Orphaning some packages...
I'd like to turn over the following packages to someone else to maintain since I have no time or interest in keeping up with them going forward: * rubygem-activeldap -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ pgpy8XPHDlZtn.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
i like vim , I'll take it. 2009/10/7 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com On 10/06/2009 03:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: However, for personal reasons I need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. I have still on my list: * ldapvi -- An interactive LDAP client (the best tool for managing LDAP server I know about in Fedora) I'll take this -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: However, for personal reasons I need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. I have still on my list: * cycle -- Calendar program for women (any ladies would like to decrease gender gap in Fedora packaging? Or would like to switch your wife to Linux?) * vim-vimoutliner -- Script for building an outline editor on top of Vim (for vim lovers I don't know about any better outline editor/task manager, heck some people use it for writing huge technical books :)) * ldapvi -- An interactive LDAP client (the best tool for managing LDAP server I know about in Fedora) * JSDoc -- Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles * python-urllib2_kerberos -- Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 Please take them to your good hands. Thanks, Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On 10/06/2009 11:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote: Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +: However, for personal reasons I need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. I have still on my list: * vim-vimoutliner -- Script for building an outline editor on top of Vim (for vim lovers I don't know about any better outline editor/task manager, heck some people use it for writing huge technical books :)) Hi. I use it for my notes so I will take it. Regards, Petr -- Petr Lautrbach, Red Hat, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 10:09 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Peter I've just commented on that package, but you're not yet maintaining it, so I'll repeat what I've discussed with Matěj already: 1. There is some bug with the libraries lying in /usr/lib/syncevolution without patching no binary works out of the box 2. The sync-ui binary (which I wanted to test the most ;)) is missing. regars Christoph signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
2009/10/3 Christoph Höger choe...@cs.tu-berlin.de: Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 10:09 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Peter I've just commented on that package, but you're not yet maintaining it, so I'll repeat what I've discussed with Matěj already: 1. There is some bug with the libraries lying in /usr/lib/syncevolution without patching no binary works out of the box 2. The sync-ui binary (which I wanted to test the most ;)) is missing. yes, I'm aware of both of those issues. There's also a moblin gui for it as well which is one of the reasons I'd like to maintain it. Plan to add all of that in and a few other bits. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Christoph Wickert, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:58:58 +0200: I'm going to take over nimbus. I already reviewed it and you asked me for co-maintenance. Sorry I didn't find the time to look into the EPEL build error sooner, it's still on my todo list. Ownership released. Concernig bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ show_bug.cgi?id=522151 I think, I've got there a working solution. It might not be as cool as possible, but I think it works, and it should be (hopefully) reliable solution. Basically I believe that this bug is solved pending your approval. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I would like to maintain this package then. Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I would like to maintain this package then. Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership. I'll quite happily have someone to help co-maintain it :) Just request it in pkgdb :) Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Christoph Höger, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:23:01 +0200:
2. The sync-ui binary (which I wanted to test the most ;)) is missing.
It is not missing in devel (now F-12) package. But it is still not
working correctly due to %{_libdir}/syncevolution packages.
Matěj
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Peter Robinson, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:09:20 +0100: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I'll take this one. Released in pkgdb. Thanks. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Am Samstag, den 03.10.2009, 19:42 +0100 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Dominic Hopf, Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:46:04 +0200: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I would like to maintain this package then. Talk with Peter Robinson about comaintainership. I'll quite happily have someone to help co-maintain it :) Just request it in pkgdb :) Done. :) Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@gmail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
(intentionally breaking the thread so this is not burried somewhere in depths) Michal Schmidt, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:15:30 +0200: You're misinterpreting Jesse's quote out of context. I am misunderstanding them (in case your interpretation is more correct). So that's just that rel-eng doesn't have enough work to do (otherwise, why they do not control only critical path components?). So, this is not in protest of the current policy (this was just the last straw which broke me to do The Right Thing™ finally) and I don't want to make a drama from this (quoting Seth). However, for personal reasons I need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work. So, I am orphaning these packages: pspp -- A program for statistical analysis of sampled data (simple free clone of SPSS statistical package) syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution jbrout -- Photo manager, written in python/pygtk pyexiv2 -- Python binding to exiv2 (used by jbrout) cycle -- Calendar program for women ldapvi -- An interactive LDAP client I really care about these packages, so please somebody take them. I am willing to comaintain (meaning probably mostly to advice on the ways how the community around them works), and if nobody will step up to maintain them, I will probably stay maintaining them. pspp is close to the new release, I was building for Rawhide all prereleases (it mostly involves filing a bug report upstream for reach rebuild, because pspp seems to be hitting many issues with our super-new gcc and glibc). syncevolution was just released and upgraded in Fedora. I also wish to orphan these packages, and frankly I care about them much less, so if nobody steps up, I will probably just let them die. JSDoc -- Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles nimbus -- Desktop theme originally from Sun python-libasyncns -- Python binding for libasyncns python-urllib2_kerberos -- Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 vim-vimoutliner -- Script for building an outline editor on top of Vim All my packages are in good shape and I don't see any serious outstanding issue in them. Thanks a lot for anybody taking these. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 15:26 +, Matej Cepl wrote: I am misunderstanding them (in case your interpretation is more correct). So that's just that rel-eng doesn't have enough work to do (otherwise, why they do not control only critical path components?). Releng and QA are very small groups. The Fedora package set is extremely large. Over 8K packages. The rate of change is far too grate to provide second guessing over every package. So releng/qa decided to draw a line around the packages that are critical to everybody, and those that are critical to select few. For the packages that are critical to everybdoy, releng/qa will promise to take a second look at them before allowing them to break freeze. This is to prevent things like the dbus fiasco last release (sorry to keep picking on dbus). We just simply cannot do that for the rest of the package set. Also, the most important thing in a Fedora release is that it installs, it boots, and the user can get online and get updates after that. Anything outside of that is less critical and can be fixed by updates, so when gearing up for a release, that is where our efforts will be focused on for testing. Is this any clearer now? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
2009/10/2 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com: pspp -- A program for statistical analysis of sampled data I can take care of if. jbrout -- Photo manager, written in python/pygtk pyexiv2 -- Python binding to exiv2 (used by jbrout) I'm using it, so I'll take care of it.. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com writes: Releng and QA are very small groups. The Fedora package set is extremely large. Over 8K packages. The rate of change is far too grate to provide second guessing over every package. That's why I am surprised you want to click through all those requests for fixes in non-essential packages. Why not leave them open (or allow updates only when bug number is attached)? Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 15:26 + schrieb Matej Cepl: I also wish to orphan these packages, and frankly I care about them much less, so if nobody steps up, I will probably just let them die. JSDoc -- Produces javadoc-style documentation from JavaScript sourcefiles nimbus -- Desktop theme originally from Sun Hi Matěj, I'm going to take over nimbus. I already reviewed it and you asked me for co-maintenance. Sorry I didn't find the time to look into the EPEL build error sooner, it's still on my todo list. Please release ownership in pkg-db, so I can claim it. Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 17:37:18 +, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com writes: Releng and QA are very small groups. The Fedora package set is extremely large. Over 8K packages. The rate of change is far too grate to provide second guessing over every package. That's why I am surprised you want to click through all those requests for fixes in non-essential packages. Why not leave them open (or allow updates only when bug number is attached)? Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an upgrade and refer to that bug when they provide the upgrade. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
- Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an upgrade and refer to that bug when they provide the upgrade. Yes, of course, but I expect Fedora maintainers to be adults, so they would behave at least reasonably responsibly and not fluke rules we agree upon. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: - Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an upgrade and refer to that bug when they provide the upgrade. Yes, of course, but I expect Fedora maintainers to be adults, so they would behave at least reasonably responsibly and not fluke rules we agree upon. Well but doesn't this defeats the purpose of most have a bug attached ? If we trust maintainers to apply common sense a hard policy should not be needed. Also if you are unhappy with a process you should at least try to fix it before drawing consequences like this (orphaning packages). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 17:37 +, Matěj Cepl wrote: That's why I am surprised you want to click through all those requests for fixes in non-essential packages. Why not leave them open (or allow updates only when bug number is attached)? Because we don't have the infrastructure to handle only freezing some packages at this point. We're working on rolling that into bodhi, so that once we freeze, bodhi is the tool used to propose freeze breaks, publish proposed freeze breaks, and move things into the proper tags. The critical path packages will just require QA/releng to sign off on them before they get moved. So freeze breaks will be treated just like updates. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2009, 15:26 + schrieb Matej Cepl: syncevolution -- SyncML client for evolution I would like to maintain this package then. Regards, Dominic -- Dominic Hopf dma...@gmail.com http://dominichopf.de/ Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages [Was: Re: Buyer Beware: A Major Change in NFS is about to happen]
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 14:51:15 -0400, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote: - Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Bugs can include RFEs as well as actual brokeness. I don't think that really buys you anything. And a bad maintainer could just file an RFE for an upgrade and refer to that bug when they provide the upgrade. Yes, of course, but I expect Fedora maintainers to be adults, so they would behave at least reasonably responsibly and not fluke rules we agree upon. Which was sort of my point. If you trust them to behave, why not trust them to do only appropriate updates? It could be argued that requiring a bug number is a reminder that they should only be doing bug fixes. It still seems like an unnecessary hoop to jump through if one wants to push out an upstream bugfix release for which no open bugs exist. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
Hi, sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I am orphaning the following packages -- some of them because I no longer use them, some of them because of the packaging overhead. Mono (Banshee dependencies) ipod-sharp libipoddevice podsleuth I've taken these two. Best regards, Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
Hi, sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On these other packages, I'm reducing my involvement to being co-maintainer, and new package owners are already selected when ownership was released: banshee [spot] If there is help needed, I'd like to volunteer co-maintaining banshee. I'm using banshee from time to time and I'm also maintaining some other mono-based packages. Best regards, Christian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaning some packages
I am orphaning the following packages -- some of them because I no longer use them, some of them because of the packaging overhead. Mono (Banshee dependencies) ipod-sharp libipoddevice podsleuth Others: Io-language pidgin-rhythmbox On these other packages, I'm reducing my involvement to being co-maintainer, and new package owners are already selected when ownership was released: banshee [spot] waf [thm] Best regards, -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msa...@cs.indiana.edu Fedora • sali...@fedoraproject.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaning some packages
I've orphaned the following packages: - k3d (3D rendering Gnome app, active upstream) - plotutils (used by inkscape extension) - pstoedit (used by inkscape extension, looks like they just released a new version after 2 years of inactivity...) - alltray (recently reactivated upstream) - ghasher (inactive upstream) - gimmage (inactive upstream) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaning some packages
I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. clutterhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/clutter?_csrf_token=7d5cb9303441cf36d1b4fcb4a5432efeed555f38-- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical user interfaces clutter-cairohttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/clutter-cairo?_csrf_token=7d5cb9303441cf36d1b4fcb4a5432efeed555f38-- A basic Cairo clutter widget clutter-gsthttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/clutter-gst?_csrf_token=7d5cb9303441cf36d1b4fcb4a5432efeed555f38-- ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer clutter-gtkhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/clutter-gtk?_csrf_token=7d5cb9303441cf36d1b4fcb4a5432efeed555f38-- A basic GTK clutter widget pyclutterhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/pyclutter?_csrf_token=7d5cb9303441cf36d1b4fcb4a5432efeed555f38-- Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit Regards. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
I have grabbed everything, please let me know if I can help with anything else. co-maintaners are always welcome. On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Allisson Azevedoallis...@gmail.com wrote: I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical user interfaces clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget clutter-gst -- ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer clutter-gtk -- A basic GTK clutter widget pyclutter -- Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit Regards. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical user interfaces clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget clutter-gst -- ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer clutter-gtk -- A basic GTK clutter widget pyclutter -- Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit I can certainly pick up clutter (in fact, I may have already been a co-owner of it...) I don't really mind doing the rest, but I'd prefer to have a co-owner since I'm likely to miss upstream releases and otherwise be not be that attentive at times... I don't actually use them at all. - Owen -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
On 07/28/2009 01:38 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: I have grabbed everything, please let me know if I can help with anything else. co-maintaners are always welcome. That was fast. I applied to be a co-maintainer for all of them. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget This one is deprecated upsteam and merged into clutter, I've already done most of the rawhide dead package stuff in bug [1] it just needs the obsoletes added to clutter. Cheers, Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507389 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Owen Taylorotay...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:59 -0300, Allisson Azevedo wrote: I am orphaning this packages because i don't have time to maintain them. clutter -- Open Source software library for creating rich graphical user interfaces clutter-cairo -- A basic Cairo clutter widget clutter-gst -- ClutterMedia interface to GStreamer clutter-gtk -- A basic GTK clutter widget pyclutter -- Python modules that allow you to use the Clutter toolkit I can certainly pick up clutter (in fact, I may have already been a co-owner of it...) I don't really mind doing the rest, but I'd prefer to have a co-owner since I'm likely to miss upstream releases and otherwise be not be that attentive at times... I don't actually use them at all. Bastien Nocera has been helpfully doing all the clutter* 0.9.x updates during the current rawhide series. Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages
Am Sonntag, 26 Juli 2009 18:02:50 schrieb Stefan Posdzich: SP I am orphaning this packages because i have _no_ time to maintain them... SP SP barrage SP bastet SP biniax SP fbpanel SP xpad SP xqf So long and thanks for all the fish. I will take care of them, bro! If you want them back, I will let them go, of course. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus dem schönen Hainzell Simon Wesp The G in GNU stands for GNU http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SimonWesp -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)
On 06/03/2009 12:50 PM, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. transmission Taken this. Co-maintainers welcome. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance) Wait... didn't we just make this the default CD/DVD buring application in the Fedora spin? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome2_26 And now it's orphaned? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)
Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 06/03/2009 05:18 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance) Wait... didn't we just make this the default CD/DVD buring application in the Fedora spin? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome2_26 And now it's orphaned? Yep. Bad timing. Somebody should pick it up. Rahul Xavier Lamien said he'd pick it up, which I assume he'll do after Denis orphans it in pkgdb. -J -- in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance) Wait... didn't we just make this the default CD/DVD buring application in the Fedora spin? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome2_26 And now it's orphaned? I merely want to transfer ownership to somebody new. Matthias Clasen and Bastien Nocera are already acting co-maintainers, and so I'm waiting to hear from them before transferring ownership, in case one of them has a strong desire to take over the package... I don't have a strong desire to own any package... but if nobody else picks it up, I will find an owner for it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)
Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance) Wait... didn't we just make this the default CD/DVD buring application in the Fedora spin? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome2_26 And now it's orphaned? I merely want to transfer ownership to somebody new. Matthias Clasen and Bastien Nocera are already acting co-maintainers, and so I'm waiting to hear from them before transferring ownership, in case one of them has a strong desire to take over the package... I don't have a strong desire to own any package... but if nobody else picks it up, I will find an owner for it. See my previous message re Xavier Lamien . . . -- in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Orphaning some packages (brasero, transmission and more)
On 06/03/2009 03:55 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: On 06/03/2009 01:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:20:54AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: In an effort to focus more on FOSS upstream development, I am going to be orphaning some of my Fedora packages in the near future, starting with this first batch. brasero (high-maintenance) Wait... didn't we just make this the default CD/DVD buring application in the Fedora spin? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome2_26 And now it's orphaned? I merely want to transfer ownership to somebody new. Matthias Clasen and Bastien Nocera are already acting co-maintainers, and so I'm waiting to hear from them before transferring ownership, in case one of them has a strong desire to take over the package... I don't have a strong desire to own any package... but if nobody else picks it up, I will find an owner for it. I've released ownership. Xavier is the new owner. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Orphaning some packages (gdhcpd, wxdfast, beagle)
Hi, I am looking for new maintainers for those packages: gdhcpd: I do not really use it, upstream has released a new version a while ago but the fedora package still is at the old version. Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/gdhcpd wxdfast: Upstream is pretty much dead (no activity for years). Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/wxdfast beagle: Package needs a lot of work and I don't really have time for it (upstream is also quite busy so there is little activity there too). Bugs: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/beagle If someone wants to take (one of) them please reply to this mail. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
