Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Here's what I don't understand. Why do they need fourteen geniuses at the Apple Store to explain how to work Apple products? Why can't the geniuses just make a product that's easy and simple to operate, FROM THE START? On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: On 3/30/2014 2:02 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: You are right! So, we are agreed - at the Apple Store is a Genius Bar and most Apple Stores are in malls like the Mall of the Americas. We went there.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : Here's what I don't understand. Why do they need fourteen geniuses at the Apple Store to explain how to work Apple products? Because for every genius there are 30 idiots. Why can't the geniuses just make a product that's easy and simple to operate, FROM THE START? On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: On 3/30/2014 2:02 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: You are right! So, we are agreed - at the Apple Store is a Genius Bar and most Apple Stores are in malls like the Mall of the Americas. We went there.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
I think that's called Apple's Law, or is it call Job's Law. I can't remember. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : Here's what I don't understand. Why do they need fourteen geniuses at the Apple Store to explain how to work Apple products? Because for every genius there are 30 idiots. Why can't the geniuses just make a product that's easy and simple to operate, FROM THE START? On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: On 3/30/2014 2:02 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: You are right! So, we are agreed - at the Apple Store is a Genius Bar and most Apple Stores are in malls like the Mall of the Americas. We went there.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
On 3/29/2014 2:37 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: No Richard, you said today we went to this place and you posted a picture. You are incorrect: I posted today we went to this place along with a photo I took of the Genius Bar at the local Apple Store in the Mall of the Americas.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
You are right! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 3/29/2014 2:37 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: No Richard, you said today we went to this place and you posted a picture. You are incorrect: I posted today we went to this place along with a photo I took of the Genius Bar at the local Apple Store in the Mall of the Americas.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
On 3/30/2014 2:02 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: You are right! So, we are agreed - at the Apple Store is a Genius Bar and most Apple Stores are in malls like the Mall of the Americas. We went there.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way. Are you *sure* you know enough to use those terms, even as you apply them to you? Very black and white thinking, imho. I am surprised that you didn't know that Apple stores even existed! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Well Emily, Ann was making assumptions about me and I was giving her feedback about her assumptions about me... On Friday, March 28, 2014 12:40 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: I understand what you are saying Share, but you still interpreted her figuring as right and wrong. Are you experiencing cognitive
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn? From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way. Are you *sure* you know enough to use those terms, even as you apply them to you? Very black and white thinking, imho. I am surprised that you didn't know that Apple stores even existed! ---In FairfieldLife
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do. Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way. Are you *sure* you know enough to use those terms, even as you apply them to you? Very black and white thinking, imho. I am surprised that you didn't know that Apple stores even existed! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Well Emily, Ann was making
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
It would be nice Turkey, if you would stop with the punk ass name calling. It is so uncreative; it is so rude. It is so unneccesary and reflects on you so badly. IMHO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way. Are you
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Barry also thinks it's FUN to lie and mislead, etc., etc. He knows I'm neither psychotic nor a cultist; he also knows he is vastly more bitchy than I am. If his family really thinks I'm a psychotic cult bitch, it's because they're so stupid they believe what he tells them. I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
It is also accurate, and the most concise way to express it. I live with a family of writers. From: emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today It would be nice Turkey, if you would stop with the punk ass name calling. It is so uncreative; it is so rude. It is so unneccesary and reflects on you so badly. IMHO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
As Barry knows, it's nowhere near accurate. It is also accurate, and the most concise way to express it. I live with a family of writers. From: emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today It would be nice Turkey, if you would stop with the punk ass name calling. It is so uncreative; it is so rude. It is so unneccesary and reflects on you so badly. IMHO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
authfriend wrote: What we all need to understand... All that we need to understand is who or who has not visited an Apple Store and is familiar with Apple apps. According to my sources, the entire graphic arts department at MUM uses Apple Macintosh computers running Adobe software. *Inside the MUM Graphic Arts Department:* [image: Inline image 1] On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:28 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious.* Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way. Are you *sure* you know enough to use those terms, even as you apply them to you? Very black and white thinking, imho. I am surprised that you didn't know that Apple stores even existed! ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Well Emily, Ann was making assumptions about me and I was giving her feedback about her
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? And I would think that in a yahoo group there are just a few ways to deal with another poster. In fact, given your negative opinion of me, I'm surprised that you continue to engage with me at all, often even butting into my exchanges with others to do so! And I have no idea what's brought on this latest spate from you. Except that you called me dishonest yesterday about the consistency quote and I explained that it was an honest mistake. And you did not reply to that. So I guess you're feeling embarrassed and guilty and this is why you're so upset today... On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:55 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do. Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? I shall defer to Mark Twain: Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Share, I've told you before, your mind-reading abilities are not up to snuff. (And you're a hypocrite to boot, because you chide others for mind-reading as if you never did it yourself.) We in this case refers to FFLers who get into discussions with you that involve some element of controversy. But I don't believe you really needed me to tell you that. In fact, your response here exemplifies many of the points I just made about your general dishonesty. Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? And I would think that in a yahoo group there are just a few ways to deal with another poster. In fact, given your negative opinion of me, I'm surprised that you continue to engage with me at all, often even butting into my exchanges with others to do so! And I have no idea what's brought on this latest spate from you. Except that you called me dishonest yesterday about the consistency quote and I explained that it was an honest mistake. And you did not reply to that. So I guess you're feeling embarrassed and guilty and this is why you're so upset today... On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:55 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do. Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Turkey, Judy is not psychotic. Judy is not in a cult. Judy is not a psychotic cult bitch (I don't even know what that means, to be honest - sounds like something that would have been more appropriately assigned to Rama). The fact that you live with a family of writers is irrelevant to your use of this lame term. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : It is also accurate, and the most concise way to express it. I live with a family of writers. From: emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today It would be nice Turkey, if you would stop with the punk ass name calling. It is so uncreative; it is so rude. It is so unneccesary and reflects on you so badly. IMHO. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote : I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn? From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 4:33 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Share, Judy is stating her understanding of how and why you behave like you do to the larger FFL group. This is her right on this forum and I find it insightful, personally, given my last attempt at an exchange with you. You are not able to control who chooses to post on any particular thread; that is the nature of a public forum. This has been made clear to you many, many, times. Ask yourself why you refuse to understand this. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and wrong, thus invalidating or rendering inconsistent your statement that you don't think like that. My answer to your answer is I don't know. Smile. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : So Emily, when Ann wrote about me you do not use Apple computers what do you think would have been an appropriate answer?! On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:28 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ok, if you say so. (RIGHT) I figure you are not very savvy technically (RIGHT) and that you do not use Apple computers.(RIGHT) I figure you did not know Apple Stores existed (RIGHT) nor did you realize how cool they are, all simplistic design, glass and that they call their computer experts geniuses. (RIGHT) I figure you figure that getting out of FF twice a year amounts to some sort of cultural pinnacle (WRONG) and I figure you took exception to me making fun of the fact you don't know about Apple Stores.(WRONG) Is that enough figuring for one day do you think? (DON'T KNOW) Well Share, you indicated 5 rights, 2 wrongs, and 1 don't know. it appears that you *do* look at at least some things in a right and wrong kind of a way. Are you *sure* you know enough to use those terms, even as you
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Ok, thanks turq and Mr. Twain. Judy does claim to be an editor so I guess that explains her continual use of we when posting on FFL. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:43 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? I shall defer to Mark Twain: Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Duh, Judy! It's not mind reading when your words are right here to see and read. Nor is it mind reading when I ask you what use of we means?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:44 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Share, I've told you before, your mind-reading abilities are not up to snuff. (And you're a hypocrite to boot, because you chide others for mind-reading as if you never did it yourself.) We in this case refers to FFLers who get into discussions with you that involve some element of controversy. But I don't believe you really needed me to tell you that. In fact, your response here exemplifies many of the points I just made about your general dishonesty. Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? And I would think that in a yahoo group there are just a few ways to deal with another poster. In fact, given your negative opinion of me, I'm surprised that you continue to engage with me at all, often even butting into my exchanges with others to do so! And I have no idea what's brought on this latest spate from you. Except that you called me dishonest yesterday about the consistency quote and I explained that it was an honest mistake. And you did not reply to that. So I guess you're feeling embarrassed and guilty and this is why you're so upset today... On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:55 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do. Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe? Maybe you use them indirectly as both Ann and I have Apple products that we use to post here and you are using my post to reply to. I'm not judging the appropriateness of your choice of right and wrong, I'm just reminding you that, based on what you wrote, you *do* reduce things to right and
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
No, it doesn't, and furthermore, you know it doesn't. More dishonesty. Keep at it, Share. The more you say, the more you prove what I said about you. Ok, thanks turq and Mr. Twain. Judy does claim to be an editor so I guess that explains her continual use of we when posting on FFL. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:43 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... wrote: From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? I shall defer to Mark Twain: Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Share, her continual use of 'we' is not a true representation. Prove it. The key word you need to worry about here is continual. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Ok, thanks turq and Mr. Twain. Judy does claim to be an editor so I guess that explains her continual use of we when posting on FFL. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:43 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... wrote: From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? I shall defer to Mark Twain: Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Ok, Judy, then I hope you get rid of your tapeworms sooner rather than later. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:29 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: No, it doesn't, and furthermore, you know it doesn't. More dishonesty. Keep at it, Share. The more you say, the more you prove what I said about you. Ok, thanks turq and Mr. Twain. Judy does claim to be an editor so I guess that explains her continual use of we when posting on FFL. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:43 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... wrote: From:Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? I shall defer to Mark Twain: Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Oh, and here we have an outright lie from Share. She's apparently so freaked that she can't even read what she herself wrote, so she just denies reflexively that she said what she did. Keep at it, Share. Keep adding to your dodgy dossier for everyone to see. Duh, Judy! It's not mind reading when your words are right here to see and read. Nor is it mind reading when I ask you what use of we means?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: Share, I've told you before, your mind-reading abilities are not up to snuff. (And you're a hypocrite to boot, because you chide others for mind-reading as if you never did it yourself.) We in this case refers to FFLers who get into discussions with you that involve some element of controversy. But I don't believe you really needed me to tell you that. In fact, your response here exemplifies many of the points I just made about your general dishonesty. Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? And I would think that in a yahoo group there are just a few ways to deal with another poster. In fact, given your negative opinion of me, I'm surprised that you continue to engage with me at all, often even butting into my exchanges with others to do so! And I have no idea what's brought on this latest spate from you. Except that you called me dishonest yesterday about the consistency quote and I explained that it was an honest mistake. And you did not reply to that. So I guess you're feeling embarrassed and guilty and this is why you're so upset today... On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:55 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do. Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do, what then?! On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so it actually makes her look DUMB because what she's doing is so obvious. Ann, I said it was an interesting idea. That's not dismissing. I said I didn't agree. That's not dismissing either. More importantly, since it wasn't what you meant, that idea wasn't my focus. BTW, I also don't agree that it's a straightforward idea as you say. Emily, it's interesting that you say I'm using Apple because I'm communicating with people who are using Apple. Interesting but I don't agree. Also, I enjoy learning new stuff like that there are Apple stores and genius bars. As for uncomfortable feelings...tap, tap, tap... Hmm, interesting interpretation by Emily and one I had not thought of as a possibility when I conjectured that Sharon did not use an Apple computer. See, this is what I like about different people contributing to a thought or a conversation - they can bring to it all sorts of new dimensions and ideas. Now, what is also fascinating is to see Sharon dismiss, out of hand, the idea that she is using an Apple by reading and responding to posts made by Apple computers. On one level, of course she is using or, alternatively, utilizing the technology of an Apple because if it weren't for that type of computer Ann's or Emily's posts would not be able to be perceived here. It seems as if you, Share, have perhaps not considered this idea carefully enough. Or maybe you just feel like defying Emily for her rather straightforward and, might I add, challenging theory. Isn't this fun and enlightening? On Friday, March 28, 2014 6:22 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: Ha ha ha. Blah, blah, blah. What Share, *what* is an interesting perspective? The fact that you do reduce things to right and wrong? Try this on for interesting. Maybe you really *did* take the tiniest, barely noticeable, exception to the fact that Ann and I were teasing you about not knowing that Apple has stores and genius bars, but you didn't want to admit it (that would require admitting to a possibly uncomfortable feeling), so, instead, you denied it and told her she was wrong. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, that's a very interesting perspective. On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote: That's not the point Share. How do you know that you do not use Apple computers is a *true* statement? Depends on how you define the word use maybe?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
As you know, Share, nothing Barry said applies. Keep it coming. More dishonesty, please. (But I don't really need to ask, do I?) Ok, Judy, then I hope you get rid of your tapeworms sooner rather than later. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:29 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: No, it doesn't, and furthermore, you know it doesn't. More dishonesty. Keep at it, Share. The more you say, the more you prove what I said about you. Ok, thanks turq and Mr. Twain. Judy does claim to be an editor so I guess that explains her continual use of we when posting on FFL. On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:43 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... wrote: From: Share Long sharelong60@... To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today Judy, now you're sounding down right looney to me! For example, who is this we you're pretending speak for? Maybe it's the royal we. MPD we? I shall defer to Mark Twain: Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial 'we.'
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
On 3/29/2014 10:55 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do.* It is kind of fun to realize that Judy has probably never used an Apple app, and to watch her mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and nit-picky with Share about it, when Share acts like a normal person and asks what kind of place is a Genius Bar at an Apple Store in the mall. Who wouldn't think that's fun?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
On 3/29/2014 11:00 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Barry also thinks it's FUN to lie and mislead, etc., etc. He knows I'm neither psychotic nor a cultist; he also knows he is /vastly/ more bitchy than I am. If his family really thinks I'm a psychotic cult bitch, it's because they're so stupid they believe what he tells them. Probably nobody is dumb enough to show their friends or family all the messages they've posted to the internet, all pretty much saying the same thing since 1996; especially if your family is made up of writers. It would be kind of embarrassing if they actually found out that Barry has posted over 50,000 messages to a discussion board dedicated to yogic flying. Go figure. They'd probably just shake their heads and conclude that this guy is real a nut case. LoL! I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Richard, that is not what Share asked. And nobody said it wasn't fun. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 3/29/2014 10:55 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and lie outright the way you do. It is kind of fun to realize that Judy has probably never used an Apple app, and to watch her mislead and obfuscate and be disingenuous and nit-picky with Share about it, when Share acts like a normal person and asks what kind of place is a Genius Bar at an Apple Store in the mall. Who wouldn't think that's fun?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
On 3/29/2014 11:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *As Barry knows, it's nowhere near accurate.* It would be accurate to say that Barry owns an iPhone. So, I wonder if he's visited the Apple Store in Amsterdam - it's supposed to be the largest one on the planet- I would like to see it. I've always been fond of Apple products, especially after I heard that Steve Jobs learned TM at Reed College in Oregon.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Re: a discussion board dedicated to yogic flying. Richard, maybe you ought to explore the value of sitting still with no thoughts and determine if there is a purpose for yourself. You are sounding confused as to the purpose of this discussion board. And at close to, or over, 200 posts a week, to this forum alone you clearly have more thoughts than you can deal with. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 3/29/2014 11:00 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Barry also thinks it's FUN to lie and mislead, etc., etc. He knows I'm neither psychotic nor a cultist; he also knows he is vastly more bitchy than I am. If his family really thinks I'm a psychotic cult bitch, it's because they're so stupid they believe what he tells them. Probably nobody is dumb enough to show their friends or family all the messages they've posted to the internet, all pretty much saying the same thing since 1996; especially if your family is made up of writers. It would be kind of embarrassing if they actually found out that Barry has posted over 50,000 messages to a discussion board dedicated to yogic flying. Go figure. They'd probably just shake their heads and conclude that this guy is real a nut case. LoL! I think my family kinda nailed it. Once you understand that she's a psychotic cult bitch, what more is there to learn?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
Pundit Sir wrote: Today we went to this place: Share wrote: What kind of place is it, Richard? On 3/29/2014 2:10 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: Richard, that is not what Share asked. There must be some confusion - I said we went to an Apple Store in the mall to get a new battery for Rita's iPod. https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/378314
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
No Richard, you said today we went to this place and you posted a picture. That was the first post and the one that Share replied to with what kind of a place is it, Richard? She later acknowledged she thought it was a museum. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : Pundit Sir wrote: Today we went to this place: Share wrote: What kind of place is it, Richard? On 3/29/2014 2:10 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote: Richard, that is not what Share asked. There must be some confusion - I said we went to an Apple Store in the mall to get a new battery for Rita's iPod. https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/378314 https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/378314
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: What We Did Today
On 3/29/2014 2:37 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote: you said today we went to this place and you posted a picture. That was the first post and the one that Share replied to with what kind of a place is it, Richard? She later acknowledged she thought it was a museum. When I first saw the Apple Store in the mall I said What on earth are they doing in there with all those Apple toys? I still can't figure the whole thing out - are they instant messaging each other or what? Yes, I have a laptop computer and I know how to use it - it has a keyboard. But, the keyboard keys are like chiclet keys - you can't speed type on it - I can type 100 words per minute with 100 errors. The keyboards on these things are crap! So, I can't imagine what these kids are doing with those dumb on-screen keyboards. Real nerds use a Key Tronic mechanical keyboard. Most keyboards use a standard 55 grams of force required to register every key, Ergo Technology has 5 different levels of force. From 35 grams to 80 grams - that correspond to the strength of the finger that touches the keys. Go figure.
