Re: [Faudiostream-users] Pipewire and Faust

2024-07-10 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

https://docs.pipewire.org/page_man_pw-jack_1.html

Marc

Le 2024-07-10 à 10 h 06, Stéphane Letz a écrit :

pipewire is supposed to emulate the JACK API right ? So it should be quite 
transparent AFAICS.

Stéphane


Le 10 juil. 2024 à 15:28, LANGRENNE Christophe 
 a écrit :

Hi,

I used to compile my dsp with faust2jaqt under ubuntu studio. The new 
distribution uses the pipewire audio kernel, jack is no longer installed. What 
do you recommend?
Go back to jack and faut2jaqt or stay with pipewire, but with which faust2... 
to compile the dsp?

Thank you.

Christophe Langrenne
Ingénieur de Recherche
Laboratoire de Mécanique des Structures et des Systèmes Couplés (LMSSC)
Tél : 01 40 27 20 90

CNAM / LMSSC / EPN 04 Bureau 31.01.05, 2 rue Conté, 75003 Paris
___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users



___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users



___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] [OT] Discord blues

2023-03-18 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Hi Oliver,

Le 2023-03-18 à 11 h 18, Oliver Larkin via Faudiostream-users a écrit :

their owners may be harvesting all our data for AI to replace us -


I was not referring to that sort of existential risk, but the fact that 
the Faust team must interact with the most enthusiastic users (which is 
good thing) that happen to enjoy Discord (for the best). I don't (want 
to) care about AI, and AI should not care; to me it's a case of "less is 
more".


but both github and discord are absolutely fantastic in my opinion. 
Thank goodness we've moved on from sourceforge and IRC which were so 
incredibly un-welcoming. I don't agree with the skepticism here


I'm a bit skeptic about a fantastic solution that automagically kicks 
users out, and I hope that using emails and the Github forum won't 
trigger similar events (without some sensible human in charge). Case 
closed.


Marc



___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] [OT] Discord blues

2023-03-18 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Le 2023-03-17 à 23 h 24, Jaxter a écrit :


I'm trying to avoid GAFAM (and the likes)

Just a heads-up, GitHub is owned by Microsoft.


I wrote "I'm trying", not "I succeeded"... Because Faust code is hosted 
on Github, the discussion section is handy.



Discourse is the big one that I've heard of. I believe the
ElectroSmith Daisy forum uses it.


ElectroSmith is using Discourse for the forum, and Discord is used for 
chatting (even if Discourse provide chat rooms).


Discourse is "self-hostable" (on a cloud server) using Docker, or else 
it's a bit complex.



As far as synchronous chat applications go, Matrix is free,
self-hostable, encourages using alternative clients, and has good IRC
integration. Nannou and Zrythm both use it as their main chat
platform.


Nannou also use Github and Slack.

Zrythm also use SourceHut (instead of Github), Mastodon, and Libera.chat 
(for IRC). Good choices (imao).


Matrix looks great. Self-hosting is work, even if there's many options 
using Python, Go, Rust...


My inner Captain Obvious says: investing in communication 
infrastructures depends on possible advantages (or existential risks).


Marc



___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] [OT] Discord blues

2023-03-17 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Le 2023-03-16 à 17 h 32, Stéphane Letz a écrit :


And what about using GitHub 
discussions:https://github.com/grame-cncm/faust/discussions, good enough or not 
?


I did not know about the discussion section on github; it does look good 
enough.


So there's email lists, a discussion forum and a chat platform, to 
support a range of interactions, from calm to disruptive.


Thanks Stéphane.

Marc



___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] [OT] Discord blues

2023-03-16 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Le 2023-03-15 à 21 h 38, Julius Smith a écrit :

I was avoiding Discord as well because they messed up my account in a 
way that could not be fixed without creating a new email address 
(which is something _I_ refuse to do).  I finally got around it by 
coming in on the Mac app instead of a browser.  Apparently their 
browser support is pretty broken.
The (multi-platform) app is a web browser because it's based on 
Electron, but no filtering extensions can be installed, so I suspect 
it's worse than using a browser.


Discord is asking for a phone number, either mine or some other... From 
a company who have an extremely low score for privacy, this requirement 
is alarming: https://xgqt.gitlab.io/spywarewatchdog/articles/discord.html


The fact that there's warnings about Discord (even if many are dated), 
that the company changed its image, than hundreds of millions of people 
are using it for everything (millions simultaneously), that its market 
value is doubling each year, is not reassuring.


I vote for email!  The only downside I see is the accumulating 
indented copies of prior emails in the thread. However, if all clients 
can organize threads by subject like gmail does, we can stop including 
those in our replies.


I first vote for not using Discord, ever again, because I'm trying to 
avoid GAFAM (and the likes). Then I vote for emails (my Thunderbird 
email client is also organizing threads by subjects); they are less 
distracting than online chat activity, but I may miss important 
information as chatting is becoming the favored communication method. I 
admit: I'm old (3% of Discord users have my age), so please excuse my 
rant. Anyway, if a better (or less bad) platform than Discord (or even 
Slack) is used, please send the info to the list.



- Julius

Marc


___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


[Faudiostream-users] [OT] Discord blues

2023-03-15 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Hello Faust community,

In my quest to better interact with Faust users and devs, I used the 
Slack channel (after a long period of inactivity on Slack); it worked 
except that because old messages are automatically deleted, Discord is 
now preferred. But it kicked me because I was using an alternative 
client (a plugin for Pidgin), something I learned is forbidden. So now 
I'm being asked to provide my phone number to be verified, something I 
refuse. Hoping I could still join he party, I sent a message to Discord, 
asking how I could get in. I came to the conclusion that it won't 
happen, and it's for the best. I'm not asking the Faust community to 
choose some other messaging platform, so have fun and stay safe.


Here's my instant conversation with a friendly "AI" bot named "Clyde" (I 
received the email a few seconds after I submitted the online form):


---

Hey Marc,

Thanks for reaching out to us! Sorry for the inconvenience. Please take 
a look at the following solutions below and see if any of those fit and 
resolve your current situation.


*Are you being prompted for phone verification at login?*
If our detection system has triggered a phone verification for your 
account, you'll be required to register a phone number to your Discord 
account in order to continue its use. We're unable to lift phone 
verification requirements on any accounts.


*Are you receiving an invalid phone number error message?* nVOIP, 
Burner/Prepaid, and Landline numbers cannot be used to complete 
verification. If you're using one of these lines, it will not be able to 
successfully complete verification.
- You must use a mobile phone number to verify your account. If your 
phone number still isn't working, make sure you select the correct 
country code and double check that the full number was entered correctly.


*Do you have an alternate account, or have you helped a friend complete 
their phone verification?*
- If so, your phone number might be on timeout. Unfortunately, we cannot 
lift this timeout, and you will need to wait for the end of the timeout 
to use the phone number once more, or use a different number to verify 
the account. Here's a link with more information as well: 
https://support.discord.com/hc/articles/36961212-Invalid-Phone-Number


If you have any other questions or are still having issues with your 
phone number showing up as invalid or not receiving the text message, 
let us know:

- Full phone number you're trying to register/verify
- Screenshot of the error message you're seeing

*Are you trying to verify your phone for a server?*
If there's a server that has requested you to verify your email or phone 
number before accessing the server, we sadly won't be able to bypass 
that requirement, and you'll need to contact the server admins to ask if 
they can take away the requirement, or assign a role to your account.
More info about this process here: 
https://support.discord.com/hc/articles/216679607-What-are-Verification-Levels-


Hopefully one of these solutions was helpful for you! If not, please let 
us know as well as follow up with the relevant information (phone number 
/ screenshot of any error messages).


Best,
Clyde - Discord Support Bot.

*Marc*

Mar 15, 2023, 09:19 PDT

I'm part of a online community that switched from Slack to Discord, and 
I used a third party client for the Pidgin software; I was able to use 
it a few time, then it stopped working. I then tried to login with a web 
client (also the Electron based client) but a verification procedure 
with a telephone number is imposed. Included is a screenshot of the 
dialog from the Discord client (on Linux).


I don't want to provide my phone number for the verification, I'd prefer 
my account to be verified in some other way (email, F2A, whatever, 
except using my phone, either its number or an app). In other words: can 
you please let me in?


N.B. The phone number I provided in this form is not real,;I entered it 
so my message can reach you.


Thanks for your comprehension and your help.
Marc

---
___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] Csound export

2022-04-18 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

If I may,

It was discussed here:
https://github.com/grame-cncm/faust/issues/508

The relevant part:
"Faust for Csound can only generate the instrument part"

So it's a non-issue.

Marc

Le 2022-04-18 à 14 h 18, Stéphane Letz a écrit :

I don't have the answer, possibly ask CSound or Cabbage users ?

Stéphane


Le 18 avr. 2022 à 14:37, Vivien Aubke  a écrit :

Hi there,
I am a little confused by the Csound export from the web-IDE. The binary folder 
doesn't actually contain a .CSD file. How can I make it work with Cabbage?


___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users



___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] [Ann] Radium with support for the interpreter, and updated to latest version of Faust

2022-04-15 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Hi Kjetil,

Le 2022-04-15 à 19 h 10, Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users a écrit :

Is it possible to see the graph in a larger window, or zoom in the graph?
Because it's a bit small and the text is difficult to read;
but maybe it's a question for your support forum...


I found my answer: ctrl-mousewheel to zoom in/out
It is documented in the "Instrument info" window.
(please excuse the noise)...

Marc___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


Re: [Faudiostream-users] [Ann] Radium with support for the interpreter, and updated to latest version of Faust

2022-04-15 Thread Marc Lavallée via Faudiostream-users

Hi Kjetil,

I successfully compiled Radium from the master git version, on Linux 
(Debian 11/Bullseye);

it's a nice surprise because I tried many times before (for many years)...
So it's my first time trying it, and I confirm that the FaustDev 
instrument works.


Is it possible to see the graph in a larger window, or zoom in the graph?
Because it's a bit small and the text is difficult to read;
but maybe it's a question for your support forum...

Thanks!

Marc


Le 2022-04-15 à 04 h 25, Kjetil Matheussen a écrit :

Hi all!

Radium 6.9.98 has just been released. Faust has been upgraded to
2.37.3 in that release.

In addition, the Windows 32bit release of Radium has also gotten the
FaustDev instrument included, which was mistakenly not included
earlier.

(Radium is a DAW with an incorporated Faust development instrument
("FaustDev"). The FaustDev instrument includes a text editor. Audio,
GUI, error messages, and svg files are updated in realtime while
writing code.)


On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:39 PM Kjetil Matheussen
  wrote:

Thank you!

Radium 5.9.96 has just been released. In the audio instrument/plugin
popup menu, there's four new FaustDev example instruments: Saw,
Square, Sine, and Triangle:
https://users.notam02.no/~kjetism/radium/pictures/radium_faustdev_menus_5_9_96.png

http://users.notam02.no/~kjetism/radium/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=254&fbclid=IwAR0Vly0rlJSvNiJViPxpWuIO-25ta0_2xj-vib_2W5tcywTUqBfeOh0EMyE

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Stéphane Letz  wrote:

Yep, AFAICS Kjetil is probably the only one on earth using the interpreter 
*and* LLVM backends in a same project ! ((-; (beside our own testing tools…)

Stéphane


Le 22 janv. 2020 à 05:33, Romain Michon  a écrit :

Very nice! Awesome work! Thanks, Kjetil!

Cheers,

Romain

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:10 AM Kjetil Matheussen  
wrote:
Radium 5.9.90 has just been released. It has Faust from December
built-in. Previous problems with the interpreter backend and the llvm
backend has been fixed.

http://users.notam02.no/~kjetism/radium/

Old video demonstrating the FaustDev instrument in Radium:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJm9Lox1WFA


___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


--
Romain Michon
+33 (0)7 67 39 72 40

http://grame.fr/~michon
___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users


___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
___
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users