Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-14 Thread Mark

hmm.. they look like those icandy icons (i`m sure you`ve seen them once)..
my suggestion is to make the sizes in proportion.. now they seem to be a
little to fat.
and that handle might fit the echo theme better if you do the colors like
this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/EchoDevelopment?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=edit-undoL.png

it`s just a suggestion
looking good so far

good luck,
Mark.

2007/3/14, Martin Sourada [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


There seems to be no other comments or suggestions regarding these icons,
so,
would everyone agree if I use the wrench (with orange handle) for
document-properties and page with wrench for document-page-setup?

Thanks,
Martin


___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list



___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-14 Thread Martin Sourada
hmm I don't think so... I didn't see any icandy icons, or at least I do not
know the name... The wrench is based on OpenOffice.org crystal icons theme (the
idea), the shape of the working part is derived from Bluecurve icons (I first
made a screwdriver and this one derived from it), the handle I added to fit the
rest of the tool, maybe the outline makes it a little fatter than it really
is... About the color - I used the orange color from echo icon guidelines [1]
and added semitransparent gradients to make it more 3D and to add a light
effect. But I can look at it once more, to fit the edit-undo icon color.

And I think, I don't follow what you mean by make the sizes in proportion.
What sizes are you talking about? Sizes of the icons? Sizes of the handle
compared to the rest of the tool? Width to the length or the depth of the
wrench? What proportions do you suggest? 2:3? 4:5? Gold cut? Please be more
clear, maybe its only because my English, but I really don't understand what
your suggestion means.

Thanks for your suggestions,
Martin

References:
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/EchoIconGuidelines#head-92bac070218d68b55549cfdb50eede11583b8021

Mark napsal(a):
 hmm.. they look like those icandy icons (i`m sure you`ve seen them
 once).. my suggestion is to make the sizes in proportion.. now they seem
 to be a little to fat.
 and that handle might fit the echo theme better if you do the colors
 like this:
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/EchoDevelopment?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=edit-undoL.png
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/EchoDevelopment?action=AttachFiledo=gettarget=edit-undoL.png
 
 it`s just a suggestion
 looking good so far
 
 good luck,
 Mark.
 
 2007/3/14, Martin Sourada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
 
 There seems to be no other comments or suggestions regarding these
 icons, so,
 would everyone agree if I use the wrench (with orange handle) for
 document-properties and page with wrench for document-page-setup?
 
 Thanks,
 Martin
 
 
 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com mailto:Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-08 Thread Ben Arnold

On 07/03/07, Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Diana Fong wrote:

 I also would like to hear opinions about the use of the wrench or
 screwdriver + hammer metaphor currently used to represent 'properties'
 and 'setup' throughout the desktop, and how the use of the microscope
 can cause confusion.
setup is very different from properties. You go into setup to change
stuff and have access to configuration utilities. OTOH properties are
mostly used in passive look-at-it context, and a lot of properties are
static


Setup for base settings while properties are per-session or document?

If I'm honest, the microscope would not work as well as a metaphor
because that says 'search' or 'analyse' to me rather than properties.
That said, I always look for the text alongside that icon because it
is an easily identifiable word but that doesn't excuse it in toolbars.
The doc-prop-4 without the cog to the bottom-right and the single
spanner in #2 are my personal favourites. I think #4 would fit in more
with the other action emblems and #4 gives across the idea of more
core/basic settings well.

My 2p.

./b

--
  ..// seawolf //..
 Ben  Arnold
 e-mail / msn / icq / yahoo
iamseawolf (at) gmail (dot) com
http://clik.to/seawolfsanctuary

   fedora core  :  artwork
  GnuPG Available - ask me!

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-08 Thread Martin Sourada
--070303090405070306070601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Diana Fing wrote:
 Lots of excellent work posted today for this thread.  I was a bit skept=
ical
 about the microscope idea because it is such a complex shape, but you s=
eem to
 have pulled it off quite nicely.  I am, however, still concerned about =
how the
 microscope idea would render in the smaller sizes.  Perhaps in those ca=
ses,
 you can just use the flat microscope shape from version 7 and 7a?  To k=
eep
 consistency with your current version, the flat microscope shape would =
be
 slightly elevated from the page.  Just an idea...


I made the smaller sizes of the doc with microscope. See attachments [3],=
 [4]
and [5].

Ben Arnold wrote:
 On 07/03/07, Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Diana Fong wrote:

  I also would like to hear opinions about the use of the wrench or
  screwdriver + hammer metaphor currently used to represent 'propertie=
s'
  and 'setup' throughout the desktop, and how the use of the microscop=
e
  can cause confusion.
 setup is very different from properties. You go into setup to change
 stuff and have access to configuration utilities. OTOH properties are
 mostly used in passive look-at-it context, and a lot of properties are=

 static

 Setup for base settings while properties are per-session or document?

 If I'm honest, the microscope would not work as well as a metaphor
 because that says 'search' or 'analyse' to me rather than properties.
 That said, I always look for the text alongside that icon because it
 is an easily identifiable word but that doesn't excuse it in toolbars.
 The doc-prop-4 without the cog to the bottom-right and the single
 spanner in #2 are my personal favourites. I think #4 would fit in more
 with the other action emblems and #4 gives across the idea of more
 core/basic settings well.

 My 2p.

 ./b


If I take your meaning than the fog you are talking about is an accident.=
 As I
created more icons I derived one from another, and forget to remove a sha=
dow
from the spanner. See attachment [1]. Also I tried to delete the lines to=
 make
the gear more distinguishable. See attachment [2].


As for the microscope thing for properties: I also take it as analyzing, =
but
after few looks can get used to it as a symbol for properties. I do not c=
onsider
bad idea. However, the spanner just resembles the bluecurve theme we used=
 before
and so would be easier for users to get used to it. So I think, if I forg=
et for
a little while about the microscope, we could have a spanner from #2 (or =
#5) for
a document-properties and one of the icons with page(possibly the one wit=
h gear
- #4) for document-page-setup, since it symbolises both page and setup. O=
n the
other side if we used the microsope with page for document-properties wha=
t would
we pick for document-page-setup? Possibly again either the page with the
microscope or the page with the gear.

What do you all think?

Attachments:
[1] document-properties-4.png (page with gear)
[2] document-properties-4a.png (page with gear without lines)
[3] document-properties-8_16.png (page with microscope, 16x16 size)
[4] document-properties-8_16a.png (page with blue microscope 16x16 size)
[5] document-properties-8_24.png (page with microscope, 24x24 size)


--070303090405070306070601
Content-Type: image/png;
 name=document-properties-4.png
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename=document-properties-4.png

iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwCAYAAABXAvmHBHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAlw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Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-08 Thread Martin Sourada
Sorry again... seems I have some problems with thunderbird...
attachments again








signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Martin Sourada
I made the icons as you sugested. I made a microscope [1], put it as an image on
a page [2] and deleted lines [3]. Which of them is better?

If you {all} don't have any further sugestion, can two of the icons form this
post and/or from the inilial post be chosen for document-page-setup and
document-properties?

[1] microscope.png
[2] document-properties-7.png
[3] document-properties-7a.png

 Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
 How about using a microscope instead ? We have gears and other
 mechanical metaphors all over the place, both meaning do stuff and
 look at it. I'd be nice to reserve them for actions, with something
 else for inspection.



 

 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot

Le Mer 7 mars 2007 16:29, Martin Sourada a écrit :
 I made the icons as you sugested. I made a microscope [1], put it as an
 image on
 a page [2] and deleted lines [3]. Which of them is better?

Thanks a lot

 If you {all} don't have any further sugestion, can two of the icons form
 this
 post and/or from the inilial post be chosen for document-page-setup and
 document-properties?

 [1] microscope.png
 [2] document-properties-7.png
 [3] document-properties-7a.png

I don't like the one with lines, they make the form difficult to see
For the one without lines, maybe putting the document under the microscope
instead of the microscope inside the page would be clearer:
- for me stuff inside page = one particular file type)
- you'd get a mnemotechnic shape, which is always good

But hopefully others will comment.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Martin Sourada
--060408040803080408090100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I do not know if I fully understand what you meant by putting the docume=
nt
under the microscope, but I tried some relative positions of the page an=
d the
microscope and ended with something that seems to look fine[1]. Is that w=
hat you
was talking about?

Thanks for your suggestions.

Regards,
Martin Sourada

Attachments:
[1] - document-properties-8.png

Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
 Le Mer 7 mars 2007 16:29, Martin Sourada a =C3=A9crit :
 I made the icons as you sugested. I made a microscope [1], put it as a=
n
 image on
 a page [2] and deleted lines [3]. Which of them is better?
=20
 Thanks a lot
=20
 If you {all} don't have any further sugestion, can two of the icons fo=
rm
 this
 post and/or from the inilial post be chosen for document-page-setup an=
d
 document-properties?

 [1] microscope.png
 [2] document-properties-7.png
 [3] document-properties-7a.png
=20
 I don't like the one with lines, they make the form difficult to see
 For the one without lines, maybe putting the document under the microsc=
ope
 instead of the microscope inside the page would be clearer:
 - for me stuff inside page =3D one particular file type)
 - you'd get a mnemotechnic shape, which is always good
=20
 But hopefully others will comment.
=20

--060408040803080408090100
Content-Type: image/png;
 name=document-properties-8.png
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename=document-properties-8.png

iVBORw0KGgoNSUhEUgAAADAwCAYAAABXAvmHBHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAlw
SFlzAAAG7AAABuwBHnU4NQAAABl0RVh0U29mdHdhcmUAd3d3Lmlua3NjYXBlLm9yZ5vuPBoA
AA+3SURBVGiBrZpbkBxXecd/55zunu6Z2Z1dabUrabXW6mLJsiRbtrFlR7JNbHCguAiqHAIG
EpyLk/CQFAlOUslLivBApVIpP1AkUMQiFWPiikiQU1CADQkQGzDYgCTLEraMLGl3pdVetLtz
7T6XPHT37MzuGgvZvXVqZqcv8/9/3/+7nHNGOOd4reNfv/z4Bwcq5c8UAr/XkxKHAGdxCIRz
OAAHCHA4cCAEgEAKEEICDpF+6KxzJo5jG7di22g2bL3ZbFk/+vz99x74i9cEs+TwLueiwPd+
++79+3o9z0MpueI1uSFWMkgGPH8VWmuvWqszPz/PzOwlTp0+XSyWig8ePHR46v57D/z9r0Jg
ZTTLwKVGT5J4ReD5sNZircUY0x75Z/l55xye5xGGBcIopFQq0t/fz5r+fnpD/1MHDx1+2xtO
AHCp7cSK4JeC1lp3jU4y+T2+7xOFIVEU0V+pkGjDzdftEk4n/3Hw0OGr31ACuZ7FCuecc21w
SZIQx3HXSJKkTaLTC1IICkFAFIYEQYDneQwMDHDN6IaytfbfDx46rN4wAo5UQnRQ6JSMtbZt
7VarRavVotFo0Gw22//nRDollUopRCqJpySFQoFtW7dS9LgR+PjlYLusIKYtoY4POuRz6rEH
mT32TfxVI6jKMF5lA8FVbyLacD1KeQRBgLW2fa8QIvWClASBj3UglUIpRW9vL2/avYv/+eGz
nzh46PDh++89cOKXAbvMGBCZjkQbPIC1lsbMGNNPf45brlPsqLzI5uTrbJj6J/xvf5ixh27k
3KN/RH1+mjiO2x7IyQP4nofWGiVTKJ7nsW7dOjatGwyccw8fPHR4JeX+qgRS6GKJB6y1NGfO
EkYBzkGlJ2J1scgaGbKtGLB/dcLmyW8w/YNHSJKEJEmWBbNzjmq9jlSp5KWURFHErmt34JLW
bcaY331DCHQencEYDl+Pv/MD/N//vsz8TBXmF7DzVWYXYqqxJdEgigNd4Jd64dLcfFeKkFLS
39/Pddu2ksTxpz7zyGN9r5/AEgnlJCaeeIjaj79AKDXlyAdjkdUqMzN1vj8/xIsDdyFG9q6Y
SvNnLFRrGLt4DiAIArZu2UyoGNBJ8nevi0AOXYhu/VtrmT36Va6/7Wr23bUddALGoJH4AqL6
eezI7RgRdFm/cxhjEDi+/p2n+Oy/fYnHv/Etnj3yPDOX5iiXy+y7+SaSOP7jf/jcwetWwnZ5
WWiFFApgjaE1fpzyddcgWg2E50FYwDOGq6jTE8Q8M/0iSXJ3W0L5EEJgrUUIwT137OfM+ASv
nBvn5VfO8OzRYySJplAI2DwyzJpKWY3NzH0auOOKPEBm/dwDuesbF1+mUHBICVgH1i4OYCEB
0zPSrhGdha7VarXfSynYNDLMXfv28nsfuJcPHHgHN+26FongmZ8e5UdHj6Ob9ds/8dBnPnhl
Hlhy5ARqZ4/Q0xd1A+8gUE0gLg7jZUCbzSZSyrblT49NcNX6tYSFAlJKlFJ4nsfQmgF6y2V2
79jGK+fO8dQzz+FaTRJf/DXwxSskIADXlT3qY8foqRQ7gLsuAnPap+GvQrVaeJ7Xls2Pjp3g
a9/9PkMDA1ycmeFjH3k/G9YO4fs+QRCgPA/PTwvg2jVruGvfrfz4R88w1dKlK/ZAKp/uIK6P
H2Ndf3GZ9WMiXips5AvhrZz5xvcYXrOa7Rs3sGvrJp74wXOgPD72B79Df6WXJ777NJ/49MM8
8L53s+fa7VhrCcMQJSVhIUDriFYcozxFUlveDV8WAa1N1/95BmmNH6d3Yz9Y3UXg+KYHuLj9
fdwxNcPYhUlePjPGD194iW//+AieVJTLRQLfxznHrTftodFq8vlDj/MnH/pNtm0eRSlFFEVp
r1QoUIwiBAKd6GXYLiuItUlv7Mzfuj6Hq09QKHjdHjAOW7mKYhixdeNV3H3bXj5y77u578Db
uf2WmxgcXM3k9Cz/+PAXmZubp9FosHv7Nu7cezNf+uqTXd2r53kEhYBisYiSkkTrZW3F5RFI
NHk1yAnUxo5R7l0iH5NJqG9T+14HhEGBbRs3cuCtd/Kuu+/k6i2buHhpgc8++mUuTE1TazTp
rfRQazS6KnYqowKFQoCQEq1flwccnUFcHzvWnYEy8Fb4xKX1Xd7K/4QQ7Ni6iT9833vYMjzE
6bEx/uWxr/DK2DjHTvycW3fvaKfcXKaeUkRhiEw9sAzbFcVATmBdnoHMohcWSpux+WQ/H9Zh
RZo6hXCUSkUefODD/PeT3+PMxARf/85TFAOfd++/ednER2QTHyEEOrlSCS2JAWstzfHn6e0r
doHHWgr1SYZfeJgLU7MYa7EubxuyCVAmDykUb3/zftYOrGbzVcMM9vchszSbk8iH53lIKV6P
B3ICeREzxBdOUrpxOzQaXQTCxnlWH/lnjh2t8rjazE27d7B397WLDRWpGJVz+J5i3017qDUa
/PTYzxmfnKJcLq/Y+EkhrjwGklhn+T99WOviy4RRdvNKLYSGPaNDHLhtD42FeR796pNMz86l
E/584m8MidYMrl7FmlX9jGwY4ukjJ161azXWreiBVyUgFg+Z6ER0yqd27ig9lVdvIRYSUKu3
0ttTZt91O3jznh08+rUnqdUbbfBpsBoSY9i+ZZTVfRXOTk7TasXLVjLInKd18toxkKPO7pGA
jOOk64GNiRMUIx9bq4Exy3sg7VNYs4koiigWi2wZWc+v7b6Gp35yFK1NClwbtEkzzkClD4Gg
p1zi7IWL7ThY6oWlyWQZASHak0YJyJ07d6rR0VEviWOZFxitNf7AZurzdaQxUK9DtQ71Bk4b
agks9IxSKISEYUihUCAMQ/bfsItTZycWrW80iU5l5IDenhKVnjJnL1zsAr84yXEkSbKMwEpB
LAE5OjqqpqamVE9Pj2q2mt0Ehm9kcrax2GMrCSKdFI41QF7/HgqFAr7v4/s+6ZKkwvc94jhB
eQppBSJLrQDFMMTzFK04BZlbPT9vrUNrs0xCbQKdshkdHVWlUsmz1vqAl7Ri1Wg02qtuNuzH
lIapNzRFmZEQktkYzlT2Eux4JypbJlFKtVvoKAioNZsUw0JWE8QiQJeuCKtsci9EN1YHaLNc
Qks9IADxGx/66Mjg6Ma/ctaO6jgea1ya2XjizDilwCPyPXAWb/Ov88KLjzHQG9AjLZGF5+tl
5N0PdgHrlEEjjvGUItEGKUS2WpN6Lg9WpeTSxeBUFkJgXqMOCECMjo7KZOSabz3ibx6JLfSq

Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Martin Sourada
Oups, posted wrongly, so again the attachement.

Martin Sourada napsal(a):
 --060408040803080408090100
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
... 
 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Martin Sourada
So, if everyone agree I will consider it as the one. In that case if you don't
have any further comments I will make smaller versions and upload it to wiki.

Also, what about the document-page-setup? Should we use the same icon, or one of
the others, or do you have any idea, how it could look like?

Regards,
Martin Sourada

Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
 Le mercredi 07 mars 2007 à 20:35 +0100, Martin Sourada a écrit :
 Oups, posted wrongly, so again the attachement.
 
 I definitively like this one more than the others.
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Fedora-art-list mailing list
 Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
 http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Diana Fong

Martin Sourada wrote:

So, if everyone agree I will consider it as the one. In that case if you don't
have any further comments I will make smaller versions and upload it to wiki.

Also, what about the document-page-setup? Should we use the same icon, or one of
the others, or do you have any idea, how it could look like?

Regards,
Martin Sourada

Nicolas Mailhot napsal(a):
  

Le mercredi 07 mars 2007 à 20:35 +0100, Martin Sourada a écrit :


Oups, posted wrongly, so again the attachement.
  

I definitively like this one more than the others.


Lots of excellent work posted today for this thread.  I was a bit 
skeptical about the microscope idea because it is such a complex shape, 
but you seem to have pulled it off quite nicely.  I am, however, still 
concerned about how the microscope idea would render in the smaller 
sizes.  Perhaps in those cases, you can just use the flat microscope 
shape from version 7 and 7a?  To keep consistency with your current 
version, the flat microscope shape would be slightly elevated from the 
page.  Just an idea...


I also would like to hear opinions about the use of the wrench or 
screwdriver + hammer metaphor currently used to represent 'properties' 
and 'setup' throughout the desktop, and how the use of the microscope 
can cause confusion.  Perhaps it's just me.  I don't have an answer to 
this, but believe that if we are to introduce the microscope in 
signifying this, or a similar, action...we should clearly state, when a 
wrench would be used, when the microscope would be used, etc.  Please 
help clarify.


Martin, your post today on shadows, shall I include that in the Echo 
Guidelines?  Did you find any of the feedback from the previous 
'shadows' thread useful to include? 


Thanks,
Diana Fong

Red Hat Visual Designer



___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: document-page-setup or/and document-properties icon mockups.

2007-03-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mercredi 07 mars 2007 à 17:07 -0500, Diana Fong a écrit :

 I also would like to hear opinions about the use of the wrench or 
 screwdriver + hammer metaphor currently used to represent 'properties' 
 and 'setup' throughout the desktop, and how the use of the microscope 
 can cause confusion.

setup is very different from properties. You go into setup to change
stuff and have access to configuration utilities. OTOH properties are
mostly used in passive look-at-it context, and a lot of properties are
static

For me gears = active/running stuff, wrench = tweaking things
(gears have been used in the past to mark system services and
executable/batch files). Both are not appropriate metaphors for looking
at static things

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list