Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
On 06/19/2009 01:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: To sum it up: You say you wanted to work together with me, but you did not contact me, you did not tell me and you did not send me your ks, although you promised to do so. Right? I made no such promise. I expressed a intend to do so and got busy with the other things. Since there is no big difference between kickstart files that essentially do the same thing and is so old now that is not going be useful anymore, I am not even sure why you are so bothered with it. Neverthless if you wanted it, you could have easily send me a reminder instead of bringing it up after such a long time. My name is at the top of the ks and you hardly can remove a copyright notice. It is a kickstart file with a bunch of packages and groups and some simple configuration changes. Hardly something unique enough to be copyrightable. Nevertheless AFAICS all you changed is: * You replaced slim with gdm because you could not get it working * and included PolicyKit-gnome This is not really much remixing of my work. Don't you think that my name should have been mentioned in the announcement? I agree it would be been nice to do so but I have already said that in long offlist mails and IRC conversations. It is not reasonable to demanding it however since much of what we do is by nature, building on others work. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
Can this be stopped. It is not helping. Please Frank -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: PolicyKit and malware, was: What I HATE about F11
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:02 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:58 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: As it is, malware need only sit in the background and wait for e.g. a PolicyKit-enabled user manager to acquire the authorization for user creation to be able to easily install a backdoor account. Nils, this is somewhat inaccurate (or to put it more strongly, it is misinformation...). I'm glad that you say that (and for your explanation below) -- I read the documentation for the new polkit version but didn't find that information. I have some questions below where I'd appreciate a bit of clarification though. First of all, unless the policy specifies _keep, you can only do things once after getting the authorization. With the hypothetical user manager app, would this mean I'd have to authenticate once in the program so that I could add a number of users and re-authenticate if I ran the program for a second time, or would this be only valid for one user added? And even with _keep, it is not true that PolicyKit automatically authorizes all other applications running on the same desktop. The retained authorization is only valid for the subject that obtained it, which will typically be a process (identified by process id and start time) or a canonical bus name. And your malware does not have either. So authorizations wouldn't carry over if I ran an app for the second time if I specify _keep? Here is a little demo to show how this works: The org.freedesktop.policykit.example.pkexec.run-frobnicate action has auth_self_keep in its policy. Now if you try running pkexec pk-example-frobnicate in a terminal, PolicyKit retains the authorization that you obtain by entering your password, and the subject it associates it with is the parent process of pkexec, ie the shell you are running this in. Repeating the pkexec call in the same shell will not ask you for your password again. But if you open a new terminal or tab and repeat it there, you will get asked again. So for my example above, an authorization isn't attached to the user manager app process, but its parent (the panel)? Thanks, Nils -- Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
On 06/19/2009 05:53 PM, Harsha gowda wrote: Hi, Help !, I want to setup a debug build of wpasupplicant so that i can Trace PEAP - MSCHAP v2 protocol for my study, so i have installed Fedora release 10 (Cambridge), the wpa supplicant works fine by default which come with CD, I downloaded *wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-2.fc10.src.rpm*, and extracted it to a folder, # debuginfo-install wpa_supplicant Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
On 06/19/2009 06:21 PM, Harsha gowda wrote: Still wireless connection is disabled in network-manager, Could you please elaborate what you want to say.. ? You were asking for a method to install the debug information. I have provided you a better way than rebuilding the package from source. You can proceed from here to do what you intended to do in the first place which is not very clear to me. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
Thank you for your precious information, But how can i modify the source , For example think i just added a printf(HARSHA); in wpa_supplicant/main.c main () function, How do i compile it.. How do i install my compiled executable! so that in wpa_supplicant.log i can see the text HARSHA, where i have to put the compiled one ...? If i replace with /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant the networkmanager wont show wireless If any links how to do development of wpa_supplicant would be of greater help. Thanks in advance. Regards Harsha On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: On 06/19/2009 06:21 PM, Harsha gowda wrote: Still wireless connection is disabled in network-manager, Could you please elaborate what you want to say.. ? You were asking for a method to install the debug information. I have provided you a better way than rebuilding the package from source. You can proceed from here to do what you intended to do in the first place which is not very clear to me. Rahul -- ಇಂತಿ ಹರ್ಷ ಕೃ ಗೌಡ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
But how can i modify the source , For example think i just added a printf(HARSHA); in wpa_supplicant/main.c main () function, How do i compile it.. How do i install my compiled executable! so that in wpa_supplicant.log i can see the text HARSHA, That's not specific to wpa_supplicant. Just rebuild the srpm with your own tarball, and install the resulting rpm. -- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Announcing LXDE Fedora Remix 11
Am Freitag, den 19.06.2009, 13:55 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 06/19/2009 01:41 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: To sum it up: You say you wanted to work together with me, but you did not contact me, you did not tell me and you did not send me your ks, although you promised to do so. Right? I made no such promise. I expressed a intend to do so and got busy with the other things. Quote: I will post the ks file and the image to fedora-devel list a bit later. To me this sounds like a promise. Since there is no big difference between kickstart files that essentially do the same thing and is so old now that is not going be useful anymore, I am not even sure why you are so bothered with it. I'm not really interested in your file since it based on my work and hardly differs from it. I just wanted to point out that I *did* try to cooperate: I provided you my work, I asked for your progress and my mine was documented in the wiki. Can you say the same for your work? Neverthless if you wanted it, you could have easily send me a reminder instead of bringing it up after such a long time. That was a boomerang. I can say the very same or even better: Before sending a reminder you should have told me about your plans in first place. My name is at the top of the ks and you hardly can remove a copyright notice. It is a kickstart file with a bunch of packages and groups and some simple configuration changes. Hardly something unique enough to be copyrightable. I guess the same applies to the Xfce ks and the first thing you did was to place a copyright notice and your name on it. Nevertheless AFAICS all you changed is: * You replaced slim with gdm because you could not get it working * and included PolicyKit-gnome This is not really much remixing of my work. Don't you think that my name should have been mentioned in the announcement? I agree it would be been nice to do so but I have already said that in long offlist mails and IRC conversations. It is not reasonable to demanding it however since much of what we do is by nature, building on others work. But whenever one builds on others work, one credits them. This is what FOSS is about. Anyway: Frank is right, complaining does not help, because it doesn't fix the damage done. So I'm going to stop here. Rahul Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: !Help Development of WPA_SUPPLICANT
Hi sundaram, Thanks for your reply, I tried as you mentioned, Below is output, [r...@localhost wpa_supplicant]# *debuginfo-install wpa_supplicant* Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit = Package Arch Version Repository Size = Installing: dbus-debuginfo i386 1.2.4-1.fc10fedora-debuginfo 1.2 M glibc-debuginfo i686 2.9-2 fedora-debuginfo9.1 M openssl-debuginfoi686 0.9.8g-11.fc10fedora-debuginfo 3.0 M wpa_supplicant-debuginfo i386 1:0.6.4-2.fc10 fedora-debuginfo 1.1 M Installing for dependencies: glibc-debuginfo-common i386 2.9-2 fedora-debuginfo 13 M Transaction Summary == Install 5 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 28 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/5): wpa_supplicant-debuginfo-0.6.4-2.fc10.i386.rpm | 1.1 MB 00:10 (2/5): dbus-debuginfo-1.2.4-1.fc10.i386.rpm | 1.2 MB 00:15 (3/5): openssl-debuginfo-0.9.8g-11.fc10.i686.rpm | 3.0 MB 00:25 (4/5): glibc-debuginfo-2.9-2.i686.rpm | 9.1 MB 01:07 (5/5): glibc-debuginfo-common-2.9-2.i386.rpm | 13 MB 01:39 Total 126 kB/s | 28 MB 03:43 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing : glibc-debuginfo-common 1/5 Installing : glibc-debuginfo 2/5 Installing : openssl-debuginfo 3/5 Installing : wpa_supplicant-debuginfo 4/5 Installing : dbus-debuginfo 5/5 Installed: dbus-debuginfo.i386 0:1.2.4-1.fc10 glibc-debuginfo.i686 0:2.9-2 openssl-debuginfo.i686 0:0.9.8g-11.fc10 wpa_supplicant-debuginfo.i386 1:0.6.4-2.fc10 Dependency Installed: glibc-debuginfo-common.i386 0:2.9-2 Still wireless connection is disabled in network-manager, Could you please elaborate what you want to say.. ? Thanks Harsha On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Rahul Sundaram sunda...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: On 06/19/2009 05:53 PM, Harsha gowda wrote: Hi, Help !, I want to setup a debug build of wpasupplicant so that i can Trace PEAP - MSCHAP v2 protocol for my study, so i have installed Fedora release 10 (Cambridge), the wpa supplicant works fine by default which come with CD, I downloaded *wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-2.fc10.src.rpm*, and extracted it to a folder, # debuginfo-install wpa_supplicant Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- ಇಂತಿ ಹರ್ಷ ಕೃ ಗೌಡ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090619 changes
Compose started at Fri Jun 19 06:15:07 UTC 2009 New package 389-console 389 Management Console New package bespin A style for Qt/KDE4/KDM New package healpy A python wrapper of the healpix library New package libccss A simple api for CSS Stylesheets New package python-ZConfig Structured Configuration Library New package rest A library for access to RESTful web services New package twitter-glib A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API Updated Packages: CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-12.fc12 -- * Thu Jun 18 2009 - Parag Nemade panem...@gmail.com - 2.8.38-12 - Rebuild against new binutils package to fix rawhide dependency error. asciidoc-8.4.5-1.fc12 - * Fri Jun 19 2009 Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com 8.4.5-1 - new upstream version 8.4.5 - required by X.org libXi to build bzr-1.16-1.fc12 --- * Thu Jun 18 2009 Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net - 1.16-1 - Update to 1.16 cronie-1.3-2.fc12 - * Thu Jun 18 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.3-2 - 506560 check return value of access crontabs-1.10-30.fc12 - * Thu Jun 18 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com 1.10-30 - 491793 thanks Andrew Hecox for patch which allows set allow/deny jobs - comment change empty crontab csound-5.10.1-7.fc12 * Thu Jun 18 2009 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com - 5.10.1-7 - Obsolete olpcsound cups-pk-helper-0.0.4-2.fc12 --- * Thu Jun 18 2009 Marek Kasik mka...@redhat.com - 0.0.4-2 - Update to polkit-1 dbus-cxx-0.4.0-1.fc12 - * Thu Jun 18 2009 Rick L Vinyard Jr rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu - 0.4.0-1 - New release - Added glibmm subpackage deluge-1.1.9-1.fc12 --- * Wed Jun 17 2009 Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com - 1.1.9-1 - Update to new upstream bug-fix release (1.1.9). - Do not hard-code minimum rb_libtorrent version. (We're only building against the system rb_libtorrent for Fedora 11+, which already has the necessary version.) e2fsprogs-1.41.6-5.fc12 --- * Thu Jun 18 2009 Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com 1.41.6-5 - Update journal backup blocks in sb after resize (#505339) - Fix memory leak in extent handling functions - Fix bug in inode writing in extent code, clobbered i_extra_isize etc eclipse-oprofile-0.2.0-2.fc12 - * Thu Jun 18 2009 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 0.2.0-2 - Add -Dconfigs to fix compile. * Wed May 13 2009 Kent Sebastian kseba...@redhat.com 0.2.0-1 - 0.2.0 gnokii-0.6.27-5.fc12 * Mon Jun 15 2009 Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi - 0.6.27-5 - Build with pcsc-lite and readline support (#430387). guimup-0.1.4-7.b.fc12 - k3b-1.66.0-3.fc12 - * Thu Jun 18 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org - 0:1.66.0-3 - -extras-freeworld avail now, drop Obsoletes kdebindings-4.2.90-2.fc12 - * Wed Jun 17 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org - 4.2.90-2 - rework old-PyQt4 patch kernel-2.6.31-0.11.rc0.git13.fc12 - * Thu Jun 18 2009 Kyle McMartin k...@redhat.com 2.6.31-0.11.rc0.git13 - 2.6.30-git13 - config changes: - arm: - CONFIG_UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY is not set - i686-PAE: - CONFIG_XEN_DEV_EVTCHN=m - CONFIG_XEN_SYS_HYPERVISOR=y - ia64: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64 - nodebug: - CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK is not set - CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST=m - powerpc: - CONFIG_CAN_SJA1000_OF_PLATFORM=m - CONFIG_PPC_EMULATED_STATS=y - CONFIG_SWIOTLB=y - CONFIG_RDS is not set (broken on ppc32) - powerpc32: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=32 - powerpc64: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64 - CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS is not set (broken on ppc64) - s390x: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64 - CONFIG_SECCOMP=y - CONFIG_PM=y - CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y - CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION=/dev/jokes - sparc64: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64 - x86: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=32 - CONFIG_IOMMU_STRESS is not set - CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=y - CONFIG_X86_OLD_MCE is not set - CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL=y - CONFIG_X86_MCE_AMD=y - CONFIG_X86_ANCIENT_MCE is not set - CONFIG_X86_MCE_INJECT is not set - x86_64: - CONFIG_EDAC_AMD64=m - CONFIG_EDAC_AMD64_ERROR_INJECTION is not set - CONFIG_XEN_DEV_EVTCHN=m - CONFIG_XEN_SYS_HYPERVISOR=y - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64 - CONFIG_IOMMU_STRESS is not set - CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=y - CONFIG_X86_MCE_INJECT is not set - generic: - CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=32 - CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM=m - CONFIG_MMC_CB710=m - CONFIG_CB710_CORE=m - CONFIG_CB710_DEBUG is not set - CONFIG_SCSI_MVSAS_DEBUG is not set - CONFIG_SCSI_BNX2_ISCSI=m - CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_OSF=m - CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT=y (used to be =m, which was invalid) - CONFIG_DE2104X_DSL=0 - CONFIG_KS8842 is not set - CONFIG_CFG80211_DEBUGFS=y - CONFIG_MAC80211_DEFAULT_PS=y - CONFIG_IWM=m - CONFIG_IWM_DEBUG is not set -
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 --- * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk - 2.4.2-1 - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 - Add support for ppc and ppc64 - Add label for udev-acl is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
2009/6/19 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 --- * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk - 2.4.2-1 - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 - Add support for ppc and ppc64 - Add label for udev-acl is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate but that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the matter if you bring them to their attention. - David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:53 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 --- * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk - 2.4.2-1 - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 - Add support for ppc and ppc64 - Add label for udev-acl is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate but that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the matter if you bring them to their attention. - David /me understands that the issue is with versioning of the package, not in upstream. The changelog clearly says it's 2.4.2 preview 1 and the release number in package should reflect it, e.g. by having the NVR mono-tools-2.4.2-0.1.pre1.fc12. It helps users of that package to easier tell that its actually a pre-release, not a stable release. Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Nielsen wrote: 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 --- * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the- johnsons.co.uk - 2.4.2-1 - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 - Add support for ppc and ppc64 - Add label for udev-acl is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate but that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the matter if you bring them to their attention. - David This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release: 0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual release. Example: kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64 k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAko8DZoACgkQiPi+MRHG3qS77ACgtDdrNf+lo02KDHDT5QHov0Il PygAnAkMp7Yi61+OKSHVCxhJexDymYcj =PnQs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20090619 changes
2009/6/20 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Nielsen wrote: 2009/6/19 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12 --- * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the- johnsons.co.uk - 2.4.2-1 - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1 - Add support for ppc and ppc64 - Add label for udev-acl is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision tags for alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else? Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's unfortunate but that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on the matter if you bring them to their attention. - David This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release: 0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual release. Example: kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64 k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme. My apologies. - David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: using CD/DVD as media
Chuck Anderson wrote: As was mentioned earlier in this thread, I think it *does* make sense to install the older packages from DVD because then you can take advantage of yum-presto to save on download bandwidth later when you update from the network. Packages which are already installed and updated might not allow the old packages on DVD to be installed, due to dependencies. So ideally yum should be able to use the DVD as a repo, and have the ability to combine an old local rpm with a downloaded drpm to generate the newest package before installing, to satisfy the dependencies. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: system-config-firewall picking up slack where firestarter fell off
Adam Miller wrote: 1) Cisco VPN I don't use this myself but I was told it just needs these rules, so I don't see a big issue here: $IPT -A FORWARD -i $IF -o $INIF -p udp --dport 500 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT $IPT -A FORWARD -i $IF -o $INIF -p tcp --dport 500 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT $IPT -A FORWARD -i $IF -o $INIF -p 50 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT $IPT -A FORWARD -i $INIF -o $IF -p 50 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT Hmm... $DAYJOB uses Cisco VPN, and the only rule I seem to have for it is: -A INPUT -i cipsec0 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT (...and similar in FORWARD, as this box is a gateway router) Either vpnc auto-manages the needed rules, or open port 500 isn't universally required. 2) Auto setup of Internet Sharing, so autoconfig of dhcpd and providing a bridge between WAN and LAN. This is one that I'm not entirely sure there is really in the scope of system-config-firewall and might need to be its own utility. Maybe. As above, I've done it by hand and it's not trivial (not hard, but requires more than one thing set up). You can pick defaults for many things, but to set up forwarding you need: - forwarding on in kernel (/etc/sysctl.conf) - iptables rules - configure dnsmasq (else fiddling with updating dns servers via dhcp is a pain) - configure dhcpd (or use dnsmasq) - somehow ask user or guess what is external, internal interfaces (Don't forget to bind dnsmasqd/dhcpd to the lan interface, please!) And it should ideally let you configure (in advanced mode): - specify net/subnet and ranges for dhcp - static hosts for dhcp - forwarded ports other machines in the LAN FWIW, 'doze apparently has point-and-click internet connection sharing, so this would be a good thing to address. Say, how come s-c-f isn't merged into NM yet? ;-) -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- The spiraling shape will make you go insane! -- They Might Be Giants -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaned packages fxload, unison*
I've orphaned the fxload, unison213, unison227 packages. unison* have reverted ownership to gemi. fxload now has no maintainer. Unfortunately, with a young child, busy job, and the fact I switched my PC to Ubuntu, I'm not able to maintain these anymore. All of these packages are very low maintenance; since the initial creation, about the only activity has been mass rebuilds. fxload A helper program to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices This program is conveniently able to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices, as well as the original AnchorChips EZ-USB. It is intended to be invoked by udev scripts when the unprogrammed device appears on the bus. unison213 unison227 Multi-master File synchronization tool Unison is a multi-master file-synchronization tool. It allows two replicas of a collection of files and directories to be stored on different hosts (or different locations on the same host), modified separately, and then brought up to date by propagating the changes in each replica to the other. Note that this package contains Unison version 2.27, and will never be upgraded to a different major version. Other packages exist if you require a different major version. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
FESco meeting summary for 20090619
Minutes: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/Fedora-Meeting/2009/fesco.2009-06-19-17.00.html Full log at: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/Fedora-Meeting/2009/fesco.2009-06-19-17.00.log.html (and attached) kevin -- 17:00:01 nirik #startmeeting 17:00:10 nirik #meetingtopic FESCo Meeting 17:00:21 nirik #meetingname fesco 17:00:28 nirik #chair bpepple dgilmore dwmw2 jwb notting nirik sharkcz jds2001 j-rod 17:00:39 nirik who all is here for the fesco meeting? 17:00:55 * sharkcz is here 17:00:57 * bpepple is here. 17:01:00 * jnovy is here 17:01:05 * j-rod waves 17:01:13 * subfusc points on nirik 17:01:40 * notting is here 17:02:11 nirik ok, I guess we can go ahead and get started... 17:02:15 nirik #topic Feature: F12X86Support - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support 17:02:26 nirik notting: care to introduce this? 17:02:43 notting sure 17:03:13 notting back when we did i586 for F-11, we agreed in a FESCo vote to do i586 for F-11 and i686 likely for F-12. i was asked to write up the feature last week, so i did 17:03:31 notting the original feature specified a minimum of a SSE-2 capable cpu. it was ... not received well. 17:03:42 bpepple notting: yeah, I noticed. ;) 17:03:57 nirik so, what does moving from i586 - i686 really buy us? dropping old stuff we don't want to support? 17:04:02 notting so the current proposal is to just built for basic i686-class CPUs, but optimize for Atom, as it's the currently available model 17:04:25 notting nirik: 1-2% performance in benchmarks, fewer kernel builds 17:04:27 * nirik has to step away for just a min. back in a minute. 17:04:42 nirik but is it really? it would be i686 instead of i586? so same #? 17:05:30 j-rod we also make the compiler guys happier 17:05:42 notting nirik: no, we build separate i586 and i686 kernel packages ATM 17:06:04 j-rod notting: we build kernel.i586 and kernel-PAE.i686 17:06:08 j-rod (iirc) 17:06:17 notting according to uli, the -march=i686 code paths are more tested that -march=i586 17:06:29 notting for base i686, the geode in the XO still works 17:06:56 notting the one potentially relevant CPU that we would be dropping support for is the Via C3 17:07:06 j-rod so yeah, no less kernels built, we don't have a kernel.i686 atm 17:07:45 davej notting: one possibility, is that someone once did a patch to provide cmov emulation for userspace. 17:07:53 j-rod my only c3 board has cmov. everyone else be damned. 17:08:00 notting j-rod: less builds, i.e. not tying up two build machines. also, shared debuginfo-common 17:08:05 notting j-rod: ...? are you sure it's not a c5 17:08:29 j-rod ah, yes, there's slightly less build output then... 17:08:38 j-rod pretty sure its a c3 17:08:39 davej the later C3's had cmov (nehemiah steppings onwards iirc) 17:08:42 j-rod Via Nehemiah 17:09:22 davej the older ones were used in those epia and other mini-itx boards a lot though. 17:09:26 j-rod (the board is actually sitting on the shelf in my cube, its way too slow to be worth playing with when you're spoiled w/quad-core stuff...) 17:10:10 j-rod mine's an epia mini-itx as well, but yeah, I know plenty of the earlier ones had no cmov 17:10:23 notting davej: is the cmov emulation patch slow-as-molasses? 17:10:56 davej notting: you're using a c3, speed isn't really your concern. 17:11:01 j-rod ...but faster than not working at all 17:11:46 notting one other thing: the benefits do rely on a mass rebuild. jwb, f13 - you had concerns? (this applies to the later xz feature as well) 17:12:00 davej sidenote: I thought I read somewhere that gcc doesn't emit cmov's when tuned for atom because it's not a perf win any more? 17:12:13 notting davej: uno momento 17:13:25 notting davej: one of my test binaries shows 73 cmov instructions for -mtune=atom 17:13:43 davej ok 17:15:30 bpepple anyone have any other questions/concerns? 17:15:32 notting if someone wants the raw data that went into my numbers, http://notting.fedorapeople.org/benchfu.gnumeric. ignore the openssl numbers, they're not a valid benchmark 17:16:25 f13 notting: I had concerns with fitting in a every package rebuild within the F12 cycle 17:16:42 f13 or an every package with arch change rebuild 17:16:55 j-rod start now 17:16:56 j-rod :) 17:17:17 f13 since we dropped the point release previously known as alpha this is less of a concern 17:17:21 f13 but still a lot of bit shuffle 17:17:27 notting the executive summary is: -mtune=atom is a win for both i586 and i686 on atom, and a (small) loss on other cpus. -march=i686 is a win on all CPUs except for P4 17:18:41 notting atom scheduling actually helps p4 17:18:51 notting (although that may be noise) 17:19:06 notting f13: the mass rebuild for f11 took... one week? 17:19:25 f13 technically it's still not done 17:19:31 f13 there are things which haven't been rebuilt. 17:19:48 f13 but yes, the scripted part was less than a week 17:19:51 notting erm, ok. i mean, 'the automated part for packages that aren't broken' :) 17:21:08 f13 yeah
Pulseaudio question...
At the risk of bringing up a touchy subject, I have a couple pulseaudio questions. Just wondering if the behaviour I am experiencing is a bug or intended behaviour. Fedora 11 recently installed fully up to date as of now. I've opened a movie in totem, the main volume level is somewhere in the range of 70%, however totem is at about 4%. The movie is too quiet so I've upped the volume in totem to 19%. The main volume is now 84%. All fine and good. However if I modify the main volume at all (up or down), the main volume resets to whatever the main volume was before I changed totem's volume. If I in this case bring the main volume up to 84% again, totem is at the 19% I set it to... Is this expected behaviour? -- Nathanael d. Noblet T: 403.875.4613 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rpms/rt3/F-11 rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff, NONE, 1.1 rt3.spec, 1.39, 1.40 rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff, 1.1, NONE
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rt3/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1564
Modified Files:
rt3.spec
Added Files:
rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff
Removed Files:
rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff
Log Message:
* Fri Jun 19 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.2-8
- Address BZ #506885 (BZ #506236).
- Remove rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff.
rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff:
--- NEW FILE rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff ---
--- rt-3.8.2.orig/share/html/Admin/Global/MyRT.html 2009-01-07
02:15:23.0 +0100
+++ rt-3.8.2/share/html/Admin/Global/MyRT.html 2009-06-19 07:25:23.0
+0200
@@ -91,8 +91,13 @@
current_portlets = $default_portlets-Content,
OnSave = sub {
my ( $conf, $pane ) = @_;
- $default_portlets-SetContent( $conf );
-push @actions, loc( 'Global portlet [_1] saved.', $pane );
+if (!$session{'CurrentUser'}-HasRight( Object= $RT::System, Right =
'SuperUser')) {
+push @actions, loc( 'Permission denied' );
+}
+else {
+$default_portlets-SetContent( $conf );
+push @actions, loc( 'Global portlet [_1] saved.', $pane );
+}
}
);
Index: rt3.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rt3/F-11/rt3.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -p -r1.39 -r1.40
--- rt3.spec24 Apr 2009 07:28:40 - 1.39
+++ rt3.spec19 Jun 2009 07:13:08 - 1.40
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
Name: rt3
Version: 3.8.2
-Release: 7%{?dist}
+Release: 8%{?dist}
Summary: Request tracker 3
Group: Applications/Internet
@@ -52,10 +52,14 @@ Source4:README.fedora.in
Source5: rt3.logrotate.in
Patch0:rt-3.8.1-config.diff
-Patch1:rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff
Patch2:rt-3.8.1-Makefile.diff
Patch3:rt-3.8.1-test-dependencies.diff
+# Address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506236
+# Patch from
http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2009-June/000170.html
+# Fixed in rt = 3.8.4
+Patch4:rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff
+
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -229,9 +233,9 @@ chmod -x UPGRADING README C* aclocal.* c
find etc -type f -exec chmod a-x {} \;
%patch0 -p1
-#%patch1 -p1
%patch2 -p1
%patch3 -p1
+%patch4 -p1
# Patch backups added by rpm disturb
find -name '*.orig' -exec rm -f {} \;
@@ -431,6 +435,10 @@ fi
%{RT3_LIBDIR}/RT/Test*
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 19 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.2-8
+- Address BZ #506885 (BZ #506236).
+- Remove rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff.
+
* Fri Apr 24 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.2-7
- README.fedora.in: Add --dba root to rt-setup-database (BZ #488621).
- R: perl(XML::RSS) (BZ #496720).
--- rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff DELETED ---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/rt3/F-10 rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff, NONE, 1.1 rt3.spec, 1.38, 1.39 rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff, 1.1, NONE
Author: corsepiu
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rt3/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2637
Modified Files:
rt3.spec
Added Files:
rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff
Removed Files:
rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff
Log Message:
* Fri Jun 19 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.2-8
- Address BZ #506885 (BZ #506236).
- Remove rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff.
rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff:
--- NEW FILE rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff ---
--- rt-3.8.2.orig/share/html/Admin/Global/MyRT.html 2009-01-07
02:15:23.0 +0100
+++ rt-3.8.2/share/html/Admin/Global/MyRT.html 2009-06-19 07:25:23.0
+0200
@@ -91,8 +91,13 @@
current_portlets = $default_portlets-Content,
OnSave = sub {
my ( $conf, $pane ) = @_;
- $default_portlets-SetContent( $conf );
-push @actions, loc( 'Global portlet [_1] saved.', $pane );
+if (!$session{'CurrentUser'}-HasRight( Object= $RT::System, Right =
'SuperUser')) {
+push @actions, loc( 'Permission denied' );
+}
+else {
+$default_portlets-SetContent( $conf );
+push @actions, loc( 'Global portlet [_1] saved.', $pane );
+}
}
);
Index: rt3.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/rt3/F-10/rt3.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.38
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -p -r1.38 -r1.39
--- rt3.spec24 Apr 2009 07:28:40 - 1.38
+++ rt3.spec19 Jun 2009 07:16:35 - 1.39
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
Name: rt3
Version: 3.8.2
-Release: 7%{?dist}
+Release: 8%{?dist}
Summary: Request tracker 3
Group: Applications/Internet
@@ -52,10 +52,14 @@ Source4:README.fedora.in
Source5: rt3.logrotate.in
Patch0:rt-3.8.1-config.diff
-Patch1:rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff
Patch2:rt-3.8.1-Makefile.diff
Patch3:rt-3.8.1-test-dependencies.diff
+# Address https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506236
+# Patch from
http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2009-June/000170.html
+# Fixed in rt = 3.8.4
+Patch4:rt-3.8.2-rh-bz506236.diff
+
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -229,9 +233,9 @@ chmod -x UPGRADING README C* aclocal.* c
find etc -type f -exec chmod a-x {} \;
%patch0 -p1
-#%patch1 -p1
%patch2 -p1
%patch3 -p1
+%patch4 -p1
# Patch backups added by rpm disturb
find -name '*.orig' -exec rm -f {} \;
@@ -431,6 +435,10 @@ fi
%{RT3_LIBDIR}/RT/Test*
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 19 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.2-8
+- Address BZ #506885 (BZ #506236).
+- Remove rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff.
+
* Fri Apr 24 2009 Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org - 3.8.2-7
- README.fedora.in: Add --dba root to rt-setup-database (BZ #488621).
- R: perl(XML::RSS) (BZ #496720).
--- rt-3.4.1-I18N.diff DELETED ---
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-AutoXS-Header/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-AutoXS-Header.spec, 1.3, 1.4 sources, 1.3, 1.4
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-AutoXS-Header/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv850
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-AutoXS-Header.spec sources
Log Message:
update to 1.02
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-AutoXS-Header/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore 3 Jun 2009 13:48:07 - 1.3
+++ .cvsignore 19 Jun 2009 15:42:46 - 1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-AutoXS-Header-1.01.tar.gz
+AutoXS-Header-1.02.tar.gz
Index: perl-AutoXS-Header.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-AutoXS-Header/devel/perl-AutoXS-Header.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- perl-AutoXS-Header.spec 3 Jun 2009 13:48:07 - 1.3
+++ perl-AutoXS-Header.spec 19 Jun 2009 15:42:46 - 1.4
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-AutoXS-Header
-Version:1.01
+Version:1.02
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Container for the AutoXS header files
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 19 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com 1.02-1
+- update
+
* Wed Jun 3 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com 1.01-1
- update
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-AutoXS-Header/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources 3 Jun 2009 13:48:07 - 1.3
+++ sources 19 Jun 2009 15:42:46 - 1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1ed3aa16cfe7c30e9700876ac757a2c2 AutoXS-Header-1.01.tar.gz
+bfed85ce503f6ab6ddd5cf7c41bc AutoXS-Header-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Class-XSAccessor/devel perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec, 1.3, 1.4
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-XSAccessor/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2011
Modified Files:
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec
Log Message:
- rebuild with AutoXS::Header 1.02
Index: perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-XSAccessor/devel/perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec 1 Jun 2009 13:52:10 - 1.3
+++ perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec 19 Jun 2009 15:47:15 - 1.4
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Class-XSAccessor
Version:1.03
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 19 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 1.03-2
+- rebuild with AutoXS::Header 1.02
+
* Mon Jun 1 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.03-1
- update
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Broken dependencies in Fedora 10 - 2009-06-19
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: perl-MooseX-Types-0.12-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-10-i386 unresolved deps: perl(Carp::Clan) = 0:6.00 package: perl-MooseX-Types-0.12-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-10-ppc unresolved deps: perl(Carp::Clan) = 0:6.00 package: perl-MooseX-Types-0.12-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-10-ppc64 unresolved deps: perl(Carp::Clan) = 0:6.00 package: perl-MooseX-Types-0.12-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-10-x86_64 unresolved deps: perl(Carp::Clan) = 0:6.00 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 10 - 2009-06-19
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:23:50PM -, Michael Schwendt wrote:
package: perl-MooseX-Types-0.12-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-10-*
unresolved deps:
perl(Carp::Clan) = 0:6.00
I wonder how can this happen when F 10 updates testing do contain
Carp::Clan 6.00.
$ koji latest-pkg dist-f10-updates-testing perl-Carp-Clan
Build Tag Built by
perl-Carp-Clan-6.00-1.fc9 dist-f9-updatesmmaslano
Stepan
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 10 - 2009-06-19
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:23:50PM -, Michael Schwendt wrote: package: perl-MooseX-Types-0.12-1.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-10-* unresolved deps: perl(Carp::Clan) = 0:6.00 I wonder how can this happen when F 10 updates testing do contain Carp::Clan 6.00. $ koji latest-pkg dist-f10-updates-testing perl-Carp-Clan Build Tag Built by perl-Carp-Clan-6.00-1.fc9 dist-f9-updatesmmaslano I wasn't sure of that either, so I went and looked at my friendly neighbourhood mirror; it wasn't in the actual repo despite koji's claim it was. I've built and entered an update for 6.00 on F-10. -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 10 - 2009-06-19
Hi Chris, I wasn't sure of that either, so I went and looked at my friendly neighbourhood mirror; it wasn't in the actual repo despite koji's claim it thank you for checking this. I filed a rel-eng ticket to resolve the inconsistency: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1936 Stepan -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Wx/devel perl-Wx.spec,1.26,1.27
Author: kasal
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Wx/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv4817
Modified Files:
perl-Wx.spec
Log Message:
rebuild
Index: perl-Wx.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Wx/devel/perl-Wx.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.26 -r1.27
--- perl-Wx.spec3 Jun 2009 14:23:37 - 1.26
+++ perl-Wx.spec19 Jun 2009 21:43:09 - 1.27
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: perl-Wx
Version:0.91
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Interface to the wxWidgets cross-platform GUI toolkit
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Fri Jun 19 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 0.91-2
+- rebuild
+
* Wed Jun 3 2009 Marcela MaÅ¡láÅová mmasl...@redhat.com - 0.91-1
- update
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
