Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 18:50 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: 2009/9/1 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com: Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your package provides 11.84. AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or the texlive version. In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class. Actually, there is an option to install the AucTeX bundled preview privately for auctex. so both versions could co-exist, if we wanted to do that (although that's not my recommendation). Meanwhile, is there a workaround? I can install the right tex-preview alongside texlive-preview, but still can't install the old dvipng and kpathsea to get emacs-auctex. That kpathsea wants texlive-2007. Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
2009/9/2 Matthew Saltzman m...@clemson.edu: On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 18:50 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: 2009/9/1 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com: Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your package provides 11.84. AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or the texlive version. In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class. Actually, there is an option to install the AucTeX bundled preview privately for auctex. so both versions could co-exist, if we wanted to do that (although that's not my recommendation). Meanwhile, is there a workaround? I can install the right tex-preview alongside texlive-preview, but still can't install the old dvipng and kpathsea to get emacs-auctex. That kpathsea wants texlive-2007. I don't see an easy one without rebuilding emacs-auctex against Jindrich's new packages, and that's not an option for the main F-11 repo. One the new texlive is in rawhide, we can fix this stuff up there. J. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
2009/8/31 Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com: 2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com: Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should successfully obsolete it. But doing installation that way, I end up with both installed: tex-preview-11.85-8.fc11.noarch texlive-preview-2009-11.84.13530.fc11.noarch Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your package provides 11.84. AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or the texlive version. In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class. Jonathan (emacs-auctex maintainer). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
2009/9/1 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com: Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your package provides 11.84. AucTeX is the upstream for the preview tex package - so this is another case where we need to decide whether to go with upstream or the texlive version. In this case, I think we have to go with the upstream (AucTeX) one as each Auctex release is tested against the bundled preview class. Actually, there is an option to install the AucTeX bundled preview privately for auctex. so both versions could co-exist, if we wanted to do that (although that's not my recommendation). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:23:50PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009: $ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree Finished Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates Finished Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package emacs-auctex.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: tex-preview = 11.85-8.fc11 for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: dvipng for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Running transaction check --- Package dvipng.x86_64 0:1.11-2.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: dvipng-1.11-2.fc11.x86_64 --- Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-42.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 for package: kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 -- Finished Dependency Resolution kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I have texlive-dvipng, texlive-kpathsea, and texlive-preview installed. Should I file a bug someplace? Hmmm, it looks like a problem in how yum resolves obsoletes/provides. I will get exactly this when I try to install emacs-auctex, but if I do: yum install dvipng -y then texlive-dvipng and texlive-dvipng-bin get successfully installed. Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should successfully obsolete it. Jindrich Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
2009/8/31 Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com: Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should successfully obsolete it. But doing installation that way, I end up with both installed: tex-preview-11.85-8.fc11.noarch texlive-preview-2009-11.84.13530.fc11.noarch Is that intentional? Seems emacs-auctex requires 11.85, while your package provides 11.84. - Thomas -- Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:01 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:23:50PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote: Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009: $ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree Finished Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates Finished Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package emacs-auctex.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: tex-preview = 11.85-8.fc11 for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: dvipng for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Running transaction check --- Package dvipng.x86_64 0:1.11-2.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: dvipng-1.11-2.fc11.x86_64 --- Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-42.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 for package: kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 -- Finished Dependency Resolution kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I have texlive-dvipng, texlive-kpathsea, and texlive-preview installed. Should I file a bug someplace? Hmmm, it looks like a problem in how yum resolves obsoletes/provides. I will get exactly this when I try to install emacs-auctex, but if I do: yum install dvipng -y then texlive-dvipng and texlive-dvipng-bin get successfully installed. Then installation of emacs-auctex runs without problems. So it seems like yum has a hard time to resolve both installation of emacs-auctex and obsoletion of dvipng in one transaction even though emacs-auctex contains unversioned Requires: to dvipng and texlive-dvipng should successfully obsolete it. I'm not seeing the install without problems behavior, unfortunately. The messages above come from after installing texlive-dvipng*. After latest updates: [...@yankee ~]$ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree Finished Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates Finished Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package emacs-auctex.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: tex-preview = 11.85-8.fc11 for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: dvipng for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Running transaction check --- Package dvipng.x86_64 0:1.11-2.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: dvipng-1.11-2.fc11.x86_64 --- Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-42.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 for package: kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 -- Finished Dependency Resolution kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest [...@yankee ~]$ rpm -qa \*dvipng\* texlive-dvipng-2009-1.12.13822.fc11.noarch texlive-dvipng-bin-2009-14697.fc11.x86_64 [...@yankee ~]$ rpm -qa \*kpathsea\* texlive-kpathsea-2009-14773.fc11.noarch texlive-kpathsea-lib-2009-0.3.20090828.fc11.x86_64
AucTeX dependencies and TeXLive 2009
Here's what happens when I try to install AucTeX for Emacs with texlive-2009: $ sudo yum install emacs-auctex Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree Finished Excluding Packages from RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Nonfree - Updates Finished Excluding Packages from Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates Finished Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package emacs-auctex.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: tex-preview = 11.85-8.fc11 for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: dvipng for package: emacs-auctex-11.85-8.fc11.noarch -- Running transaction check --- Package dvipng.x86_64 0:1.11-2.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: dvipng-1.11-2.fc11.x86_64 --- Package tex-preview.noarch 0:11.85-8.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-42.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 for package: kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 -- Finished Dependency Resolution kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: texlive = 2007-42.fc11 is needed by package kpathsea-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 (fedora) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I have texlive-dvipng, texlive-kpathsea, and texlive-preview installed. Should I file a bug someplace? Thanks. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
