F12 updates-testing issue: X flickers and fails to start

2009-12-08 Thread Pekka Savola

Hi,

On my laptop, after F12 updates-testing update today, after reboot F 
logo shows but then the screen goes dark and starts flickering between 
various shades of dark (changing modes?) with intel graphics chipset 
(GM965/GL960).  I'm only using 1024x768 resolution. Nomodeset or using 
a previous kernel didn't help.  Booting to runlevel 3 and running 
system-config-display (--reconfig) resulted in the same.


I've worked around the issue by yum history undo 1 which rolled 
back a couple of hundred packages.


Any idea which package could be the culprit and I should file a bug 
against or to isolate it?  Somehow I don't think this is necessarily 
an Xorg base or driver issue.


--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-29 Thread Pekka Savola

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:

Well, a couple of Fedoras back, X didn't work except with radeonhd,
but now radeon appears to support this one as well; I switched to it,
and the CPU issue is gone even with KMS.  Now fonts (esp small ones)
look very smudgy though.  But I suppose there are already bug(s) open
on this.


I'm guessing with radeonhd you did something to increase or decrease
your font size in some dialog box, they had different ideas on DPI to
the rest of the world. Try with a test user, though it might just be DPI
changes.


Thanks for input.  Neither a test user or rolling back to radeonhd 
helped; maybe something changed between F11 and F12.


I filed a PR: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542398

--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-28 Thread Pekka Savola

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Dave Airlie wrote:

Don't use radeonhd, the Fedora X team don't support it and never have.

I'm thinking it should reallyt be removed from the distro at this point
as it makes things worse rather than better. remove your xorg.conf
and turn modesetting on and if its still horrible, then we can talk.


Well, a couple of Fedoras back, X didn't work except with radeonhd, 
but now radeon appears to support this one as well; I switched to it, 
and the CPU issue is gone even with KMS.  Now fonts (esp small ones) 
look very smudgy though.  But I suppose there are already bug(s) open 
on this.


--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora 12 Graphics Issues: Cancel F13 and concentrate on fixing F12 ?

2009-11-26 Thread Pekka Savola

On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

I have not entered any bugzilla numbers as yet. I spent days with F11 and
previous releases diagnosing reporting and attempting to fix bugs. No
graphics updates were ever made available for F11 and still Fedora cannot
run even Blender on most of my machines. At the moment I am not
convinced that
it is worth spending this time on F12. It seems likely no updates will
appear and in F13 the whole ball game may have changed anyway.


Seems a bunch of incorrect assumptions considering that Fedora 11 did
get many updates and I already see updates for Fedora 12 in
updates-testing repository. Specific bug reports are definitely going to
help.


Well, here's one graphics regression: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540476


radeon.modeset=0 worked around the problem.

(I'm not sure if it's filed against the right component.)

--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


F10 updates-testing - F11 updates-testing yum upgrade issue

2009-06-10 Thread Pekka Savola
When trying to do a yum upgrade from 10 updates-testing to 11 
updates-testing, I get the following:


This is due to F11 updates-testing 'vte' package including a newer 
version of libvte, but the previous version was not retained.  Could 
someone push a rebuild of gnome-terminal, gnome-desktop-sharp, 
Terminal and grip ASAP (maybe other packages are affected as well) ?


Error: Missing Dependency: libvte.so.9 is needed by package 
gnome-terminal-2.26.2-1.fc11.i586 (updates-testing)
Error: Missing Dependency: libvte.so.9 is needed by package 
gnome-desktop-sharp-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libvte.so.9 is needed by package 
Terminal-0.2.12-1.fc11.i586 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libvte.so.9 is needed by package 
Terminal-0.2.12-1.fc11.i586 (updates)
Error: Missing Dependency: libvte.so.9 is needed by package 
1:grip-3.2.0-26.fc11.i586 (fedora)


--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: Fedora Core 5 Status

2006-03-10 Thread Pekka Savola

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Philippe Rigault wrote:
...

In conclusion, I think that:
1. There should be a new test release, so that gcc/glibc are tested before
FC5 final
2. Since GNOME 2.14 may happen before this test release, it could be
included.


Uhh, I'm not following the logic about testing.  It's not like you can 
just install FC5, disable yum, and forget about it for years.


FWIW, at present, FC4 has over 2 GB of updates.  If there are major 
bugs in any of the FC5 system components, I'm pretty confident that 
they'll be fixed; as a matter of fact, I'd be surprised if the gcc, 
glibc or gnome weren't updated within the next 3 months or so.


--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings