Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 17:25:36 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 16:54:43 -0500, > Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > blobAndConquer seems to have dropped out of today's rawhide repo even > > > though > > > it is still tagged for dist-f12, f12-beta and f12-final. > > > Are other people seeing this? > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2509 > > Thanks. Not that you remind me I do vaguely remember seeing a message from > Hans about it on some list. That 'Not' was supposed to be 'Now'. I have updated the games spin and added a note to the ticket to ask for checking for use in spins in addition to normal dependencies for future cases. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 16:54:43 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > blobAndConquer seems to have dropped out of today's rawhide repo even though > > it is still tagged for dist-f12, f12-beta and f12-final. > > Are other people seeing this? > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2509 Thanks. Not that you remind me I do vaguely remember seeing a message from Hans about it on some list. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:30:12AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > You were told to do the work yourself. I see your still looking for someone > > else to do it for you. > > > > Good luck with that > > I forget to mention that I was convinced by one of the fedorians that > maintaining such list on a public web site is worse because it would > be like advertising. I'm no longer ask for just list to be made. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list I am glad I was able to live up to your expectations, and that you've resolved 'your' issue. =) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > blobAndConquer seems to have dropped out of today's rawhide repo even though > it is still tagged for dist-f12, f12-beta and f12-final. > Are other people seeing this? https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2509 -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
blobAndConquer seems to have dropped out of today's rawhide repo even though it is still tagged for dist-f12, f12-beta and f12-final. Are other people seeing this? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
> You were told to do the work yourself. I see your still looking for someone > else to do it for you. > > Good luck with that I forget to mention that I was convinced by one of the fedorians that maintaining such list on a public web site is worse because it would be like advertising. I'm no longer ask for just list to be made. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
> You were told to do the work yourself. I see your still looking for someone > else to do it for you. Schwendt! see how they weren't listening, I told them I already prepared that list even before the original message was posted. TK009, I do my own homework myself. I did not invite Mr. Schwendt to do mine nor to help me, I just give him a prediction about the hostile community attitude toward him, and you demonstrated that practically ;-) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
USB Keyboard Amok?
Hardware: Logitech USB Keyboard Asus Motherboard Problem: Approximately every 100th cold boot/system restart, the BIOS message, as it is displaying memory, hard drives, etc., is all scrambled, even in colour, and the beep that normally occurs at boot becomes a single long ring that never stops, and the system hangs, unresponsive to any input. Solution: To remedy this, one must unplug the computer, wait until the LED on the motherboard extinguishes, remove the battery from the motherboard, plug in a spare PS/2 keyboard, put the battery and power cable back in, and reboot. Then, the BIOS settings must all be set from scratch, as they are totally awry - no, not the defaults! If one does not use a PS/2 keyboard, no keyboard entry is possible. If one does not remove the battery, then some mysterious BIOS supervisor password will be set that cannot be circumvented (I don't use a BIOS supervisor password). After having performed all of these steps, the system works perfectly, like before, until about the 100th time (wild guess - a long time - but often the problem occurs 2 or 3 times in a row, then not at all for weeks). Curiously, the same problem existed with a previous Asus motherboard (same USB keyboard, which works perfectly, as far I am able to determine from regular, daily use). Is this an Asus problem, since 2 Asus motherboards are affected (I upgraded the BIOS, but there have not been any new upgrades available for 18 months), a USB keyboard problem (the problem occured on the older motherboard while kbd, not evdev, was in use), or something altogether different? I have been unable to replicate the problem or determine any actions/states that appear to produce it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 04:59:22PM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > I asked the fedorians if they can't remove such packages just to > maintain a list of such packages so I would add them to exception list > in yum.conf, they offended me and tried to shoot me, so be warned and > prepared to be Trolled > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forum#Troll > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list You were told to do the work yourself. I see your still looking for someone else to do it for you. Good luck with that TK009 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Updates-testing
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 14:16:13 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:17:13 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote > > > Yes, but you should make the dump with the dump utility of the new > > release to which you want to update. > > So version x.y+1 is unable to read a dump created by version x.y? They can read them, but sometimes there are new features and you can take advantage of them better during the dump. So that when you do the load into the new version, it will end up getting done better. I don't have a for sure example off hand, but I seem to remember that this was a good idea when schemas got added. Another possibility was that at some point dependency handling during dumps was improved (probably more than once) and that these additions were not backported to every version someone might have been using. Doing the dump with the later version might have saved you some hand tweaking of the table definitions (particularly when tables referenced each other) at some upgrade points. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
I asked the fedorians if they can't remove such packages just to maintain a list of such packages so I would add them to exception list in yum.conf, they offended me and tried to shoot me, so be warned and prepared to be Trolled http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_forum#Troll -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20091017 changes
Compose started at Sat Oct 17 06:15:14 UTC 2009
Broken deps for ppc64
--
python-mwlib-0.11.2-3.20090522hg2956.fc12.ppc64 requires LabPlot
Removed package blobAndConquer
Updated Packages:
abrt-0.0.10-1.fc12
--
* Thu Oct 15 2009 Jiri Moskovcak 0.0.10-1
- new version
- added more logging (vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- made polkit policy to be more permissive when installing debuginfo
(jmosk...@redhat.com)
- lib/Plugins/CCpp.cpp: add build-ids to backtrace (vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- lib/Plugins/CCpp.cpp: do not use temp file for gdb commands - use -ex CMD
instead (vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- GUI: added refresh button, added sanity check to plugin settings
(jmosk...@redhat.com)
- Initial man page for abrt-cli (kk...@redhat.com)
- Added --version, -V, --help, -? options. Fixed crash caused by unknown
option. (kk...@redhat.com)
- Date/time honors current system locale (kk...@redhat.com)
- fixed saving/reading user config (jmosk...@redhat.com)
- SPEC: added gnome-python2-gnomekeyring to requirements (jmosk...@redhat.com)
- GUI: call Report() with the latest pluginsettings (jmosk...@redhat.com)
- Fix Bug 526220 - [abrt] crash detected in abrt-gui-0.0.9-2.fc12
(vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- removed unsecure reading/writting from ~HOME directory rhbz#522878
(jmosk...@redhat.com)
- error checking added to archive creation (da...@rawhide.localdomain)
- try using pk-debuginfo-install before falling back to debuginfo-install
(vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- abrt-gui: make "report" toolbar button work even if abrtd is not running
(vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- set LIMIT_MESSAGE to 16k, typo fix and daemon now reads config information
from dbus (npajk...@redhat.com)
- add support for abrtd autostart (vda.li...@googlemail.com)
- GUI: reversed the dumplist, so the latest crashes are at the top
(jmosk...@redhat.com)
- rewrite FileTransfer to use library calls instead of commandline calls for
compression (dnovo...@redhat.com)
- and many minor fixes ..
aria2-1.6.2-1.fc12
--
* Sat Oct 10 2009 Rahul Sundaram - 1.6.2-1
- Minor bug fixes and switch XZ compressed source
- http://aria2.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/aria2/trunk/NEWS?revision=1586
binutils-2.19.51.0.14-33.fc12
-
* Thu Oct 15 2009 Jakub Jelinek 2.19.51.0.14-33
- Add .cfi_sections support. (PR debug/40521)
claws-mail-3.7.3-1.fc12
---
* Mon Oct 12 2009 Andreas Bierfert
- 3.7.3-1
- version upgrade (including gtk 2.18 fixes #527065)
claws-mail-plugins-3.7.3-1.fc12
---
* Mon Oct 12 2009 Andreas Bierfert
- 3.7.3-1
- version upgrade
- new plugins bsfilter, python
firstboot-1.110-1.fc12
--
* Wed Oct 14 2009 Chris Lumens 1.110-1
- Always attempt to display the Fedora logo, if present (jmccann).
- Fix a bunch of small firstboot UI problems (jmccann).
glibc-2.10.90-25
* Mon Oct 12 2009 Andreas Schwab - 2.10.90-25
- Update from master
- Fix descriptor leak when calling dlopen with RTLD_NOLOAD (#527409).
- Fix week-1stday in C locale.
- Check for integer overflows in formatting functions.
- Fix locale program error handling (#525363).
gnome-panel-2.28.0-6.fc12
-
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Matthias Clasen 2.28.0-6
- Put status icons in a predictable order
* Wed Oct 14 2009 Matthias Clasen 2.28.0-5
- Tweaks to the default panel configuration
gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.16-2.fc12
-
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Bastien Nocera 0.10.16-2
- Fix autoconvert caps negotiation
gtk2-2.18.2-3.fc12
--
* Tue Oct 13 2009 Matthias Clasen - 2.18.2-3
- Make gtk-builder-convert use system python
hercstudio-1.0.0-1.fc12
---
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Dan Horák - 1.0.0-1
- update to 1.0.0
imsettings-0.107.4-2.fc12
-
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Akira TAGOH - 0.107.4-2
- Run IM for Mailthili by default. (#529144)
kazehakase-0.5.8-2.fc12
---
* Sat Oct 17 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.5.8-2
- Fix crash when trying to view source or cert with no page loaded
(bug 529334)
kdebase-runtime-4.3.2-4.fc12
* Thu Oct 15 2009 Rex Dieter 4.3.2-4
- Conflicts: kdebase4 < 4.3.0 instead
* Wed Oct 14 2009 Rex Dieter 4.3.2-3
- Conflicts: kdebase < 6:4.3.0
- Requires: oxygen-icon-theme >= %{version}
kdeplasma-addons-4.3.2-3.fc12
-
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Rex Dieter - 4.3.2-3
- rev microblog/twitter patch (kde#200475#c36)
* Sat Oct 10 2009 Rex Dieter - 4.3.2-2
- microblog/twitter fix (kde#209891)
libasyncns-0.8-1.fc12
-
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Lennart Poettering 0.8-1
- New release
libcanberra-0.21-1.fc12
---
* Fri Oct 16 2009 Lennart Poettering 0.21-1
- New version 0.21
* Thu Oct 15 2009 Lennart Poettering 0.20-1
- New version 0.20
* Wed Oct 14 2009 Lennart Poett
Re: Updates-testing
Hi. On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:17:13 +0200, Jochen Schmitt wrote > Yes, but you should make the dump with the dump utility of the new > release to which you want to update. So version x.y+1 is unable to read a dump created by version x.y? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
gnaughty (was: Re: Who do I send to get a package removed...)
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:29:46 +0200, Haïkel wrote: > I recently came accross Gnaughty (aka Fast and Easy Porn Downloader), > I'm seriously thinking to file a ticket against it. It can be used to > download p0rn, yuck ! > What sort of content should we provide as replacement ? > > Is this a joke ? It seems so. What will be the next step? Fedora bookmarks for Firefox, which point at the same web sites that gnaughty uses and advertises? More tools like that? A competing tool for a competitor's adult web site? A comps group for such software packages? | Description: Application to download automatically adult sex content, i.e. |: movies and pictures, from a known internet directory. "Known"? Known by whom? It can't be spelled out like in the README? All what the tool seems to do is to serve as an advertisement. It is trying to lure people into visiting those web sites with a normal web browser, isn't it? > On the one hand, we provide gnaughty, on the other > hand, we are seriously thinking patching Gestikk We shouldn't provide gnaughty with a hardcoded download site and hardcoded search terms. It is not a versatile downloader like wget/curl, however, that can be pointed at arbitrary URLs. It is limited to downloading from that one directory that it tries to advertise. And we should remove bad language from gestikk and convince gestikk upstream to remove it, too. > Fedora maintainers have no time to waste > on such petty issues. Why not? It's not much different from spending time on legal issues, such as verifying the licensing terms applied in source files, removing source code or content we don't want to ship, or making sure we don't include a Yum repo definition package for RPM Fusion. Can you tell whether the tool _by default_ (!) offers illegal content? > If you don't like it, don't yum it first. Doesn't fix the image trouble. Doesn't answer whether the Fedora Project wants to be responsible for offering and redistributing this software and thereby preselecting the hardcoded adult web sites. You want to move the adult-check from web sites (which don't belong to the Fedora Project) into the Fedora Installer or into RPM? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
