Re: F12 mass rebuild status
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said: (done that for you http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1574035 ) I see. I guess they'll let you and/or me know if this wasn't the right thing to do. Well rel-eng did the mass rebuild and give us a list of the failed packages, fixing them does not create extra but _less_ work for them ;) Exactly; while rel-eng *could* resubmit failed builds, and may submit some at some point, we are perfectly happy not to have to, and doing so will speed things along in general. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:24 -0400, William Cohen wrote: What is the procedure for dropping packages? With the incorporation of the PCL (Performance Counters for Linux) in upcoming Linux kernel 2.6.31 there doesn't seem like there will be much need for libpfm and pfmon packages in F12. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Thursday 30 July 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html scop (1): perltidy BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more information DEBUG util.py:256: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i68 6.rpm: [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out DEBUG util.py:256: Trying other mirror. DEBUG util.py:256: Error Downloading Packages: DEBUG util.py:256:gcc-4.4.1-3.i686: failed to retrieve gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i686.rpm from build DEBUG util.py:256: error was [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out Resubmitting the job should be ok, but I don't see that button in koji for this job, could you do it? rel-eng: ping? Am I supposed to do something about this? I haven't seen any instructions regarding this and as said, it doesn't seem to be possible for me to just resubmit this build in koji (no resubmit link shown for me). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ville Skyttäville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html scop (1): perltidy BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more information DEBUG util.py:256: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i68 6.rpm: [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out DEBUG util.py:256: Trying other mirror. DEBUG util.py:256: Error Downloading Packages: DEBUG util.py:256: gcc-4.4.1-3.i686: failed to retrieve gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i686.rpm from build DEBUG util.py:256: error was [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out Resubmitting the job should be ok, but I don't see that button in koji for this job, could you do it? rel-eng: ping? Am I supposed to do something about this? I haven't seen any instructions regarding this and as said, it doesn't seem to be possible for me to just resubmit this build in koji (no resubmit link shown for me). Well you can just do a checkout and make build (done that for you http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1574035 ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Sunday 02 August 2009, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ville Skyttäville.sky...@iki.fi wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html scop (1): perltidy BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more information DEBUG util.py:256: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3. i68 6.rpm: [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out DEBUG util.py:256: Trying other mirror. DEBUG util.py:256: Error Downloading Packages: DEBUG util.py:256:gcc-4.4.1-3.i686: failed to retrieve gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i686.rpm from build DEBUG util.py:256: error was [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out Resubmitting the job should be ok, but I don't see that button in koji for this job, could you do it? rel-eng: ping? Am I supposed to do something about this? I haven't seen any instructions regarding this and as said, it doesn't seem to be possible for me to just resubmit this build in koji (no resubmit link shown for me). Well you can just do a checkout and make build Yes, I can do that and various other things. The reason I'm asking before trying something in random is that rel-eng has not indicated what to do about cases like this, and there's no way for me to tell whether doing something like this will cause extra work for rel-eng, break rebuild-needed/failed tracking scripts or whatnot. I can guess, but I don't want to, and at the same time I want to try to point out that rel-eng has not given enough information to packagers and are not responding too quickly to related questions. (done that for you http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1574035 ) I see. I guess they'll let you and/or me know if this wasn't the right thing to do. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html I will try to keep these updated multiple times a day. In the case of the needed rebuilds file we're working on a version that takes secondary arch into account. drago01 (1): dbus-c++ - /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ../include/dbus-c++/dbus.h ../include/dbus-c++/types.h ../include/dbus-c++/connection.h ../include/dbus-c++/property.h ../include/dbus-c++/debug.h ../include/dbus-c++/error.h ../include/dbus-c++/interface.h ../include/dbus-c++/message.h ../include/dbus-c++/dispatcher.h ../include/dbus-c++/object.h ../include/dbus-c++/pendingcall.h ../include/dbus-c++/server.h ../include/dbus-c++/debug.h ../include/dbus-c++/util.h ../include/dbus-c++/refptr_impl.h ../include/dbus-c++/introspection.h ../include/dbus-c++/api.h ../include/dbus-c++/eventloop.h ../include/dbus-c++/eventloop-integration.h ../include/dbus-c++/glib-integration.h '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.9.20090203git13281b3.fc12.x86_64/usr/include/dbus-c++-1/dbus-c++/' /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.9.20090203git13281b3.fc12.x86_64/usr/include/dbus-c++-1/dbus-c++/debug.h' with `../include/dbus-c++/debug.h' make[2]: *** [install-lib_includeHEADERS] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dbus-c++/src' make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dbus-c++/src' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.UHUMwZ (%install) --- err.. wtf? The package did not change at all since the last mass rebuild, thanks autotools -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 10:16 +0200, drago01 wrote: '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.9.20090203git13281b3.fc12.x86_64/usr/include/dbus-c++-1/dbus-c++/' /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.9.20090203git13281b3.fc12.x86_64/usr/include/dbus-c++-1/dbus-c++/debug.h' with `../include/dbus-c++/debug.h' The Makefile[.am] there has that header file listed twice, i.e. $(HEADER_DIR)/debug.h \ ... $(HEADER_DIR)/debug.h \ so just remove one of them and you'll be good to go. C. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Caolán McNamaracaol...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 10:16 +0200, drago01 wrote: '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.9.20090203git13281b3.fc12.x86_64/usr/include/dbus-c++-1/dbus-c++/' /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dbus-c++-0.5.0-0.9.20090203git13281b3.fc12.x86_64/usr/include/dbus-c++-1/dbus-c++/debug.h' with `../include/dbus-c++/debug.h' The Makefile[.am] there has that header file listed twice, i.e. $(HEADER_DIR)/debug.h \ ... $(HEADER_DIR)/debug.h \ so just remove one of them and you'll be good to go. good catch, thanks. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Jesse Keating wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html I will try to keep these updated multiple times a day. In the case of the needed rebuilds file we're working on a version that takes secondary arch into account. What is the procedure for dropping packages? With the incorporation of the PCL (Performance Counters for Linux) in upcoming Linux kernel 2.6.31 there doesn't seem like there will be much need for libpfm and pfmon packages in F12. -Will -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html So, I get this weird error in recent koji builds of OOo over the last week, i.e. dmake: Error: -- `VA8CLASSFIFILES)' not found, and can't be made http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1562484name=build.log I can guess that VA8CLASSFIFILES is a corrupted JAVA8CLASSFILES strings which appears in solenv. The thing is though, it doesn't happen on my up-to-date local rawhide x86_64, not even in mock with a config pulled from koji dist-f12, so I'm sort of baffled as to how to figure this one out at the moment. C. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On 07/30/2009 01:40 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html jsafrane (1): OpenIPMI It seems to me your script just forgot to build the package - it correctly bumped release number, but I can't see any koji builds. When I try 'make build', koji compiles the package correctly (i.e. the package is rebuilt now). Jan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status - gdal
And again there are troubles with gdal :-) I have a patch (thanks to PLD), that solves the incompatibility with the new libdap 3.9.3. And an update to 1.6.1 solves some swig related issues from 1.6.0. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On 07/30/2009 01:40 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html corsepiu: OpenSceneGraph Seems as if you modified the *.spec (traces in CVS), but haven't launched any built (no traces of a built in koji). perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles No traces of a rebuilt, neither in CVS nor in koji. Seems to me, as if your mass-rebuild script might have some cracks. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Jan Safranek wrote, at 07/30/2009 05:39 PM +9:00: On 07/30/2009 01:40 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html jsafrane (1): OpenIPMI It seems to me your script just forgot to build the package - it correctly bumped release number, but I can't see any koji builds. When I try 'make build', koji compiles the package correctly (i.e. the package is rebuilt now). It seems that when building N* O* P* packages, something wrong occured on koji (network trouble) and make srpm failed on these packages: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?start=7850owner=jkeatingstate=allview=toplevelmethod=allorder=-completion_time Regards, Mamoru -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Hi, On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Mamoru Tasakamtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote: Jan Safranek wrote, at 07/30/2009 05:39 PM +9:00: On 07/30/2009 01:40 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html jsafrane (1): OpenIPMI It seems to me your script just forgot to build the package - it correctly bumped release number, but I can't see any koji builds. When I try 'make build', koji compiles the package correctly (i.e. the package is rebuilt now). It seems that when building N* O* P* packages, something wrong occured on koji (network trouble) and make srpm failed on these packages: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?start=7850owner=jkeatingstate=allview=toplevelmethod=allorder=-completion_time I even saw few failed g* packages got following common root.log message DEBUG util.py:256: Transaction Check Error: DEBUG util.py:256:file /sbin/fsck from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.8-4.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package util-linux-ng-2.16-1.fc12.i686 DEBUG util.py:256:file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.8-4.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package util-linux-ng-2.16-1.fc12.i686 Regards, Parag. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html mso (1): invinxble-backgrounds This is a false positive. I've marked this package as DEAD in cvs (licensing issues with used sources [1]) and requested removal [2] about a week ago. Martin References: [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512836 [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2011 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:37:03PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:29 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: It has not seen a release since November of 2006. I think we should let it slip into retirement. I'm fine with seeing it go. I should make it clear that I'm not the owner of cogito (Chris is), nor am I a user of it (and I don't play one on TV either). I'm just some guy on a mailing list saying that package should be retired. :) Well, I agree with you. It needs to die. So now that's two guys on a mailing list, both of whom happen to be git co-maintainers. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Jesse Keating wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html I will try to keep these updated multiple times a day. In the case of the needed rebuilds file we're working on a version that takes secondary arch into account. Many of mine, and others', seem to be due to the new freeglut. Does anyone have any pointers for this, generally speaking? -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
* Todd Zullinger (t...@pobox.com) wrote: It has not seen a release since November of 2006. I think we should let it slip into retirement. No issue from me. thanks, -chris -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Jon Ciesla wrote: Many of mine, and others', seem to be due to the new freeglut. Does anyone have any pointers for this, generally speaking? One common issue for at least 2 packages (jasper being one), was that freeglut no longer links libGLU, so if your package uses libGLU symbols, it now needs to explicitly link it (should have done so before, it's only obvious now). -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Rex Dieter wrote: Jon Ciesla wrote: Many of mine, and others', seem to be due to the new freeglut. Does anyone have any pointers for this, generally speaking? One common issue for at least 2 packages (jasper being one), was that freeglut no longer links libGLU, so if your package uses libGLU symbols, it now needs to explicitly link it (should have done so before, it's only obvious now). -- Rex Would a BR for mesa-libGLU-devel be needed, or just a patch to -llibGLU? -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: corsepiu: OpenSceneGraph Seems as if you modified the *.spec (traces in CVS), but haven't launched any built (no traces of a built in koji). perl-IPC-Run-SafeHandles No traces of a rebuilt, neither in CVS nor in koji. Seems to me, as if your mass-rebuild script might have some cracks. Yes, there were some troubles with ssh shared sockets and rapid fire cvs actions, and a number of attempts got locked. I'm still going through the script output and will try to re-submit these that haven't already been submitted. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) identi.ca (http://identi.ca/jkeating) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:48 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 16:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: I've now generated the first of the mass rebuild status pages. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/needed-f12-rebuilds.html mso (1): invinxble-backgrounds This is a false positive. I've marked this package as DEAD in cvs (licensing issues with used sources [1]) and requested removal [2] about a week ago. Martin References: [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512836 [2] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2011 Ah, it wasn't marked as an orphan in pkgdb or else I would have picked it up in the orphan purging. Please mark it as orphan or retired. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Chris Wright wrote: * Todd Zullinger (t...@pobox.com) wrote: It has not seen a release since November of 2006. I think we should let it slip into retirement. No issue from me. Alrighty. Jesse, is retiring cogito something Chris needs to do or can you mark it as dead? (If neither of you have any round tuits at hand, I'm happy to do the deed, but applying for ownership just to retire the package seems odd. ;) -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors, and miss. -- Lazarus Long, Time Enough for Love pgpSQuTlknxyT.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:36 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: Chris Wright wrote: * Todd Zullinger (t...@pobox.com) wrote: It has not seen a release since November of 2006. I think we should let it slip into retirement. No issue from me. Alrighty. Jesse, is retiring cogito something Chris needs to do or can you mark it as dead? (If neither of you have any round tuits at hand, I'm happy to do the deed, but applying for ownership just to retire the package seems odd. ;) I was already in a package whacking mode, so I whacked this one too. It's dead. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) identi.ca (http://identi.ca/jkeating) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
cogito is dead [was: Re: F12 mass rebuild status]
* Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote: I was already in a package whacking mode, so I whacked this one too. It's dead. Thanks! Any additional notification necessary? thanks, -chris -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: cogito is dead [was: Re: F12 mass rebuild status]
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:05 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: * Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote: I was already in a package whacking mode, so I whacked this one too. It's dead. Thanks! Any additional notification necessary? thanks, -chris Probably not, did anything depend on it? It'll show up as one of the removed packages in tomorrow's rawhide report. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html xulchris (1): spambayes From build log: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/spambayes-1.0.4 find: `debug': No such file or directory At first glance this appears to be a problem with the debuginfo script. Is this a known issue? Regards, Chris -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
From build log: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/spambayes-1.0.4 find: `debug': No such file or directory At first glance this appears to be a problem with the debuginfo script. Is this a known issue? It should not even be run on a noarch build, I don't think. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:29 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: It has not seen a release since November of 2006. I think we should let it slip into retirement. I'm fine with seeing it go. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Jesse Keating wrote: On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:29 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: It has not seen a release since November of 2006. I think we should let it slip into retirement. I'm fine with seeing it go. I should make it clear that I'm not the owner of cogito (Chris is), nor am I a user of it (and I don't play one on TV either). I'm just some guy on a mailing list saying that package should be retired. :) -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence. -- Charles De Gaulle pgp2XwbuwEUe7.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html chunkd should be fixed as soon as wait-repo permits :) Jeff -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: F12 mass rebuild status
On Thursday 30 July 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html scop (1): perltidy BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status 30; see root.log for more information DEBUG util.py:256: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i686.rpm: [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out DEBUG util.py:256: Trying other mirror. DEBUG util.py:256: Error Downloading Packages: DEBUG util.py:256:gcc-4.4.1-3.i686: failed to retrieve gcc/4.4.1/3/i686/gcc-4.4.1-3.i686.rpm from build DEBUG util.py:256: error was [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out Resubmitting the job should be ok, but I don't see that button in koji for this job, could you do it? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
