Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Nicu Buculei

On 04/09/2009 09:09 PM, William Jon McCann wrote:

  My view is that the current trend of highly decorative and themed
boot splashes is an artifact of our failure to improve boot times.  We
should be designing for the case where boot is fairly quick and the
boot screens are merely a brief transition to GDM (only necessary
since it will be longer than 2 seconds even in the best case).  Having
it be a distinct and highly decorative stage in the boot process
detracts from the overall experience from power-on to desktop.


I disagree and the reason is also the transition to GMD. To have it 
smooth I believe it make a lot of sense to have a similar level of 
decoration in Plymouth and GDM, have the transition from one to another 
be just a matter of fade out/fade in for some elements (progress 
bar/login window).



Also, moving away from a traditional progress bar is a good thing, in
my opinion.  For what its worth, Windows 7 seems to be headed in this
direction as well:
http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/02/18/engineering-the-windows-7-boot-animation.aspx


Does Windows 7 change the screen mode from the boot progress to the 
login screen to the desktop?


--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Ian Weller
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 05:35:48PM -0400, Michael Langlie wrote:
> Based on Ray Strode's comments and suggestions, here are a couple more 
> versions where the progress indicator loops before resolving as the Fedora 
> logo. These could also work without using the Fedora logo, just a circle 
> shape.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_04.gif
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_05.gif
> 
So I'm assuming the idea is to have a progress bar under these? If so, I
really like 04.

-- 
Ian Weller 
GnuPG fingerprint:  E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226  B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36


pgpRzQ6LJi454.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Keiran Smith
I like this very much. I would love to boot my machine to that. I will be
doing soon :D

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Michael Langlie wrote:

> Based on Ray Strode's comments and suggestions, here are a couple more
> versions where the progress indicator loops before resolving as the Fedora
> logo. These could also work without using the Fedora logo, just a circle
> shape.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_04.gif
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_05.gif
>
>
> Mike
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mlanglie
>
> ___
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>



-- 
Keiran Smith
- Fedora Ambassador / BugZapper - 
- Free Software Foundation Associate - 
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Michael Langlie
Based on Ray Strode's comments and suggestions, here are a couple more versions 
where the progress indicator loops before resolving as the Fedora logo. These 
could also work without using the Fedora logo, just a circle shape.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_04.gif
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_05.gif


Mike

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mlanglie

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Ian Weller
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:08:37PM -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> I think this looks really good, too.  I like the idea of a minimally themed 
> or unthemed splash that we can standardize on.
> It means we can
> 
> 1) provide a consistent look at boot time from release to release
> 2) take the time to polish and evolve one idea
> 
Whole-heartedly agreed. This would be great. :)

-- 
Ian Weller 
GnuPG fingerprint:  E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226  B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36


pgprKqTyTNPoB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Ray Strode
Hi,

> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Michael Langlie  wrote:
> > Here are a couple animated GIFs (forgive the glow banding near the end) 
> > demonstrating ideas for a general/non-themed Fedora boot screen. They use 
> > the logo icon as a progress indicator before being applied as branding.
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_01.gif
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_02.gif
> 
> These look great.  I love this simplicity and elegance.  And I think
> it looks even better than I expected without the Fedora text.
I think this looks really good, too.  I like the idea of a minimally themed or 
unthemed splash that we can standardize on.
It means we can

1) provide a consistent look at boot time from release to release
2) take the time to polish and evolve one idea

> This also gives us a reasonable target for how quickly we should boot.
>  My view is that the current trend of highly decorative and themed
> boot splashes is an artifact of our failure to improve boot times.  We
> should be designing for the case where boot is fairly quick and the
> boot screens are merely a brief transition to GDM (only necessary
> since it will be longer than 2 seconds even in the best case).  Having
> it be a distinct and highly decorative stage in the boot process
> detracts from the overall experience from power-on to desktop.
> 
> Also, moving away from a traditional progress bar is a good thing,
I don't disagree in the mid-to-long run, but realistically people are going to 
be stuck with 45 - 75 second boots for F11 like they were with F10 and earlier.

I feel like while that animation looks really good at the speed shown in the 
mock up, it won't feel quite right on the vast majority of machines that slow 
boot times.  Unfortunately, I really do think we need a separate progress bar 
for now.

Given we're stuck with slow boot times, I'd propose for F11 we do one of:

1) do the proposed animation in a loop while booting and have a nice looking 
separate progress bar that's lifetime is the entire boot process
or
2) do the proposed animation at the same speed as the mock up at the very tail 
end of the boot process (the last 10 seconds or whatever) and do a progess bar 
up until that point.  

If we know ahead of time that boot up will be fast (remember we record the last 
boot duration and load it at boot up), then we can just omit the progress bar 
steps. That way, those users with fast SSD drives or whatever get the best 
experience even now, and users with slow boot up get an okay experience now and 
the best experience later when we actually fix boot time.

--Ray

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread William Jon McCann
Hey Mike,

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Michael Langlie  wrote:
> Here are a couple animated GIFs (forgive the glow banding near the end) 
> demonstrating ideas for a general/non-themed Fedora boot screen. They use the 
> logo icon as a progress indicator before being applied as branding.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_01.gif
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_02.gif

These look great.  I love this simplicity and elegance.  And I think
it looks even better than I expected without the Fedora text.

I think I prefer the first slightly more than the second because the
second puts too much emphasis on the infinity symbol.

This also gives us a reasonable target for how quickly we should boot.
 My view is that the current trend of highly decorative and themed
boot splashes is an artifact of our failure to improve boot times.  We
should be designing for the case where boot is fairly quick and the
boot screens are merely a brief transition to GDM (only necessary
since it will be longer than 2 seconds even in the best case).  Having
it be a distinct and highly decorative stage in the boot process
detracts from the overall experience from power-on to desktop.

Also, moving away from a traditional progress bar is a good thing, in
my opinion.  For what its worth, Windows 7 seems to be headed in this
direction as well:
http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/02/18/engineering-the-windows-7-boot-animation.aspx

Anyway, I think this is clearly a step in the right direction.
Perhaps some of the talented artists on this list can further refine
these ideas.  But even as they are I think this is an excellent
candidate for the default F11 boot splash.

Jon

PS.  It is pretty exciting that in F11 we will have
graphical/quiet/smooth/elegant boot on all major platforms for the
first time ever.  Before any other open source software distribution!
As such I think it pays to think carefully about how we present this.

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Alagappan
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Michael Langlie wrote:

> I added a third version that does not use the Fedora logo or branding.
>

I feel the versions which use Fedora logo are quite good.

The layered Photoshop files are also zipped and posted on my page.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_03.gif
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeLanglie
>
> Mike
>
>

-Alagappan
NIT Trichy

www.alagappanitsme.blogspot.com
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Michael Langlie
I added a third version that does not use the Fedora logo or branding.
The layered Photoshop files are also zipped and posted on my page.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_03.gif
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeLanglie

Mike


- Original Message -
From: "Michael Langlie" 
To: "Fedora Art List" 


Here are a couple animated GIFs (forgive the glow banding near the end) 
demonstrating ideas for a general/non-themed Fedora boot screen. They use the 
logo icon as a progress indicator before being applied as branding.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_01.gif
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_02.gif

Mike

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: idea for Fedora boot screen

2009-04-09 Thread Paolo Leoni
Great work! I like the second with the infinity symbol.

2009/4/8 Michael Langlie 

> Here are a couple animated GIFs (forgive the glow banding near the end)
> demonstrating ideas for a general/non-themed Fedora boot screen. They use
> the logo icon as a progress indicator before being applied as branding.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_01.gif
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Fedora_boot_animation_02.gif
>
> Mike
>
> ___
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>



-- 
Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wallpaper Extras - was: Re: F11 Art Schedule

2009-04-09 Thread Nicu Buculei

On 04/09/2009 12:57 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:36 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:

- do we require some minimal specs for the images, like a minimum
resolution?


Good uestion. How does 1600x1200 and 1600x1050 as the minimum reqs
sounds?


Those are absolute minimums. We can accept something lower only if it is 
vector image.


But what could be a recommended rezolution?


Another question is, should we package all the wallpapers on the
wallpaper extras wiki [1], or are we going to hand-pick a few?


If we open the gate and announce that widely, I think we will get *a 
lot* of images, ending with a huge package.

IMO we can have two types of criteria to divide the images:
- the quality, and I don't mean the *artistic* quality, but technical 
quality, for images with too much noise, bad focus or exposure, wrong 
aspect ratio and such;
- the subject, someone wanting a nice landscape may not want to endure 
the download of a lot of flower macros and  cute cats.



Also, I don't recall the conversation back then, but when googling, I
found this proposal [2] from Ian that sound like a pretty big
improvement over our current set-up. It would require probably these
steps:

1. reorganise the wallpaper extras wiki, create categories and templates
2. create an art-team space on fedora hosted (with git for the stored
images)
3. create a script (be it in python, ruby, perl, bash, whatever) to pull
the images together with info (author, cc attribution, ...) from wiki
and put them in a sane format into the git repo

Note that we would benefit from the fedorahosted space even more - i.e.
we would have good place to store the release graphics (especially the
wallpapers which currently contain the source archive only within the
srpm) have a place to track our tasks (ticket system) and could also be
a better place than wiki for the design queue.


I would like a much lower barrier to entry, having an upload form there 
the contributor select a file to upload, check a few boxes and fill a 
few fields with keywords, press a button and is done (that sounds 
awfully close to a gallery software?). If the barrier is low and 
contribution easy, I am sure we will get more contributors.


Ian's proposal sound better for the packager but somewhat complicated 
for the contributor.



Martin

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/Wallpaper_Extras
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-art-list@redhat.com/msg06898.html



--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Wallpaper Extras - was: Re: F11 Art Schedule

2009-04-09 Thread Martin Sourada
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 12:36 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Martin, Mo, let breathe a bit and make a plan:
> - when do we need the extra wallpapers packaged? a deadline... since we 
> talk about bitmaps, can we go with something absolutely minimal for the 
> freeze and add a few more later?
I think, freeze is irrelevant here. It's highly probable it won't be on
any of the official spins, so having the package released at the same
day as GA is IMHO fine.

> - do we require some minimal specs for the images, like a minimum 
> resolution?
> 
Good uestion. How does 1600x1200 and 1600x1050 as the minimum reqs
sounds?

> I think I have some images that could do for nice wallpapers (mostly 
> flower macros) and knowing about a deadline would be useful to 
> prioritize some work (selection, gimping, upload).
> 
Cool. I think Mo should have the last word about the deadline, but you
can do some work nevertheless, should you have some spare time to do it.

Another question is, should we package all the wallpapers on the
wallpaper extras wiki [1], or are we going to hand-pick a few?

Also, I don't recall the conversation back then, but when googling, I
found this proposal [2] from Ian that sound like a pretty big
improvement over our current set-up. It would require probably these
steps:

1. reorganise the wallpaper extras wiki, create categories and templates
2. create an art-team space on fedora hosted (with git for the stored
images)
3. create a script (be it in python, ruby, perl, bash, whatever) to pull
the images together with info (author, cc attribution, ...) from wiki
and put them in a sane format into the git repo

Note that we would benefit from the fedorahosted space even more - i.e.
we would have good place to store the release graphics (especially the
wallpapers which currently contain the source archive only within the
srpm) have a place to track our tasks (ticket system) and could also be
a better place than wiki for the design queue.

Martin

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/Wallpaper_Extras
[2] http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-art-list@redhat.com/msg06898.html


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)

2009-04-09 Thread Paolo Leoni
I've uploaded on my personal web space a tar.gz archive with pre-redendered
images for the english countdown banner:


http://pleoni.altervista.org/fedora11-countdown-banner_en.tar.gz

The count starts from 46 (f you want to start it in the next days).

I'll upload soon the italian version.

Thanks to all.

-- 
Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list