Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-05
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: jcollie:BADURL:spandsp-0.0.5pre4.tgz:spandsp I haven't checked out any of my other packages, but this one stuck out... Are you sure that you are checking the devel branch? The tarball in the devel branch should be spandsp-0.0.6pre12.tgz. spandsp-0.0.5pre4.tgz is the current tarball in F-11. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: All I want for Christmas is digiKam 1.0 in F12-stable...
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote: As for installation, doing a straight rpm -i over the -beta6 install resulted in a slew of error messages regarding file conflicts. I did a yum remove digikam and then an rpm -i and everything worked fine. That's to be expected, as rpm -i installs a package without removing the old one. Unless the package is specially designed (like the kernel) you'll get conflicts. Normally, you'd want to use rpm -U which will remove the old package before installing the new one. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: dist-git help wanted: write me a regex!
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: I'm having some difficulty applying this. It's going into a perl file thusly: $logmsg =~ s|/((Mon|Tues?|Wed|Thu(rs?)?|Fri|Sat|Sun)\s+(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr| May|June?|July?|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)\s+[0-3]?[0-9]\s+(19|20)[0-9][0-9]\s +[^]+[...@]+@[^\s@]+\s+2.[4-6].[0-9.-]+\s*)/|mg But that gives me Unmatched ( in regex; marked by -- HERE in m/(( -- HERE or something along those lines. The added s|...|mg is coming from other lines in this script which look like: $logmsg =~ s|^\s*\d\d*-\d\d*-\d\d*\s*[^\n]*[^\n]*\s*$|* \n|mg; so I'm sure I'm screwing something up when putting it in the script. You can't use | in the s|||mg command since it's used inside the regex. IIRC you should be able to use %: s%%%mg. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: make update broken?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: Ideas? The Fedora Infrastrutcure is being moved to a new datacenter: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-December/msg8.html https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1845 -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Datacenter, git, and cvs
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: If I understand what is happening now (and over the past weekend), the datacenter machines are moving to a new location, AND the package building is moving from cvs to git (will be, or already in process)? The move from CVS to Git won't happen until post-F13. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: ilbsndfile update!
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote: After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long standing libsndfile bugs. [...] Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now it has the libvorbis support enabled. Will libsndfile get updated in EPEL? -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Problems reporting crashes with ABRT
ABRT has detected a couple of crashes recently, but has been unable to create bugs in Bugzilla. It makes an attempt, but fails with the message: XML-RPC Fault: libcurl failed to execute the HTTP POST transaction. I've verified that I've configured ABRT with the correct bugzilla username and password. Any hints on what my problem could be? -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Problems reporting crashes with ABRT
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com wrote: Dne 10.11.2009 16:24, Jeffrey Ollie napsal(a): ABRT has detected a couple of crashes recently, but has been unable to create bugs in Bugzilla. It makes an attempt, but fails with the message: XML-RPC Fault: libcurl failed to execute the HTTP POST transaction. I've verified that I've configured ABRT with the correct bugzilla username and password. Any hints on what my problem could be? It helps you restart deamon for now. We have fix in git and it will be in new release. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531978#c5 Yup, that fixed it, thanks! -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Problem building Asterisk sounds
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote: Jeffrey Ollie wrote, at 10/21/2009 01:53 AM +9:00: On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: I'm trying to build the latest Asterisk sounds package, but I'm getting the following error: error: Recognition of file /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.16-1.fc13.noarch/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729 failed: mode 100444 zlib: invalid stored block lengthsempty (gzip compressed data, reserved method, encrypted, last modified: Tue Nov 9 20:48:48 2010, max speed) The full build log is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730585 The build fails in mock locally as well but koji actually gives me a better error message. The file in question isn't gzip compressed, it's an audio file compressed with G.729 audio compression. Can anyone help me out here? I still haven't figured this out, and it hasn't fixed itself. Can anyone take a look and give me a hint? Well, $ file ./usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729 ./usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729: gzip compressed data, reserved method, encrypted, last modified: Wed Nov 10 10:48:48 2010, max speed So it seems that this file is actually recognized as gzip compressed data, perhaps due to magic number, which seems to be causing a problem in rpm. I don't know currently how to deal with this case as I don't know if we can tell rpmbuild that this file should not be treated as a gzipped file by some methods or not, but for now I guess it is better to contact rpm maintainer. Yes, this does appear to be a bug in file/libmagic. I've filed bug 532489[1]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532489 In the meantime I'll remove the file as Asterisk should pick a recording encoded with another codec as a fallback. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Problem building Asterisk sounds
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: I'm trying to build the latest Asterisk sounds package, but I'm getting the following error: error: Recognition of file /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.16-1.fc13.noarch/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729 failed: mode 100444 zlib: invalid stored block lengthsempty (gzip compressed data, reserved method, encrypted, last modified: Tue Nov 9 20:48:48 2010, max speed) The full build log is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730585 The build fails in mock locally as well but koji actually gives me a better error message. The file in question isn't gzip compressed, it's an audio file compressed with G.729 audio compression. Can anyone help me out here? I still haven't figured this out, and it hasn't fixed itself. Can anyone take a look and give me a hint? -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Did something happen to blobAndConquer?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: blobAndConquer seems to have dropped out of today's rawhide repo even though it is still tagged for dist-f12, f12-beta and f12-final. Are other people seeing this? https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2509 -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org wrote: Original Message Subject: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed? From: Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Date: 14.10.2009 15:04 Imagine an application, which relies on a specific kernel module. This module is not a part of stock Fedora kernel (at least, yet), and we don't allow stand-alone kernel modules. If not, what does dahdi-tools do in Fedora then? Nothing, at least not without a kernel module that's not in the stock Fedora kernel. The DAHDI kernel modules are GPL, but Digium has been unwilling to merge them into the upstream kernel. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Problem building Asterisk sounds
I'm trying to build the latest Asterisk sounds package, but I'm getting the following error: error: Recognition of file /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.16-1.fc13.noarch/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729 failed: mode 100444 zlib: invalid stored block lengthsempty (gzip compressed data, reserved method, encrypted, last modified: Tue Nov 9 20:48:48 2010, max speed) The full build log is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1730585 The build fails in mock locally as well but koji actually gives me a better error message. The file in question isn't gzip compressed, it's an audio file compressed with G.729 audio compression. Can anyone help me out here? -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Trying to build zkt 0.99c on Fedora 11
I'm trying to build zkt 0.99c on Fedora 11 (x86_64) and am running into the following error: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -c -o soaserial.o soaserial.c In file included from /usr/include/sys/syslog.h:207, from /usr/include/syslog.h:1, from log.h:43, from nscomm.h:44, from nscomm.c:46: /usr/include/bits/syslog.h: In function 'syslog': /usr/include/bits/syslog.h:32: error: invalid use of '__builtin_va_arg_pack ()' Google tells me this has more to do with changes in newer GCC versions to improve compile-time error detection, but I'm unable to figure out what the right solution is. Can anyone help out here? I've successfully compiled older versions of zkt on older versions of Fedora - this is the first time I've tried it on Fedora 11. I've attached the spec file that I'm using to build the RPM package. -- Jeff Ollie zkt.spec Description: Binary data -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Switching to Native Upstart Scripts?
I was wondering what the consensus on switching to native Upstart scripts (/etc/event.d/*) vs. keeping the traditional SysV init scripts (/etc/rc.d/init.d) for daemons was? I was looking at switching Asterisk over and have an Upstart script that seems to work fairly well. I would be making the change for F-13... -- Jeff Ollie asterisk Description: Binary data -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Switching to Native Upstart Scripts?
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: 1) Likely for F-13 we're moving to upstart 0.6.x. 2) We currently have no mechanism for the following: - not starting services automatically that happen to have jobs installed - enforcing dependencies between SysV and upstart scripts Sounds the plan for now is to add the upstart script as a %doc until these issues get sorted out. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Benny Amorsenbenny+use...@amorsen.dk wrote: Patch1: 0001-Modify-init-scripts-for-better-Fedora-compatibility.patch Patch2: 0002-Modify-modules.conf-so-that-different-voicemail-modu.patch Patch5: 0005-Build-using-external-libedit.patch Patch6: 0006-Revert-changes-to-pbx_lua-from-rev-126363-that-cause.patch Patch8: 0008-change-configure.ac-to-look-for-pkg-config-gmime-2.4.patch Patch10: 0010-my-guess-as-replacements-for-the-missing-broken-stuf.patch Patch11: 0011-Fix-up-some-paths.patch Patch12: 0012-Add-LDAP-schema-that-is-compatible-with-Fedora-Direc.patch Heh, see the latest builds in F-11/rawhide. The rawhide packages should be on the mirrors now, the F-11 build should be showing up shortly. I basically did the same thing as you. I have changed some of the patches a little compared to the 1.6.1rc1 versions, just to make them apply. Yeah, fortunately it was less work than I thought. I've really grown to depend on git's merging/rebasing/cherry-picking abilities. Hopefully my git mirror of the asterisk svn will finish rebuilding soon. Digium may also be putting up a semi-official git mirror as well. I have removed chan_mobile; if upstream prefers it to be in asterisk-addons, it seems a bit futile to keep trying to patch it in. Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking when I added it in. I should probably drop Patch 6; if upstream hasn't dropped it in 6 months then it's probably something we have to live with. Not that I use Lua. Patches 2, 5, 8, and 12 ought to go upstream... Yeah, it's a matter of time/energy. Plus a couple of them really need some polishing before they would even be considered. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Asterisk - attached patch needed to enable build in Rawhide
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Quentin Armitagequen...@armitage.org.uk wrote: Could someone please add the attached patch to Asterisk in Rawhide, to allow it to build against the new openssl. The patch is not related to the new version of openssl, but to the updated version of spandsp. This is a backport from Asterisk 1.6.1.5 (and possibly earlier versions). BTW - is Asterisk currently being maintained in Rawhide. I see that there has been no update for a day or two shot of 6 months, although Asterisk has moved on from 1.6.1-rc1 to 1.6.1.5 in the intervening time. The attached patch is a quick way to get Asterisk to build and be installable again (and also not block the mass updates of openssl). There are requests in bz to update Asterisk to 1.6.1.5, and I am working on that in slowtime. I plan on getting an update to Asterisk out ASAP, but it's taking _forever_ to rebuild the git repository that I use to maintain the various patches. I'll do a quick rebuild with the attached patch so I'm not blocking the openssl update. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/pitivi/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 pitivi.spec, 1.36, 1.37 sources, 1.16, 1.17
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Martin Souradamartin.sour...@gmail.com wrote: I've just built this and seems like some of the runtime deps were raised, so far I've noticed gstreamer-python-0.10.16, you should bump the dep in spec as well. Thanks for the heads up... Looks like gstreamer-pythion is still at 0.10.15 in F-11 and rawhide so I've opened a bz with a request to have it updated: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517432 -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
pitivi-0.13.1.2-1.fc11, gnonlin-0.10.11.2-0.2.fc11
I've submitted updates to the latest prereleases of PiTiVi and gnonlin. It would be good if people could test these so that any kinks can be worked out before the final releases. -- Jeff Ollie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
