Re: More broken deps for F11 texlive-2009

2009-11-18 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 08:54:38 Jindrich Novy wrote:
> Do you see anything broken on non-x86_64 arches? I checked the F12 repo and
> everything looks sane to me.

You are right, it was a problem on my side.

> Jindrich

-- 
José Abílio

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: More broken deps for F11 texlive-2009

2009-11-17 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:47:16AM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
> > packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
> > libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
> 
> The same complain happens on F12 (on a x86_64 no less). :-)

It could happen only on x86_64 and F11 repo because I forgot to remove the
F12 packages created in local build from the repo directory before
createrepo.

Do you see anything broken on non-x86_64 arches? I checked the F12 repo and
everything looks sane to me.

Jindrich

-- 
Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: More broken deps for F11 texlive-2009

2009-11-17 Thread Jindrich Novy
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:27:08PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
> packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
> libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).
> 

It is now fixed.

Jindrich

-- 
Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


Re: More broken deps for F11 texlive-2009

2009-11-17 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 02:27:08 Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
> packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
> libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).

The same complain happens on F12 (on a x86_64 no less). :-)
-- 
José Abílio

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


More broken deps for F11 texlive-2009

2009-11-16 Thread Matthew Saltzman
Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new
packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on
libpoppler.so.5()(64bit).

-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list