Re: evolution+openchange crash
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:32 -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > If I file this, should it be against evolution-mapi, or libical? Hi, and thanks, it's already filled under this bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580706 Milan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Evolution fonts
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:00 -0400, TK009 wrote: > On 08/04/2009 10:21 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Does anyone else see the fonts and/or window panes or preview panes > > showing the email fonts or whatever in a larger size than in previous > > versions? In other words, if you highlight a folder on left pane, look > > at top section on left side at the emails at how big they are. Then > > highlight an email and look at the bottom at the preview pane and the > > fonts in the body of the email seem bigger than in previous versions. > > > > Anyone else (IF I am explaining this correctly) seeing this? > > > > Mike > > > You're not alone. I am seeing it less now. > > TK009 Hi, could you add a bug report to https://bugzilla.redhat.com and attach screenshot of that you described above, please? I do not remember any such issue seeing myself, and I cannot even imagine what you mean. Thanks in advance. Bye, Milan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Evolution in koji not correct version?
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 08:02 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > Latest release in rawhide for evo is evolution-2.27.91-1.fc12.x86_64. > The latest built in koji is evolution-2.27.5-3.1.fc12. Hi, thank you for noticing. I just built a 2.27.92, which had been released today, thus we are back on the right track. Bye, Milan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Evolution time format/double address book entries
Hi, On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 07:40 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > In the date field while viewing emails, it shows the time in 24 hour > time instead of 12 hour time with am/pm. I have went into any > preferences and made sure the two settings that have time in them are > correct and what I want, but no affect. And my clock on my desktop is > 12 hour time like it should be. which preference did you use, please? There is a new option in 2.27.9x, the Edit->preferences->Mail Preferences->Headers->Date and time format. Use "%ad %I:%M %p" in a "Table column" fields, instead of the predefined "%ad %H:%M". if wondering, it uses strftime format specifiers, plus that "%ab", which is specific for Evolution. > Also, and this has happened in most/all of F12 testing, is that when > either importing an address book or doing a complete restore when > starting evo for the first time, when you go to do a new email and click > on the to button to find an address book, it shows them as double > entries. Although if you do use one, it removes both of them from the > selection. I didn't see this myself, do I understand it correctly that this is doing contact doubling only once, just after import of a new address book or after the restore? Maybe file a bug in https://bugzilla.gnome.org and continue a discussion there (send here a bug URL). Bye, Milan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Evolution time format/double address book entries
Hi, On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 15:25 +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote: > I recollect that Evolution used to display times in am/pm format, but > mine is now displaying in 24 hour format (which I happen to prefer). see my reply to Mike for the preferences entry. > One thing I have noticed though is that "yesterday" shown in the Date > column in table format seems to be two days (i.e. on 13th September all > emails received on both the 12th and 11th September are shown as > yesterday), and the "2 days ago" etc are all one day out. I noticed this too, but failed to track the cause of it. Could you file a bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org for investigation, please? My first walk through the code didn't seem to indicate any logical issue, but there is some, obviously. Bye, Milan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Evolution time format/double address book entries
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 12:05 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > > One thing I have noticed though is that "yesterday" shown in the Date > > column in table format seems to be two days (i.e. on 13th September all > > emails received on both the 12th and 11th September are shown as > > yesterday), and the "2 days ago" etc are all one day out. > > I noticed this too, but failed to track the cause of it. Could you file > a bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org for investigation, please? My first > walk through the code didn't seem to indicate any logical issue, but > there is some, obviously. I take this back, the bug is there and fixed already, see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594609 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Evolution time format/double address book entries
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 16:46 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > I didn't see this myself, do I understand it correctly that this is > > doing contact doubling only once, just after import of a new address > > book or after the restore? Maybe file a bug in > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org and continue a discussion there (send here a > > bug URL). > > After both, either after a restore or after importing a .cvf (?) file of > your address book. I can send a new email, click on "to" button, and > see them doubled when you go to choose who to send the email too. BUT, > if you look in the address book itself (via view/window/contacts), there > is just one entry. So in other words, it's on doubled when you go to > send an email and want to add someone from your address book. > > Understand what I am referring to? Hi, yes, I do understand now. I tried even without import and it seems to double contacts from the default address book. When I change addressbook forth and back then it stops doubling them. I found an upstream bug for that, see [1] Thanks and bye, Milan [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595082 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
