Re: dist-git proof of concept phase 1 complete
Hello All! 2009/12/15 Jesse Keating : > git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/ eg if you wished > to clone the kernel, you'd type: > > git clone git://publictest5.fedoraproject.org/git/pkgs/kernel How to easily clone whole package tree? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20091128 changes
Hello All!
2009/11/28 Richard W.M. Jones :
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:51:52PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> mingw32-plib-static-1.8.5-0.fc13.noarch requires mingw32-plib =
>> 0:{version}-{release}
>
> Hmmm ... this is a packaging bug, and since the package was just added
> it should have been caught during review.
Yes, indeed. I missed this issue.
Stefan, it's time for the next rebuild (with this bogus "Requires"
removed), I think.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rawhide report: 20091104 changes - excluding noarch packages
2009/11/4 Orion Poplawski : > Is there any way to exclude a noarch package from certain arches? If it does depends on arch, then it isn't a noarch. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
How to add upstream developer as a (co)maintainer of the existing application?
Hello All! There is a package, already included in Fedora, and there is a friendly and active upstream developer, who wants to be a (co)maintainer of this app. (S)he doesn't maintain any packages in Fedora currently. So the question is - is there a policy on how such situations should be handled? I remember, that if Redhat hires someone from upstream, then no additional procedures with review requests and sponsorship needed (at least visible to others, outside Redhat) - (s)he just started to be a (co)maintainer. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: OpenSER / Kamailio
Hello All! 2009/10/25 Felix Kaechele : > Hi there, > I'm just starting to play with my SIP Phones using OpenSER. > I was wondering why there have been no updates to the OpenSER package > since it was renamed to Kamailio in version 1.4.0? There are plans to package sip-router, when it will reach some level of quality, since it's a merge of SER and OpenSER/Kamailio. Also, there is an attempt to package OpenSIPs (another one fork of SER/OpenSER codebase) - take a look here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529831 > I did however notice that version 1.4.0 in fact is of an earlier date > than version 1.3.4 (which still is named OpenSER and is in Fedora). 1.3.4 is the last stable version of OpenSER. Since ver. 1.4.0 it was rebranded as Kamailio. > So is there an actual difference between OpenSER and Kamailio - other > than the name - that prevents us from replacing the OpenSER package with > a Kamailio package. A lots, actually. There are some changes in config-file syntax, in plugins and so on. Every version of OpenSER/Kamailio (1.3.x/1.4.x/1.5.x) is incompatible to some degree with previous one. Fortunately, they can be installed in parallel due to different naming scheme. The curse of this project is the team/features management issues, which led project to the number of consequent forks (and one merge), which confuses end users a lot. One of popular questions from customers, is "which one from these routers should we choose - SER/OpenSER/OpenSIPs/Kamailio/SIP-Router?". I'm voting for OpenSER 1.3.4 right now - it's stable and it was proved to work reliably. Perhaps, at 2010, we may consider switching to SIP Router. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
2009/10/16 Rahul Sundaram : > On 10/16/2009 02:29 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of >> aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark >> ages of censorship, brainwashing and hypocrisy. > You seem to be equating "aggressive thinking" with sexism and racism and > censorship with a requirement for civil and decent behaviour in > communities. Civil and decent behavior is to be tolerant to others, right? So, please, be tolerant to sexists/racists/-ists. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
2009/10/16 Till Maas : > You may also want to think about whether you really find it great that > there's sexism on the internet, because you might have confused it with > sexual content. No, I meant sexism. I thought, that sexism is modern trend nowadays, since almost every OSS-related rss-feed is full of "Sexism in OSS" articles. And yes, I forgot about racism, also. You see, I personally prefer to live in the society with some level of aggressively thinking and speaking minorities, rather than in dark ages of censorship, brainwashing and hypocrisy. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Who do I send to get a package removed because of bad language.
2009/10/16 Steven James Drinnan : > I will file a ticket. > > But my point was the image of Fedora.Does Fedora want be associated with > software vendors that use this type of language? Please, disconnect yourself from the Internet asap, because it's full of obscene videos, jokes, sexism and so on. And that's great! -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
2009/10/14 Stephen Gallagher : > This is an interesting question. Suppose someone wrote (for example) an > GPLed configuration tool for a closed-source hardware driver. Would it > be permissible to include an open-source tool in the distribution, even > knowing it would only ever be usable with a tainted kernel? An example from a real life is a proprietary drivers, which sometimes has only kernel-part closed, while has opensourced userspace. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
2009/10/14 Itamar Reis Peixoto : > yes, I am already told this for you. > > for example I have user-mode-linux user space but I don't have > user-mode-linux enabled in kernel. I have strong opinion, that this is a bad practice. So I decided to ask others. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Are packages w/o necessary kernel modules allowed?
Hello All! Imagine an application, which relies on a specific kernel module. This module is not a part of stock Fedora kernel (at least, yet), and we don't allow stand-alone kernel modules. Whether or not this package can be allowed? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
2009/10/2 Matej Cepl : > pspp -- A program for statistical analysis of sampled data I can take care of if. > jbrout -- Photo manager, written in python/pygtk > pyexiv2 -- Python binding to exiv2 (used by jbrout) I'm using it, so I'll take care of it.. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: yum-presto not on by default
2009/9/23 Jonathan Dieter : > I don't think yum-presto should be enabled by default in Fedora 12. Agree with you. For me - traffic and space for rpms are cheap, while rebuilding rpms is slow. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [Heads up] FUSE so-name bump is coming.
2009/9/8 Ville Skyttä : > On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > >> I'll plan to upgrade fuse in Rawhide (and, possibly, in F-11) up to >> ver. 2.8.0, and there will be so-name bump. > > Rationale for considering doing it in F-11? After some thinking, I reconsidered plans to update FUSE to 2.8.0 in F-11. So no need to worry here :) -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [Heads up] FUSE so-name bump is coming.
Hello! 2009/9/8 Till Maas : > Will you also rebuild the packages once the new fuse is in place? Yes, I'll try to rebuild also all packages, dependent on fuse. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Heads up] FUSE so-name bump is coming.
Hello All! I'll plan to upgrade fuse in Rawhide (and, possibly, in F-11) up to ver. 2.8.0, and there will be so-name bump. I'll do it next week, if nobody have any objections. Also I'll try to test all (or as much as I can) FUSE-related packages for compatibility with new package before (this weekend, probably). -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
What happens to hermes.ko in 2.6.30
Hello All! I just wondering why hermes_dld.ko hermes.ko were disabled in 2.6.30. Did they obsoleted by orinoco*.ko ? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora on NSLU2/Synology/etc.
2009/8/30 Pete Zaitcev : > Dear All: > > I'm wondering if anyone tried to run Fedora on a small home NAS, > in the class of NSLU2 or Synology 108j. I'm hacking on software > that permits easy management of storage clouds and I'm thinking > about creating a testbed populated with something cheap ($100 or so). > Please let me know if you have a hands-on experience with it. I advice you to look at the Western Digital MyBook World Edition series, especially at the latest WD MyBook WE White Light: http://www.wdc.com/ru/products/Products.asp?DriveID=587 http://www.wdc.com/ru/products/Products.asp?DriveID=589 They have 128 Mb of RAM, 1Gbit ethernet, CPU ~ 300+ MHz and a 1 or 2 SATA2 ports (number of SATA2 ports depends on model). I've got some experience with previous model (which has only 32 Mbytes of RAM and less powerful CPU), and it works well. Here is its smolts profile: http://www.smolts.org/client/show_all/pub_597e2d6d-7d94-4299-a9ae-e7c3a7e35b31 Although they are costs ~200-300 $ (please, note that HDD is already included, so the actual price is ~100$ + 1 or 2 TB HDD), they are very hack-friendly, since you don't need to flash/re-flash them (and, therefore, chances to brick them are very very small). They work as following: * After power-up CPU loads tiny firmware, which reads first 512 bytes from attached HDD, which should contain 1st stage loader, and executes it. * 1st stage loader (if it was loaded correctly) loads 2nd stage loader from the rest of HDD. All these loaders are easy to install using just the USB-HDD box or directly attaching HDD to your computer. And you may, also, very simply (using only dd and bzip2) create a backup of the original firmware in case you'll gave up :) Note, that you need to remember your soldering skills since you will need to attach serial cable (I'm afraid most of consumer's NAS devices sold without serial or JTAG). -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Firmware licence question
Hello, All! 2009/8/20 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) : > I very want see this driver in Fedora: > http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/dkms-tiacx/ > This is free and even packaged, so no problem there... This module has very sad story - since, it was made as a result of direct reverse engineering (no "clean room" techniques were used), it produced series of flamewars in LKML. As a result it was rejected from inclusion into main kernel tree. More to say, the firmware status is also unclear. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review
Hello All! 2009/8/5 Jonathan MERCIER : > Dear sir, > I have an old bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 > This person want a review someone can review this software please. > Thanks > kind regards Jonathan, you may review this srpm by yourself. Don't be afraid, just step in :) Others, will help you, if you missed something during review. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: dia outdated
2009/8/4 Jonathan MERCIER : > Dear sir, > I have put a put a message here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515097 > But i have no answer, actually dia version is 0.96.1 > dia version: > - 2007-03-25: 0.96 final release > - 2009-05-03: 0.97 sources > > on http://live.gnome.org/Dia/ it's write the latest stable release > version 0.97 is now available > > Someone have some news about that ? I have no idea about why Dia still not updated, but this issue was already mentioned: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502870 -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb (2nd try)
2009/7/29 Toshio Kuratomi : > Okay, please test this with a package that has people on the initial CC > list so we've tested precisely the behaviour people are concerned about. > > If the initialcclist is not set when a security bug comes in I don't > think there's a reason we shouldn't auto-approve watchbugzilla in pkgdb. I think, that we should treat this as an issue - user should be added to watchlist for sensitive bugs, only if he is in "commits" group (which means, that he can fix security bugs). If he just in watchbugzilla, then he shouldn't see such tickets. Anyway, we should autoapprove watchcommits, at least. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb (2nd try)
Hello All! Since nobody changed anything after last discussion, I repean my proposal again (if someone missed it). Why we should approve manually requests to watching bugzilla and cvs changes for packages? I'm sure we need to change policy in order to automatically approve all such requests. See previous discussions: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/67465 (2007-10-26, started by Toshio Kuratomi) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/94641 (2008-10-12, started by Patrice Dumas) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/116848 (2009-07-06, started by me) -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora-wiki is broken since this morninng (~ 06.00 am GMt+00)
Hello All! 2009/7/25 Ricky Zhou : > On 2009-07-25 08:05:53 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Hello All! >> I'm always get this message while trying to visit pages since this morning: > Hi, this was due to a configuration error I made yesterday, can you > check and see if it's fixed now? Seems working now. Thanks. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Fedora-wiki is broken since this morninng (~ 06.00 am GMt+00)
Hello All!
I'm always get this message while trying to visit pages since this morning:
=
Utf8Case.ser is missing, please run "make" in the serialized directory
Backtrace:
#0 /usr/share/mediawiki/languages/Language.php(1429): Language::getCaseMaps()
#1 /usr/share/mediawiki/languages/Language.php(2574): Language->lc('??')
#2 /usr/share/mediawiki/languages/Language.php(2532): Language->fixUpSettings()
#3 /usr/share/mediawiki/languages/Language.php(1334): Language->load()
#4 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/MessageCache.php(539):
Language->getMessage('missing-article')
#5 [internal function]: MessageCache->get('missing-article', true, false)
#6 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/StubObject.php(58):
call_user_func_array(Array, Array)
#7 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/StubObject.php(76):
StubObject->_call('get', Array)
#8 [internal function]: StubObject->__call('get', Array)
#9 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php(583):
StubObject->get('missing-article', true, false)
#10 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php(548):
wfMsgGetKey('missing-article', true, false, true)
#11 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/GlobalFunctions.php(454):
wfMsgReal('missing-article', Array, true)
#12 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Article.php(407):
wfMsg('missing-article', 'PeterLemenkov', '')
#13 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Article.php(302): Article->fetchContent(0)
#14 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Article.php(226): Article->loadContent()
#15 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Article.php(128): Article->getContent()
#16 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Wiki.php(305): Article->followRedirect()
#17 /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/Wiki.php(60):
MediaWiki->initializeArticle(Object(Title), Object(WebRequest))
#18 /usr/share/mediawiki/index.php(114):
MediaWiki->initialize(Object(Title), NULL, Object(OutputPage),
Object(User), Object(WebRequest))
#19 {main}
=
Seems that something is broken in the internals of mediawiki.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
How to properly name a cross-toolchain package?
Hello All!
I plan to add arm-toolchain into Fedora and encountered a difficulty -
how to properly name the package? From what I found in the Internets,
the cross-toolchains *often* named with the following prefix:
For example:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-
powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/embedded/handbook/?part=1&chap=3
However sometimes they named differently (arm-none-eabi-,
arm-uclinuxeabi-, etc). Some cross-compilers already included into
Fedora, and their packages naming schemes are also different - some
examples of prefixes are arm-gp2x-linux-, avr-, msp430-, spu-
(mingw32 differs from others because it, at least, implies target OS
and libc).
I'm sure, it's time to create unified rules for packaging of
cross-toolchains, but right now I'm asking you for help in proper
naming of it. Should we name it as gcc or should we use some other naming schemes? What
values should be used for - "fedora" maybe? O should we
simply drop this field ("unknown")?
--
With best regards!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: How to add custom rpm-defines to rpmbuild while building in Koji?
2009/7/7 Erik van Pienbroek : > Op dinsdag 07-07-2009 om 13:02 uur [tijdzone +0400], schreef Peter > Lemenkov: >> Hello All! >> In order to build cross-toolchain I need to pass additional --define >> "binutils_target " to rpmbuild command-line. See >> this spec, for example: >> >> http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/spu-binutils/devel/spu-binutils.spec?revision=1.10&view=markup >> >> How can I do it? > > Hi, > > In the .spec file you referred to the binutils_target is already set > (first line: %define binutils_target spu). Oh, I didn't noticed it. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
How to add custom rpm-defines to rpmbuild while building in Koji?
Hello All! In order to build cross-toolchain I need to pass additional --define "binutils_target " to rpmbuild command-line. See this spec, for example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/spu-binutils/devel/spu-binutils.spec?revision=1.10&view=markup How can I do it? -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: [RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb
2009/7/6 Tom Lane : > Peter Lemenkov writes: >> Why we should approve manually requests to watching bugzilla and cvs >> changes for packages? I'm sure we need to change policy in order to >> automatically approve all such requests. > > Isn't there a security issue there? I'm not sure I want any random > person watching every bz or commit I make. I don't think so - right now anyone can subscribe to the Bugzilla activity of (or , or anyone else) and anyone can watch cvs commits. Adding youself to watchcommits and watchbugzilla is just another one (more convenient for Fedora members) way to monitor bugzilla and commits. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[RFE] Auto-approve watchcommits and watchbugzilla in Pkgdb
Hello All! Why we should approve manually requests to watching bugzilla and cvs changes for packages? I'm sure we need to change policy in order to automatically approve all such requests. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Raising the bar
2009/6/30 Peter Robinson : >> I repeat - this initiative should be based only (exclusively) on >> current releases. > What a load of crap! I use rawhide as do hundreds of other testers. You contradicting to yourself - if you have many (enough to say that their number is huge) crash test dummies with Rawhide enabled, when you don't need any other special initiatives. However, I still think that you need more *users*, average users. I repeat - users don't use Rawhide, and this initiative will be doomed. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Raising the bar
2009/6/30 Jesse Keating : > As much fun as it is to make up stats on the spot, I would ask you to show > some proof that nobody uses rawhide. Please, take a look at smolts statistics, for example. Don't fool yourself with wrong statement that many users (not redhat employees) using Rawhide. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Raising the bar
2009/6/30 Casey Dahlin : > These aren't typically the sort of issues you can fix in a running release. > UI is one of those things we expect to remain stable through the cycle. Even if average user(s) feel uncomfortable? Oh, come on! -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Raising the bar
2009/6/29 Peter Robinson : > Focus on rawhide will mean the next release will see the improvements :) That means, that the next release will be untested, as usual. So why create another useless initiative? Please, keep in mind, that almost nodoby using Rawhide == nobody will participate except few paid Red Hat developers == useless initiative. I repeat - this initiative should be based only (exclusively) on current releases. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Raising the bar
2009/6/29 Matthias Clasen : > Hey all, > > we'd like to announce the 'Fit and Finish' initiative for Fedora, > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fit_and_Finish > > with the goal to improve the user experience of the Fedora desktop. If you wish to improve *user* experience, then you should focus entirely on actual Fedora releases rather than on Rawhide. However I see that in testing days you still encourage only users with up-to-date Rawhide installations. That's not an option for wide audience, and, therefore this initiative will be doomed. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
How user could loose his "CLA done" status?
Hello All! There is a newbie fedora packager, whom I sponsored not so long time ago - he seems very active and enthusiastic, and almost every day he asks me some advice on his (still not included into Fedora) package. Today, I was badly surprised to see that he lost his "CLA done" status - I asked him, what's happens? Maybe he is just gave up or this is (possibly) his technical issue? But he swears that he didn't do anything destructive with his account so far. The only suspicious issue, is that he has some troubles with firefox - it refuses to remember his login and password for Fedora and he frequently uses "forgot my password" feature. Can someone check the status of this issue (whether it's a user's mistake or infrastructure bug)? User - aleksey2005 -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: How to enable xorg.conf in F-11
2009/6/11 Oscar Osta Pueyo : > Hi, >> * How to enable traditinal ctrl+alt+backpsace behaviour ? > > http://ryanler.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/controlaltbackspace-shortcut-does-not-restart-the-x-server-in-fedora-11/ Unfortunately, I don't use nor Gnome, neither KDE. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
How to enable xorg.conf in F-11
Hello All! I've got some issues with Xogr on F-11. On order to fix (or properly describe them in bugzilla, at least) I need to change some parameters of Xorg, and the only way to make it (AFAIK) is to change values in xorg.conf. Also I need to restart X as usial (ctrl+alt+backpsace) So I have the following questions: * How to enable traditinal ctrl+alt+backpsace behaviour ? * How to change options for my xorg-x11-drv-ati ? * How to dump current config from running Xorg? * How to use config instead of relying on built-in or autodetected options? PS I think that no need to describe, how I hate those guys, who decided to disable ctrl+alt+backpsace. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?
2009/5/26 Bill Nottingham : >> Subj. As Debian folks did years ago. Such branching will be done very >> easy technically. > > Because all the builds and composition is done in the US, and the trademarks > are held by a US entity. Not a serious reason. Why not to relocate then in Europe? -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Why not to create Fedora-us and Fedora-non-us branches?
Subj. As Debian folks did years ago. Such branching will be done very easy technically. -- With best regards! -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
