Re: rpms/nss/devel nss.spec,1.105,1.106
Problem should be fixed in nss-3.12.3.99.3-29.fc12. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129934 and comments in Bug 520277. Elio On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim < michael.silva...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Michael Schwendt > wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:13:54 + (UTC), Elio wrote: > > > >> Author: emaldonado > >> > >> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel > >> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14629 > >> > >> Modified Files: > >> nss.spec > >> Log Message: > >> Do not require sqlite for nss, it breaks nss-util install - bug 520277 > >> > It's nss-tools, not nss-util > > -- > Michel Alexandre Salim > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
how to pack an rpm for sqlite manager the xul application
hello, Sqlite manager is now made an application not just an extension http://sqlite-manager.googlecode.com/files/SQLiteManager_XR_0.5.2b3.zip (it's supposed to be noarch since it uses python) I can run it like this xulrunner path/application.ini but I tried to copy it to /usr/share/SQLiteManager/ then run as regular user xulrunner /usr/share/SQLiteManager/application.ini it did not work I also tried xulrunner --install-app /path/to/SQLiteManager_XR_0.5.2b3.zip /usr/share/ SQLiteManager and it won't run so what is the right way to make an rpm for it ? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009: $ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree Finished Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates Finished Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package emacs-auctex.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: tex-preview = 11.85-8.fc11 for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch --> Processing Dependency: dvipng for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package dvipng.x86_64 0:1.11-2.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: dvipng-1.11-2.fc11.x86_64 ---> Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-42.fc11 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 for package: kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 from fedora has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I have texlive-dvipng, texlive-kpathsea, and texlive-preview installed. Should I file a bug someplace? Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/kdebase/devel kdebase.spec,1.386,1.387
Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/30/2009 10:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Anyway, I'm open to suggestions on how to better achive what we want >> here. Maybe drop the kde-plasma-folderview dep, and just add to comps >> instead? > > FWIW, this is the solution, I prefer. sounds like a winner, done. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/kdebase/devel kdebase.spec,1.386,1.387
On 08/30/2009 10:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Anyway, I'm open to suggestions on how to better achive what we want > here. Maybe drop the kde-plasma-folderview dep, and just add to comps > instead? FWIW, this is the solution, I prefer. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/nss/devel nss.spec,1.105,1.106
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:13:54 + (UTC), Elio wrote: > >> Author: emaldonado >> >> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel >> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14629 >> >> Modified Files: >> nss.spec >> Log Message: >> Do not require sqlite for nss, it breaks nss-util install - bug 520277 >> It's nss-tools, not nss-util -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora on NSLU2/Synology/etc.
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:14:03 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > http://www.smolts.org/client/show_all/pub_597e2d6d-7d94-4299-a9ae-e7c3a7e35b31 Well, that's encouraging. The big question for me is, is there a sign that a system architecture emerges for ARM, or at least a sufficiently popular basic design that has a future? If we look at Synology, for instance, their DS109j is the 6th revision or so, and it's on the cusp of being replaced again, that's why the price dipped: http://www.amazon.com/Synology-Disk-Station-DS109j-Effective/dp/B0023P5QWW/ Chasing the kaleidoscopic change of platforms is a non-starter for me as a software developer. I want to buy the box, jumpstart it, and it should get into the cloud right away, with my software pulled from the repo and running on it. Currently I use these: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856167032 With cheap RAM and disk it goes firmly below $200. If ARM box that I have to nurse into working costs that much, it's not interesting. But I'm willing to investigate, that's what my question was about. -- Pete -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent
2009/8/30 Christoph Höger : > Hi, > > is dma packaged by someone? That would be the first step and I would > happily test that thing (having postfix installed after Paul Frields > advice which works well). > I think I'll do the packaging -- it's in Dragonfly's Git, and the one thing I regret about Git vis-a-vis Subversion is that you cannot just grab a subdirectory, so our source verification might get a bit tricky. Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent
Hi, is dma packaged by someone? That would be the first step and I would happily test that thing (having postfix installed after Paul Frields advice which works well). regards Christoph signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: (SOLVED: sort of) Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 07:36 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 07:21 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure > > > > was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, > > > > plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on > > > > it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in? > > > > > > The gutenprint project supplies a driver for the PIXMA MP180 which might > > > possibly work. > > > > > > Install the gutenprint-cups package for that. > > > > I have it installed, but can't figure out how to use the drivers from > > it? All I see in the printer setup/configuration (s-c-p I guess) is what > > looks like same drivers. Is there a different way to go about it using > > gutenprint? > > Probably same thing, but also went through cups (localhost:631) and I > don't see the pixma mp printers at all. Guess they are called something > else or I need to install something else? Ok, it didn't install the first time, no idea what was up with that but got it going this time. It did find/install the 180 driver and so far it seems to work. Haven't scanned or copied yet but printing works. Thanks, and guess this will work until the 190 comes out. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090830 changes
Compose started at Sun Aug 30 06:15:09 UTC 2009
New package eclipse-texlipse
Eclipse plugin for editing Latex
Updated Packages:
PackageKit-0.5.2-0.2.20090824git.fc12
-
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Christopher Aillon -
0.5.2-0.2.20090824git
- Fix build against polkit, rebuild against newer libnm_glib
abiword-2.7.10-1.fc12
-
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Marc Maurer - 1:2.7.10-1
- New upstream release
akonadi-1.2.0-2.fc12.2
--
empathy-2.27.91.1-5.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Matthias Clasen - 2.27.91.1-4
- Rebuild against newer libnm_glib
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Brian Pepple - 2.27.91.1-5
- Backport patch to fix incorrect assumption about navigation-request. (#519849)
etoys-4.0.2247-1.fc12
-
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Gavin Romig-Koch - 4.0.2247-1
- pulled in latest upstream release 4.0.2247
exaile-0.3.0-1.fc12
---
* Fri Aug 28 2009 Deji Akingunola - 0.3.0-1
- Update to 0.3.0
filezilla-3.2.7.1-1.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 3.2.7.1-1
- Update to 3.2.7.1
gdm-2.27.90-2.fc12
--
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Caolán McNamara 1:2.27.90-2
- rebuild with new audit
gnome-shell-2.27.1-4
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Owen Taylor - 2.27.1-4
- Fix GConf %preun script to properly be for package removal
gnome-specimen-0.4-1.fc12
-
* Fri Aug 21 2009 Pablo Martin-Gomez 0.4-1
- Update to 0.4
- Fix bug rh #511791 by adding 'pyexecdir=' to make and make install
- Own the created directory
- Clean the spec
gnonlin-0.10.12.2-0.1.fc12
--
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Jeffrey C. Ollie - 0.10.12.2-0.1
- Update to prerelease for 0.10.13
jd-2.4.2-0.3.svn3054_trunk.fc12
---
* Sun Aug 30 2009 Mamoru Tasaka
- rev 3054
kazehakase-0.5.7-1.fc12
---
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.5.7-1
- Update to 0.5.7
kdebase-workspace-4.3.0-102.fc12
* Fri Aug 28 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 4.3.0-102
- Fix typo
* Thu Aug 27 2009 Rex Dieter - 4.3.0-12
- PolicyKit-kde subpkg (#519172, #519654)
* Thu Aug 27 2009 Rex Dieter - 4.3.0-101
- inflate Release tag, avoiding possible upgrade/obsoletes pain
- -devel: drop Provides: PolicyKit-kde-devel, bump Obsoletes
kipi-plugins-0.6.0-1.fc12
-
krb5-auth-dialog-0.12-1.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Matthias Clasen - 0.12-1
- Update to 0.12
- Rebuild against new libnm_glib
kvirc-4.0.0-0.14.20090830svn3436.fc12
-
* Sun Aug 30 2009 Alexey Kurov -
4.0.0-0.14.20090830svn3436
- patch for using standard compiler flags
lirc-0.8.6-0.6.pre2.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.8.6-0.5.pre2
- Update to lirc 0.8.6pre2
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Jarod Wilson 0.8.6-0.6.pre2
- Rediff patches so they actually apply still
magic-8.0.54-1.fc12
---
* Fri Aug 28 2009 Chitlesh Goorah -
8.0.54-1
- new upstream release
memcached-1.4.1-1.fc12
--
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Paul Lindner - 1.4.1-1
- Upgrade to 1.4.1
- http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes141
mingw32-filesystem-54-1.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 54-1
- Added the file /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-pkg-config which is a wrapper script
which calls pkg-config with the right environment variables set (BZ #513825)
mingw32-libp11-0.2.6-3.fc12
---
* Sun Aug 30 2009 Kalev Lember - 0.2.6-3
- Rebuilt with new mingw32-openssl
mingw32-opensc-0.11.8-4.fc12
* Sun Aug 30 2009 Kalev Lember - 0.11.8-4
- Rebuilt with new mingw32-openssl
mingw32-openssl-1.0.0-0.3.beta3.fc12
* Sun Aug 30 2009 Erik van Pienbroek -
1.0.0-0.2.beta3
- Fixed invalid RPM Provides
* Sun Aug 30 2009 Kalev Lember - 1.0.0-0.3.beta3
- Simplified the lib renaming patch
* Fri Aug 28 2009 Erik van Pienbroek -
1.0.0-0.1.beta3
- Update to version 1.0.0 beta 3
- Use %global instead of %define
- Automatically generate debuginfo subpackage
- Merged various changes from the native Fedora package (up to 1.0.0-0.5.beta3)
- Don't use the %{_mingw32_make} macro anymore as it's ugly and causes
side-effects
- Added missing BuildRequires mingw32-dlfcn (Kalev Lember)
- Reworked patches to rename *eay32.dll to lib*.dll (Kalev Lember)
- Patch Configure script to use %{_mingw32_cflags} (Kalev Lember)
mingw32-pixman-0.16.0-1.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 0.16.0-1
- Update to 0.16.0
mutter-2.27.3-3.fc12
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Owen Taylor - 2.27.3-3
- Fix %preun GConf script to properly be for package removal
mysql-5.1.37-4.fc12
---
* Sat Aug 29 2009 Tom Lane 5.1.37-4
- Remove one misguided patch; turns out I was chasing a glibc bug
- Tempor
Re: Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 07:21 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure > > > was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, > > > plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on > > > it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in? > > > > The gutenprint project supplies a driver for the PIXMA MP180 which might > > possibly work. > > > > Install the gutenprint-cups package for that. > > I have it installed, but can't figure out how to use the drivers from > it? All I see in the printer setup/configuration (s-c-p I guess) is what > looks like same drivers. Is there a different way to go about it using > gutenprint? Probably same thing, but also went through cups (localhost:631) and I don't see the pixma mp printers at all. Guess they are called something else or I need to install something else? Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 12:13 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure > > was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, > > plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on > > it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in? > > The gutenprint project supplies a driver for the PIXMA MP180 which might > possibly work. > > Install the gutenprint-cups package for that. I have it installed, but can't figure out how to use the drivers from it? All I see in the printer setup/configuration (s-c-p I guess) is what looks like same drivers. Is there a different way to go about it using gutenprint? Thanks, Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora on NSLU2/Synology/etc.
2009/8/30 Pete Zaitcev : > Dear All: > > I'm wondering if anyone tried to run Fedora on a small home NAS, > in the class of NSLU2 or Synology 108j. I'm hacking on software > that permits easy management of storage clouds and I'm thinking > about creating a testbed populated with something cheap ($100 or so). > Please let me know if you have a hands-on experience with it. I advice you to look at the Western Digital MyBook World Edition series, especially at the latest WD MyBook WE White Light: http://www.wdc.com/ru/products/Products.asp?DriveID=587 http://www.wdc.com/ru/products/Products.asp?DriveID=589 They have 128 Mb of RAM, 1Gbit ethernet, CPU ~ 300+ MHz and a 1 or 2 SATA2 ports (number of SATA2 ports depends on model). I've got some experience with previous model (which has only 32 Mbytes of RAM and less powerful CPU), and it works well. Here is its smolts profile: http://www.smolts.org/client/show_all/pub_597e2d6d-7d94-4299-a9ae-e7c3a7e35b31 Although they are costs ~200-300 $ (please, note that HDD is already included, so the actual price is ~100$ + 1 or 2 TB HDD), they are very hack-friendly, since you don't need to flash/re-flash them (and, therefore, chances to brick them are very very small). They work as following: * After power-up CPU loads tiny firmware, which reads first 512 bytes from attached HDD, which should contain 1st stage loader, and executes it. * 1st stage loader (if it was loaded correctly) loads 2nd stage loader from the rest of HDD. All these loaders are easy to install using just the USB-HDD box or directly attaching HDD to your computer. And you may, also, very simply (using only dd and bzip2) create a backup of the original firmware in case you'll gave up :) Note, that you need to remember your soldering skills since you will need to attach serial cable (I'm afraid most of consumer's NAS devices sold without serial or JTAG). -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 20:51 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure > was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, > plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on > it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in? The gutenprint project supplies a driver for the PIXMA MP180 which might possibly work. Install the gutenprint-cups package for that. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/nss/devel nss.spec,1.105,1.106
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:13:54 + (UTC), Elio wrote:
> Author: emaldonado
>
> Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel
> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14629
>
> Modified Files:
> nss.spec
> Log Message:
> Do not require sqlite for nss, it breaks nss-util install - bug 520277
>
>
> Index: nss.spec
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/nss/devel/nss.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.105
> retrieving revision 1.106
> diff -u -p -r1.105 -r1.106
> --- nss.spec 29 Aug 2009 20:46:40 - 1.105
> +++ nss.spec 30 Aug 2009 07:13:53 - 1.106
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> Summary: Network Security Services
> Name: nss
> Version: 3.12.3.99.3
> -Release: 26%{?dist}
> +Release: 27%{?dist}
> License: MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+
> URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/
> Group:System Environment/Libraries
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ Requires: nspr >= %{nspr_version
> Requires: nss-util >= %{nss_util_version}
> Requires: nss-softokn >= %{nss_softokn_version}
> Requires: nss-softokn-freebl%{_isa} >= %{nss_softokn_version}
> -Requires: sqlite
Highly questionable!
Just by watching this diff and the commit comment, it cannot fix
anything. Why? All you changed is to drop an explicit dependency on
sqlite. If sqlite breaks nss-utils, it would still be broken on
installations where sqlite is available.
So, let's visit bug 520277:
| The two depends on libsqlite3.so() -- on 64-bit systems,
| libsqlite3.so()(64bit) but this is not available; sqlite only provides
| libsqlite3.so.0() and libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)
You still have "BuildRequires: sqlite-devel", so nss does still build
with sqlite, doesn't it?
Yes, it does. The bad libsqlite3.so dependency (mentioned in the bug
report) is still present:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1520459
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Some ideas/questions about yum
2009/8/28 Muayyad AlSadi : > or wait till the PK API is rewritten so that mounting is done in the > non-privileged console user part Not re-written, but written. I've explained how to do this in the past, it just needs someone with an itch-to-scratch to implement it properly. Richard. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Canon PIXMA MP190 drivers
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > Yes I know I should had done my research before buying, but wasn't sure > was gonna get it when I was at the store. Anyway, got this printer, > plugged it in, was detected but said no drivers for it. Any plans on > it, or way I can submit info from the CD to get them in? > >From experience, sadly Canon is one of the most Linux-unfriendly printer companies existing. There was a time when the only available driver had to be purchased from a third-party company in Germany. Best of luck, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
