Re: Building packages for EPEL

2009-07-03 Thread SmootherFrOgZ
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Gregory Hoslerghos...@redhat.com wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Dennis Gilmore wrote:
 EPEL is now using koji to build instead of plague.  please make sure that you
 update th common directory in your checkout to pick up the needed changes to
 submit builds.

 I was able to do builds for EL-4/EL-5 using koji. thanks a lot!

 Bodhi support will come early next week to issue updates.

 Please let us know as and when make update will be available. Until then, 
 what
 is the alternative? http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates ?


make update goes to bodhi as well as
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates; which is bodhi UI.

epel-releng will be taking care of the updates for now.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: beagle

2009-06-25 Thread SmootherFrOgZ
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:

 * Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

 beagle-owner AT fedoraproject DOT org

 Recipient address rejected:
 User unknown in local recipient table (state 14).

 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name  shows more than a
 dozen people on watchcommit+commit, but no package owner. It's an orphan.

 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs  shows more than a
 dozen open tickets, but nobody is subscribed to watchbugzilla.

 * yum list beagle shows beagle-0.3.9-6.fc11 in fedora.



Unfortunetely yes,
It has been orphaned few days ago and no one took it over.
=
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00037.html

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: mono-2.4 and ppc64 status

2009-06-10 Thread SmootherFrOgZ
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:11:33 +0200, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:

  list

 I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt.
 then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.

 Are F-11 and devel in sync? It seems you have not built any of these
 changes for devel (.fc12).


 I did, on some packages already (eg. gtk-sharp2, gnome-sharp). the
rest are on their ways
If you have package to rebuild, feel free to do it


-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: mono-2.4 and ppc64 status

2009-06-09 Thread SmootherFrOgZ
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Orcan Ogetbiloget.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, SmootherFrOgZ wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
 Mono-2.4 has been built for ppc64 in F11 and devel.  So people should be
 able to start rebuilding packages to include ppc64 as well as the other
 arches.  There's a few wrinkles to watch out for:

 1) Packages with dependencies will have to be built in dependency order.
  For instance, a lot of packages depend on the gtk-sharp2 bindings and
 those haven't been built yet.

 2) Because of the imminent release of F11 we're in a freeze state.  This
  means getting dependencies into the Fedora11 buildroot will require
 people to request tagging explicitly.  This also means that if you
 rebuild your package for F11 with ppc64 support and later you have to
 get this package tagged into the release, all of the packages it depends
 on will need to be tagged in as well (otherwise your ppc64 build will
 have broken deps).

 With these in mind, I'd recommend people start rebuilding their mono
 packages on ppc64 in the devel branch.  Keep track of the dependency
 chain you encounter.  Then perform your builds in the Fedora 11 branch
 as updates after the release.  I'm not a mono-sig member, though, so if
 you guys decide something else makes sense, just be sure to come up with
 a plan so we don't release with a bunch of broken dependencies.


 Sound like I forgot to update this thread.
 Well,
 All packages which should depend on gtk-sharp2  and gnome-sharp has
 been rebuilt (list below).
 If i missed some please, step up or feel free to build them if you have Acls.

 list
 
 gnome-sharp-2_24_0-4_fc11
 gtksourceview2-sharp-1_0-5_svn89788_3_fc11
 gecko-sharp2-0_13-3_fc11
 webkit-sharp-0_2-2_fc11
 monosim-1_3_0_2-3_fc11
 avahi-0_6_25-2_fc11
 mono-addins-0_4-7_20091702svn127062_1_fc11
 gmime-2_4_3-5_fc11
 bless-0_6_0-3_fc11
 dbus-sharp-0_63-12_fc11
 themonospot-0_7_1_1-3_fc11

 ndesk-dbus-0_6_1a-5_fc11
 gnome-subtitles-0_8-8_fc11
 gnome-desktop-sharp-2_26_0-3_fc11
 evolution-sharp-0_20_0-2_fc11
 lat-1_2_3-7_fc11
 gsf-sharp-0_8_1-10_fc11
 mono-tools-2.4-9.fc11
 bareftp-0:0.2.2-2.fc10.i386
 gtk-sharp-1_0_10-23_fc11
 ndesk-dbus-glib-0_4_1-5_fc11

 beagle-0.3.9-8.fc11
 notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.7.20080912svn.fc11
 gnome-keyring-sharp-1.0.1-0.3.115768svn.fc11
 podsleuth-0.6.3-3.fc11
 tasque-0.1.8-3.fc11
 tomboy
 muine
 f-spot

 ipod-sharp-0.8.1-3.fc11
 mono-zeroconf-0.7.6-9.fc11
 gnome-do-0.8.1.3-6.fc11
 giver-0.1.8-5.fc11
 gbrainy-1.1-4.fc11



 gnome-guitar is missing which I rebuilt a while ago (before your email).

 I just saw that the new gnome-sharp and gtk-sharp2 is not in F-11
 repos although they were in the buildroot override. This caused
 dependency breakage. I also can't find them on bodhi. What is going
 on?


I assume that no one have any mono packages to rebuilt.
then if so, i gonna request a push above packages.

-- 
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list