non root X
Hi A few days back I ran into http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html I am wondering, since we are already using KMS in most places in Fedora, how far are we from achieving this by default in a Fedora release? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: More Fedora mock breakage
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:41:17PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:48:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) boche...@fedoraproject.org writes: ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by exim-4.69-12.fc12.x86_64 I had the same on F11, building in a Rawhide mock. I was advised to update rpm to 4.7.1 that was in updates-testing, which fixed the problem. [ consults CVS... ] So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring the capability in order to do useful development work? All I can say is WTF. Did you have a better plan for migrating to an XZ payload for F12 in time for Alpha? IMHO there should be a much larger window between providing an new feature in RPM, and requiring it for development. eg, new features should go into RPM in rawhide F11 at least 2-3 months before we require them. Yes this would have required XZ support to be merged much sooner in the F12 schedule, or alternatively merge XZ support in F12, but don't use it till F13. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090803 changes
Compose started at Mon Aug 3 06:15:05 UTC 2009 Updated Packages: DeviceKit-power-010-3.fc12 -- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Richard Hughes rich...@hughsie.com - 010-3 - Put the development include files in the devel packagem not the main package. - Fixes #515104 R2spec-2.5.3-1.fc12 --- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Pingou pingou-at-pingoured.fr 2.5.3-1 - New upstream release abiword-2.7.8-1.fc12 * Sun Aug 02 2009 Marc Maurer u...@abisource.com - 1:2.7.8-1 - New upstream version * Mon Jul 27 2009 Marc Maurer u...@abisource.com - 1:2.7.7-1 - New upstream release - Add --enable-dynamic to configure so plugins link against libabiword.so * Mon Jul 27 2009 Marc Maurer u...@abisource.com - 1:2.7.7-2 - Add a patch to work around a templates makefile bug * Mon Jul 27 2009 Marc Maurer u...@abisource.com - 1:2.7.7-3 - Rerun autogen.sh after changing the makefiles bugzilla-3.4.1-1.fc12 - * Sun Aug 02 2009 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 3.4.1-1 - Update to 3.4.1, fixing a security leak control-center-2.27.4-4.fc12 * Sun Aug 02 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.27.4-4 - Drop unneeded direct deps filelight-1.9-3.rc2.fc12 * Sun Aug 02 2009 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com - 1.9-3.rc2 - fix some rpmlint complaints: - Follow cmake_kde4 recipe untabify convert ChangeLog to utf8 don't mark filelightrc as config * Fri Jul 31 2009 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com - 1.9-2.rc2 - Updates for kde4 - Update to 1.9rc2 gaupol-0.15-3.fc12 -- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org - 0.15-3 - do not remove required file (b.g.o #590537) gimp-resynthesizer-0.16-1.fc12 -- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Ewan Mac Mahon e...@macmahon.me.uk - 0.16-1 - Bump to version 0.16 - Patch makefile to allow Fedora CFLAGS to override defaults. gnome-backgrounds-2.24.1-3.fc12 --- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.24.1-3 - Co-own /usr/share/backgrounds instead of requiring desktop-backgrounds-basic gnome-python2-desktop-2.27.2-3.fc12 --- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com - 2.27.2-3.fc12 - Disable nautilus-cd-burner bindings. Package is dead. gthumb-2.10.11-6.fc12 - * Mon Aug 03 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.10.11-6 - Drop unneeded direct deps haproxy-1.3.19-1.fc12 - * Sun Aug 02 2009 Jeremy Hinegardner jeremy at hinegardner dot org - 1.3.19-1 - update to 1.3.19 jam-2.5-9.fc12 -- * Mon Aug 03 2009 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk - 2.5-9 - Add the stack overflow fix patch js-1.70-8.fc12 -- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Pavel Alexeev pa...@hubbitus.info - 1.70-8 - Reformat spec with tabs. - By report of Thomas Sondergaard (BZ#511162) Add -DXP_UNIX=1 -DJS_THREADSAFE=1 flags and nspr requires into libjs.pc kdeaccessibility-4.3.0-3.fc12 - * Sun Aug 02 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 1:4.3.0-3 - include epoch's in -libs-related Requires kdeplasma-addons-4.3.0-2.fc12 - * Sun Aug 02 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org - 4.3.0-2 - fix to allow updating of status via microblog plasmoid kdeutils-4.3.0-3.fc12 - * Sun Aug 02 2009 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org - 6:4.3.0-3 - include epoch's in -libs-related Requires libchewing-0.3.2-15.fc12 * Mon Aug 03 2009 Ding-Yi Chen dchen at redhat dot com - 0.3.2-15 - Fix [Bug 512108:issue 11] ibus-chewing crash the application by move cursor_orig to chewingio.c global. libnice-0.0.9-1.fc12 * Sun Aug 02 2009 Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org - 0.0.9-1 - Update to 0.0.9. - Drop sha1 patch. Fixed upstream. lklug-fonts-0.6-1.20090803cvs.fc12 -- * Mon Aug 03 2009 Parag pnem...@redhat.com - 0.6-1.20090803cvs - update to cvs snapshot 20090803. lxpanel-0.5.1-1.fc12 * Sun Aug 02 2009 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org - 0.5.1-1 - Update to 0.5.1 - Remove cpu-history.patch and manpages.patch, fixed upstream - Thu Jul 27 2009 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org - 0.5.0-1 - Update to 0.5.0 magic-8.0.51-1.fc12 --- mfiler2-4.0.9b-5.fc12.Repack1 - * Mon Aug 03 2009 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp - 4.0.9b-5.Repack1 - 4.0.9b maintenance release nautilus-2.27.4-3.fc12 -- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com - 2.27.4-3 - Drop desktop-backgrounds-basic dep that we've carried for 9 years without ever making use of it nginx-0.7.61-1.fc12 --- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Jeremy Hinegardner jeremy at hinegardner dot org - 0.7.61-1 - Update to new stable 0.7.61 perltidy-20090616-2.fc12 * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora
Trouble with F11 build
Built on devel OK. Then I try to build for F11 and get http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575532 Complains about error: Bad source: /builddir/build/SOURCES/filelight_part.desktop.diff: No such file or directory But cvs says: File: filelight_part.desktop.diff Status: Up-to-date Working revision:1.1 Repository revision: 1.1 /cvs/pkgs/rpms/filelight/F-11/filelight_part.desktop.diff,v Sticky Tag: (none) Sticky Date: (none) Sticky Options: (none) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Trouble with F11 build
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 08:40 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: Built on devel OK. Then I try to build for F11 and get http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575532 Complains about error: Bad source: /builddir/build/SOURCES/filelight_part.desktop.diff: No such file or directory You didn't tag it: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/filelight/F-11/filelight_part.desktop.diff?view=log -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: License change for ghostscript
On 07/31/2009 04:19 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 22:47 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
This might cause problems for a bunch of packages.
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ghostscript ghostscript-
gtk --qf=%{NAME}: %{LICENSE} | grep -vP '\bGPL(v3|\S*\+)' | sort
Wouldn't it be packages using the libraries that might pose problems?
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps
'libgs.so.8()(64bit)' 'libijs-0.35.so()(64bit)' --qf=%{NAME}:
%{LICENSE}
foomatic: GPLv2+
ghostscript-devel: GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
libspectre: GPLv2+
ImageMagick: ImageMagick
ghostscript: GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
ghostscript-gtk: GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
ghostscript-devel: GPLv2 and Redistributable, no modification permitted
gutenprint: GPLv2+
Other packages would be invoking the executable, which (AIUI) is not
considered based on ghostscript.
The ImageMagick license seems to be compatible with GPLv3.
I'm really only concerned about these library linking cases, which all
seem to be GPLv3 compatible.
I think it is a reasonable argument that applications which call out to
ghostscript are well separated, thus, can be sanely treated as two
separate programs.
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: More Fedora mock breakage
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:41:17PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 06:48:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: [ consults CVS... ] So XZ support in F-11's rpm is less than a week old, there is *no* support in F-10, and we're already requiring the capability in order to do useful development work? All I can say is WTF. Did you have a better plan for migrating to an XZ payload for F12 in time for Alpha? IMHO there should be a much larger window between providing an new feature in RPM, and requiring it for development. eg, new features should go into RPM in rawhide F11 at least 2-3 months before we require them. Yes this would have required XZ support to be merged much sooner in the F12 schedule, or alternatively merge XZ support in F12, but don't use it till F13. I would be satisfied if there was any window at all. The upthread suggestions that it's okay to expect every individual Fedora packager to cope with this for themselves were insane, not to say insulting. I have real work to do, and dealing with that sort of make-work is not it. regards, tom lane -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: (done that for you http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1574035 ) I see. I guess they'll let you and/or me know if this wasn't the right thing to do. Well rel-eng did the mass rebuild and give us a list of the failed packages, fixing them does not create extra but _less_ work for them ;) Exactly; while rel-eng *could* resubmit failed builds, and may submit some at some point, we are perfectly happy not to have to, and doing so will speed things along in general. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:24 -0400, William Cohen wrote: What is the procedure for dropping packages? With the incorporation of the PCL (Performance Counters for Linux) in upcoming Linux kernel 2.6.31 there doesn't seem like there will be much need for libpfm and pfmon packages in F12. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Clipboard manager by default in Fedora 11
Ian Chapman, Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:47:23 +0800: I'd like to see some consistency between how apps handle clipboard content, when 1. The user highlights content and pastes using the middle mouse button 2. The user uses the copy paste menu options or hot keys. Read this http://www.jwz.org/doc/x-cut-and-paste.html first please. Thank you Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/blender/devel blender-2.49.config, 1.4, 1.5 blender-repack.sh, 1.2, 1.3 blender.spec, 1.121, 1.122
Can we have an explanation about why the Changelog entry doesn't
really match what was actually committed ?
Nicolas (kwizart)
2009/8/3 Jochen Schmitt s450...@fedoraproject.org:
Author: s4504kr
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/blender/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28431
Modified Files:
blender-2.49.config blender-repack.sh blender.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for python-2.6.2
Index: blender-2.49.config
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/blender/devel/blender-2.49.config,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- blender-2.49.config 19 Jun 2009 13:20:36 - 1.4
+++ blender-2.49.config 3 Aug 2009 16:38:43 - 1.5
@@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ BF_GETTEXT_LIB = 'gettextlib qhull'
BF_GETTEXT_LIBPATH = '@LIB@'
WITH_BF_FTGL = 'true'
-BF_FTGL = '#extern/bFTGL'
-BF_FTGL_INC = '${BF_FTGL}/include/'
-BF_FTGL_LIB = 'extern_ftgl'
+BF_FTGL = '/usr'
+BF_FTGL_INC = '${BF_FTGL}/include/FTGL'
+BF_FTGL_LIB = ['ftgl', '@LIB@']
WITH_BF_GAMEENGINE='true'
Index: blender-repack.sh
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/blender/devel/blender-repack.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -p -r1.2 -r1.3
--- blender-repack.sh 19 Jun 2009 13:54:39 - 1.2
+++ blender-repack.sh 3 Aug 2009 16:38:43 - 1.3
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ pushd extern
#Removed because of ip
rm -rf ffmpeg libmp3lame x264 xvidcore
#Removed because we can expect to use system one
- rm -rf fftw glew libopenjpeg ode qhull make verse
+# rm -rf fftw glew libopenjpeg ode qhull make verse
#Will have to be removed later: bFTGL
popd
rm -rf scons
Index: blender.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/blender/devel/blender.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.121
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -p -r1.121 -r1.122
--- blender.spec 24 Jul 2009 18:09:52 - 1.121
+++ blender.spec 3 Aug 2009 16:38:43 - 1.122
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Name: blender
Version: 2.49a
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: 3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
@@ -80,8 +80,6 @@ Requires: dejavu-fonts
Provides: blender-fonts = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: blender-fonts = 2.48a-9
-
-
%description
Blender is the essential software solution you need for 3D, from modeling,
animation, rendering and post-production to interactive creation and
playback.
@@ -110,6 +108,20 @@ Blender Game Engine.
%patch100 -p1
%patch101 -p1
+# binreloc is not a part of fedora
+rm -rf extern/bFTGL
+rm -rf extern/ffmpeg
+rm -rf extern/fftw
+rm -rf extern/glew
+rm -rf extern/libmp3lame
+rm -rf extern/libopenjpeg
+rm -rf extern/libredcode
+rm -rf extern/ode
+rm -rf extern/x264
+rm -rf extern/xvidcore
+rm -rf extern/qhull
+rm -rf extern/make
+rm -rf extern/verse
PYVER=$(%{__python} -c import sys ; print sys.version[:3])
@@ -233,6 +245,9 @@ fi || :
%{_bindir}/blenderplayer.bin
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 3 2009 Jochen Schmitt Jochen herr-schmitt de 2.49a-4
+- Rebuild for python-2.6.2
+
* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering
rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 2.49a-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Last few orphans left
There are only a few orphans left. I blocked all that weren't causing dep breakage, so these /really/ need a home or we need to block a few more things beyond just the orphans. glade2 is on this list because it was just recently orphaned. Unblocked orphan cryptix Unblocked orphan glade2 Unblocked orphan libdockapp Unblocked orphan qt-qsa Unblocked orphan tomoe List of deps left behind by orphan removal: Orphan: cryptix cryptix-asn1 requires cryptix = 3.2.0-13.fc12 Orphan: libdockapp wmacpi requires libdockapp.so.2 wmacpi requires libdockapp-devel = 0.6.2-3.fc12 Orphan: qt-qsa LabPlot requires qt-qsa-devel = 1.1.5-7.fc12 LabPlot requires libqsa.so.1 Orphan: tomoe tomoe-gtk requires tomoe-devel = 0.6.0-15.fc12 tomoe-gtk requires tomoe = 0.6.0-15.fc12 tomoe-gtk requires libtomoe.so.0 tomoe-gtk-devel requires pkgconfig(tomoe) = 0.6.0 tomoe-gtk-devel requires tomoe-devel = 0.6.0-15.fc12 tomoe-gtk-devel requires libtomoe.so.0 The script that generated this page can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py There you can also report bugs and RFEs. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
F11: Bug in sh-4.0 source build-in command
There is a bug in sh-4.0 source command: Must specify directory (./file) for filename, without not work. sh-4.0# cd /tmp sh-4.0# echo aaa=ppp sourcefile sh-4.0# ls -l sourcefile -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8 3 ago 20:37 sourcefile sh-4.0# cat sourcefile aaa=ppp sh-4.0# . sourcefile sh: .: sourcefile: file not found sh-4.0# source sourcefile sh: source: sourcefile: file not found sh-4.0# echo $aaa sh-4.0# source ./sourcefile sh-4.0# echo $aaa ppp sh-4.0# exit hope this help. -- Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Last few orphans left
Unblocked orphan tomoe dchen (CC'ed) was interested in tomoe. In fact he is one of the co-maintainers. Cheerio, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an imaginary part. -- Andrew Koenig -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F11: Bug in sh-4.0 source build-in command
Dne Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:46:55 +0200 Dario Lesca napsal(a): There is a bug in sh-4.0 source command: Must specify directory (./file) for filename, without not work. sh-4.0# cd /tmp sh-4.0# echo aaa=ppp sourcefile sh-4.0# ls -l sourcefile -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8 3 ago 20:37 sourcefile sh-4.0# cat sourcefile aaa=ppp sh-4.0# . sourcefile sh: .: sourcefile: file not found sh-4.0# source sourcefile sh: source: sourcefile: file not found sh-4.0# echo $aaa sh-4.0# source ./sourcefile sh-4.0# echo $aaa ppp sh-4.0# exit hope this help. Not a bug. You're running bash in POSIX mode (probably you ran sh). In POSIX mode the current directory is not searched by the source command. This is documented in the manpage. Michal -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [Fedora-it] F11: Bug in sh-4.0 source build-in command
AFAIK, bash looks in PATH for the command 'source' 2009/8/3 Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it There is a bug in sh-4.0 source command: Must specify directory (./file) for filename, without not work. sh-4.0# cd /tmp sh-4.0# echo aaa=ppp sourcefile sh-4.0# ls -l sourcefile -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8 3 ago 20:37 sourcefile sh-4.0# cat sourcefile aaa=ppp sh-4.0# . sourcefile sh: .: sourcefile: file not found sh-4.0# source sourcefile sh: source: sourcefile: file not found sh-4.0# echo $aaa sh-4.0# source ./sourcefile sh-4.0# echo $aaa ppp sh-4.0# exit hope this help. -- Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it ___ Fedora-it-list mailing list fedora-it-l...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-it-list -- Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18) Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278 Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
python-urlgrabber update to 3.9.0
Hi, I've pushed python-urlgrabber 3.9.0 into rawhide. It is an api-compliant urlgrabber - but it is now backended to libcurl instead of urllib2. In tests so far everything appears to work as intended. However, please let me know if something seems odder than normal with this change. We can revert back to 3.1.X pretty easily. Thanks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: python-urlgrabber update to 3.9.0
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Seth Vidal wrote: Hi, I've pushed python-urlgrabber 3.9.0 into rawhide. It is an api-compliant urlgrabber - but it is now backended to libcurl instead of urllib2. In tests so far everything appears to work as intended. However, please let me know if something seems odder than normal with this change. We can revert back to 3.1.X pretty easily. completed build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=125399 let me know what breaks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Release Engineeirng meeting summary for 2009-08-03
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-03/fedora-meeting.2009-08-03-18.10.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-03/fedora-meeting.2009-08-03-18.10.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-03/fedora-meeting.2009-08-03-18.10.log.html Meeting log --- * **roll call** (f13-18:10:25_) * **Old Business** (f13-18:12:54_) * **Orphans (old business)** (f13-18:13:14_) * *ACTION*: f13 will re-post the current orphans that will break deps to try and get some movement on them. (f13-18:16:46_) * **gpg purging (old business)** (f13-18:17:11_) * *ACTION*: f13 still needs to file a ticket about gpg purging in koij (f13-18:17:35_) * **Critical Path (old business)** (f13-18:18:51_) * *LINK*: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/346 (skvidal-18:20:09_) * *ACTION*: now that the ticket has been filed, lmacken will report in a week's time if any progress has been made. (f13-18:23:14_) * *ACTION*: f13 still needs to package offtrac (f13-18:23:32_) * **Mass Rebuild (old business)** (f13-18:24:24_) * *ACTION*: dgilmore will draft an SOP (with help) for managing RPM changes in rawhide. (f13-18:25:49_) * *INFO*: Comps listing of critical packages is not a depclosed listing. (f13-18:33:03_) * **no frozen rawhide (old business)** (f13-18:33:50_) * *ACTION*: f13 still needs to file a bodhi ticket (f13-18:38:04_) * *ACTION*: lmacken will create the ticket instead (f13-18:38:32_) * *AGREED*: No Frozen Rawhide has been punted to Fedora 13 (f13-18:45:44_) * *ACTION*: f13 will report to FESCo this change. (f13-18:46:10_) * **Rawhide fixup for rpm deps (old business)** (f13-18:47:24_) * **Fedora 12 Alpha (old business)** (f13-18:51:06_) * *ACTION*: f13 to fix issues with full pungi composes in order to produce Test Compose for Fedora 12 Alpha (f13-18:52:31_) * **Package Signing (old business)** (f13-18:56:46_) * *ACTION*: f13 will coordinate bridge/vault rebuild with smooge (f13-18:58:56_) * **open floor** (f13-19:07:06_) * *ACTION*: f13 to threaten recursive blocking if orphans are not picked up by tomorrow (f13-19:12:11_) -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
fedoracommunity-0.3.4 bugfix release
I just pushed a new version of the Fedora Community portal into production. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community Changes in this release include: - The Rawhide and Build Owner widget is no longer broken (#289) - The package download release filter is no longer broken (#264) - Huge optimizations in the Bugzilla Connector - Fixed a pagination bug in the Recent Bugs widget (#291) - Brought the pkgdb connector up to speed with recent API changes - Fixed a bug in the watchers/owners grids (#298) - Fixed the broken maintainers grids (#290) - Fixed a couple of timezone-related clock problems (#260, #287) - Properly weigh search results (#292) - Fixed some broken links in the tour - Various other minor UI tweaks Also, today we had a great brainstorming session around future Fedora Community apps. You find find the IRC logs and gobby notes here: https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/moksha/2009-August/000116.html As always, you can file bugs and feature requests here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedoracommunity/newticket ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Review swaps
Hi All, Anyone interested in some review swaps? I have the following packages that I need to get reviewed for Moblin so if you've got a package you'd like to swap (or you've just got a few spare cycles for a plain review) they are as follows: bickley - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 bisho - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 dalston - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Last few orphans left
- Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: There are only a few orphans left. I blocked all that weren't causing dep breakage, so these /really/ need a home or we need to block a few more things beyond just the orphans. glade2 is on this list because it was just recently orphaned. Unblocked orphan tomoe I would take tomoe, and related package such as tomoe-gtk, scim-tomoe. Regards, -- Ding-Yi Chen Software Engineer Internationalization Group Red Hat, Inc. Looking to carve out IT costs? www.apac.redhat.com/promo/carveoutcosts/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review swaps
Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 00:39 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: Hi All, Anyone interested in some review swaps? I have the following packages that I need to get reviewed for Moblin so if you've got a package you'd like to swap (or you've just got a few spare cycles for a plain review) they are as follows: bickley - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 bisho - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 dalston - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Hi Peter, as promised I will take them. You can in turn do: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 whaawmp - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 Cheers, Peter Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 10 - 2009-08-03
On 08/03/2009 02:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-3.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-10-i386 unresolved deps: python-pylons = 0:0.9.7 python-decorator = 0:3.0 package: python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-3.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-10-ppc unresolved deps: python-pylons = 0:0.9.7 python-decorator = 0:3.0 package: python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-3.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-10-ppc64 unresolved deps: python-pylons = 0:0.9.7 python-decorator = 0:3.0 package: python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-3.fc10.noarch from fedora-updates-10-x86_64 unresolved deps: python-pylons = 0:0.9.7 python-decorator = 0:3.0 So.. lmacken, spot, are you planning on making forward compat packages for python-pylons on F-10? If so, I'll update python-decorator. If not, I'd rather not. 3.0 is not 100% API compatible with 2.x. However, the changes are not in very frequently used code and we already verified that the packages that use it within Fedora were okay when we updated for F-11. -Toshio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 502402] RFE: please deliver (and use!) filtering macros
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502402
--- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-08-03 02:52:55 EDT
---
Looks like the FPC and FESCo just approved
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering,
so we can start thinking about delivering a Perl-specific one under
/etc/rpm/macros.perl:
http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/macros.perl
It's just a sensible default for perl-* packages, preventing private solib
provides from showing up, as well as anything that may crop up under %_docdir.
Implemented as a single macro like this will enable us to use it as:
%{?perl_default_filter}
...which will help prevent srpm breakage on other releases/distros that may not
have these macros present. Note that the %perl_default_filter is defined such
that if the filtering macros aren't present on the system, the build will not
fail.
Thoughts? :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/devel import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Test-Refcount.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: kwizart
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23334/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Test-Refcount.spec
Log Message:
Initial import for devel
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
perl-Test-Refcount-0_05-2_fc11:HEAD:perl-Test-Refcount-0.05-2.fc11.src.rpm:1249300708
--- NEW FILE perl-Test-Refcount.spec ---
Name: perl-Test-Refcount
Version:0.05
Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Assert reference counts on objects
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Refcount/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Test-Refcount-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Refcount)
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::FindRef)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder::Tester)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
The Perl garbage collector uses simple reference counting during the normal
execution of a program. This means that cycles or unweakened references in
other parts of code can keep an object around for longer than intended. To
help avoid this problem, the reference count of a new object from its class
constructor ought to be 1. This way, the caller can know the object will be
properly DESTROYed when it drops all of its references to it.
%prep
%setup -q -n Test-Refcount-%{version}
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
#Test fails rhbz#514942
make test || :
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Test
%{_mandir}/man3/Test*.3*
%changelog
* Fri Jul 31 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 0.05-2
- Add missing BR
- Use %%{_fixperms}
- Fix %%files section
- Add comment about why it fails
* Thu Jul 9 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 0.05-1
- Initial spec
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 31 Jul 2009 21:19:45 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 3 Aug 2009 12:00:27 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 31 Jul 2009 21:19:45 - 1.1
+++ sources 3 Aug 2009 12:00:27 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+657b089713b1283218590119faf12432 Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-11 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Test-Refcount.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: kwizart
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24714/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Test-Refcount.spec
Log Message:
Initial import for f11
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
perl-Test-Refcount-0_05-2_fc11:F-11:perl-Test-Refcount-0.05-2.fc11.src.rpm:1249300857
--- NEW FILE perl-Test-Refcount.spec ---
Name: perl-Test-Refcount
Version:0.05
Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Assert reference counts on objects
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Refcount/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Test-Refcount-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Refcount)
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::FindRef)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder::Tester)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
The Perl garbage collector uses simple reference counting during the normal
execution of a program. This means that cycles or unweakened references in
other parts of code can keep an object around for longer than intended. To
help avoid this problem, the reference count of a new object from its class
constructor ought to be 1. This way, the caller can know the object will be
properly DESTROYed when it drops all of its references to it.
%prep
%setup -q -n Test-Refcount-%{version}
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
#Test fails rhbz#514942
make test || :
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Test
%{_mandir}/man3/Test*.3*
%changelog
* Fri Jul 31 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 0.05-2
- Add missing BR
- Use %%{_fixperms}
- Fix %%files section
- Add comment about why it fails
* Thu Jul 9 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 0.05-1
- Initial spec
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-11/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 31 Jul 2009 21:19:45 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 3 Aug 2009 12:02:57 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-11/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 31 Jul 2009 21:19:45 - 1.1
+++ sources 3 Aug 2009 12:02:57 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+657b089713b1283218590119faf12432 Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-10 import.log, NONE, 1.1 perl-Test-Refcount.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: kwizart
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25514/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log perl-Test-Refcount.spec
Log Message:
Initial import for F10
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
perl-Test-Refcount-0_05-2_fc11:F-10:perl-Test-Refcount-0.05-2.fc11.src.rpm:1249301001
--- NEW FILE perl-Test-Refcount.spec ---
Name: perl-Test-Refcount
Version:0.05
Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:Assert reference counts on objects
Group: Development/Libraries
License:GPL+ or Artistic
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Refcount/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/P/PE/PEVANS/Test-Refcount-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::Refcount)
BuildRequires: perl(Devel::FindRef)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder::Tester)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
The Perl garbage collector uses simple reference counting during the normal
execution of a program. This means that cycles or unweakened references in
other parts of code can keep an object around for longer than intended. To
help avoid this problem, the reference count of a new object from its class
constructor ought to be 1. This way, the caller can know the object will be
properly DESTROYed when it drops all of its references to it.
%prep
%setup -q -n Test-Refcount-%{version}
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
#Test fails rhbz#514942
make test || :
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/Test
%{_mandir}/man3/Test*.3*
%changelog
* Fri Jul 31 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 0.05-2
- Add missing BR
- Use %%{_fixperms}
- Fix %%files section
- Add comment about why it fails
* Thu Jul 9 2009 kwizart kwizart at gmail.com - 0.05-1
- Initial spec
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-10/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 31 Jul 2009 21:19:45 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 3 Aug 2009 12:06:36 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Test-Refcount/F-10/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 31 Jul 2009 21:19:45 - 1.1
+++ sources 3 Aug 2009 12:06:36 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+657b089713b1283218590119faf12432 Test-Refcount-0.05.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
