. ... are grasping at straws as they sink below 
 the waves of the progress of science.
 
 OffWorld
 
 
 
   

 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com