Re: Package updates not replaced by newer package in -testing
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 07:44 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > This is partially my fault -- my network connection hasn't been good for the > last day so instead of clearing with you which Fedora releases had the new > package, I just looked quickly at bodhi and didn't see any obsoletes so I > requested it be pushed to stable. I now remember that obsoletes had to be > disabled in bodhi due to other bugs :-( so that didn't clue me in. > > Sorry, mea culpa. rel-eng can unpush packages -- but it might be better if > they could just push the new set with the fixed deltarpm instead. No problem, I'll open a ticket for the new version to be pushed. I should have communicated that I'd pushed a new version to testing. Thanks again for your work, Jonathan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Package updates not replaced by newer package in -testing
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:24:36PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > A few days ago, I built deltarpm-3.4-18.fc11 which resplit off a > subpackage that had accidentally been merged into the main package in > deltarpm-3.4-17.fc11. I pushed -18 into -testing, and assumed (since it > was newer than -17) that -17 wouldn't get pushed to stable > automatically. > > Now I've just received an email from koji saying that -17 has been > pushed to updates from updates-testing. I've just pushed -18 into > updates, but is there any way to avoid a one or two day delay where -17 > makes it into updates before -18 does? > This is partially my fault -- my network connection hasn't been good for the last day so instead of clearing with you which Fedora releases had the new package, I just looked quickly at bodhi and didn't see any obsoletes so I requested it be pushed to stable. I now remember that obsoletes had to be disabled in bodhi due to other bugs :-( so that didn't clue me in. Sorry, mea culpa. rel-eng can unpush packages -- but it might be better if they could just push the new set with the fixed deltarpm instead. -Toshio pgpIeRfSe8048.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Package updates not replaced by newer package in -testing
2009/10/8 Jonathan Dieter : > A few days ago, I built deltarpm-3.4-18.fc11 which resplit off a > subpackage that had accidentally been merged into the main package in > deltarpm-3.4-17.fc11. I pushed -18 into -testing, and assumed (since it > was newer than -17) that -17 wouldn't get pushed to stable > automatically. > > Now I've just received an email from koji saying that -17 has been > pushed to updates from updates-testing. I've just pushed -18 into > updates, but is there any way to avoid a one or two day delay where -17 > makes it into updates before -18 does? How was it automatic pushed to stable? Automatic karma push? Disable that then. Or unpush it. That's all *i* know. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Package updates not replaced by newer package in -testing
A few days ago, I built deltarpm-3.4-18.fc11 which resplit off a subpackage that had accidentally been merged into the main package in deltarpm-3.4-17.fc11. I pushed -18 into -testing, and assumed (since it was newer than -17) that -17 wouldn't get pushed to stable automatically. Now I've just received an email from koji saying that -17 has been pushed to updates from updates-testing. I've just pushed -18 into updates, but is there any way to avoid a one or two day delay where -17 makes it into updates before -18 does? Jonathan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
