Re: Come back
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Alain Portal alain.por...@free.fr wrote: Hi, I just took ownership of kbackup as it was orphan. As there is a long time that I didn´t contribute to the Fedora Project, can somebody tell me how to update the package and ask for F-10 and F-11 branches? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages Bye, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
Hi all, some Fedora users just pointed me out that the x86 DVD image names are not accurate. The install DVD is called Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso while the live DVD is called Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso. Please note the i386 text in the install DVD file name. This is creating some confusion among users because they tend to believe that packages are still compiled for i386 and not for i686. Bye. Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 x86 DVD images
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: The base arch of the family is i386, just like we call the ppc spin ppc even though it only supports a subset of the ppc family, ditto sparc, arm, etc... Then why the Live DVD and the Install DVD have different names? And why the same is true for the directory labels (i386/ for install DVD and i686/ for live DVD)? Can we at least have some consistency? Thanks! Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote: musuruan:BADSOURCE:libicns-0.7.0.tar.gz:libicns This is valid. Temporary SF problem? The URL is fine, but the source doesn't match up. What I downloaded from the URL: e2932389d10ccee20dc922155165c8f8 libicns-0.7.0.tar.gz what sources has in the lookaside cache: d2539bb1bec033395ad908311c49a954 libicns-0.7.0.tar.gz So, either upstream changed sources without changing release, or something else bad happened. ;( Yes, upstream changed the sources without issuing a new release :( I'll update the package soon. Thanks again. Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote: Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. musuruan:BADSOURCE:hatari-1.2.0.tar.bz2:hatari Thanks! URL changed. I'll updated it soon. musuruan:BADSOURCE:libicns-0.7.0.tar.gz:libicns This is valid. Temporary SF problem? Regards, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Ongoing effort to package JOSM
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Jerry Jamesloganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com wrote:
---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---
[...]
test:
BUILD FAILED
/home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Problem:
failed to create task or type junit
Cause: the class
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask was not found.
This looks like one of Ant's optional components.
Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in
-/usr/share/ant/lib
-/home/andrea/.ant/lib
-a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument
Do not panic, this is a common problem.
The commonest cause is a missing JAR.
This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem
---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---
You need to BuildRequires ant-junit to get the necessary jar (namely,
%{_javadir}/ant/ant-junit.jar).
If I do that I get:
[...]
test:
[junit] WARNING: multiple versions of ant detected in path for junit
[junit]
jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class
[junit] and
jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class
[junit] Running com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests
[junit] Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,269 sec
BUILD FAILED
/home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Test
com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests failed
Total time: 1 second
Regards,
Andrea.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Ongoing effort to package JOSM
Hi, Cédric OLIVIER has submitted a review request for JOSM, an editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/508351 Since I'm an OSM contributor, a JOSM user and a Fedora packager, I tried to address some of the problem the package has with some informal reviews (I'm not a sponsor and Cédric is looking for one). The most evident mistake is that the package is using pre-built JAR files instead of system JARs. These libraries are not yet available in Fedora. To speed things up, I packaged them and submitted for review: Gettext-commons: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/515136 Metadata-extractor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/516343 Although I maintain more than 20 packages in Fedora and RPM Fusion, these are my first two Java packages. Any hint or suggestion on how to improve them is well accepted. A reviewer is welcome too :) In metadata-extractor I had to disable junit test. This is something Debian package does too. But I do not understand why enabling it I get the following error: ---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8--- [...] test: BUILD FAILED /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Problem: failed to create task or type junit Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/usr/share/ant/lib -/home/andrea/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem ---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8---8--- Any help appreciated. Bye, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Client-side certificate generation error
Hi all, my client-side certificate is expired. I tried to generate a new one on the Fedora Account System, but I get an error saying Your certificate could not be generated.. Not very helpful as an error message. I do not know what should I do. Can someone help? Thanks, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Client-side certificate generation error
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Thu June 4 2009, Andrea Musuruane wrote: my client-side certificate is expired. I tried to generate a new one on the Fedora Account System, but I get an error saying Your certificate could not be generated.. Not very helpful as an error message. I do not know what should I do. Can someone help? The fedora infrastructure team can help, just open a ticket here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure Thanks. I'm doing it right now. Bye, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
