Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: > > Looks like it. Does a koji scratch build succeed? Yes: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1822361 > >> If so, should I just close the bug? > > I'd wait until Matt's builders are fixed or you might just end up > getting another bug raised. Ok, thank you very much -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora rawhide rebuild in mock status 2009-11-18 x86_64
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: > > it's not SELinux (that is Disabled on my builders). I believe it is: > Bug 510183 - mock mounts /dev/pts in chroot with wrong options > > because the failure comes during your %check section: > openpty failed > Child returncode was: -15 Is this the same as my buildbot failure? I see: [ERROR]: buildbot.test.test_slavecommand.ShellPTY.testShell1 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/builddir/build/BUILD/buildbot-0.7.11p3/buildbot/slave/commands.py", line 388, in start self._startCommand() File "/builddir/build/BUILD/buildbot-0.7.11p3/buildbot/slave/commands.py", line 507, in _startCommand usePTY=self.usePTY) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/twisted/internet/posixbase.py", line 221, in spawnProcess processProtocol, uid, gid, usePTY) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/twisted/internet/process.py", line 812, in __init__ masterfd, slavefd = pty.openpty() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/pty.py", line 29, in openpty master_fd, slave_name = _open_terminal() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/pty.py", line 70, in _open_terminal raise os.error, 'out of pty devices' exceptions.OSError: out of pty devices If so, should I just close the bug? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Wodim trouble
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > So, while waiting for libburn to improve, we could either take over > cdrkit development, or do a(nother) legal review of cdrecord. It seems > that the latter should be simpler, given that it's a one-time effort. > Already done around June: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legal/473 -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/14/2009 03:04 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Imagine an application, which relies on a specific kernel module. This >> module is not a part of stock Fedora kernel (at least, yet), and we >> don't allow stand-alone kernel modules. >> >> Whether or not this package can be allowed? >> > IMO: no. > > Packages in Fedora should "just work" and therefore must not rely on > anything which is not in Fedora. Which is precisely the reason why sysprof was moved to rpmfusion when kmods were banned from Fedora -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: How to resurrect a dead package?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: > What are the right steps to take? I think: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages covers them. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning packages
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: >> - php-adodb -- Active Data Objects Data Base > > Taking this one, co-maintainers welcome > Additionally, can you orphan the other active branches as well? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning packages
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > - php-adodb -- Active Data Objects Data Base Taking this one, co-maintainers welcome -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: library path
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote: > Hi all. > > I am currently working on an openmotif .spec openmotif is being packaged at rpmfusion due to its license: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Mock issue with ifarch BuildRequires
Sorry for the cross-posting, I'm trying to get a clue...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gianluca Sforna
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:38 AM
Subject: Mock issue with ifarch BuildRequires
To: Discussion of Fedora build system
I am trying to run the tests included in the BuildBot package during
the RPM build, and one of the tests requires darcs, which is built in
Fedora ExclusiveArch %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha.
Now, I'm adding to buildbot's spec[1] file an ifarch like:
%ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha
# darcs ExclusiveArchs
BuildRequires: darcs
%endif
but it seems darcs is never installed in the buildroot [2]
am I just doing something stupid or there's a bug somewhere?
[1]
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/buildbot/devel/buildbot.spec?view=log
[2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1470380&name=root.log
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: USB autosuspend in F12
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > USB is an irritating protocol that requires USB controllers to remain > active whenever a device is attached, even if that device is doing > nothing. Is this somewhat addressed in the USB3 specs? -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Announcing Fedora Activity Day - Fedora Development Cycle 2009
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Not to forget > Jesse (as rel-eng lead in a quite important position) and his "quest > to reduce the number of updates" (which he gave up -- see earlier this > thread), FTR, he actually said "I've all *but* given up on my quest to reduce the number of updates", emphasis is mine. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Question about web applications
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:41 PM, David Nalley wrote: > I think that's an outstanding idea, and I'd be willing to work towards > such an end, and perhaps since there is such a prevalence of php we > can get some buy-in from the php-sig as well. To illustrate some of > the usefulness - I have a web app I am working on now that uses > php-Snoopy as ampache also does, so that's at least two applications > that can make use of the package. Any taker for nusoap? One of my packages (mantis) embeds a copy of it as well... -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/gianlucasforna -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Vim-7 Preview
On 3/16/06, Karsten Hopp wrote: > > I've uploaded it one moment ago... > wow. that was fast...
Re: Vim-7 Preview
On 3/16/06, Michael Weiner wrote: > > any chance of posting the src.rpm and/or spec file? It seems to be there... http://people.redhat.com/karsten/vim-7.0aa.000-1.src.rpm Cheers Gianluca
mock question
may I use mock to test compilation of the 64bit variant of a rpm using my regular 32bit centrino laptop? Thanks in advance Gianluca
Re: FC5 test3 udev hang
On 3/13/06, Mike Chambers wrote: > > I would try an install from rawhide and see if that works with the > latest kernel/packages. > Just installed RawHide. hangs at the very same place :( I also have a bunch of messages like: PCI: Cannot allocate resource region X of device Y are there any smart kernel parameters I can try to use in order to boot correctly ? thanks in advance Gianluca
FC5 test3 udev hang
Hi, I just put my hands an a shiny Acer Travelmate 8202WLMi laptop so I decided to give a try to FC5. The installation wen fine, but upon first reboot I an stuck at: Starting udev:_ Admittedly, I did _not_ expected FC to work fine on that, having a bunch of fancy new hardware in there ( Centrino Core Duo, wifi ipw3945ABG, SATA HD and so on ), so this is just for the records. If someone also has an idea on how to get it booting, I could try to upgrade the beast so I can see if newer packages fixes the problem. Thanks a lot Gianluca
