Re: TeXLive 2009 texconfig
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 Matthew Saltzman wrote: > texconfig from TeXLive 2009 in F11 hangs when I attempt to set the dvips > default paper type. The hang occurs when I run texconfig as a user and > texconfig or texconfig-sys as root. It works for me on either scenario (F11/texlive-2009/i586). > -- > Matthew Saltzman -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: TeXLive 2009 texconfig
2009/9/9 José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 09 September 2009 Matthew Saltzman wrote: >> texconfig from TeXLive 2009 in F11 hangs when I attempt to set the dvips >> default paper type. The hang occurs when I run texconfig as a user and >> texconfig or texconfig-sys as root. > > It works for me on either scenario (F11/texlive-2009/i586). > [..] Is there some bug filed where we can report after testing, if no @Mathew may you report one ? Thanks, -- Rakesh Pandit https://fedoraproject.org/ freedom, friends, features, first -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: GCC var-tracking-assignments: testing and bug reports appreciated
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:46:26PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >Jakub built gcc-4.4.1-10 earlier today, with a new feature that >generates much better debug information in optimized programs. > >The feature has been under development for a couple of years, and it's >recently been accepted into GCC, for GCC 4.5. We've backported it for >Fedora 12. Why are you backporting something like this from a non-released compiler into F12 _after_ Alpha and particularly _after_ the mass rebuild? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
cannot mockbuild
Hi, when I try make mockbuild on the bsf package to test my changes, I get the following error: [r...@choeger5 devel]# yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/root/ resolvedep ccache 'jython' 'java-gcj-compat-devel' 'ant' 'tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api' 'xalan-j2' 'servlet' 'jpackage-utils >= 1.6' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 309, in user_main errcode = main(args) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 157, in main base.getOptionsConfig(args) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 189, in getOptionsConfig self.conf File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 652, in conf = property(fget=lambda self: self._getConfig(), File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 239, in _getConfig self._conf = config.readMainConfig(startupconf) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/config.py", line 794, in readMainConfig yumvars['releasever'] = _getsysver(startupconf.installroot, startupconf.distroverpkg) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/config.py", line 873, in _getsysver hdr = idx.next() StopIteration Any ideas what causes that? regards Christoph signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
$PATH
I found out while compiling some apps manually that they are failing because they can't find files, I investigated and found out that the binaries are installed but just not in $PATH. /usr/lib/qt4/bin/ Is this path left out on purpose? Cheers! -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, msn: valent.turko...@hotmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > zkota:BADURL:bazaar_1.4.2.tar.gz:bazaar > zkota:BADURL:bazaar-doc_1.4.tar.gz:bazaar It seems the bazaar-1 (aka baz) sources are not available anymore at the bazaar's site. At least I haven't found them. What to do with this then? (I know, this package is dead, and I will likely orphan it soon. :-) ) Zoltan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On 09/09/09 14:26, Zoltan Kota wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Kevin Fenzi wrote: zkota:BADURL:bazaar_1.4.2.tar.gz:bazaar zkota:BADURL:bazaar-doc_1.4.tar.gz:bazaar It seems the bazaar-1 (aka baz) sources are not available anymore at the bazaar's site. At least I haven't found them. What to do with this then? (I know, this package is dead, and I will likely orphan it soon. :-) ) Try here: http://bazaar-vcs.org/releases/src/obsolete/ Paul. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
> Tomorrow - 2009-09-09 - is ATI/AMD Radeon graphics card Test Day (1). I have been trying to follow the "procedure" to get the liveusb key to boot - but changing the kernel line to either of "root=live:LABEL=F12-Snap1-i686-Live to: root=live:LABEL=F12-i686" or to LABEL=LIVE won't work for me! I have seen both the bz reports at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520207 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521471 The boot gets to the stage where the white/blue line goes across the page but the screen then shows "No root device found. Boot has failed, sleeping forever" - the advertised method for fixing this fails for me - is there any other suggested work-around? Thanks -- mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $PATH
Valent Turkovic wrote: > I found out while compiling some apps manually that they are failing > because they can't find files, I investigated and found out that the > binaries are installed but just not in $PATH. > > /usr/lib/qt4/bin/ > > Is this path left out on purpose? Shrug, there's -qt4 versions in /usr/bin, which is the common convention these days (since qt3 and qt4 versions exist, and conflict). apps not looking for those should be fixed. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
On 09/09/09 07:17, mike cloaked wrote: Tomorrow - 2009-09-09 - is ATI/AMD Radeon graphics card Test Day (1). I have been trying to follow the "procedure" to get the liveusb key to boot - but changing the kernel line to either of "root=live:LABEL=F12-Snap1-i686-Live to: root=live:LABEL=F12-i686" or to LABEL=LIVE won't work for me! I have seen both the bz reports at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520207 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521471 The boot gets to the stage where the white/blue line goes across the page but the screen then shows "No root device found. Boot has failed, sleeping forever" - the advertised method for fixing this fails for me - is there any other suggested work-around? Thanks -- mike Try using /sbin/dosfslabel or /sbin/e2label to read the actual label. Then use that for the label on the boot line. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
Bob Arendt wrote: > Try using /sbin/dosfslabel or /sbin/e2label to read the actual label. > Then use that for the label on the boot line. Bingo! That works - excellent - I think I will add this to the reference page - others will doubtless be bitten by this also. Now I hope I can test later this evening -- mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Snapshot Label bug (was Graphics Test Week)
On 09/09/09 08:17, mike cloaked wrote: Bob Arendt wrote: Try using /sbin/dosfslabel or /sbin/e2label to read the actual label. Then use that for the label on the boot line. Bingo! That works - excellent - I think I will add this to the reference page - others will doubtless be bitten by this also. Now I hope I can test later this evening mike Glad it helped. I tried out the Snapshot 1 liveusb, and was puzzled when it didn't work; My original post to those bugs was based on /sbin/dosfslabel (it was a vfat stick). I'm curious - what *was* the label reported? How did you create your live boot? I'd used the "livecd-iso-to-disk" tool, latest F11 version to put the live iso's on to a USB stick .. and ended up with labels "F12-i686" and "F12-x86_64". Some tool somewhere is mucking this up. I don't know if it's the .iso creation on the fedoraproject side, or the livecd-iso-to-disk from the livecd-tools package (or some sort of tool inconsistency). -Bob Arendt -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: TeXLive 2009 texconfig
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:38 +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Wednesday 09 September 2009 Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > texconfig from TeXLive 2009 in F11 hangs when I attempt to set the dvips > > default paper type. The hang occurs when I run texconfig as a user and > > texconfig or texconfig-sys as root. > > It works for me on either scenario (F11/texlive-2009/i586). Mine's x86_64. Maybe that makes a difference? PS Sorry about the occasional dupes. Damn evolution-exchange... > > > -- > > Matthew Saltzman > -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Processing Review Requests
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 21:21 +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know: This message is off-topic to this list. Redirecting discussion to fedora-devel-l...@redhat.com. > 1. If there is a comprehensive contact list of Fedora Packagers who > are allowed to sponsor packages? Is the list available somewhere that > new joinees can use, and contact Fedora packagers? or is it always > that whenever a Sponsor looks into FE-NEEDSPONSOR review requests in > bugzilla, the package is reviewed? Yes, you can look in FAS who have sponsor status in the Packager group. Normally sponsors look for review requests needing sponsors, but if you've been waiting for very long you can mail fedora-devel-list and ask for someone to have a look at your package. > 2. Is there a queue of review requests that is maintained, say, for > example a review-request that has not been reviewed for a month, > should be given first priority or is there any criteria as such? or is > it left to the Packagers? Not especially, but the review bugs have bug numbers that are in increasing order in time, so older reviews have smaller numbers. Picking what to review is up to the packager. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: $PATH
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Valent Turkovic wrote: > >> I found out while compiling some apps manually that they are failing >> because they can't find files, I investigated and found out that the >> binaries are installed but just not in $PATH. >> >> /usr/lib/qt4/bin/ >> >> Is this path left out on purpose? > > Shrug, there's -qt4 versions in /usr/bin, which is the common > convention these days (since qt3 and qt4 versions exist, and conflict). > apps not looking for those should be fixed. > > -- Rex Ok, thanks, I'll pass that up to upstream devels for GPX Viewer. -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic, msn: valent.turko...@hotmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Preupgrade to rawhide fails with VGA monitor going out of range (i915)
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 02:26:06PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Yes, it is now that legendary time, well loved by the hearts of men for > millennia(*): Graphics Test Week! > Something related.. I just tried preupgrade from F11 to F12/rawhide. It didn't go very well.. when I restart the computer so that it boots to anaconda my VGA monitor goes "Input Signal out of Range" and I can't see anything.. I rebooted again, and this time edited the "Upgrade to Rawhide" grub entry and added "nomodeset" option.. that didn't work either, now the display went blank, and the monitor didn't show _any_ signal. F10 and F11 work perfectly well on this computer, without any manual graphics configuration. Hardware info: # lspci|grep VGA 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation E7221 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 05) and gfx stuff from F11 kernel dmesg: [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 i915 :00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 i915 :00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64 allocated 1280x1024 fb: 0x007df000, bo f69bf420 fbcon: inteldrmfb (fb0) is primary device Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x64 [drm] DAC-6: set mode 1280x1024 1a fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device registered panic notifier [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 Any ideas/tips? -- Pasi -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Snapshot Label bug (was Graphics Test Week)
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:56 -0700, Bob Arendt wrote: > On 09/09/09 08:17, mike cloaked wrote: > > Bob Arendt wrote: > > > >> Try using /sbin/dosfslabel or /sbin/e2label to read the actual label. > >> Then use that for the label on the boot line. > > > > Bingo! That works - excellent - I think I will add this to the > > reference page - others will doubtless be bitten by this also. > > Now I hope I can test later this evening > > > > mike > > > Glad it helped. I tried out the Snapshot 1 liveusb, and > was puzzled when it didn't work; My original post to > those bugs was based on /sbin/dosfslabel (it was a vfat stick). > > I'm curious - what *was* the label reported? How did you > create your live boot? I'd used the "livecd-iso-to-disk" > tool, latest F11 version to put the live iso's on to a USB > stick .. and ended up with labels "F12-i686" and "F12-x86_64". > > Some tool somewhere is mucking this up. I don't know if > it's the .iso creation on the fedoraproject side, or the > livecd-iso-to-disk from the livecd-tools package (or some > sort of tool inconsistency). livecd-iso-to-disk is the culprit, we believe. I already filed a bug on this when I hit it during an earlier test event (dracut). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520207 (I know you've found out about this, but posting for the benefit of the list :>) I cleaned up the warning note on the Wiki page - but thanks for adding it, guys, helped a lot of people while I was still asleep :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Preupgrade to rawhide fails with VGA monitor going out of range (i915)
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 21:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > Any ideas/tips? try 'nomodeset xdriver=vesa' or just 'nomodeset vesa', that may work around it during the upgrade. then you can test it once rawhide is installed and see if you can find an error message in the X logs. Thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Re: Snapshot Label bug (was Graphics Test Week)
Bob Arendt wrote: > Glad it helped. I tried out the Snapshot 1 liveusb, and > was puzzled when it didn't work; My original post to > those bugs was based on /sbin/dosfslabel (it was a vfat stick). > I'm curious - what *was* the label reported? How did you > create your live boot? I'd used the "livecd-iso-to-disk" > tool, latest F11 version to put the live iso's on to a USB > stick .. and ended up with labels "F12-i686" and "F12-x86_64". I had labelled the stick myself when I first got it - as "fedora-test" and this was what was needed. Of course plugging the stick in to a running system gives a desktop icon with the correct label that I perhaps could have spotted earlier! The live usbkey was created with the livecd-iso-to-disk command as per the Fedora wiki, from within a running F11 system (up to date). I had previously labelled the stick using e2label (if I remember correctly!) -- mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Re: Snapshot Label bug (was Graphics Test Week)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > The live usbkey was created with the livecd-iso-to-disk command as per > the Fedora wiki, from within a running F11 system (up to date). > I had previously labelled the stick using e2label (if I remember correctly!) Thinking about it that can't be right - e2label only does ext2/3 so it may have been that I used qtparted to reformat it to vfat and gave it a label at the same timeit was a while back! -- mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Preupgrade to rawhide fails with VGA monitor going out of range (i915)
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:44:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 21:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > Any ideas/tips? > > try 'nomodeset xdriver=vesa' or just 'nomodeset vesa', that may work > around it during the upgrade. then you can test it once rawhide is > installed and see if you can find an error message in the X logs. > Thanks. > I tried both, but no luck :( computer crashed with both of them.. I have to press reset button to powercycle. It crashes after anaconda is started, and I guess X should start up.. More ideas? -- Pasi -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
gtk-sharp2 heads up
Hi, Monodevelop 2.2 beta 1 has just hit paydirt and, of course, I've built it and plonked it over to koji to do its magic. However, to get MD to compile, I've also had to update gtk-sharp2 to 2.12.9. This should not have any direct effect on anything else, but you can never tell.. MD 2.2 (full version) is due in October sometime. TTFN Paul -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
GCC update breaks PPC?
Has anyone noticed any problem with the PPC build servers in the past day or so? I've been building LLVM with no problem on Koji, but today I've had 2 virtual memory exhaustions, and now this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667095 Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: GCC update breaks PPC?
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 07:44:26 pm Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Has anyone noticed any problem with the PPC build servers in the past > day or so? I've been building LLVM with no problem on Koji, but today > I've had 2 virtual memory exhaustions, and now this: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667095 > > Thanks, Maybe http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/120454 . Regards, -- Conrad Meyer -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: TeXLive 2009 texconfig
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:42:59PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > texconfig from TeXLive 2009 in F11 hangs when I attempt to set the dvips > default paper type. The hang occurs when I run texconfig as a user and > texconfig or texconfig-sys as root. > Works for me as well on x86_64/scheme-full. Could you please attach strace output to 488651? Thanks, Jindrich > -- > Matthew Saltzman > > Clemson University Math Sciences > mjs AT clemson DOT edu > http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: GCC var-tracking-assignments: testing and bug reports appreciated
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Jakub built gcc-4.4.1-10 earlier today, with a new feature that > generates much better debug information in optimized programs. > > The feature has been under development for a couple of years, and it's > recently been accepted into GCC, for GCC 4.5. We've backported it for > Fedora 12. > > I'd appreciate if you Cc: me on any bug reports you hit that might be > related with this new feature (GCC internal compiler errors, verify_ssa > failures, crashes, etc). > This bug affects LLVM on ppc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522316 I've Cc:ed you on it. Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: GCC update breaks PPC?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 09 September 2009 07:44:26 pm Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >> Has anyone noticed any problem with the PPC build servers in the past >> day or so? I've been building LLVM with no problem on Koji, but today >> I've had 2 virtual memory exhaustions, and now this: >> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667095 >> >> Thanks, > > Maybe http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/120454 . > Thanks, that was it. I already filed a bug and replied to the initial post. Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: GCC var-tracking-assignments: testing and bug reports appreciated
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Jakub built gcc-4.4.1-10 earlier today, with a new feature that >> generates much better debug information in optimized programs. >> >> The feature has been under development for a couple of years, and it's >> recently been accepted into GCC, for GCC 4.5. We've backported it for >> Fedora 12. >> >> I'd appreciate if you Cc: me on any bug reports you hit that might be >> related with this new feature (GCC internal compiler errors, verify_ssa >> failures, crashes, etc). >> > This bug affects LLVM on ppc: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522316 I don't see a more recent pass in Koji. Did you try compiling with -fno-var-tracking-assignments does it help? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Graphics Test Week (ATI, NVIDIA and Intel graphics Test Days)
2009/9/8 Adam Williamson : > > The testing's very easy to do and it shouldn't take more than an hour of > your time to boot the live CD and run the tests. There's no need to > install anything to hard disk. I tried to boot from the testday-20090908-x86_64.iso from CD on an MacBook Pro 2,1, but I won't boot because of "No root device found. Boot has failed, sleeping forever." messages. If try to change the label as suggested to root=live:LABEL=F12-x86_64" or to LABEL=LIVE. But it neither works for me. Again, this is _not_ a boot attempt from a USB stick, it's from the live CD. Anyone else see this or has some suggestions to workaround? Thanks! PS: The USB stick is also not working, but this seams related to EFI and/or rEFIt. -- Regards, Niels -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gtk-sharp2 heads up
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > Monodevelop 2.2 beta 1 has just hit paydirt and, of course, I've built > it and plonked it over to koji to do its magic. > Neat! Are you packaging any of the optional language support plugins? Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: GCC var-tracking-assignments: testing and bug reports appreciated
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> Jakub built gcc-4.4.1-10 earlier today, with a new feature that >>> generates much better debug information in optimized programs. >>> >>> The feature has been under development for a couple of years, and it's >>> recently been accepted into GCC, for GCC 4.5. We've backported it for >>> Fedora 12. >>> >>> I'd appreciate if you Cc: me on any bug reports you hit that might be >>> related with this new feature (GCC internal compiler errors, verify_ssa >>> failures, crashes, etc). >>> >> This bug affects LLVM on ppc: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522316 > > I don't see a more recent pass in Koji. Did you try compiling with > -fno-var-tracking-assignments does it help? > Weird, I definitely did another build, and yes, it passed with that flag: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5646 Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Cannot include sub directories and files in rpm package
Hello, I am creating one rpm for my package. WHen I try to run spec file, it shows the sub directories can't be fine. Error: install: cannot stat `/mine/derot.txt': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /home/user/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.XgsNY2 (%install) Actually in SOURCE, I have Script directory. Inside the ShellScript dir, I have mine directory and its files. my spec %install part is, %install mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/ mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts/mine install -d ShellScripts $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts install -p Scripts/dir_check.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts/dir_check.sh install -d ShellScripts/mine $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts/mine install -p /mine/derot.txt $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts/mine/derot.txt install -p ShellScripts/mine/dir_check.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/home/dictator/supplies/ShellScripts/mine/dir_check.sh In my test-1.tar.gz file, test-1 directory contains ShellScript dir. Inside ShellScript dir, i created mine directory. In build, I am noit able to add mine in my binary. *How to add directory and subdirectories in binary. * thank you. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
