Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11
On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: tremulous-1.1.0-8.fc11.i586 from fedora-11-i386 unresolved deps: libopenal.so.0 --- Seriously, can the openal maintainer please stop breaking the ABI in updates? This isn't the first time. Is there a real necessity to do so? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11
Am 11.11.2009 21:16, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: tremulous-1.1.0-8.fc11.i586 from fedora-11-i386 unresolved deps: libopenal.so.0 --- Seriously, can the openal maintainer please stop breaking the ABI in updates? This isn't the first time. Is there a real necessity to do so? Rahul I have forgoten that for F-11 some changes are needed in the spec file. I have fixed it and the new package is on the way. Sorry for the problems. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:50 +0100, LinuxDonald wrote: Am 11.11.2009 21:16, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: tremulous-1.1.0-8.fc11.i586 from fedora-11-i386 unresolved deps: libopenal.so.0 --- Seriously, can the openal maintainer please stop breaking the ABI in updates? This isn't the first time. Is there a real necessity to do so? Rahul I have forgoten that for F-11 some changes are needed in the spec file. I have fixed it and the new package is on the way. Sorry for the problems. Did you notice that the package still upgrades the library SONAME from libopenal.so.0 to libopenal.so.1? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:46:44AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 11/12/2009 01:05 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: == The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == package: tremulous-1.1.0-8.fc11.i586 from fedora-11-i386 unresolved deps: libopenal.so.0 --- Seriously, can the openal maintainer please stop breaking the ABI in updates? This isn't the first time. Is there a real necessity to do so? Can someone give me a definitive answer on whether or not I need to rebuild tremulous and tremfusion with the new ABI? I'm willing to, I just need the confusion to go away. -- Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org Why, a four-year-old could understand this report. Find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail out of it. -- Groucho Marx, Duck Soup pgpZalmmUgz8E.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0600, Ian wrote:
Can someone give me a definitive answer on whether or not I need to
rebuild tremulous and tremfusion with the new ABI? I'm willing to, I
just need the confusion to go away.
No need to.
This was just the separate openal-soft package that is supposed to be
parallel-installable with the older openal instead of obsoleting it.
I've mentioned in the bodhi ticket that the packager could evaluate
%{fedora} in the spec file to avoid the error that has happened.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-11
Am 11.11.2009 22:39, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0600, Ian wrote:
Can someone give me a definitive answer on whether or not I need to
rebuild tremulous and tremfusion with the new ABI? I'm willing to, I
just need the confusion to go away.
No need to.
This was just the separate openal-soft package that is supposed to be
parallel-installable with the older openal instead of obsoleting it.
I've mentioned in the bodhi ticket that the packager could evaluate
%{fedora} in the spec file to avoid the error that has happened.
It was my wrong on the Spec file for fedora 11.
I have created an new packaged that don't make any problems and it's
installable with openal.
Sorry for that :(
@Tremulos you not need rebuild it for fedora 11 you have rebuild that
game allready for f12 and that is okay :)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
