Push?
Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the dependency issues around yum upgrades to F-11. :) Next few days, maybe? No hurry, just looking for a rough ETA if one exists. -J -- in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I *Sigh* > assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some > Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but > haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the That's because it keeps dying for various reasons and I have to go fix it up manually. > dependency issues around yum upgrades to F-11. :) > > Next few days, maybe? No hurry, just looking for a rough ETA if one exists. A push has been running since about noon yesterday. I refuse to give an ETA since I have no idea how often it is going to die still. It's mashed: f9-updates-testing f10-updates-testing f11-updates f11-updates-testing It's working on f10-updates. That leaves f9-updates. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I *Sigh* assume this is GA-related, which is fine, just curious. I saw some Bodhi mail for my updates which made me think one was impending, but haven't seen anything yet. Hoping the next push will resolve the That's because it keeps dying for various reasons and I have to go fix it up manually. dependency issues around yum upgrades to F-11. :) Next few days, maybe? No hurry, just looking for a rough ETA if one exists. A push has been running since about noon yesterday. I refuse to give an ETA since I have no idea how often it is going to die still. It's mashed: f9-updates-testing f10-updates-testing f11-updates f11-updates-testing It's working on f10-updates. That leaves f9-updates. josh Many thanks! -- in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:34:00AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Not to nag, but it's been going on 2 weeks since the last push. I > > *Sigh* > As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure if the two functions are related.) -Chris -- Chris Weyl Ex astris, scientia -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Chris Weyl (cw...@alumni.drew.edu) said: > As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure > if the two functions are related.) They're unrelated. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
>> As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure >> if the two functions are related.) > > They're unrelated. Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> As a side note, is this impacting override tagging, as well? (I'm not sure >>> if the two functions are related.) >> >> They're unrelated. > >Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? Yes. Mostly getting people to do them. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? > > Yes. Mostly getting people to do them. FYI, you can ping rdieter for override tags. Peter Robinson, if you're thinking of webkitgtk-1.1.8-1.fc11, SMParrish asked rdieter to tag it on #fedora-kde, it should be tagged now. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:34:32PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>>Is there a different problem with the override tagging then? >> >> Yes. Mostly getting people to do them. > > FYI, you can ping rdieter for override tags. Peter Robinson, if you're > thinking of webkitgtk-1.1.8-1.fc11, SMParrish asked rdieter to tag it on > #fedora-kde, it should be tagged now. hehe, no i wasn't actually :-) I was wanting opal for ekiga :-D Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Push?
Peter Robinson wrote: > hehe, no i wasn't actually :-) I was wanting opal for ekiga :-D As I said, pinging rdieter is the probably most effective method to get override tags, he does most of them (almost all the KDE ones and several non-KDE ones too). (Hopefully he won't get so flooded with override tag requests after this message that he can't handle them anymore. ;-) ) Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
disallow broken push to updates?
Wouldn't it be a good idea to disallow a push to updates that has broken deps? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Final F-10 updates push
Hi All, Fedora 10 will go EOL on December 17th. The final day for updates to be submitted will be December 14th. Please make sure any final updates you want pushed to the F10 repos are submitted by this date. Thanks, josh ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
please push gstreamer-plugins-base update
For those of us that have pitivi installed and want the pitivi update, we need the new gstreamer-plugins-base update. The gstreamer packages are still sitting in updates-testing (after several updates pushes). Needless to say, dep resolving is failing. Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Close comments/karma after update push?
After a recent xorg bug[1] with intel chips, I had to question the use of bodhi for karma/comments after an update has been pushed to "updates." Should the comments and karma for packages be closed after an update leaves "updates-testing?" I don't see any value and it seems the wrong place to have notes about bugs on released packages. Bug reports should go in Bugzilla, no? Should a comment be left on the page before it is closed noting to report bugs to Bugzilla to be a nice pointer for the uninformed? Perhaps a pointer to the next update in line to be released as a user may stumble on an older release. "Obsoleted by: [link]" Update page: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8766 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518748 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:26:27AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >Wouldn't it be a good idea to disallow a push to updates that has broken >deps? Yes, it would. It's been discussed numerous times on this list an others. Summary: Needs hard thinking and people actually working on it. Not trivial. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
2009/11/20 Neal Becker : > Wouldn't it be a good idea to disallow a push to updates that has broken > deps? If the special case is kde-plasma-smooth-tasks. It is not in updates yet. The needed deps are in updates-testing. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
>>>>> "NB" == Neal Becker writes: NB> Wouldn't it be a good idea to disallow a push to updates that has NB> broken deps? It's a good idea, but as Josh Boyer says, it's quite tricky to actually implement. And there are so many other issues/fires to put out with getting each Fedora release, that I think this kind of gets relegated to the back-burner because the broken deps typically often only affect a subset of packages at any one time. Anyway, you can track progress on this ticket I filed against bodhi 2 years ago: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/79 Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: disallow broken push to updates?
Thomas Janssen wrote: > If the special case is kde-plasma-smooth-tasks. It is not in updates > yet. The needed deps are in updates-testing. The problem is that the KDE 4.3.3 updates were edited while a push was underway and so got accidentally unpushed from testing. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
UPDATE: Final F-10 updates push date revised
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:31:35PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >Hi All, > >Fedora 10 will go EOL on December 17th. The final day for >updates to be submitted will be December 14th. Please make >sure any final updates you want pushed to the F10 repos are >submitted by this date. Due to the infrastructure outage that has been scheduled for this timeframe, the final F10 updates push has now been rescheduled for December 11th, 2009. Please make sure any final updates you want pushed to the F10 repos are submitted by the revised date of December 11th, 2009. Apologies for the confusion and change in schedule. We will work more closely with the Infrastructure team in the future to avoid a similar situation. josh ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Reminder: Tomorrow is the last F10 updates push
Hi All, Just a friendly reminder that Dec 11 00:00:00 UTC is the cutoff for F10 updates submission. Ideally these would just be the final stable updates, as pushes to updates-testing would basically be stuck there forever. Please take a few moments to review your pending requests, add any final stable updates you'd like pushed, and clear out any update requests that don't make much sense for a soon to be EOL'd distro. josh ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
