Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-31 Thread Greg Schick


Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:49 +0100, Steve Hill 
wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> 
> > If you want other distro for comparison - Mint Linux (as a good
> > example comes to mind) and UbuntuStudio (as a not so good example).
> > look at this:
> > http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/bianca-2.2/06.png
> 
> Mint seem to have made the panel a bit more interesting, but the titlebars 
> are very plain and boring (also my complaint with the Fedora theme).
> 
> I had a quick google around for Ubuntu Studio screenshots:
> http://ubuntustudio.com/ww2/themes/ubuntustudio/images/screenshots/screenshot-3.png
> Quite nice - I like the domed look on the panels and title bars, and that 
> could be alpha-blended when switching to compiz to keep the theming 
> consistent.

Definitely not a fan of that ... looks way too much like vista.

Paul

http://gallery.filefront.com/Leadgolem//588843/

http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Blended+Crystal?content=58001



   
-
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. ___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-30 Thread Kelly
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:49 +0100, Steve Hill wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> > > If you want other distro for comparison - Mint Linux (as a good
> > > example comes to mind) and UbuntuStudio (as a not so good example).
> > > look at this:
> > > http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/bianca-2.2/06.png
> >
> > Mint seem to have made the panel a bit more interesting, but the
> > titlebars are very plain and boring (also my complaint with the Fedora
> > theme).

I'm willing to bet you're referring to the Gnome theme, but I did port 
sections of Mint's KDE design to Fedora...

-- 
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-30 Thread Paul
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:49 +0100, Steve Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> 
> > If you want other distro for comparison - Mint Linux (as a good
> > example comes to mind) and UbuntuStudio (as a not so good example).
> > look at this:
> > http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/bianca-2.2/06.png
> 
> Mint seem to have made the panel a bit more interesting, but the titlebars 
> are very plain and boring (also my complaint with the Fedora theme).
> 
> I had a quick google around for Ubuntu Studio screenshots:
> http://ubuntustudio.com/ww2/themes/ubuntustudio/images/screenshots/screenshot-3.png
> Quite nice - I like the domed look on the panels and title bars, and that 
> could be alpha-blended when switching to compiz to keep the theming 
> consistent.

Definitely not a fan of that ... looks way too much like vista.

Paul


___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-30 Thread Valent Turkovic

On 5/30/07, Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:

> If you want other distro for comparison - Mint Linux (as a good
> example comes to mind) and UbuntuStudio (as a not so good example).
> look at this:
> http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/bianca-2.2/06.png

Mint seem to have made the panel a bit more interesting, but the titlebars
are very plain and boring (also my complaint with the Fedora theme).

I had a quick google around for Ubuntu Studio screenshots:
http://ubuntustudio.com/ww2/themes/ubuntustudio/images/screenshots/screenshot-3.png
Quite nice - I like the domed look on the panels and title bars, and that
could be alpha-blended when switching to compiz to keep the theming
consistent.

For what it's worth, I use a customised LimeRefresh theme under Beryl,
changing the green titlebars to blue - much more interesting than the
plain default Metacity theme.


That is what I'm talking abot - Fedora is the best linux desktop IMHO
and only thing it need is a little, really little polish regarding
gnome theme.

--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241
Skype: valent.turkovic

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-30 Thread Steve Hill

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:


If you want other distro for comparison - Mint Linux (as a good
example comes to mind) and UbuntuStudio (as a not so good example).
look at this:
http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/bianca-2.2/06.png


Mint seem to have made the panel a bit more interesting, but the titlebars 
are very plain and boring (also my complaint with the Fedora theme).


I had a quick google around for Ubuntu Studio screenshots:
http://ubuntustudio.com/ww2/themes/ubuntustudio/images/screenshots/screenshot-3.png
Quite nice - I like the domed look on the panels and title bars, and that 
could be alpha-blended when switching to compiz to keep the theming 
consistent.


For what it's worth, I use a customised LimeRefresh theme under Beryl, 
changing the green titlebars to blue - much more interesting than the 
plain default Metacity theme.


--

 - Steve
   xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.nexusuk.org/

 Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-30 Thread Valent Turkovic

On 5/29/07, Chris Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 28/05/07, Valent Turkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 5/28/07, Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> >
> > > I can only share one comment of my apple osx friend who was an ex
> > > windows user after installing Fedora 6:
> > >
> > > "This looks like windows 98."
> >
> > Of course then you showed him Beryl, right? :)
>
> No, he removed it before I could do any customization to it...
>
> And after I showed him my desktop that was already too late, he was
> not interested too much because his own experience was too blend.
>
> > That said, I was under the impression that an aweful lot of Windows
people
> > switch XP back to the "classic interface" - i.e. something that looks
just
> > like Win98?
> >
> > I saw Vista with Aero for the first time a couple of weeks ago - maybe
> > I've just been spoilt by Beryl, but my first thought was "It's just XP
but
> > with transparent bits and slightly different window decoration".  I've
not
> > yet worked out why people are raving about Aero, it just doesn't seem
> > anything special to me.
>
> People are't raving about it - it is just a little more polished -
> just what fedora 7 or 8 or 9 needs :) Why is every fedora the same -
> theme wise? Each fedora has great artwork but the theme says the
> same... that is just laziness :) or lack of insight... there should be
> gnome theme that corresponds with the artwork IMHO. At lest a little
> polish.
>
> Now F7 looks so Fedora Core 3 like :) not to make the same comparison
> my friend did with windows because I don't use them.
>
> > > And when I looked it from his perspective I saw he was right. Don't
> > > get me wrong I love Fedora theme... but when windows looks like osx I
> > > think Fedora needs also a little polish to make it shine...
> >
> > I consider the default Fedora settings to be quite plain and basic -
they
> > get the job done but they don't make you go "Ooh".  The first thing
I
> > do with my Fedora machines when they get installed is switch window
> > manager and copy my customised settings onto the system.  However,
that's
> > the power of Linux - you _can_ customise it, and what's right for one
> > person isn't right for another.
>
> you can customize windows and osx, and you can argue which is more
> customizable...
> that is not the point. the point is in default theme.
>
> > There is a limit to how far the defaults can go though - for example,
> > starting Compiz or Beryl by default would certainly make things shiny,
but
> > there are just so many driver problems associated with them.
>
> I don't agree. I had 3rd party Compiz and Berly packages on FC5 and
> FC6 6 months ago and had better exeperience and less bugs with them
> than with compiz that is now in F7! To me this looks like lack of
> attention for these packages.

I'm motivated to weigh in on this argument as so far the accusations
levelled at Fedora is that it looks like Windows 98, Fedora Core 3 and needs
to be shinier.  You've also accused artists of laziness and that each theme
looks the same. Try taking a look at other distributions sometime - you'll


I only look at Fedora because it is the only distro I use full time :)
Sorry if I sounded like accusing artist of being lazy - this wasn't my
intention!
I can see that they do a lot of work because each fedora release has a
great and different looking artwork! And I love it!

I only said that gnome theme should be inline with the rest of the artwork.

If you want other distro for comparison - Mint Linux (as a good
example comes to mind) and UbuntuStudio (as a not so good example).
look at this:
http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/bianca-2.2/06.png

I love what they have done with the gnome theme - look how much better
gnome panels look when you give them a little polish :)


see much less variation and you are always welcome to use theme packs of
which several sit in the main repository.


The default look or "out of the box" experience is what everybody look
at 90% of the time - and that is what gets screenshots in reviews. I
know that you can theme the hell out of gnome but that is not the
point.


I'm not sure what version of Windows 98 looks like FC6 but I'm betting it
wasn't OEM. As for arguing that Beryl and Compiz packages are not getting
the required attention then it would be helpful if you elaborated a little,
particularly regarding the bugs. Even have a trawl through bugzilla and add
your thoughts.


I added two compiz but to bugzilla. Currently I'm not testing or using
berly because I'm spending all of my free time (and stealing alot of
hours fromf work) deling with bigger bugs in Fedora 7 (they are all on
bugzilla).



Regards
Chris




Regards,
Valent from Croatia.

--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241
Skype: valent.turkov

Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-28 Thread Kelly
On Monday, May 28, 2007 5:16 pm Valent Turkovic wrote:
>
> People are't raving about it - it is just a little more polished -
> just what fedora 7 or 8 or 9 needs :) Why is every fedora the same -
> theme wise? Each fedora has great artwork but the theme says the
> same... that is just laziness :) or lack of insight... there should be
> gnome theme that corresponds with the artwork IMHO. At lest a little
> polish.

What?  Clearlooks rocks.  In fact, I STILL say that KDE ought to use 
Klearlooks as the default widget theme just to get the similar look...

-- 
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Fwd: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-28 Thread Valent Turkovic

I missed sending this mail to this mail list, so I'm doing it now.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Valent Turkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 28, 2007 3:53 PM
Subject: shiny desktop, anyone?
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Discussions about development for the
Fedora desktop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


On 5/23/07, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 16:39 +0800, Ken YANG wrote:
> as we see, suse 10.2 has the animation grub, it looks good.
>
> can fedora has this kind of grub?
>

We (the desktop team) hope to get rid of the grub menu in the default
boot sequence instead of making it nicer. See

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBetterStartup



Great! Go desktop team, go! :)

I really believe that presentation of linux is one of the most
important things... it must be shiny and prety :) Nice kernel
hacks and speedups are nice... but those are things that most desktop
users don't care and don't know even exist... but they know good
interface and nice boot grub screen when they see one.

So please make grub as nice as possible... the test of Fedora is
really nice... I really like it graphically wise.

I can only share one comment of my apple osx friend who was an ex
windows user after installing Fedora 6:

"This looks like windows 98."

And when I looked it from his perspective I saw he was right. Don't
get me wrong I love Fedora theme... but when windows looks like osx I
think Fedora needs also a little polish to make it shine...

I saw UbuntuStudio theme, that is an other extreme... but still a good
try. It is too dark an a bit too shiny... but I guess that that is
what users expect to see.

Just my 2c.

--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241
Skype: valent.turkovic


--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241
Skype: valent.turkovic

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list


Re: shiny desktop, anyone?

2007-05-28 Thread Valent Turkovic

On 5/28/07, Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Mon, 28 May 2007, Valent Turkovic wrote:

> I can only share one comment of my apple osx friend who was an ex
> windows user after installing Fedora 6:
>
> "This looks like windows 98."

Of course then you showed him Beryl, right? :)


No, he removed it before I could do any customization to it...

And after I showed him my desktop that was already too late, he was
not interested too much because his own experience was too blend.


That said, I was under the impression that an aweful lot of Windows people
switch XP back to the "classic interface" - i.e. something that looks just
like Win98?

I saw Vista with Aero for the first time a couple of weeks ago - maybe
I've just been spoilt by Beryl, but my first thought was "It's just XP but
with transparent bits and slightly different window decoration".  I've not
yet worked out why people are raving about Aero, it just doesn't seem
anything special to me.


People are't raving about it - it is just a little more polished -
just what fedora 7 or 8 or 9 needs :) Why is every fedora the same -
theme wise? Each fedora has great artwork but the theme says the
same... that is just laziness :) or lack of insight... there should be
gnome theme that corresponds with the artwork IMHO. At lest a little
polish.

Now F7 looks so Fedora Core 3 like :) not to make the same comparison
my friend did with windows because I don't use them.


> And when I looked it from his perspective I saw he was right. Don't
> get me wrong I love Fedora theme... but when windows looks like osx I
> think Fedora needs also a little polish to make it shine...

I consider the default Fedora settings to be quite plain and basic - they
get the job done but they don't make you go "Ooh".  The first thing I
do with my Fedora machines when they get installed is switch window
manager and copy my customised settings onto the system.  However, that's
the power of Linux - you _can_ customise it, and what's right for one
person isn't right for another.


you can customize windows and osx, and you can argue which is more
customizable...
that is not the point. the point is in default theme.


There is a limit to how far the defaults can go though - for example,
starting Compiz or Beryl by default would certainly make things shiny, but
there are just so many driver problems associated with them.


I don't agree. I had 3rd party Compiz and Berly packages on FC5 and
FC6 6 months ago and had better exeperience and less bugs with them
than with compiz that is now in F7! To me this looks like lack of
attention for these packages.

Valent.

--
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241
Skype: valent.turkovic

___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list