Right-click for wacom driver?

2009-11-22 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

While working on Flash development in Windows XP TabletPC, I noticed the
right-click is done by pressing the stylus for few second and icon will
display the right-click mouse  delay. I wonder if the new
xorg-x11-drv-wacom can do similar action for stylus that don't have
eraser action.

I am not sure if the current linuxwacom can do similar action. If so,
how can it be done?

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic  Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksJyGYACgkQaS6HaNQHFTkFVwCaA7qSkuj3DH6BO6Ue8jo8nQs6
EoQAoJOhiHKXye+La8Lz7CDhDuH4rARR
=u8CC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Right-click for wacom driver?

2009-11-22 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/22/2009 05:09 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:25:27PM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
 I am not sure if the current linuxwacom can do similar action. If so,
 how can it be done?

 the principle would be similar to the middle mouse button emulation in
other
 drivers. when a press is detected, a timer is set. that timer is cancelled
 by a button release but if the timer expires normally a right click/button
 3 event is posted to the server.
 Of course, you'd need to take some motion filtering into account to avoid
 having every drag action converted into right clicks.

 The main usability issue is sorting out whether to delay the original
button
 press until the timeout is triggered or to send the button 1 press
 immediately and fake the release before posting button 3.

 My tendency is that the former is better, the latter would not allow for
 right clicks without previous selection. I'd be curious what windows
does in
 that regard though.
 
In reply to Windows behaviour for the right-click, button 1 (assuming it
is left-click) is pressed, there seems to be a slight delay before the
timer is triggered for button 3. It sounds similar to the first method
you mentioned. Because of closed nature of Windows, I don't know how
that exactly works.

I think it would be nice to include that functionality someday.

Cheers,

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic  Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksKKIIACgkQaS6HaNQHFTnECgCcC6MNxm2jsEY7CQub95yNOopi
pscAn22rD1bPtr5BOlf7kgDTopddWymP
=My3Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: buildsys Broken dependencies - libc

2009-11-16 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/15/2009 09:37 PM, Arthur G wrote:
 Hi anyonewhocanhelp,
 
 Just curious, is libc now an explicit dependency or should I buy a
sense of humour? 
 
 broken dependencies in the development tree:
 On ppc:
xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6
 etc
 
 Regs, Arthur.
 

You are not alone, I receives the same broken dependencies for PPC and
PPC64. I wonder if migration for both architecture as second class has
occurred in a process.

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic  Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksBDfwACgkQaS6HaNQHFTn31wCePwWtki4IJHQuv0vc2HfPe5nF
V9kAn1O+pGsbFb5w3QD4KawQwgBfHu0S
=Ojqa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: linuxwacom maintenance

2009-11-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 11/09/2009 02:35 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:59:12PM -0500, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
 I don't have time to maintain the linuxwacom package anymore. Anyone
willing
 to do it?

 I'll pick it up. Note that it will become obsolete soon anyway once
 xorg-x11-drv-wacom gets past the new package review.

Just curious, was xorg-x11-drv-wacom available on past Fedora release
(Moonshine version comes in mind)?

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic  Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkr4zIgACgkQaS6HaNQHFTn2EgCfQHrdrYChTuvPXeOhaUc9GJNe
ibAAnjQQj18pSCpoih3uFfWyDIndWkM0
=st5A
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12 (#2)

2009-06-18 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga

On 06/17/2009 12:17 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Bill Nottinghamnott...@redhat.com  wrote:


I'm thinking specifically with people with Centrino stickered
laptops of unclear vintage who may not realize that they have a 64bit
capable machine even when they do. The Centrino branding doesn't
exactly make it obvious as Intel pushed 64bit capability into the
brand at some point (2006 ?).

I am one of users with Centrino stickered notebook. It does not 
support x86_64 being a 2005 model.


cat /proc/cpuinfo

processor: 0
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 13
model name: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.50GHz
stepping: 6
cpu MHz: 600.000
cache size: 2048 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug: no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 2
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 mtrr pge mca cmov pat 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe up bts est tm2

bogomips: 1196.26
clflush size: 64
power management:


Luya

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Strange /etc/fedora-release and smolt help

2009-06-13 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/06/09 09:40 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:

 Can anyone with F11 installed look at what is in their /etc/fedora-release
 and tell me which one you have, and how you installed?  Also what version
 of fedora-release you have.

 -Mike

$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)

$ rpm -qa fedora-release
fedora-release-11-1.noarch

$ yum info fedora-release
Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, dellsysidplugin2, downloadonly, keys,
merge-
  : conf, post-transaction-actions, presto, protect-packages,
  : refresh-packagekit, upgrade-helper
Installed Packages
Name   : fedora-release
Arch   : noarch
Version: 11
Release: 1
Size   : 26 k
Repo   : installed
- From repo  : rawhide
Summary: Fedora release files
URL: http://fedoraproject.org
License: GPLv2
Description: Fedora release files such as yum configs and various
/etc/ files
   : that define the release.

As seen, the box went from Rawhide to stable release.

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic  Web Designer
P:  (604) 682-6618
E:  l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://thefinalzone.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAko0eJ8ACgkQa10Jb0NOz+GwUACcCQlVGcTAoGgUaYrpNkzhJIl6
hgwAn1N5xvxAJ0YS9FOHXuByY3KDIY2q
=m6p8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list