Re: Fedora 10 Art Schedule
Nicu Buculei said the following on 09/07/2008 03:35 AM Pacific Time: John Poelstra wrote: Has a final date been picked to decide the final theme? If so, what is it? I believe Mo mentioned 21 September as the final date, but don't listen to me, I am at FUDCon with too much Czech beer... Update schedule is here: http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-art-tasks.html Let me know if anything else needs fixing. John ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:01 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:09 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > > > >> Heh, didn't occurred to me that I could check gtk docs :-D Thanks for > >> the link, seems like many of the stock icons are already in the > >> icon-naming-spec (though under different names). I think > >> icon-naming-utils create symlinks for those correctly, but I'll check it > >> nevertheless. > >> > > > > Our gnome-icon-theme package has a patch to create the gtk stock > > symlinks, even if the other legacy symlinks are left out, since the gtk > > stock names are not really legacy. > > > Ah, cool! Do you have a url to that patch? > - Andreas http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-themes-list/2008-June/msg3.html ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 20:01 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:09 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > > > >> Heh, didn't occurred to me that I could check gtk docs :-D Thanks for > >> the link, seems like many of the stock icons are already in the > >> icon-naming-spec (though under different names). I think > >> icon-naming-utils create symlinks for those correctly, but I'll check it > >> nevertheless. > >> > > > > Our gnome-icon-theme package has a patch to create the gtk stock > > symlinks, even if the other legacy symlinks are left out, since the gtk > > stock names are not really legacy. > > > Ah, cool! Do you have a url to that patch? > - Andreas > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gnome-icon-theme/devel/ Seems like they use custom version of the legacy-icon-mapping.xml. Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:09 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: Heh, didn't occurred to me that I could check gtk docs :-D Thanks for the link, seems like many of the stock icons are already in the icon-naming-spec (though under different names). I think icon-naming-utils create symlinks for those correctly, but I'll check it nevertheless. Our gnome-icon-theme package has a patch to create the gtk stock symlinks, even if the other legacy symlinks are left out, since the gtk stock names are not really legacy. Ah, cool! Do you have a url to that patch? - Andreas ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:01 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > No, there is no plan to do that, and it is not really possible either. > Those strings are compiled into millions of binaries all over the > world... > Not sure about that. As long as we keep the symlinks in icon themes, but change the gtk #definitions, the old applications would still work and the newly rebuilt ones would follow icon-naming-spec more closely - which would eventually (after some years probably) practically remove the need for those symlinks. But I am in no position to tell gtk devs what they should do, so if you disagree, just ignore my comment, I was merely interested to know if there are any such plans :) Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:09 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > Heh, didn't occurred to me that I could check gtk docs :-D Thanks for > the link, seems like many of the stock icons are already in the > icon-naming-spec (though under different names). I think > icon-naming-utils create symlinks for those correctly, but I'll check it > nevertheless. Our gnome-icon-theme package has a patch to create the gtk stock symlinks, even if the other legacy symlinks are left out, since the gtk stock names are not really legacy. > Do you know whether gtk guys plan to stick with the current names (like > gtk-add) or switch to icon-naming-spec (like list-add)? No, there is no plan to do that, and it is not really possible either. Those strings are compiled into millions of binaries all over the world... ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 09:15 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Martin Sourada wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:35 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > >> I'm here... So, I think we need to act quickly to make Echo the default > >> for the beta, to test the waters before F10. For Gnome, the way to do > >> that is to change the inheritance of the Fedora icon theme to pull in > >> Echo instead of Mist. > >> > >> > >> b) GTK+ stock icons > >> > > Not sure about that, I'll probably need to look into gnome-icon-theme to > > see which are still missing. > > > Here is the list of stock items: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-Stock-Items.html > > Even though the same team drew both GTK+ stock and gnome-icon-theme, we > only ship icon-naming-spec stuff with gnome-icon-theme. Thats actually a bug, if you ask me. In fact, I've filed one with a .xml file to use with the icon-naming-utils to create just gtk stock symlinks, not all the other legacy symlinks. ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 09:15 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Here is the list of stock items: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-Stock-Items.html > > Even though the same team drew both GTK+ stock and gnome-icon-theme, we > only ship icon-naming-spec stuff with gnome-icon-theme. So even though > some items are the same, there is a bunch of icons in there that are > specific to GTK+. > These are actually used quite a lot in unexpected places, like the > games, 3rd party applications etc. so they are quite important. > - Andreas > Heh, didn't occurred to me that I could check gtk docs :-D Thanks for the link, seems like many of the stock icons are already in the icon-naming-spec (though under different names). I think icon-naming-utils create symlinks for those correctly, but I'll check it nevertheless. Do you know whether gtk guys plan to stick with the current names (like gtk-add) or switch to icon-naming-spec (like list-add)? Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Good news about Echo
Martin Sourada wrote: On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 09:35 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I'm here... So, I think we need to act quickly to make Echo the default for the beta, to test the waters before F10. For Gnome, the way to do that is to change the inheritance of the Fedora icon theme to pull in Echo instead of Mist. b) GTK+ stock icons Not sure about that, I'll probably need to look into gnome-icon-theme to see which are still missing. Here is the list of stock items: http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-Stock-Items.html Even though the same team drew both GTK+ stock and gnome-icon-theme, we only ship icon-naming-spec stuff with gnome-icon-theme. So even though some items are the same, there is a bunch of icons in there that are specific to GTK+. These are actually used quite a lot in unexpected places, like the games, 3rd party applications etc. so they are quite important. - Andreas ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
