Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:44:59 -0700, Adam wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.1-1.fc11,synce-sync-engine-0.14-1.fc11,synce-hal-0.14-1.fc11,synce-kpm-0.14-1.fc11,librra-0.14-1.fc11,librapi-0.14-1.fc11,unshield-0.6-1.fc11,libsynce-0.14-1.fc11 Submitted on 2009-07-21, still pending. Not pushed anywhere? Bodhi problem? I'm not sure. May be just that it doesn't have the karma yet. I'll try and find time to test on my little F11 box and confirm/deny...this system runs F12. Normally, bodhi would have added a comment like This update has been submitted for testing and a similar one for stable plus another comment for the actual push. Such comments are missing in this ticket, as if it has not been submitted to any repo yet. And it's not a security update which enter the Security Team's queue before such comments appear. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:44:59 -0700, Adam wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.1-1.fc11,synce-sync-engine-0.14-1.fc11,synce-hal-0.14-1.fc11,synce-kpm-0.14-1.fc11,librra-0.14-1.fc11,librapi-0.14-1.fc11,unshield-0.6-1.fc11,libsynce-0.14-1.fc11 Submitted on 2009-07-21, still pending. Not pushed anywhere? Bodhi problem? I'm not sure. May be just that it doesn't have the karma yet. I'll try and find time to test on my little F11 box and confirm/deny...this system runs F12. Normally, bodhi would have added a comment like This update has been submitted for testing and a similar one for stable plus another comment for the actual push. Such comments are missing in this ticket, as if it has not been submitted to any repo yet. And it's not a security update which enter the Security Team's queue before such comments appear. Exactly. It hasn't been pushed at all. The maintainer needs to click the 'push to testing' or 'push to stable' buttons in Bodhi. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 07:44 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: I'm not sure. May be just that it doesn't have the karma yet. I'll try and find time to test on my little F11 box and confirm/deny...this system runs F12. Normally, bodhi would have added a comment like This update has been submitted for testing and a similar one for stable plus another comment for the actual push. Such comments are missing in this ticket, as if it has not been submitted to any repo yet. And it's not a security update which enter the Security Team's queue before such comments appear. Exactly. It hasn't been pushed at all. The maintainer needs to click the 'push to testing' or 'push to stable' buttons in Bodhi. Yikes, seems everything I post lately gets misunderstood. :) I know that's the _process_ reason why it hasn't shown up, of course - it hasn't been manually pushed. What I was getting at is that I didn't know why Andreas hasn't manually pushed it yet, and I was thinking it may be because no-one's tested it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:29 +, Michael Schwendt wrote: synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial I thought I'd seen these addressed on the list before, but just in case: synce-serial is entirely deprecated now, it is not needed for anything. These packages should not depend on it, and synce-hal should obsolete it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:29 +, Michael Schwendt wrote: synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial I thought I'd seen these addressed on the list before, but just in case: synce-serial is entirely deprecated now, it is not needed for anything. These packages should not depend on it, and synce-hal should obsolete it. Erm - actually, vdccm is obsoleted by synce-hal too. Sorry. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:50 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:09:30 -0700, Adam wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 01:29 +, Michael Schwendt wrote: synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial I thought I'd seen these addressed on the list before, but just in case: synce-serial is entirely deprecated now, it is not needed for anything. These packages should not depend on it, and synce-hal should obsolete it. Erm - actually, vdccm is obsoleted by synce-hal too. Sorry. May be true, but such a synce-hal is not in the repos yet. (Extras repoclosure does evaluate Obsoletes tags) Yes, I meant that synce-hal obsoletes vdccm in a code sense, so the package ought to have the Obsoletes set if it isn't already. Sorry to not be clear. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libopensync-plugin-synce-0.22.1-1.fc11,synce-sync-engine-0.14-1.fc11,synce-hal-0.14-1.fc11,synce-kpm-0.14-1.fc11,librra-0.14-1.fc11,librapi-0.14-1.fc11,unshield-0.6-1.fc11,libsynce-0.14-1.fc11 Submitted on 2009-07-21, still pending. Not pushed anywhere? Bodhi problem? vdccm = synce-serial is obsolete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/498409 synce-kde = synce-serial is obsolete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/498410 I'm not sure. May be just that it doesn't have the karma yet. I'll try and find time to test on my little F11 box and confirm/deny...this system runs F12. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On 07/28/2009 03:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: For those that had not noticed, rubygem-rails-2.3.3 requires rubygem-rack whatever-is-available-now, so... -- Jeroen == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-i386 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-rails-2.3.2-3.fc11.noarch from fedora-updates-testing-11-x86_64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activeresource) = 0:2.3.2 rubygem(activerecord) = 0:2.3.2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
On 07/28/2009 03:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-i386 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 These will be resolved with the next build of rubygem-actionpack (building now). -- Jeroen package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-ppc unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-ppc64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 package: rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch from fedora-11-x86_64 unresolved deps: rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-07-28
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): beagle CodeAnalyst-gui gauche-gl gauche-gtk mono-tools openmpi pcmanx-gtk2 ppl python-repoze-what python-tgext-crud R-RScaLAPACK rubygem-actionpack rubygem-activeldap rubygem-main rubygem-rails synce-kde tomboy vdccm vtk == Broken packages in fedora-11-i386: R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs gauche-gl-0.4.4-4.fc11.i586 requires gauche = 0:0.8.13 gauche-gtk-0.4.1-18.fc11.i586 requires gauche = 0:0.8.13 openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11 pcmanx-gtk2-xulrunner-plugin-0.3.8-5.fc11.i586 requires xulrunner = 0:1.9.1 rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.i586 requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.i586 requires synce-serial == Broken packages in fedora-11-ppc: R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.ppc requires openmpi-libs gauche-gl-0.4.4-4.fc11.ppc requires gauche = 0:0.8.13 gauche-gtk-0.4.1-18.fc11.ppc requires gauche = 0:0.8.13 openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.ppc requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11 pcmanx-gtk2-xulrunner-plugin-0.3.8-5.fc11.ppc requires xulrunner = 0:1.9.1 rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.ppc requires synce-serial == Broken packages in fedora-11-ppc64: R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.ppc64 requires openmpi-libs openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.ppc64 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11 pcmanx-gtk2-xulrunner-plugin-0.3.8-5.fc11.ppc64 requires xulrunner = 0:1.9.1 rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.ppc64 requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.ppc64 requires synce-serial == Broken packages in fedora-11-x86_64: R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs gauche-gl-0.4.4-4.fc11.x86_64 requires gauche = 0:0.8.13 gauche-gtk-0.4.1-18.fc11.x86_64 requires gauche = 0:0.8.13 openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11 pcmanx-gtk2-xulrunner-plugin-0.3.8-5.fc11.x86_64 requires xulrunner = 0:1.9.1 rubygem-actionpack-2.3.2-1.fc11.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport) = 0:2.3.2 synce-kde-0.9.1-4.fc11.x86_64 requires synce-serial vdccm-0.10.1-5.fc11.x86_64 requires synce-serial == Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-i386: CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.38-12.fc11.i586 requires libbfd-2.19.51.0.2-17.fc11.so ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.i586 requires libpl.so.5.7.6 ppl-yap-0.10.2-3.fc11.i586 requires libYap.so == Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-ppc: ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.ppc requires libpl.so.5.7.6 ppl-yap-0.10.2-3.fc11.ppc requires libYap.so == Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-ppc64: beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0 beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gsf-sharp) = 0:0.0.0.7 beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0 beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0 beagle-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(taglib-sharp) = 0:2.0.3.2 beagle-evolution-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0 beagle-evolution-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(evolution-sharp) = 0:5.0.0.0 beagle-gnome-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0 beagle-gnome-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0 beagle-thunderbird-0.3.9-9.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0 ppl-swiprolog-0.10.2-3.fc11.ppc64 requires libpl.so.5.7.6()(64bit) ppl-yap-0.10.2-3.fc11.ppc64 requires libYap.so()(64bit) tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0 tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0 tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(gnome-panel-sharp) = 0:2.24.0.0 tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0 tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0 tomboy-0.14.3-1.fc11.ppc64 requires
